State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
Ozone Early Action Compacts Clearing the Air in Tennessee Prepared by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation for the Tennessee Pollution.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Council of Governments Donnie Redmond July 13, 2005.
SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Metrolina Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Triad Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ Eddie.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond August 11,
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Granville County Board of Commissioners Donnie Redmond July 5, 2005.
Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, /17/2010.
Environmental Leadership The Pursuit of Cleaner Air
Public Meeting to Receive Comments on NCs Potential Recommendation Designations for PM 2.5 in North Carolina.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Mobile Source Emissions Reduction Grant Program Heather J. Hildebrandt NC Division of Air Quality.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Clark County Ozone February 10, Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Background 1997 NAAQS for ground-level ozone set at an 8-hour.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
Clark County Air Quality Status Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management August 10, 2004.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Meeting of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission 4/16/2015.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Control Measures for the 8-hour Ozone SIP Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Is “Good and Gooder” Good for Georgia and Georgian’s? Jimmy Johnston Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Keeping Tomorrow’s Air Clean: Conforming Transportation Plans with Air Quality Attainment Efforts San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
1 Meeting Air Quality Goals in California Nancy L. C. Steele, D.Env. The Tender Land November 6, 2004 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
Air Quality Public Advisory Committee (AQPAC) Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments January 26, 2009 www.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
Potential Control Strategies for Mobile Sources Dave Shaw, NY DEC 2004 OTC Annual Meeting Red Bank, NJ.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Finding A Better Way to Cleaner Air in Texas Departing from the SIP Process.
Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee (MWAQC) Tom Dernoga, Chair, MWAQC Member, Prince George’s County Council May 12, 2004 Update on Activities.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Air Quality Update Regional Council February 28, 2007.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee: Focus and Priorities
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005

2 Outline Background Timeline Current DAQ effort Modeling results Future: Potential Developments What do you need to remember from this presentation?

3 Background Federal Clean Air Act –Ozone formation Designation –Impact New Source Review (NSR) Transportation conformity State Implementation Plan (SIP) Difference between –Attainment demonstration –Redesignation request –Transportation conformity

4 Attainment Demonstration Focus of todays presentation Process that DAQ is now undertaking –Essentially, a modeling exercise to demonstrate that the State has a valid plan to attain the standard –Does not address Actual current air quality Transportation conformity

5 Redesignation Request Separate process to be undertaken at a future date –Local field monitors show standards have been met –It is possible that Triangle will meet standards after this summer

6 Current Ozone Values (Standard is less than 85 ppm) County average average Durham8986 Franklin9088 Granville9489 Person9187 Wake9288

7 Transportation Conformity SIP contains a budget for each source segment –Point sources Industries –Area sources Dry cleaners, gas stations, print shops, etc. –Mobile Onroad, offroad –Biogenics

8 Attainment Demonstration Focus of todays presentation Process that DAQ is currently undertaking –Develop emissions inventory –Select meteorological event –Perform computer modeling –Show that area is projected to attain standard during summer of 2008 –Submit to EPA by June 2007

9 Timeline Summer 2005: Modeling results Fall 2005: Strategies Spring 2006: Public hearings Fall 2006: Environmental Management Commission (EMC) approval Early 2007: Legislative review June 2007: Due to EPA

10 Current DAQ Efforts Emissions Inventory –Factor in growth Model existing regulations –Federal control measures Cleaner vehicles Cleaner fuels NOx SIP Call/Clean Air Interstate Rule –State control measures Better auto emissions testing procedure Expanded auto emissions testing Clean Smokestacks Act

11 Modeling Results When will they be ready What they will mean –If we are clean –If we are not Local measures (local input)

12 Local Measures Focus on major emission sources Reduction in vehicle miles traveled Nonroad engines –Generators, construction equipment, lawnmowers, etc. Fleet turnover Alternative fuels Diesel retrofit, anti-idling policies Growth management Episodic controls

13 Future: Potential Developments When we get through this current process, we cannot declare victory and go home … Growth assumptions may change Science may change –EPA is now reviewing ozone and PM standards Sept 2006: Fine particles Dec 2007: Ozone

14 What do you need to take away from this … Modeling results will be ready in June/July If they show attainment –Be happy, but remember things may change in the future If they dont show attainment –Well need to consider local measures –Well need them rather quickly to meet deadlines

15 For additional info Donnie Redmond –Asst. Chief for Planning – DAQ website – –To see live air quality values