Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 4 Mobilize Community Partnerships to Identify and Solve Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Planning 2 Resource Mobilization. Learning Objectives Identify and understand various sources of funds Understand how the strategic planning.
Advertisements

Heidi Deutsch, NACCHO PACE EH Summit Louisville, KY March 28-29, 2006
Local Public Health System Assessment
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 2 Diagnose and Investigate Health Problems and Health Hazards.
WELCOME. Objectives why MAPP is a long-term, system-wide paradigm shift in public health practice; who to involve; the benefits of the process; the phases.
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.
Local Immigration Partnerships: Systems Planning to Help People.
Public Health Core Functions
What do we do? Assessment Planning Education Outreach Information Intervention Research Convening Respond Collaboration Prevention Needs analysis Facilitation.
Principles of Standards and Measures
WELCOME _______________________________________________________________.
AAMC/CDC/Fullerton Sponsored Population Health Improvement Leadership Monday, January 5 th, :00-1:00 pm.
Performance Improvement Processes
VISION: All eligible facilities in Ontario receive the Baby-Friendly Initiative designation and other supporting facilities practice according to Baby-Friendly.
1 Glasgow Conference 2004 Enhancing the Student Experience in Scottish Higher Education.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
The 5 Characteristics Successful Nonprofits Have in Common
WELCOME. Connecting the Dots Using MAPP to Accomplish the Goals of Live Well, San Diego! County of San Diego Health and Human Services Wilma Wooten, M.D.,
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:8 Assure a Competent Public Health and Personal Healthcare Workforce.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service: 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify Community Health Problems.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.
Public Health Accreditation: County of San Diego HHSA’s Experience.
2012 Annual Meeting November 7, 2012 Dorchester House.
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.
Modern Public Health: Tools and Functions
Outcomes of Public Health
The Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Plan: An assessment of South Carolina’s efforts to reduce infant mortality and improve maternal and child health outcomes.
Children’s Mental Health: An Urgent Priority for Illinois.
Sector Partnerships in Toronto East/Toronto South LIP Presented by: Sandra Guerra Toronto South LIP WoodGreen Community Services July 30, 2012.
Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda Initiative Overview Common themes across plans Sector Plans Implementation Structure Next Steps.
Performance Standards: Opportunities for Quality Improvement for Maternal and Child Health Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
York District Local Public Health System Assessment Sharon Leahy-Lind District Public Health Liaison-York York District Public Health Sanford DHHS Office.
How to Build a Network. Overview: Recruiting and Mobilizing Community Organizations Together, the Steering Committee and the Community Action Team: Identify.
USERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN MENTAL HEALTH WORK. By Sylvester Katontoka
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:9 Evaluate Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Quality of Personal.
Introduction to MAPP Lowrie Ward, MPH, CPH Program Analyst, Accreditation Preparation & Quality Improvement National Association of County and City Health.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Rural Public Health Preparedness: Setting the Agenda for Change Michael Meit, MA, MPH, Director, University of Pittsburgh Center for Rural Health Practice;
Augusta Health Forum Specialty Providers Home Health Parks Economic Development Colleges Employers Nursing Homes Mental Health Drug Treatment Civic.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 7 Link People to Needed Personal Health Services and Assure the.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify Community Health Problems.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
WELCOME. Who’s Here? What is Public Health? Improving health is a shared responsibility not only of health care providers, and public health officials,
Ready communities... Ready communities... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Virginia’s Definition of School Readiness.
Building Partnerships to Enhance the Colorado Nursing Workforce.
Mobilizing for Action Through Planning and Partnership MAPP What the MAPP Process has taught US.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Arranging Assessments that Span Jurisdictions.
WELCOME. Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships: what is it and why should we care? National Association of County & City Health Officials.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.
EMS Technical Assessments for Critical Access Hospital Communities Mary Sheridan ORHP Grantee Partnership Meeting September 1, 2009 …improving access to.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:4 Mobilize Community Partnerships to Identify and Solve Health.
WELCOME. Nuts and Bolts of Community Assessment with MAPP Heidi M. Deutsch, MA MSDM National Association of County & City Health Officials Sue Grinnell.
NACDD Hill Day: Legislative Visits What to Expect Mari T. Brick, MA Program Consultant, NACDD
HMACommunityStrategies.com Data Friday Overview of Public Health February 12, 2016.
MAPP - What and Why?. MAPP is: A community-wide strategic planning tool for improving public health. A method to help communities prioritize public health.
Baccalaureate Education: Foundation for Public Health Nursing Practice—A Call to Action November, 2007 Baccalaureate Education: Foundation for Public Health.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
WELCOME.
WELCOME.
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
National one Health Strategy( )
Presentation transcript:

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 4 Mobilize Community Partnerships to Identify and Solve Health Problems

4.1.1 Does the LPHS have a process for identifying key constituents or stakeholders? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the LPHS maintain a current list of the names and contact information for individuals and key constituent groups? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Are new individuals/groups identified for constituency building? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Are key constituents identified for general health issues (i.e., improved health and quality of life at the community level)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Are key constituents identified for specific health concerns (i.e., a particular health theme, disease, risk factor, life stage need)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

4.1.2 Does the LPHS encourage the participation of constituents in improving community health? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS encourage constituents from the community-at-large to identify community issues and themes through a variety of means? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS support, through recruitment, promotion, and retention, opportunities for volunteers to help in community health improvement projects or activities? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

4.1.3 Does the LPHS maintain a current directory of organizations that comprise the LPHS? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Is the directory easily accessible? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

4.1.4 Does the LPHS use communications strategies to build awareness of the importance of public health? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do communications strategies exist for building awareness with the community-at-large? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do communications strategies exist for facilitating communication among organizations? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

4.2.1 Do partnerships exist in the community to maximize public health improvement activities? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Exchange information? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Alter or align activities related to the Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Conduct collaborative decision-making and action? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Optimize resources to deliver Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Share responsibilities to deliver Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Do organizations within these partnerships: Include a broad representation of the community (including representatives such as those listed in Discussion Toolbox)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

4.2.2 Does the LPHS have a broad-based community health improvement committee? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does this committee: Participate in the community health assessment process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does this committee: Participate in the implementation of a community health improvement process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does this committee: Monitor and evaluate progress toward prioritized goals? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does this committee: Leverage community resources? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does this committee: Meet on a regular basis? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

4.2.3 Does the LPHS review the effectiveness of community partnerships and strategic alliances developed to improve community health? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the review include: An assessment of the effectiveness of partnership participation in solving health problems? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the review include: Information on the satisfaction of constituents with partnership efforts? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the review include: An assessment of the expertise and system capacity needed to conduct partnership building activities? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the review include: Identification of actions to improve the partnership process and capacity? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Does the review include: Implementation of actions recommended to improve the partnership process and capacity? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) :10

Schools Recreation Centers Employers Transit Elected Officials Doctors EMS Law Enforcement Nursing Homes Fire Corrections Mental Health Faith Institutions Civic Groups Non-Profit Organizations Neighborhood Organizations Laboratories Home Health Community Health Centers Hospitals Tribal Health Drug Treatment Public Health Agency Thank You!