17-1 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss another UAV Operating Environment The atmosphere Expectations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture X: Air Density Factor
Advertisements

Basic Airplane Instruments
Flight Instrument Systems
Introduction to Propulsion
Part 6. Altimetry. Part 6. Altimetry TOPICS Pressure, Humidity & Temperature ISA and the Aircraft Altimeter 4 Pressure, Humidity & Temperature 4 ISA.
Basic Aerodynamic Theory
MET 61 1 MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology - Lecture 2 “The atmosphere (II)” Dr. Eugene Cordero San Jose State University.
Predicting Performance
Flight Instruments Which way’s up?
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 30 Turn Performance. “Turning” the tables…
Lesson 24 Performance— Thrust Required and Thrust Available
Lesson 31 Velocity vs. Load Factor (V-n) Diagrams
Lesson 16: Aircraft Instrument Systems
Section 03 - Altimetry Lesson 08
The Nine Deadly Sins Presented by KVGT FAASTeam
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
WDNS About Density Altitude
The Four Forces of Flight
Mission Aircrew Course Chapter 7: High Altitude and Terrain Considerations (Jul 2005)
AE 1350 Lecture #4 PREVIOUSLY COVERED TOPICS Preliminary Thoughts on Aerospace Design Specifications (“Specs”) and Standards System Integration Forces.
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Aerodynamic Theory Review 3
Property of Lear Siegler. NAVIGATIONAL COMPUTER SLIDE RULE.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
HOMEWORK PHAK CHAPTER 10 JEPPESEN Chapter 8 section A GLEIM CHAPTER 5
Property of Lear Siegler 1. 2 PHYSICS OF THE ATMOSPHERE 3.
Principles of Flight.
Lecture 5: Climb PERFORMANCE
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
23-1 Design of UAV Systems Methodology Correlationc 2002 LM Corporation Objectives Lesson objective - Methodology correlation including … F-16 RQ-4A (Global.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
18-1 Design of UAV Systems Propulsionc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss Propulsion and propulsion parametrics including … Rationale Applications.
Structural Design Considerations and Airspeeds
Basic aerodynamics relationships
Air vehicle performance
Final report and briefing
Property of Lear Siegler. PHYSICS OF THE ATMOSPHERE.
Temperature, Pressure, and Density Danielle Hettmann and Chris Saleh SYST460 – Fall 2011.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
Heavier-than-air flight is made possible by a careful balance of four physical forces: lift, drag, weight, and thrust. For flight, an aircraft's lift.
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
Chalmers University of Technology Elementary axial turbine theory –Velocity triangles –Degree of reaction –Blade loading coefficient, flow coefficient.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
Aircraft Speeds & Units
The Private Pilot.
Flight Investigations TEXT BOOK CHAPTER 16 PAGE
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Lecture 6: CRUISE PERFORMANCE
Performance Charts.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 11, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) The intensity or strength of the vortices is directly proportional to the ________.
Barometry  Evangelista Torricelli credited with invention of barometer.  Gasparo Berti may have been first.
Flight Instrumentation
Subject Name : ELEMENTS OF AERONAUTICS
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Mission Aircrew Course High Altitude and Terrain Considerations
Gas Dynamics for Design of Intakes
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Atmosphere Aerospace Engineering © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Atmosphere Aerospace Engineering © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Straight and Level The Flight Training Manual - Section 6
1976 U.S. Standard Atmosphere
1976 U.S. Standard Atmosphere
ALTIMETRY.
Presentation transcript:

17-1 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss another UAV Operating Environment The atmosphere Expectations - You will understand how this environment drives UAV design and operations

17-2 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Why is it important A UAV operates in two important environments 1. Physical - The atmosphere in which it flies - Varies with altitude (primary) and weather (secondary) 2. Functional - The rules for how it operates - Originally established for manned aircraft - Now imposed on unmanned aircraft If you don’t understand both environments, you can’t design for them Lesson 6 This lesson

17-3 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Indicated air speed (IAS) - the speed sensed by the aircraft (proportional to dynamic pressure) Equivalent air speed (EAS) - indicated air speed corrected for instrument and installation errors and compressibility effects (important when M > 0.5) True air speed (TAS) - the actual speed through the air MSL Altitude - Altitude above mean sea level (the altitude used for pilotage and air traffic control) AGL - Altitude above ground level Indicated altitude - The altitude sensed by the aircraft Pressure altitude - Indicated altitude corrected to sea level standard conditions Geometric altitude - Actual altitude (measured - RF, etc) Definitions

