North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mercury Strategy Outline RMP CFWG September 14, 2007.
Advertisements

Mercury and Methylmercury Processes in North SF Bay Tidal Wetland Ecosystems San Francisco Estuary Institute USGS BRD WERC Vallejo, CA USGS WRD Menlo Park,
Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
Mercury in SF Bay The 8-Minute Conceptual Model California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004.
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Regulatory Update Carrie Austin, SF Bay Water Board Michelle Wood, CV Water Board.
A Pilot Program for Monitoring, Stakeholder Involvement, and Risk Communication Relating to Mercury in Fish in the Bay-Delta Watershed (aka The Fish Mercury.
UPDATE ON DAQS AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS & MERCURY STUDIES NC DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 19, 2004 Steve Schliesser Todd Crawford NC.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
© Richard A. Medeiros 2004 x y Function Machine Function Machine next.
Mobile Source Emissions Reduction Grant Program Heather J. Hildebrandt NC Division of Air Quality.
Oil & Gas Final Sample Analysis April 27, Background Information TXU ED provided a list of ESI IDs with SIC codes indicating Oil & Gas (8,583)
Clock will move after 1 minute
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Fish Bioaccumulation Studies Associated with the Kingston Fly Ash Release Marshall Adams - Oak Ridge National Lab Tyler Baker - TVA Allison Fortner - Arcadis.
Assessment of Fish Population Health in the Vicinity of the Kingston Fly Ash Release Marshall Adams - Oak Ridge National Lab Allison Fortner – Arcadis.
Mark S. Greeley 1, S. Marshall Adams 1, Tyler F. Baker 2, Logan R. Elmore 1, Mary K. McCracken 1, and Rick M. Sherrard 2 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Mercury.
1 Regulatory Update Part 2 San Francisco Bay Mercury Coordination Meeting February 22, 2007 Michelle Wood (Central Valley Water Board) Carrie Austin (San.
Survey of the Mercury Content of Earthworms on the South River Floodplain John Cianchetti and Dean Cocking, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.
Progress report: Biological mechanisms for Hg accumulation in largemouth bass Ben Greenfield San Francisco Estuary Institute Fish Mercury Project 2007.
SF Bay Region Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring Funded by: RMP, USEPA w/ services by: NADP/MDN, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Jose.
Biomagnification of Monomethylmercury in Carnegie Lake x 10 4 H2OH2O.
Fish Mercury Project Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DEVELOPING SAFE EATING GUIDELINES.
Something Fishy…Do Now
Don Ingle Pond Profile 2007 Limnology 415 Zooplankton & Littoral Macroinvertebrates Brent Beller Heather Gang Karen Johnson Randy Johnson.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Freshwater Fish Species Wildlife, Fisheries and Ecology Roni Tarver.
Mercury Bioaccumulation in Bluegill and Largemouth Bass from a Hunting and Fishing Site in South Carolina, USA Brandy Bossle* and Virginia Shervette, University.
Mercury Monitoring on the Fond du Lac Reservation Joy Wiecks, Air Quality Technician Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa December 15, 2005 WRAP.
Bream Lab: Relative Weight BIOL 3500L Dr. Christopher Kodani.
Adrienne Ethier*, Joseph Atkinson, Joseph DePinto and David Lean.
Mercury Sources to Water and Associated Impacts Chris Piehler.
As tale of Teresa Casal Ed.S. FCE LTER. Objectives-  Learn about the chemistry, the sources, cycling and health effects of mercury.  Trace Hg as it.
Use of Multi-Media Monitoring to Develop a Statewide Mercury TMDL Bruce Monson and Howard Markus Environmental Analysis & Outcomes Division Minnesota Pollution.
An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C.
Quantifying the Role of Ecological Uncertainty in a Public Health Policy Decision Annual Meeting American Association for the Advancement of Science Seattle,
Mercury Concentrations in Stream Fish Throughout 12 Western States in the USA Alan Herlihy and Robert Hughes Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon State.
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
NorCal SETAC 2001 Seafood Contamination and Consumption.
Slide 1 Mercury Control Program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta Estuary San Francisco Bay RMP Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Michelle Wood.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T Request to Discontinue Project HGOS Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee.
Hg Process Study Options RMP CFWG September 14, 2007.
Illinois Lake Michigan (nearshore) Mercury and PCB TMDLs.
1 Methylmercury TMDL & Implementation Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta Estuary 2006 National Monitoring Conference Michelle Wood.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Completing the SF Bay Mercury TMDL Carrie Austin SF Bay Water Board.
Mercury in the Ohio River A Modeling and Field Data Approach Presentation to: ORSANCO Reed Harris, David Hutchinson and Don Beals RHE Ltd. February 12,
1 National Descriptive Model of Mercury in Fish Tissue Stephen P. Wente Mounds View, MN U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Selenium Aquatic Life Criteria and Implementation ORSANCO Technical Committee Meeting October 21, 2009 Holly Green, USEPA Office of Science and Technology.
Speciation and Bioavailability of Mercury in Ambient and Wastewater-Influenced Water Samples: A Preliminary Study Rob Reash American Electric Power, Columbus,
Commercial Fisheries Bycatch Monitoring on Utah Lake David Tinsley and Jackie Watson Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Mercury Method 1631: It’s Not As Bad As We Thought It Would Be Dana Folley, PERCS Unit 2005 NC Pretreatment Workshop August 23, 2005 Charlotte, NC.
Mercury: What’s going on? Michelle Woolfolk, Modeling Unit Discharger meetings:December 18, 2002 and January 15, 2003.
Unexpected Relationships between Methylmercury Enrichment in Fresh Waterbodies and Food-Web Uptake Steve Dent PhD, Eric Blischke, Andy Greazel PG- CDM.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Human Health & Aquatic Life Criteria
Aroon Melwani, Shira Bezalel, Jennifer Hunt, Letitia Grenier,
Water Quality Control Commission Hearing June 8, 2015
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection
Questions From July 2013 EMC Meeting
Methylmercury and Mercury in SF Bay & Wetlands
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury (Hg)
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting

