Elementary and secondary education in Tennessee is governed by Federal law, Tennessee statutes, State Board of Education Rules and policies of local.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Presented by : Delaware Department of Education March 15, 2011.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Federal Programs Tennessee Department of Education May 19, 2010
Minnesotas Plan for Monitoring School Improvement Grant Implementation April 21, 2010 Patricia King Jonathan Luknic 1.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
Race to the Top Years 2 to 4 Finish line webinars July
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
CIP Overview 1. Purposes of the CIP What Does CIP Success Look Like? Identifying the Team Roles of LEA, Principal, and CIP Team CIP Timeline 2.
Overview of The Legislation’s Purpose and Requirements CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION School Governance Councils.
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
STUDENT ORGANIZATION Returning Organization Recognition Packet Please review these guidelines to assist organization officers in completing the requirements.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ERSEA Training April 17, /17/2015
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Alabama State Department of Education Federal Programs FY 2011 SIG Technical Assistance Mini-Webinar: March 18, 2011.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Office of Program Administration and Accountability April 19, 2011.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Focus School Grant ApplicationFocus School Grant Application Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring June 16, 2015June 16,
1 SCIP and Title I Information Session Fiscal Year
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Single Plan for Student Achievement
Historical Context on Indiana’s School Turnaround Efforts Presentation to Committee on School Turnarounds August 21,
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
TITLE X, PART C MCKINNEY-VENTO ACT The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Grant Application FY Office of Federal Programs March 9 th, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Title I Section, 1003g Renewal Requirements March 2012.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Parental Involvement Requirements
TTIPS Model Overview.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Presentation transcript:

Elementary and secondary education in Tennessee is governed by Federal law, Tennessee statutes, State Board of Education Rules and policies of local education agencies (LEAs). Most state statutes governing education are contained in Title 49. Federal lawTennessee statutes Ruleslocal education agencies The State Board of Education is the governing and policy making body for the Tennessee system of public elementary and secondary education. The Board also coordinates its efforts with the State Department of Education, which implements law and policies established by the General Assembly and the Board.

Although the State Department of Education has some regulatory authority over local education agencies with regard to certain issues, most issues related to elementary and secondary education are under the authority of local school systems. Pursuant to TCA Section , a local board of education has the authority to "manage and control all public schools established or that may be established under its jurisdiction."

The LEA must assure that it will-- 2) Modify its practices and policies as necessary to enable its schools to implement the interventions fully and effectively [Assurance that receives the signatures of Director of Schools and Board Chair on L-2]

The LEA must describe actions it has taken, or will take, to d) Modify its practices or policies, if necessary, to enable its schools to implement the interventions fully and effectively.

The LEA will provide: Name of School Improvement Grant Coordinator or other person who will address policy and procedural barriers throughout the implementation of the grant. (This responsibility will be included in the roles of the SIG Coordinator p. L-14.); Date of review and status of LEA board policy; Date of review and status of LEA practices or procedures;

Date of review and status of handbooks of schools receiving SIG funds; The LEA shall describe topic(s) requiring modification and current progress of these modifications. [Appendix B Scoring Rubric-page 4 Question 13]

Operational flexibility to implement the grant, i.e., time in school day, calendar, hiring practices, financial (procurement/delivery of goods), etc. Recruitment, selection, and retention of high quality staff Access to work with data and its use Acceptance (Buy in) of staff and community

at all levels to eliminate/minimize barriers

This section must be submitted electronically for each individual school that will be served by school improvement funds. The electronic file with the school level descriptive information must contain the LEA name and the school name. Caution: Please take care to complete the correct items for the status of that specific school.

Name of School: _____________ Principal Name for SY10-11:___________ (mark TBD if unknown at this time) Tier: I II III (Please check appropriate tier)

Needs of School: All and disaggregated Student Achievement Data (Insert most recent TSIP data, not AYP data, for math, reading/language arts, graduation or attendance rate by all students and subgroups)(copy and paste data into the box):

an School Achievement and Goals for other Indicators: Attach an electronic copy of your TSIP Action Plan (Component 4) to your application. Appendix CTemplate for Component 4 Professional Development: Each school must include a minimum of 30% of the grant funds for ongoing professional development including job-embedded training designed to build capacity and support staff. This includes literacy training for the staff unless the school demonstrates proficiency in this area. Provide your schools PD plan including topics and projected dates.