17-4 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Defined by internationally agreed models on how pressure, temperature and density vary with altitude above mean sea level (MSL). Used widely for: - Altimeter calibration - Air traffic control - Aircraft design - Performance computation - Etc. Models describe a “Standard Day” and provide variations for other conditions - “Hot” day - “Tropical” day - “Cold” day - “Polar” day The atmosphere For simplicity we will use the Standard Day only

17-5 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Sea level standard (SLS) conditions (in British units) Static pressure (P 0 ) lb/ft^2 (psf) or… in. Hg Temperature (T 0 ) degR or… degF Assumptions - - No moisture - Obeys perfect gas law Standard atmosphere For simplicity (mine) we will use English units

17-6 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Key definitions Ta = Ambient temperature (at altitude) Pa = Ambient pressure (at altitude) M = Mach number c = Speed of sound (kts) q = Dynamic pressure (lb/ft^2) or (psf) h= Pressure altitude (in thousands of feet) Static pressure ratio (  ) = Pa/P 0 Static temperature ratio (  ) = Ta/T 0 Density ratio (  ) =  /  Dynamic pressure (q) = 0.7*Pa*M^2 Speed of sound in kts (c)= 661.5*sqrt (  ) True air speed in kts (KTAS) = M*c Equivalent air speed in kts (KEAS)= KTAS*sqrt(  ) (17.1) (17.2) (17.3) (17.4) (17.5) (17.6) (17.7)

17-7 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation q - the alternate form The standard form q = [  /2]  V^2 But by definition (basic fluid mechanics) V = M  c where c = speed of sound c = [  g  R  T]^0.5 where  ≈ 1.4, g = gravity, R = universal gas constant P =  g  R  T Therefore q = [  /2]  [M  c]^2 = P  [  /2]  M^2 =  0.7   *M^2 or q =  M^2 where  = Pa/P0 (17.4a) We will use this form extensively

17-8 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Atmosphere characteristics Sea level ft (troposphere) - Exponential ambient pressure decrease - Linear ambient temperature decrease ft (stratosphere) - Logarithmic ambient pressure decrease - Constant ambient temperature ft - Exponential ambient pressure decrease - Linear ambient temperature increase

17-9 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Spread sheet equations Altitude (Kft)hAmbient pressure ratioAmbient temperature ratio delta = ( *h/1000)^ theta = *h/ delta = *exp((h )*( *10^-2))theta = theta = h*1.0566*10^ delta = exp( h* ) InputOutputs Approximate 1962 U.S. Standard Atmosphere (17.8) (17.10) (17.9) (17.13) (17.12) (17.11)

17-10 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Typical calculations Throughout this course we will use the standard atmosphere for performance, aerodynamic and propulsion calculations. Some examples: 1. A UAV is flying at M = 0.75 and h = 65 Kft. What is the dynamic pressure? - From (17.4a) q = *  *M^2 - From (17.10)  =  q = * *0.75^2 = 46.4 psf 2. A UAV is flying at KTAS = 350 Kts. What Mach will it fly at h = 30, 50 and 70Kft? How about KEAS? - From (17.4-7) KTAS = M*c = M*661.5*sqrt (  ) (17.14) and KEAS = KTAS*sqrt (  ) = M*661.5*sqrt (  ) (17.15)

17-11 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Calculations - cont’d 2. cont’d From (17.15) M = KTAS/661.5*sqrt (  )  h=30Kft = 350/(661.5*sqrt (.7938)) = 0.59 h=50Kft = 350/(661.5*sqrt (.7519)) = 0.61 h=70Kft = 350/(661.5*sqrt (.7565)) = 0.61 From (17.16) KEAS = M*661.5*sqrt (  )  h=30Kft = 0.59*661.5*sqrt (.2970)) = 213 KEAS h=50Kft = 0.61*661.5*sqrt (.1145)) = KEAS h=70Kft = 0.61*661.5*sqrt (.0438)) = 84.4 KEAS 3. A UAV with a wing loading of 60 psf wants to loiter at a Cl of 0.8 for L/Dmax. What M will it fly at 30/50/70 Kft? At loiter L ≈ W = Cl*q*S (See RayAD Chapter 5.3)  W/S  wing loading = Cl*q or q = (W/S)/Cl (17.16)

17-12 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Calculations - cont’d 3. cont’d Combining (17.14) and (17.16) we find M = sqrt((W/S)/(Cl* *  )) (17.17)  h=30Kft = sqrt(60/(0.8* *0.2970)) = 0.41 h=50Kft = sqrt(60/(0.8* *0.1145)) = 0.66 h=70Kft = sqrt(60/(0.8* *0.0438)) = Is there something wrong at 70 Kft? No - it can’t fly at subsonic speeds at 70Kft at this wing loading. It either needs a bigger wing or has to lose weight (burn fuel - and a lot) 4. Assume the UAV in problem 3 has a loiter Mach number of 0.6. What will its loiter altitude be?

