Consumer Involvement in Evaluating a Recovery-based Systems Change Initiative Vicki Cousins, Director Office of Consumer Affairs South Carolina Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Advertisements

Development and Implementation of a Recovery-Based System: Comparison of Instruments for Assessing Recovery Jeanette M. Jerrell, Ph.D. Professor of Neuropsychiatry,
Mentoring/Succession Program Elva M
Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Turning Information Into Health.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Neami Limited The Role of NGOs in the Provision of Community Mental Health Services.
Youth Outcome Questionnaire & Arkansas Indicators Compliance Rates and Satisfaction with Services Kazi Ahmed Paula Stone October 18, 2012.
1 Prevention & Early Intervention – Early Start Stigma & Discrimination Workgroup Proposal Debbie Innes-Gomberg and Eduardo Vega Delegates Stakeholders.
Introduction to Consumer Operated Service Programs
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
1 Consumer/Family Satisfaction Teams (C/FST): Harriet Baum, Executive Director NAMI Southwestern Pennsylvania New Directions in Consumer and Family Involvement.
1 South Carolina Department of Mental Health Tri-County Community Mental Health Center Marlboro, Chesterfield, and Dillon Counties Dr. Teresa Rhodes
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
DHSS DSAMH Department of Health and Social Services Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Jeff Grosvenor, Interim Director
Domestic Violence And Rape Crisis Center of Scotland County Domestic Violence And Rape Crisis Center of Scotland County.
South West Experience. How we went about Different Perspectives Findings Questions But first …………………..
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2012 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services January,
EARNING A LIVING: WORK, MENTAL ILLNESS AND RECOVERY Johnson & Johnson-Dartmouth Family Advocacy Project for IPS Supported Employment NAMI NATIONAL September.
Promotores de Salud as New approach to the African American in the County of San Bernardino A partnership between two Community Based Organizations in.
Public Health Social Work in North Carolina
Organizational Readiness For Using Peer Supports Presented by Patrick Hendry Senior Director, Consumer Advocacy Mental Health America Webinar May 9, 2014.
The Australian Mental Health System Nathan Smyth Mental Health and Workforce Division The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.
Greater Bay Area Mental Health & Education Workforce Collaborative Health Workforce Initiative May 22, 2013.
A Pennsylvania and New Jersey Collaboration 2012.
The Office for Disability & Mental Health Bairbre Nic Aongusa, Director Presentation to IASE Conference, 9 October 2009.
FAMILY PEER SUPPORT SERVICES OMH Children’s Division of Integrated Community Services May 19, 2015 Presentation to New York State Success Membership.
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency An Overview.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
National Alliance on Mental Illness Wednesday, July 27, 2011 Chris Bouneff
Identifying Effective Practice-Based Strategies for Engaging Families and Youth Bill Hobstetter & Carol Cecil Kentucky Partnership for Families and Children.
Grading America’s Public Mental Health System – Cloudy Skies, Silver Lining on the Horizon? Mary Giliberti Director of Public Policy and Advocacy, NAMI.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2011 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
Stephanie Hull MGA Conference Chief, Long Term Services and Supports June 7, 2012 Maryland Department of Aging.
Presented by Vicki M. Young, PhD October 19,
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
5 th Annual Housing Institute June , 2012.
Education, Training & Workforce Update FSP Training for Small Counties June 29, 2007 By Toni Tullys, MPA, Project Director, Regional Workforce Development,
The Life of a Policy Council Member
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
Health Care Reform Primary Care and Behavioral Health Integration John O’Brien Senior Advisor on Health Financing SAMHSA.
Recovery Connections February 28, Project Foundation Client and family consultation project (January – March 2012) Input from 250+ client and family.
MENTAL HEALTH FIRST AID A Collaborative Partnership of National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare, Maryland State Department of.
NASHP State Health Policy Conference October 2010 Julia Kenny Assistant Secretary Office for Citizens with Developmental Disabilities Louisiana Department.
Substance Abuse Prevention & Treatment SAPT + County Behavioral Health Directors Association of California March 25 – 26, 2015.
for quality and accountability
1 CMHS Block Grant Peer Reviews Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council California Mental Health Planning Council April.
SAMHSA’s Focus on the Military & Military Families: The Role of the Mid-America ATTC Pat Stilen, LCSW | Director, Mid-America ATTC October 28, 2010.
1 Standardized Needs Assessment Update PA Office of Developmental Programs July 12, 2007.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: Results of Two Interim Evaluations in Texas College on Problems of Drug College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
Developing a Community Based Recovery Resource Center Ijeoma Achara Joe Schultz Bev Haberle.
Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Developing Shared Goals in Public Health, Coalition Building, and District Partnership Success Chronic Disease University.
Educating Social Workers in Evidence Based Practice and Treatments in Mental Health The NY State Social Work in Mental Health Consortium Nancy J. Smyth,
COUNTY INTEGRATION PLANNING County of San Diego Karen Ventimiglia, MHSA Coordinator May 17,
United Way of Mid Coast Maine Mental Health Initiative Presentation to Midcoast District Coordinating Council March 8, 2011.
1 Health Service Reform: Implications for the Disability Sector Presentation to NFPBA 25 th July 2005 James O’Grady National Manager for Disability Services.
1 Career Transition Staff Disability Training Sylvia Domagalski Regional Disability Consultant.
1 Developing Partnerships Between Healthcare and Business Together we can make a difference The Lowndes County Partnership for Health.
1 Technical Assistance Project Update Sonja Armbruster Public Health Initiatives Coordinator Center for Community Support and Research 10/30/2013.
Update on Medicaid Integration in SW Washington January 7, 2016 Erin Hafer, MPH Director, New Programs Integration & Network Development.
Peer Support in Behavioral Health Presentation to the Mental Health Caucus Adrienne Shilton, CBHDA April 20, 2016.
Meredith O’Boyle, LCSW Vice President, Behavioral Health, Bailey House Behavioral Health Center Lauren Pallies, LMSW Vice President, Integrated Heath &
Maria Fuentes, MSW Senior Services Manager
OT 460A Week 2: 9/4/12 Client and family perspectives
CEO Report Board Meeting BCEO Meeting
Certified Peer Specialist
Oregon Supported Employment Center for Excellence (OSECE)
Presentation transcript:

