API ANSI RP 754 Implementation Conference Call September 26, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsible CarE® Codes of Management Practices Overview
Advertisements

Safety & Accident Prevention Measures
C3 Orientation.
Occupational Disease and Experience Rating. Overview  Statistics suggest a high prevalence of occupational disease (‘OD’) in New Zealand.  Our no-fault.
Responsible Care® Performance Metrics Update Al Biggs GM, Operational Excellence/ GPCA RCC Member – Sipchem March 20 th, 2012.
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
1 EQUATE RESTRICTED - For internal use only Performance Metrics Guidance Document For GPCA Member Companies Asrar Mohammad EQUATE Petrochemical.
Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
API Process Safety Committee Meeting 10/22/09 Wendy Dominguez November 11, 2009 An Update for the CRE - Fall Meeting, 2009.
© 1999 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation CA57 WHAT IS AN ACCIDENT.
Responsible Care Performance Metrics Kashif Rasheed Senior Consultant Lloyd’s Register EMEA 24 September 2012.
Performance Metrics Reporting Requirements Including Enhancements Qasim Yunus Tariq Alauddin 1.
CLOCS Compliance Date: 02/02/2015.
Spill Prevention and Control Regulatory Requirements Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) –29 CFR –Covers spill response.
Introduction The purpose of the following presentation is to provide you with important information on how to respond to a “Vale hazardous material release.
Bureau of Workers’ Comp PA Training for Health & Safety (PATHS)
TECH581 Improve/Control Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 12/09/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed.
Transportation Strategy SCMN 4780 Modal Analysis: Pipeline.
ILLNESS AND INJURY PREVENTION. Topics  Impact of Unintentional Injuries  Community Hazards and Crime Areas  Community Resources  Illness and Injury.
RP 3 Webinar Series: Safety Overview of the RP 3 Safety Checklist Friday, April 25, :00pm – 2:00 pm.
Incident Reporting Procedure
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
History of Responsible Care® in the Gulf Alan J. Izzard Borouge VP Corporate HSE/ VC RC Committee.
Process Safety Management
Sampling. Concerns 1)Representativeness of the Sample: Does the sample accurately portray the population from which it is drawn 2)Time and Change: Was.
Davis-Bacon, Related Acts, and Your Project Where you can locate the information needed to comply with Davis-Bacon and Related Acts 1.
Overview of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Southern Plains Area USDA/ARS.
Copyright  Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Safety Training Presentations Spill Prevention and Control.
OSHA Office of Training and Education1 Introduction to OSHA.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 13 Regulatory Overview OSHA, PSM, and EPA.
1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Engineering Safety in Design Bo Hu John Nieber. Safety Damage from an unsafe process or product – A defective automobile brake system: Collision: driver,
VPP Introduction Challenge for the Future of Safety Developed from VPP website information.
VPP Mobile Workforce Demonstration for Construction.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
STEEL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION FATALITY PREVENTION INITIATIVE September 2008.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 4 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
1 Occupational Driving Safety Programs: The Roadway Workplace Karen Puckett Director, Workplace Safety Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
ISA99 - Industrial Automation and Controls Systems Security
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Discovery Management Zone (DMZ) Emerging Technology (ET) Shared Interest Group (SIG)
2016 Step Up for Safety in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry
E-PRTR incompleteness check Irene Olivares Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme Eionet NRC workshop on Industrial Pollution Copenhagen.
Prevention not Intervention Developing a Sound Response to Erosion and Sediment Control Problems through the Planning Process.
1 People First System Enhancements Release 1 B Leave Balance Overview Screen.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Cross Industry E-Reps Forum Increasing Environmental Awareness and the role of the E-Rep 21 November 2012.
Rick Statham HAS Dip, CMIOSH (Joint Managing Director) Safety & Access Ltd SG4:10 Preventing Falls in Scaffolding Revised Industry Guidance.
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПЕРЕСЧЁТА КВЕД 2005 – КВЕД 2010 Bronislava Kaminskienė.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
 To serve as an advisory board  To participate in the development of health & safety procedures  To measure effectiveness of safety programs  To get.
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
LOCK-OUT/TAGOUT SAFETY SAFELY MAINTAINING EQUIPMENT AND MACHINES.
Korea Responsible Care Council RESPONSIBLE CARE ® in KOREA March 2001 By KOREA RESPONSIBLE CARE COUNCIL.
CLOCS Compliance Date:
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Gerald Whitney, Mission Support Alliance
47b. Fatal injuries at road construction sites, by major industry, total (All employment)
Breakout Session Summary Construction
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
CLICK TO SHOW ANIMATION
Attendance Data
Presentation transcript:

API ANSI RP 754 Implementation Conference Call September 26, 2011

Purpose of RP 754 Conference Calls To drive broad adoption of API 754 throughout the Refining and Petrochemical industries To drive consistency in Tier 1 and 2 metrics reporting in order to establish credibility and validity To share learning's regarding the effective implementation of Tier 3 and 4 leading metrics 2