Tier I and Tier II school only 1) Intervention Model (of the 4 allowable) 2) Responses to Questions in Appendix F regarding Intervention Model Selection (number of questions to be answered vary with intervention model. All questions for intervention model chosen must be answered in boxes provided. 3) Rationale for selection of intervention model

Questions for selection of an Intervention for Tier I and Tier II schools only. Please refer to VII. School Level Descriptive Information EXCERT from Handbook on Effective Implementation of School Improvement Grants, Center on Innovation & Improvement The Turnaround Model The LEA replaces the principal (although the LEA may retain a recently hired principal where a turnaround, restart, or transformation was instituted in past two years) and rehiring no more than 50% of the staff; gives greater principal autonomy; implements other prescribed and recommended strategies. 1. How will the LEA select a new leader for the school, and what experience, training, and skills will the new leader be expected to possess? 2. How will the LEA assign effective teachers and leaders to the lowest achieving schools? 3. How will the LEA begin to develop a pipeline of effective teachers and leaders to work in turnaround schools?

Renewal Schools only ( Schools in Corrective Action or Restructuring I that are not in Tier I) 1) Intervention ( Must adopt a Whole School Reform Model-- a proven model for capacity building and transformational change in the school SDE will provide the following to assist with selection of a model: a) a list of state-approved vendors on the state website and b) training to assist in a data driven selection process and to provide examples of Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to use in contracting with the vendor. 2) Rationale for choosing intervention from the vendor list

Tier III Focus Schools only( Title I schools in School Improvement I or II) Intervention activities the school will implement Exemplary Educators and STATS will be provided to identify needs and implement change to impact student achievement positively.

Tier I, Tier II, or Tier III Schools Description of implementation plan with quarterly milestone goals for each year and 3 year timeline [Appendix B Scoring Rubric-page 5 and 6 School Section Questions 1-10]

EVENT Applications due to the SDE Grants reviewed and evaluated Grant award notification letters sent to LEAs Grant awards posted to state website Implementation Year I Milestone Visits Evaluation of Year 1 for Year 2 funding by SDE LEA submission of updated budget/grant for Year 2/3 New Tier 1, 2, 3 schools identified and beginning of new grant cycle (while continuing with prior grant cycle). A school may only be in one grant cycle. DATE June 2, 2010 June 7-18, 2010 June 21-July 1, 2010 July 1, 2010 School Year Sept 2010, Jan 2011 Mar 2011, May 2011 May-June 2011(dependent on student achievement data and SIG indicators) July 2011 Aug 2011, May 2012

LEA Application - Documents to be Submitted LEA Application: For Review and Submission LEA Application: For Review and Submission Appendix J - External Providers Form Appendix J Appendix K - Budget Spreadsheet [being adjusted so that one submitted per LEA] Appendix K School Level Application for each school [Template in application and is being added to website] LEA Application - Documents to be Used in the Completion of the Application Appendix A - Tier I, II, and III Schools (Determined in ) Appendix A Appendix B - Title I School Improvement Grant Rubric Appendix B Appendix C - Tennessee School Improvement Planning Process, Component 4 Appendix C Appendix D - What Is A Good School? Appendix D Appendix E - School Improvement Grant Final Requirements Appendix E Appendix F - Tennessee Pyramid of Interventions and Model Questions Appendix F Appendix G - Framework for TCSPP Component 5 Appendix G Appendix H - TCSPP 2008 Rating Sheet Appendix H Appendix I - TSIP Planning Rubric Appendix I

June 2 deadline Electronic application (LEA application, Appendix J, Appendix K, School portion for each school that the LEA plans to serve with SI funds) ed to Only paper submittedpages L-1 and L-2-- Assurances with original signaturesmailed to this address: Jacqueline Moore, TN State Department of Education, Office of Federal Programs, 5 th FloorAndrew Johnson Tower, 710 James Robertson Parkway, Nashville, TN (Be sure to keep a copy of the signed application.)