Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
Planning for Our Future:
CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,
CBP Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented CBP WQGIT Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Briefing.
Christopher Brosch University of Maryland Modeling Subcommittee Meeting January 11, 2012.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Citizens Advisory Committee December 6, 2013 Meeting Rich Batiuk,
BMP Verification Process Progress to Date Frank Coale, AgWG Chair Mark Dubin, AgWG Coordinator 06/19/12.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.
Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Agriculture Workgroup (AgWG) AgWG Membership Workshop December 17, 2015.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC Meeting February 18, 2016.
Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Program Update Chesapeake Bay Program Citizens Advisory Committee Thursday, February.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Funding from the Local Perspective
Local Planning Process…
Chesapeake Bay Program
Funding from the Local Perspective
Funding from the Local Perspective
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting
CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware Partners BMP Verification Meeting March 26, 2015

Daughter is a Blue Hen—Class of 2012 Being an out-of-state parent, made a $ignificant four-year investment in DE’s economy 30+ years of purchasing DE fishing licenses Decades of putting up with John Schneider (starting with his days in Florida!) 2 Delaware Credentials

3 What is BMP Verification?

4 “Verification: the process through which agency partners ensure practices, treatments, and technologies resulting in reductions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollutant loads are implemented and operating correctly.”

“…implemented and operating correctly.”

6 Why Verify BMPs?

Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Pollution Diet for All Sectors and Sources Pollution Delivered to the Bay (million pounds/year) 2017 Interim target 2025 Planning Target 7

9

11 National Academy of Sciences “The committee was unable to determine the reliability and accuracy of the BMP data reported by the Bay jurisdictions.”

12 National Academy of Sciences “The committee was unable to determine the reliability and accuracy of the BMP data reported by the Bay jurisdictions.”

How? BMP Verification Life Cycle

Who?

Framework Adoption by the Partnership Jurisdictions/Federal Agencies Development of Their BMP Verification Programs EPA Review and Approval of the Jurisdictions’ BMP Verification Programs September 2014 October July 1, 2015 July - October 2015 Full Implementation of the Jurisdictions’ Verification Programs 2018 External Panel Review of the Jurisdictions/ Federal Agencies’ BMP Verification Programs Jurisdictions Ramp-up Their Verification Program Implementation November - December When?

Verification principles Review Panel Sector verification guidance Practice life spans Full access to federal cost-shared practice data Enhanced reporting of federally cost shared practices Accounting for non- cost shared practices Preventing double counting Clean-up of historic BMP databases Documentation of jurisdictional BMP verification programs Evaluation and Oversight Communications and outreach Framework Elements

Practice reporting Scientific rigor Public confidence Adaptive management Sector equity 17 Verification Principles

Defining and categorizing agricultural BMPs Defining implementation mechanisms Agricultural BMP verification methods Follow-up assessment guidelines 18 Agriculture Verification Guidance

Agricultural riparian forest buffers Agricultural tree planting Expanded tree planting Urban riparian forest buffers Forest harvesting BMPs 19 Forestry Verification Guidance

Regulated BMPs Semi-regulated BMPs Non-regulatory BMPs Legacy BMPs 20 Stormwater Verification Guidance

Wastewater treatment facilities Combined sewer overflows Septic systems/septic system removals (connecting to wastewater treatment plants) Advanced on-site treatment systems 21 Wastewater Verification Guidance

Wetland restoration, creation and enhancement Floodplain reconnection Project design and siting, pre- and post construction Inspection, maintenance, monitoring framework Field assessment checklist 22 Wetlands Verification Guidance

Individual stream restoration project verification Maintenance, monitoring tied to performance Inspection, maintenance, monitoring framework Initial verification of installation Recommended cycle of field verification 23 Streams Verification Guidance

Aggregated data considered transparent upon validation Treat cost-shared data and non-cost shared agricultural conservation practice data the same in terms of applying privacy restrictions Public access to all credited practice data 24 Transparency and Data Access