API (US Refining only): 17 companies reported 76 refineries NPRA (US Refining only): 39 companies reported 107 refineries 2010 PSE Data Collection - Overview Both API and NPRA are collecting RP 754 data You do not have to be an API or NPRA member to submit RP 754 data and receive their report Refineries and petrochemicals may submit data Only those submitting data receive the report 2010 statistics:

2010 PSE Data Collection - Conclusions Both API and NPRA 2010 PSE data reports are now issued. The “PSE Rates” are different because there are two different data populations. Proceed with caution when using these industry PSE rate numbers for internal benchmarking purposes for a few years until data consistency and validity is deemed sufficient. Goal is to make a US Refining industry-aggregated “PSE Rate” publically available in 2013.

Three areas from the 2010 data collection require further education to ensure data consistency: 1)PRD Discharges 2)Contractor hours 3)Consequences Data Inconsistencies in 2010 submittals

Two ways to have a PSE involving a PRD (Pressure Relief Device): 1.A LOPC from a PRD that results in: an employee, contractor or subcontractor “days away from work” injury and/or fatality; or a hospital admission and/or fatality of a third-party; or an officially declared community evacuation or community shelter-in-place; or a fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $25,000 of direct cost to the Company or an employee, contractor or subcontractor recordable injury; or a fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,500 of direct cost to the Company 2.A PRD discharge that both exceeds the Threshold Quantity (Tier 1 or 2) rate* and has one or more of the following four consequences: Liquid carryover Discharge to a potentially unsafe location On-site shelter-in-place Public protective measures (e.g. road closure) * The Threshold Quantity rate is calculated at the PRD. Data Inconsistencies – PRD Discharges

PSE Tiering for Releases from Pressure Relief Devices (PRDs) When one of these releases, and causes one of these: - an employee, contractor or subcontractor “days away from work” injury and/or fatality; or - a hospital admission and/or fatality of a third-party; or - an officially declared community evacuation or community shelter-in- place; or - a fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $25,000 of direct cost to the Company it is a Tier 1 PSE. But if it causes one of these: - an employee, contractor or subcontractor recordable injury; or - a fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,500 of direct cost to the Company it is at least a Tier 2 PSE, but it might still be a Tier 1 PSE if....

When one of these releases, here, to here, or here, and causes or, discharge to a potentially hazardous location, or, an onsite shelter-in-place or a road closure then you must estimate the quantity released through the Pressure Relief Device to determine the PSE Tier.

If the quantity released from this is greater than this, the event is a Tier 1 PSE.

If the quantity released from this is greater than this, the event is a Tier 2 PSE.

When one these releases, and none of the consequences on the previous slides occurs, record the event as a Tier 3 PSE regardless of the quantity released.

Contractor hours include: – Embedded contractors – Specialty contractors – Project hours (if not major construction) Contractor hours do not include: – Delivery drivers – Large-scale projects that are typically fenced-off and not connected to the existing process (i.e. major construction) Data Inconsistencies – Contractor Hours

List all consequences for the Tier. e.g. list both Threshold Release Quantities and Number of Days Away from Work or Fatalities – Exception: If the event is a fire or explosion, the chemical-released quantity is not required to report. Basis: Chemical released is consumed by the fire/explosion. However, if the fire/explosion results in secondary release points the site shall report threshold quantities of other chemicals released. Do not list Tier 2 consequences in Tier 1 except for those related to human impact (i.e. employee, contractor, or sub-contractor recordable injuries ). Data Inconsistencies - Consequences

API and NPRA are reaching out to international organizations to encourage data collection alignment. However, each organization will have its own report out. Examples: ACC, CEFIC, CONCAWE, UKPIA International Adoption

RP Broad Access [Nationwide] Public Reporting API & NPRA Public Reporting Plan – Tier 1 and 2 Annually, each Company publicly reports:  2010 data – Implementation  2011 data – Data validation  2012 data – Industry aggregated result (public)  2013 data – Industry and Company blinded results (public)  2014 data – Industry and Company transparent results (public) NOTE - Tier 2 reporting may lag Tier 1 by one year

2011 Data Collection Improvements have been made to the data collection spreadsheet Still one spreadsheet used by both API and NPRA Spreadsheet will be distributed by 4 th quarter 2011 for sites to begin collecting 2011 data

Conclusions It will take a few years to ensure data consistency and validity - as was expected. Don’t over-focus on the 2010 PSE rate but instead build confidence in your data through consistent reporting. Trends over time are more valid than specific rates. The true value comes from determining PSE causal factors, implementing corrective actions, and sharing lessons learned to prevent future events.

API website API RP 754 Fact Sheet Series of four webinars presented in fall 2010 (available for viewing) Listing of FAQ’s that help you properly classify a PSE API Guide to collecting PSE data Read-only access to API RP 754