17-13 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Calculations - cont’d 4. cont’d From (17.16)  = (W/S)/(Cl* *M^2) (17.18)  M=0.6 = 60/(0.8* *0.36) = At what altitude will  = 0.141? Answer - From chart 17.7, we can see that the altitude is somewhere between 40 and 50 Kft. If we solve (17.10) we will find that hlo = 45.7 Kft Note – We will program equations (17.8) through (17.13). We will use them a lot.

17-14 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Implications for design At a given air speed, dynamic pressure drops about an order of magnitude by 50Kft. It drops about another order of magnitude by 100Kft. - Generating lift above 65K ft is a major challenge - Simple aerodynamic analysis show why Altitude is also a problem for the engine even though drag goes down with q - Engine power required to run generators does not go down (environmental control requirements can go from cooling to heating) Above 65K ft. lift and power are major design issues - This lesson will address the lift issue

17-15 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Global Hawk Example

17-16 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Global Hawk Assessment Takeoff weight = 25,600 lbs, wing area (S) = 540 ft^2, fuel = 14,500 lbs Assuming 15% fuel consumption for takeoff and climb to initial cruise altitude (50Kft), the initial cruise wing loading (W/S) would be - W/S = (25, *14,500)/540 = 43.4 psf At a nominal cruise Mach of 0.6, cruise q = 61.0 psf. If L = W, what would the cruise lift coefficient (Cl-cruise) be? Answer : Cl-cruise = (W/S)/q = 0.71 At mid-mission (loiter with 50% fuel) the wing loading would be - W/S = (25, *14,500)/540 = 34.0 psf at a required loiter altitude of 65Kft. Assuming the loiter speed is also Mach 0.6 (q = 29.7 psf), what would Cl-loiter have to be? Answer : Cl-loiter = 34/29.68 = 1.15 (near or at stall speed?) In order to operate efficiently at high altitude, Global Hawk has to fly at high cruise and loiter lift coefficients. What if it had to loiter even higher - say 70Kft?

17-17 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation 70Kft Assessment Option 1 - Loiter at a higher speed For Cl-loiter = 0.84 and W/S = 34.0 psf as before - Required q-loiter = 34/0.84 = 40.5 or M = 0.8 (too high for a thick unswept wing!) Option 2 - Loiter at a higher Cl For M = 0.6 (q = 23.35) and W/S = 34.0 psf as before - Required Cl-loiter = 34/23.35 = 1.45 (way too high!) Option 3 - Loiter at a lighter weight Assume M = 0.6 (q = 23.35) and Cl-loiter = 0.84 as before - Allowable W/S = 23.35*0.84 = 19.6 (less than empty weight ) Option 4 - Combination of Options 1-3 Assume M = 0.65 (q = 27.4) and Cl-loiter = Allowable W/S = 27.4*1.1 = 30.1 (35% fuel remaining) A 70Kft requirement would be a significant challenge!

17-18 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Summary - Atmosphere Simple atmospheric models in combination with basic aerodynamic analysis are invaluable for first- order evaluation of air vehicle requirements and concepts High altitude requirements drive air vehicle design Very high altitude (>65Kft) is a difficult (but not impossible) design space Simple analysis of existing aircraft can provide very useful insight for pre-concept and conceptual design Secondary power at high altitude is a major issue that we will address in subsequent sessions

17-19 Expectations You should now understand how to model a standard atmosphere -Equations for pressure and temperature are all you need to fully characterize the standard day physical environment -You will use these models extensively throughout this course (and your career if you plan to work in air vehicle design) -See spreadsheet SSC.StdAtmosphere.xls You should also understand the issues associated with UAV operating environments - Very high altitude will be a major design challenge - Simple atmospheric and aerodynamic analysis can identify the problems Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation

17-20 Homework (extra credit) Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation 1.(Individual grade) Use spreadsheet ASE261.StdAtmosphere.xls to calculate true airspeed at the WAS altitude required for your project UAV assuming a wing loading of 35 psf - Assess one lift coefficient per team member -Cl = 0.3, 0.9,1.2 or (team grade) Which of the four (4) lift coefficients would be most appropriate for your WAS UAV at loiter? Explain your answer.

17-20 Design of UAV Systems Standard atmospherec 2002 LM Corporation Intermission