State Initiatives for Reducing Power Plant Pollution Martha H. Keating Clean Air Task Force NC DAQ Mercury and CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 20, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
Estimated Mercury Emission Reductions in NC from Co- control as a Result of CSA 2004 NC DENR/DAQ Hg & CO2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 20, 2004 Steve Schliesser.
Clean Smokestacks Act North Carolina Mercury and CO2 Workshop April , 2004 Brock Nicholson, P.E. Deputy Director N.C. Division of Air Quality.
Environmental Leadership The Pursuit of Cleaner Air
Duke Power Clean Smokestacks & Mercury Efforts April, 2004.
Reducing CO 2 from Coal-Fired Utilities: State and Local Initiatives Amy Royden State & Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators (STAPPA) Association.
Renewable Energy as a Mechanism for Reducing Pollution North Carolina DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO2 Workshop Raleigh. North Carolina April 20, 2004 Harnessing the.
Insights on Economic Impacts of Utility Mercury and CO 2 Controls Anne Smith Charles River Associates North Carolina DENR/DAQ Workshop on Mercury and CO.
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
MACT Vacaturs & Section 112(j) Plywood MACT Vacatur Boiler MACT Vacatur & Section 112(j) rule Section 112(j) applicability Section 112(j) requirements.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit:
KEEA Conference October 2013 Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants under Section 111 of the CAA: How Energy Efficiency Can Help States Comply 1 Jackson.
Mercury Monitoring by States Robert Vollaro U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Division (May 2009)
North Carolina Division of Air Quality – Report on Applicability of Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program to Federal Installations In response to 15 NCAC.
Company LOGO U. S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Helping PUCs analyze options to reduce GHG regulatory risk in coal dependent states Dalia Patiño-Echeverri Nicholas School of the Environment - Duke University.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division;
Indiana Energy Association Environmental Issues Impacting Coal Fired Power Plants September 12, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department.
AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy Presented by: John McManus, Vice President Environmental Services APP Site Visit October.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
Progress Energy and the Environment Western North Carolina Air Quality Don Cooke April 29, 2003.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Report on Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units In response to 15 NCAC 02D.2509(b)
WELCOME TO NEW MEXICO WESTAR Fall Business Meeting 2009.
EPA Energy Regulation Discussion Featuring If you experience any technical difficulties, please contact Anna Lemp at Clare Foran.
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
REGULATIONS & LEGISLATION BIG TEN ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GROUP STEVE MARUSZEWSKI – PENN STATE Greenhouse Gases.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
WHO WE ARE The Coalition for a Secure Energy Future has been officially established to get the message out to businesses, policymakers, and residents.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
MA, GA, NY, NH, VA, NC, PA, RI, DE, MD, SC, CT, NJ Tuesday 09/08
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Legal Response to Climate Change Maxine Lipeles Association of Women Faculty February 22, 2008.
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Is There Need for a 75 ppb Ozone Transport Rule? Gregory Stella Alpine Geophysics, LLC 1 David Flannery Steptoe & Johnson PLLC Prepared For The Midwest.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Clear Skies Act of 2003 Western regional Air Partnership April 2-3, 2003.
111D OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR MISSOURI David Weiskopf Sustainable Energy Fellow Natural Resources Defense Council October 28 th.
Harry Klodowski, Esq. Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC.
WA OH WV VA PA NY ME NC SC GA TN KY IN MI WI MN IL LA TX OK ID NV OR CA AZ NM CO WY MT ND SD IA UT FL AR MO MS AL NE KS AK 12 States Have Passed Budgets.
New Source As defined in the CAA, construction of a new source, or modification of an existing source, that will produce a significant increase in emissions.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Department of Environmental Quality
Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act was first passed in 1963
EMC – Air Quality Committee March 9, 2016
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
15A NCAC 2D Start-up, Shut-down, Malfunction SSM SIP Call
NACAA Response to EGU MACT Vacatur
Presentation transcript:

State Initiatives for Reducing Power Plant Pollution Martha H. Keating Clean Air Task Force NC DAQ Mercury and CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 20, 2004

States are Taking Control of Mercury Wait and see what EPA is going to do: not good enough for 14 states. Some are moving ahead with mercury-specific state regulation. Others have co-benefit pollutant approach developed by state environmental departments. Legislative actions on the table in other states. Voluntary program Regulation by permit

Final and Proposed Mercury-Specific Rules CT Final rule WI Proposed rule MA Proposed rule NJ Proposed rule

Co-Control Approach Taking advantage of NOx and SOx co-control: mercury reduction without even trying. North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Bill (estimated 65% Hg co-benefit). May recommend Hg specific controls in New Hampshire Clean Power Act. Mercury cap will be recommended to legislature by DES in 2004.

Legislative Activity DE - bill introduced to cut Hg by 90% - also covers NOx and SOx - similar to NC. IL EPA to recommend limits in Spring MI DEQ working with task force to develop a mercury reduction plan in 2004.

Still Trying MN - Voluntary plan passed by legislature in 1999 recommending that utilities voluntarily reduce Hg emissions. A 2001 progress report showed no emissions have been reduced. MD - bill (similar to NC) introduced in 2003 but withdrawn. OH - legislation introduced in 2002 but didnt make it out of committee. Will be re-introduced. NY - Several bills introduced in past legislative sessions have not made it out of committee.

New Source Permits Since coal-fired utility units are now on the source category list (although EPA is trying to delist them), they are subject to CAA section 112(g) (Modifications) and 112(j) (the permit hammer). New or modified sources are subject to case-by-case MACT determination. Most states are only looking at co-benefits of criteria pollutant controls as MACT. Virtually all of these are being challenged in court. Iowa has stepped up and negotiated a permit requirement for a new coal-fired facility that will achieve at least an 83% reduction in Hg emissions through the use of activated carbon injection. Plant will come on-line in 2007.

Keys to Success Buy-in from affected companies. Identification of and compromise on make or break issues. Examples: –Connecticut –Wisconsin –Massachusetts and New Jersey