No Child Left Behind Amber Humphries Graham Hayes Amy Harvey Kate Bloom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Events that led to NCLB Allows all children to receive a quality education Gives higher standards and greater accountability Teachers teach things that.
Bureau of Indian Education
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act Ben, Eric & Shawn.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
George W. Bush Provides public school choice and services for students in failing schools as early as the fall of Integrate scientifically based.
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
AYP: Are You Perfect? By: Jalynn Speck, Linda Oller, and Jill Polsley.
Kaitlin White Mark Sanders Megan Davenport Nicole Faulkner.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
No Child Left Behind Presented by: Daniel J. Herrera Based on information obtained at and Presented by: Daniel J. Herrera.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
NCLBNCLB No Child Left Behind (take notes, please)
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
WHY ARE WE TAKING SO MANY TESTS? Education Reform and the Modern Accountability Movement Wayne Zhang.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
BY Taylor, Kristen and Bridget.  Developed by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief of State School Officers.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
NCLB and It's Unequal Effect on Band Participation Kristofer Kimmel.
McKenzie Special School District No Child Left Behind Parent Advisory Committee Fall 2009.
Presented By: Kealee Paulsen, Chelsea Varney, Zoë Brown, McKenna Marshall.
STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: PROMOTION AND GRADUATION TESTS BY ISABELLA BROWN Emory University Summer 2006.
No Child Left Behind Passed by Congress in 2001 A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
Web Pedagogies Week 8: Systems Approach The No Child Left Behind Policy.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Overview of the Title I, Part A Program at [school name]
What Parents Need to Know
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
What Parents Need to Know
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
What Parents Need to Know
Education and Accountability
Title 1 Annual Parent Meeting
What Parents Need to Know
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind Amber Humphries Graham Hayes Amy Harvey Kate Bloom

Do the positive attributes of NCLB outweigh the negative consequences of the act? “If a nations expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” -Thomas Jefferson, 1816 Taken from the introduction of the NCLB bill

Effects on Schools and Administration States must produce annual state and school district report cards that inform parents and communities about state and school progress /high/h pdfhttp:// 004/high/h pdf States, districts, and schools must assess 95% of students overall, and in every subgroup.

Effects on Schools and Administration (cont.) Schools that do not make progress must provide supplemental services, such as free tutoring or after-school assistance. If progress is not made school wide in five years, the school will be closed and reopened as a charter school.

Effects on Schools and Administration (cont.) School Rewards –Successful schools that have made the greatest progress in improving the achievement of disadvantaged students will be recognized and rewarded with “No Child Left Behind” bonuses.

Effects on Teachers Requires every teacher to be “highly qualified.” Every teacher to hold full licensure by By requiring highly qualified teachers, NCLB might raise class size. The required testing takes away valuable class time and forces teachers to teach the test.

Effects on Teachers The testing can show the students’ weak areas, implementing reflective teaching practices. Forces teachers to use teaching methods scientifically proven to increase student achievement.

Effects on Students Pros: $1 billion a year over 5 years to strengthen public schools Students scores on reading and math tests are rising Achievement gaps between whites and minorities is closing Children enjoy the benefits of well-qualified teachers By school year every child grade 3-8 will be tested annually in reading and math By science testing will be added

Effects on Students Cons By year % of students in every state must score ‘proficient’ on state tests means all subgroups in schools must make the same dramatic progress as the student body as a whole in 2003 in Washington DC their reading goal was 32% & only 4 out of 5 schools met this goal tests for disabled and limited English children is unfair and unworkable cutting time in teaching science, social studies, art, music, to make time for reading and math

References child-left-behind.htmlhttp:// child-left-behind.html ?src=ovhttp:// ?src=ov web5.infotrac.galegroup.com.library.winthrop.ed u/itw/infomark/679/896/ w5/purl=rc1_IT OF_0_A &dyn=3!xrn_12_0_A ?sw_aep=winthropudlhttp://0- web5.infotrac.galegroup.com.library.winthrop.ed u/itw/infomark/679/896/ w5/purl=rc1_IT OF_0_A &dyn=3!xrn_12_0_A ?sw_aep=winthropudl

References orts/080203Rose/080203rose.htmlhttp:// orts/080203Rose/080203rose.html B.cfmhttp:// B.cfm News017.asp News017.asp