BMP Verification Life Cycle Practice Life Spans

Data sharing agreements in place for all 6 states and all agencies involved in reporting Credit conservation technical assistance Hold USDA agencies accountable to commitment to enhance data reporting Common protocols and schedule for annual accessing of federal cost- shared data 26 Federal Cost Shared Practices

Focused on practices implemented without cost share and not covered by a regulatory program Crediting practices that meet CBP or NRCS definitions and standards and CBP approved ‘Resource Improvement Practices’ implemented w/o public cost-share funds 27 Accounting for Non-Cost Shared Practices

28 Prioritize Verification Towards Priority Practices

29 Prioritize Verification Towards Priority Practices

30 Jurisdictions’ Verification Programs

Table 8. Jurisdictional Verification Protocol Design Table A. WIP Priority B. Data Grouping C. BMP Type D. Initial Inspection (Is the BMP there?) E. Follow-up Check (Is the BMP still there?) F. Lifespan/ Sunset (Is the BMP no longer there?) G. Data QA, Recording & Reporting MethodFrequencyWho inspectsDocumentation Follow-up Inspection Statistical Sub-sample Response if Problem

Illustration of Diversity of Verification Approaches Tailored to Reflect Practices SectorInspectedFrequencyTimingMethodInspectorData RecordedScale Stormwater AllStatistics<1 yearMonitoringIndependentWater quality dataSite PercentageTargeting1-3 yrsVisualRegulatorMeets SpecsSubwatershed SubsampleLaw3-5 yrsAerialNon-RegulatorVisual functioningCounty TargetedFunding>5 yrsPhone SurveySelfLocationState Agriculture AllStatistics<1 yearMonitoringIndependentWater quality dataSite PercentageTargeting1-3 yrsVisualRegulatorMeets SpecsSubwatershed SubsampleLaw3-5 yrsAerialNon-RegulatorVisual functioningCounty TargetedFunding>5 yrsPhone SurveySelfLocationState Forestry AllStatistics<1 yearMonitoringIndependentWater quality dataSite PercentageTargeting1-3 yrsVisualRegulatorMeets SpecsSubwatershed SubsampleLaw3-5 yrsAerialNon-RegulatorVisual functioningCounty TargetedFunding>5 yrsPhone SurveySelfLocationState Verification Implementation

Evaluation and Oversight Amend Partnership BMP protocol to address verification Amend CBP Grant Guidance Annual reviews of progress data submissions Annual EPA reviews of changes to jurisdictions’ quality assurance plans Periodic EPA audits of jurisdictions’ BMP verification programs 33

Communications and Outreach Goals: Build understanding of and support for BMP Verification Ensure consistent public messaging Manage expectations 34 Mechanisms Online news features Press releases Editorials Social media releases and messaging Photo essays and video products Web-based resources Supporting print materials Webinars, training sessions, and workshops

Work towards accounting for all implemented practices which are reducing nutrient, sediment pollution Help message on importance of verification to restoring local stream health, habitats, and recreational areas and protecting sources of drinking water Make the investment and follow-through on demanding a return on your investment 35 State and Local Partners’ Roles

verification_committee CBP Partnership’ BMP Verification Committee CBP Partnership’s BMP Review Panel Approved BMP verification principles Link to Dec 2013 USGS Agricultural Conservation Practices report Final Chesapeake Bay Basinwide BMP verification framework report & appendices Source sector BMP verification guidance Information Sources

37 Strengthening Verification of Best Management Practices Implemented in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: A Basinwide Framework Report and Documentation from the Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team’s BMP Verification Committee October 2014

DE Chesapeake Bay Grants: CBIG, CBRAP DE WIP Assistance Funds: Tetra Tech contractual support Virginia Tech Cooperative Agreement: access to statistical survey design experts Source Sector Workgroup Coordinators: Ag, Stormwater, Wastewater, Forestry, Wetlands, and Streams Source Sector webinars: being scheduled for this spring and summer Your State and DC Partners! 38 Available Resources

39 Rich Batiuk Chair Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s BMP Verification Committee Associate Director for Science, Analysis and Implementation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 307 Annapolis, Maryland Work Mobile Home

Questions 40