NC Eastern Regional Mercury Study Funded by USEPA grant (104(b)(3)) Goals 1.Evaluate levels of ambient mercury in surface water systems using low level techniques (Method 1631) 2.Estimate site-specific total mercury:methyl mercury translators to evaluate water quality criteria 3.Estimate site-specific water to fish bioaccumulation factors 4.Evaluate potential mercury loads from WWTPs Referred to hereafter as the ERMS

Ambient Surface Water Total Hg Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels No. of observations 46 Geometric mean (ng/L) 4.49 Median (ng/L)4.1 Range of concentrations 1.06 – 28.6 Standard exceeded in 11 % of samples.

Ambient Surface Water Total MeHg No. of observations 48 Geometric mean (ng/L) 0.32 Median (ng/L)0.241 Range of concentrations – 4.04 Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Ambient sediment Total Hg No. of observations 24 Geometric mean (ng/g) Median (ng/g)28.22 Range of concentrations 1.52 – Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Ambient sediment Total MeHg No. of observations 24 Geometric mean (ng/g) Median (ng/g)0.214 Range of concentrations – Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Ambient Hg residue: piscivorous fish Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels Black crappie

Ambient Hg residue: Omnivores and Insectivores Spotted sucker White catfish

Bioaccumulation factors Bioaccumulation is the uptake and retention of a chemical by a living organism as a result of either intake of food, drinking water, air or direct contact. (EPA 1994b) A bioaccumulation factor is defined as : BAF = Residue C(d) where Residue = concentration in wet tissue, mg/kg C(d) = concentration of chemical dissolved in H2O, mg/L Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Bioaccumulation factors, cont. Can be species specific, size specific, or trophic level specific –Species specific: e.g., largemouth bass, black crappie, bluegill sunfish, etc. –Size specific: e.g., largemouth bass of length 40 cm –Trophic level specific: e.g., all of trophic level 3 Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Largemouth bass bioaccumulation One of three species with a regional advisory by DHHS Caught and analyzed at every site in ERMS (makes site-to-site comparison possible) Calculate BAFs to all fish caught at a site and to a normalized 40-cm bass Allow variability in exposure concentration Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Largemouth bass BAFs Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

40-cm Largemouth bass BAFs Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

What is the significance of BAFs? We use the BAFs to calculate the allowable water concentrations of MeHg(d) and ultimately Hg(t). Required to implement the AWQC for methylmercury Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Target water column levels Evaluate human health endpoint, not wildlife Only evaluate to DHHS criteria Site-specific water column translators (i.e., MeHg(d)/MeHg(t) and MeHg(t)/Hg(t)) [less confidence in relationships between MeHg(d) and Hg(t)] Goal 3a: Target water levels

Target water column levels Goal 3a: Target water levels

Target water column levels, cont. Goal 3a: Target water levels

And now for the big picture…

Photo-toon by R. Johnson

Questions? Michelle Woolfolk Div. of Water Quality, Modeling Unit (919) ext. 505 Connie Brower Div. Of Water Quality, Standards Unit (919) ext. 572