Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medi-Cal Managed Care Pay-for-performance Programs Elaine Batchlor, MD, MPH L.A. Care Health Plan.
Advertisements

THE ACUTE NEED FOR DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM MARGARET E. OKANE.
THE CHALLENGE: CHRONIC DISEASE CARE AND THE PROMISE OF HIT Health Care Information Technology 2004: Improving Chronic Care in California San Francisco.
Outline Development Timeline Development Team
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Executive Subcommittee Hearing on "Meaningful Use" of Health Information Technology Certification of.
Integrated Healthcare Association: Statewide Pay for Performance (P4P) Collaborative Ron Bangasser, MD Dolores Yanagihara, MPH National P4P Summit – Preconference.
Harvard Quality Colloquium Improving HealthCare Quality and Accountability Harvard Quality Colloquium Robert Margolis, MD Board Chair, NCQA CEO, HealthCare.
Holding Health Plans & Providers Accountable for High-Quality, Patient-Centered Care January 23, 2015.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
California Pay for Performance: Understanding the Impact of Provider Incentives for Quality Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
Medicare Advantage Quality Measurement & Performance Assessment Training Conference April 8-9, 2008 Empowering a More Informed Consumer: Medicare Plan.
Renaissance Medical Management Company Overview A Pioneer Accountable Care Organization.
Quality in Laboratory Medicine Conference Business Case for Quality Recognizing Excellence in Practice Presented to the Institute for Quality in Laboratory.
1 The Three Phases of Collaboration: Chronic Disease Management, Cancer Prevention, and Capacity Kim Salamone, Ph.D. Vice President, Health Information.
California Pay for Performance Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association Mendocino Health Information Exchange June 18, 2008.
Brown & Toland Medical Group National Pay for Performance Summit “Pay for Performance Pushes EMR Adoption” Stan Padilla, M.D. Vice-President, Medical Services.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
Alternative Quality Contract: Improving Health Care Quality While Reducing Spending Growth Alliance for Health Reform Deborah Devaux Monday, August 10,
Data Collection and Aggregation: Making It Work for Your P4P Program Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association February 27, 2008 National.
Reporting Medical Group and Physician Performance Patient Experience & Clinical Results June 2006 Ted von Glahn Director of Consumer Engagement Pacific.
Alliance for Health Reform Briefing: Medicaid and Health IT Community Health Centers and HIT Driving Innovation in the Patient-Centered Medical Home Presented.
NASHP Learning the ABCs of APCs and Medical Homes October 5, 2010 Foster Gesten, MD New York State Department of Health 1.
Rewarding Performance: Three-Year Results from California's Statewide Pay-for-Performance Experiment Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD, Kristiana Raube, PhD, Stephanie.
Pay for Performance: Choosing Measures Linda K. Shelton AVP, Product Development PFP Boot Camp for Physicians and Physician Organizations February 2006.
Ambulatory Care Quality Measures: Disease Management Research Opportunities Neil Goldfarb Director of Research and Research Assistant Professor of Health.
1 Western New York Quality Measurement Collaborative.
11 Creating Value from EMR Investment Kevin Maben, MD, FAAP Associate Medical Information Officer Presbyterian Healthcare Services.
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
New Approaches to Disease Management Get Connected Knowledge Forum Larry G. Anderson MD MMC Physician-Hospital Organization June, 2005.
2010 Pay for Performance (P4P) Program Training for Participants.
- a Rewarding Results National Grant Pay for Performance: Driving Improvement through Provider Recognition & Reward MCOL Healthcare Web Summit Participating.
California Pay for Performance: Reporting First Year Results and The Business Case for IT Investment Lance Lang, MD Health Net, California November 18,
& 1 MHMC - PTE Objectives  Objective: To get providers and patients/consumers (and secondarily purchasers, policy makers,
Page 1 External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Monday, March 21, :00 p.m. –2:30 p.m. WELCOME!
Quality Measures: Background IOM 1999 “To Err is Human” (Rx related deaths); 2001 “Crossing the Quality Chasm” (“aims for 21 st century”) –gaps in quality.
MN Community Measurement Jim Chase Executive Director February 14, 2007
11 Physician Web Portal Project Quality Measures Initiative January 2010.
Information Technology and Data Collection: February 28, 2008 Optimizing Lab Results and Pharmacy Data Collection Under P4P Concurrent Session 1.07 Horace.
HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.
The California Pay for Performance Program Stephen Shortell, Ph.D., MPH Dean, School of Public Health University of California at Berkeley National Pay.
Achieving National Quality Measurement and Reporting: A Purchaser Perspective David S. P. Hopkins, Ph.D. Pacific Business Group on Health AcademyHealth.
An initiative of Public Employers Health Purchasing Committee April 26, Partner for Quality Care is an initiative of the Oregon Health Care Quality.
A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.
Resolving Challenges in Data Collection, Aggregation, and Use of Standardized Measures Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association February.
Quality Meets H-IT: What Can We Expect? Margaret E. O’Kane, President Health Information Technology Summit October 22, 2004.
- a Rewarding Results National Grant Promoting Medical Group IT through Pay for Performance January 14, 2003 UC Health Care IT Conference.
The Role of Health Information Technology in Implementing Disease Management Programs Donald F. Wilson, MD Medical Director Quality Insights of Pennsylvania.
Use of EHR & Quality Based on Zhou, et al. The Relationship between Electronic Health Record Use and Quality of Care over Time. J Am Med Inform Assoc.
Medicare’s Medical Home: Not the Destination, Something More Nancy L. Johnson Senior Public Policy Advisor National Medical Home Summit Philadelphia, PA.
© 2011 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. All rights reserved. PHYSICIAN QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROGRAM (PQM)
Financial Incentives: Pay for Performance (P4P) and the Effects with the Chronically Ill Patients David Conley, MSc Alberto Coustasse, MD, Dr. PH, MBA.
Pay for Performance- California Style Jack Rodnick, MD Conference on Practice Improvement Denver, Colorado November 10, 2006.
Promoting Health Information Technology Linda Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations Group.
Disease Management Colloquium Using Registries to Manage Patient Care Art Sprenkle, MD Medical Director: McKesson Health Solutions; Washington State Medical.
© 2006 All rights reserved. 1 The Silicon Valley Health Information Technology Pay for Performance Collaborative The National Pay for Performance Summit.
Mini Summit I The Effectiveness of Pay for Performance: Lessons Learned and Program Adaptations for California P4P Dolores Yanagihara, MPH P4P Program.
Improvement Activities
MHQP Executive Director Pay for Performance Summit
The Elements of Health Care Quality and Current Improvement Efforts
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Wednesday Jan. 10th 2018 Noon – 1:00PM
Massachusetts Health Quality Partners
Phase 4 Milestones.
Innovations in the Measurement and Payment of Care
Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH
A Case Study from California: Pay for Performance Incentives and the Adoption of Information Technology Tom Williams Integrated Healthcare Association.
Purchasers’ Efforts to Promote Better Information Technology
Implementing the IOM’s Rewarding Provider Performance Report
Presentation transcript:

Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA

2 Measurement Core Objectives Strategic selection of measures: –important to public health in California –within the control of physician groups –economical to collect (i.e., admin data only) –stable and meaningful to consumers –valid and evidence based –tested with physician group data before implementing

3 Pay for Performance: Timeline Cycle Testing Year Measurement Year Data Aggregation and Payments

4 Measurement Core Objectives Align what matters: –Align P4P with measures required by accreditation, HEDIS, public and private purchasers and regulators

5 Measurement Core Objectives System reform: – Encourage system re-engineering over incremental improvement – Move from an individual disease management approach to cross-cutting measures – Reward better outcomes, customer service, structure and efficiency for greater change and consumer relevance

6 Measurement Core Objectives Predictability and stability: – Phase in multiple part measures – Move from process toward outcomes – Leave each measure in the set for at least 3 years

7 Bottom Line The measures must make sense to physicians If physicians don’t believe a measure will improve quality, no amount of incentive payment will change behavior

8 So many measures, yet so few “qualify”... NQF AQA RAND HEDIS AMA

Clinical Measures Chronic Disease Care Appropriate Meds for Persons with Asthma Diabetes: HbA1c Testing & Control Cholesterol Management: LDL Screening & Control Nephropathy Monitoring for Diabetics Obesity Counseling Preventive Care Breast Cancer Screening Cervical Cancer Screening Childhood Immunizations Chlamydia screening Acute Care Treatment for Children with Upper Respiratory Infection

10 Clinical Measures To-date, most measures have been: –HEDIS-based –Process measures –Primary Care –Underuse measures To align with core objectives, measure development focuses on: –Outcomes measures –Specialty measures –Overuse and misuse measures

Patient Experience Communication with doctor Overall ratings of care Care Coordination Specialty care Timely Access to care

12 CAS Questions for Patient Experience Measures

Information Technology Measure 1 - clinical data integration at group level (i.e. population mgmt.) Measure 2 - clinical decision support (point of care) to aid physicians during patient encounters For full credit, demonstrate four activities, with at least two in Measure 2

14 IT Measure 1: Population Management Patient registries Actionable report HEDIS results

15 IT Measure 2: Point of Care Technology Accessing lab results electronically Producing electronically generated prescriptions Electronically checking drug-drug interactions Accessing clinical notes from other physicians or hospital electronically

16 IT Measure 2: Point of Care Technology Receiving preventive or chronic care patient reminders Accessing clinical findings ing messages, clinical data or referrals between PCPs, patients and/or specialists

Bonus Opportunities Individual Physician Feedback Program Improvement over previous year’s performance

18 Measurement Domain Weighting Clinical50%40%50% Patient Experience 40% 30% IT Investment10%20% Individual Physician Feedback program 10% “extra credit” 10% “extra credit” Improvement X

Testing Measures Testing = Specification essentially complete; testing data collection –Colorectal Screening –Misuse of Rescue Inhalers –Medicare Clinical Measures

Development Measures Development = Create or change specifications for testing in following year –Redesign of IT Domain to Systemness Domain –Depression Management in Primary Care –Overall Quality Score –Efficiency Domain