1 ERCOT True-Up Resettlement Restart Criteria Discussion Retail Market Subcommittee Meeting, February 24, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott January 28,
Advertisements

Update to RMS February 3,  2015 AMWG Leadership ◦ Esther Kent (CNP) and John Schatz (TXU), by affirmation, return as co-chairs  2015 AMWG Goals.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board March 21, TAC Summary 3 unanimous PRRs 3 unanimous PRRs TAC discussion regarding Board Retreat Action Items TAC.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
1 Demand Response – How Do We Get There?. 2 Opt 1 – Misc. Debit Credit Opt 2 – Load Imbalance ERCOT Impacts Business / Systems RCC, EAA, CODIA, Settlements.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS April 23, 2003.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
RMS UPDATE from ERCOT Retail Market Services August 1, 2002.
RMSUpdate November 4, 2004 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
1 RMS TAC Update March 6, Texas Test Plan Chair; Bill Bell Centerpoint Energy Vice Chair; Leanne Hayden Centrica COMET Chair; Terry Bates TXU.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to TAC January 9, 2003.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
DEV Task Force RMS Update 11/11/04. DEV Update Discussed Leap Frog Inadvertent with IAG TF. Rita to report and IAGTF to own Worked with ERCOT to resolve.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
1 TDTWG Scope and Goals 2015 Wednesday January 8, 2014.
Load Profiling Working Group RMS Presentation 8/01/2002 by Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy Retail Group Chair PWG.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2009.
1 Update from ERCOT Market Services to the Board of Directors October 15, 2002.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update Kathy Scott April 9, 2013Commercial Operations Subcommittee 1.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
Feb 18, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 18, 2003.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2004.
Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC May 6, 2004.
Proposed Timeline for Extract, Variances, True-Ups Extracts 10/1/03 Clear all “old” extracts from Portal 9/26/03 Post last “old” daily extract 10/6/03.
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Emergency Issues May 6, 2008 TPTF.
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC January 8, 2009 Lee Starr, BTU.
1 SCR756 – Enhancements to the MarkeTrak application –Fondly called - MarkeTrak Phase 3 –ERCOT CEO determined that SCR756 is not necessary prior to the.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
Jan 22, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 22, 2003.
Update to RMS February 2, 2016 TX SET. Texas SET January Meeting Update Elections – Chair: Diana Rehfeldt, TNMP – Vice Chair: Kyle Patrick, NRG TMTP Changes.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
1 Status of True-up Settlements Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec April 26, 2003 Date we expect to be back to.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting August 19, 2003.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
1 Commercial Operations Working Group Update to TAC April 7, 2005.
1 Update from ERCOT Market Services for TAC October 3, 2002.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
January 10, 2017 Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update to TAC
2011 Prioritization Update to Market Subcommittees
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Presentation transcript:

1 ERCOT True-Up Resettlement Restart Criteria Discussion Retail Market Subcommittee Meeting, February 24, 2003

2 Discussion Outline Objective Background/Timeline Development of RMS Resettlement Criteria

3 Objective Develop RMS resolution for resettlement restart criteria for consideration by Technical Advisory Committee at TAC meeting scheduled 3/6/03 that considers and attempts to addresses TAC and ERCOT Board of Director concerns.

4 Background/Timeline RMS Resolution 12/18/02 TAC Resolution 1/9/03 ERCOT Board Approval 1/22/03 RMS Resolution 1/25/03 TAC Resolution 2/6/03 Board Discussion 2/18/03 RMS Meeting 2/24-25/03 TAC Meeting 3/6/03 Board Meeting 3/18/03

5 RMS Resolution from Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement (starting with January 1, 2002) will commence April 1,2003 or upon completion of the criteria below; whichever occurs first. Any discrepancies after the deadline must be accepted by all parties. Progress toward completion criteria will be reviewed at each RMS meeting. 1.Develop functionality and provide data extract as defined in SCR 727. RMS places a High-High project approval/priority to SCR Market Synchronization project priorities 1 through 6, including “TDSP as LSE” clean-up and DART/QRE defined issues, must be 95% complete by all Market Participants based upon Market Sync Reporting Tool. 3.Outstanding QRE issues documented by ERCOT as of 12/16/02 be 95% complete. (“In Progress” and “In Analysis” as reported to RMS ) 4.ERCOT will have in place a mechanism for daily monitoring and synchronization of ERCOT’s Siebel and Lodestar systems. 5.ERCOT’s Siebel related data issues will be monitored and brought to a point of being repaired daily.

6 TAC Resolution from (1) Further true-up resettlements for 2002 will be suspended and (2) True-up resettlement (starting with January 1, 2002) will resume when adequate accuracy can be assured (as developed by the RMS and approved by the TAC) and 45 days after SCR 727 has been implemented. Every effort will be made to resume true-ups by April 1, Progress toward completion criteria will be reviewed at each RMS Meeting and reported to the TAC and the Board monthly. If the April 1, 2003 date cannot be met, the Board shall be advised and a revised target resumption date shall be given.

7 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 1.Develop functionality and provide data extract as defined in SCR Market Sync completion criteria will be 95% complete for ERCOT and CR groups and 95% complete for each TDSP for Priorities 1,2,4 (1) and 5 as reported on the Market Sync Reporting tool status. 3.Outstanding QRE issues documented by ERCOT as of 12/16/02 be 95% complete. (“In Progress” and “In Analysis” as reported to RMS ) 4.ERCOT shall have the organization and procedures in place to daily synchronize ERCOT’s Siebel and Lodestar systems, and synchronization of Siebel and Lodestar systems shall be in place before the initial release of SCR727 data to Market Participants.

8 TAC Resolution From 2/6 Meeting 1.ERCOT: make SCR 727 data extracts available as soon as possible 2.RMS: Consider effected ESI IDs (customers), and the results from the February 7th Siebel and Lodestar synchronization activities, and bring an amended resolution to the TAC for consideration at its March Meeting.

9 RMS Resettlement Criteria Review of Previously Approved Resolution Consideration of Additional Criteria or Resolution Alternatives Framing of Resolution for Vote Primary TAC and Board concerns: Impact on customers Uncertainty regarding schedule and timelines

10 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 1.Develop functionality and provide data extract as defined in SCR 727.

11 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 1.Develop functionality and provide data extract as defined in SCR 727. Given information provided on SCR 727 development, delivery schedule and discrepancy resolution process, does this criteria need to be altered?

12 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 2.Market Sync completion criteria will be 95% complete for ERCOT and CR groups and 95% complete for each TDSP for Priorities 1,2,4 (1) and 5 as reported on the Market Sync Reporting tool status.

13 RMS Resettlement Criteria Market Sync completion criteria will be 95% complete for ERCOT and CR groups and 95% complete for each TDSP for Priorities 1,2,4 (1) and 5 as reported on the Market Sync Reporting tool status. Market synch survey questions: What is your projected schedule for attaining resolution of 95% of out-of-synch conditions? What items are barriers to successful resolution of these conditions? What do you need from whom and by when to meet your schedule? What is your estimate of the number of customers whose issues cannot be addressed if 5% are not addressed? What target success criteria, if any, do you think should be applied to resolution of out-of-synch conditions?

14 RMS Resettlement Criteria Market synch survey responses: Responses received from 13 REPs, 4 TDSPs, ERCOT What is your projected schedule for attaining resolution of 95% of out-of-synch conditions? Done: 4 4/1/03 (+/- 15 days): 10 No response: 4 What items are barriers to successful resolution of these conditions? What do you need from whom and by when to meet your schedule?

15 RMS Resettlement Criteria Market synch survey responses: What is your estimate of the number of customers whose issues cannot be addressed if 5% are not addressed? REPs: ~17,500 cumulative TDSPs: ~2,000 cumulative No response: 1

16 RMS Resettlement Criteria Market synch survey responses: What target success criteria, if any, do you think should be applied to resolution of out-of-synch conditions? 100%: 2 99%: 2 95% (with a variety of qualifiers): 11 Use absolute numbers, not %: 1 Criteria not applicable: 1 No response: 1

17 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 2.Market Sync completion criteria will be 95% complete for ERCOT and CR groups and 95% complete for each TDSP for Priorities 1,2,4 (1) and 5 as reported on the Market Sync Reporting tool status. Given market synch project status, survey responses and further consideration, does this criteria need to be altered?

18 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 3.Outstanding QRE issues documented by ERCOT as of 12/16/02 be 95% complete. (“In Progress” and “In Analysis” as reported to RMS )

19 RMS Resettlement Criteria Outstanding QRE issues documented by ERCOT as of 12/16/02 be 95% complete. (“In Progress” and “In Analysis” as reported to RMS ) QRE survey questions: What is your estimate of the number of customers whose issues cannot be addressed if 5% are not addressed? What target success criteria, if any, do you think should be applied to resolution of out-of-synch conditions?

20 RMS Resettlement Criteria QRE survey responses: What is your estimate of the number of customers whose issues cannot be addressed if 5% are not addressed? REPs: ~6,000 cumulative TDSPs: ~3,000 cumulative No response: 3

21 RMS Resettlement Criteria QRE survey responses: What target success criteria, if any, do you think should be applied to resolution of QRE issues? 100%: 3 99%: 2 95% (with a variety of qualifiers): 8 Use absolute numbers, not %: 1 Criteria not applicable: 3 No response: 1

22 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 3.Outstanding QRE issues documented by ERCOT as of 12/16/02 be 95% complete. (“In Progress” and “In Analysis” as reported to RMS ) Given QRE status, survey responses and further consideration, does this criteria need to be altered?

23 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 4.ERCOT shall have the organization and procedures in place to daily synchronize ERCOT’s Siebel and Lodestar systems, and synchronization of Siebel and Lodestar systems shall be in place before the initial release of SCR727 data to Market Participants.

24 RMS Resettlement Criteria RMS recommends TAC approve the following criteria for restarting true-up settlement for 2002: 4.ERCOT shall have the organization and procedures in place to daily synchronize ERCOT’s Siebel and Lodestar systems, and synchronization of Siebel and Lodestar systems shall be in place before the initial release of SCR727 data to Market Participants. Given Siebel and Lodestar synchronization status, does this criteria need to be altered?

25 RMS Resettlement Criteria Are there other criteria that need to be considered as part of resettlement restart?