Consumer Involvement in Evaluating a Recovery-based Systems Change Initiative Vicki Cousins, Director Office of Consumer Affairs South Carolina Department of Mental Health Katherine M. Roberts, MPH Coordinator, Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Team South Carolina Department of Mental Health

Words to Live By in South Carolina Nothing About Us Without Us Consumer Involvement in Four Key Areas Planning Planning Policy-making Policy-making Service Provision Service Provision Program Evaluation Program Evaluation

Consumer Involvement in Planning and Policy-making Central Administration Offices Central Administration Offices Regional Service Sites Regional Service Sites (Community Mental Health Centers in 17 locations serving 46 counties)

Consumer Involvement in Planning and Policy-making New SCDMH consumer-centered policies/directives being developed as a result of our systems emphasis on recovery.

Consumer Involvement in Service Provision Following Larry Fricks Georgia model, South Carolina has developed a Medicaid-billable service description for peer support 40-hr. certification training for consumers to become credentialed as CPSS 40-hr. certification training for consumers to become credentialed as CPSS Includes oral and written examination Includes oral and written examination Final approval from DHSS expected July 1, 2003 Final approval from DHSS expected July 1, graduates to date; trainings to be year twice a year 10 graduates to date; trainings to be year twice a year

Consumer Involvement in Program Evaluation SCDMH Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Team Several Years in the Making 1996 … … 2002 Found our place in the systems … 2002 Found our place in the systems recovery initiative

The Purpose of Consumer Involvement Surgeon Generals Report 1999 Consumer staff, clients, and the mental health system all benefit from consumer involvement.

The Purpose of Consumer Involvement a Mental Health System Surgeon Generals Report 1999 Consumer Staff meaningful activity or employment meaningful activity or employment role models of recovery role models of recovery enhance sensitivity of the service system enhance sensitivity of the service system

The Purpose of Consumer Involvement a Mental Health System Service system benefits: Increases in service satisfaction as related to peoples recovery needs Increases in service satisfaction as related to peoples recovery needs Reduced hospitalizations Reduced hospitalizations Cost-savings in community program operating costs Cost-savings in community program operating costs (Chamberlin & Rogers, 1990; Carpinello & Knight, 1993)

SCDMH Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Team Project Mission To involve individuals who receive services, family members, independent advocates and citizens-at-large in program evaluation and continuous quality improvement of the South Carolina Department of Mental Health.

SCDMH Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Team Office of Consumer Affairs, Division of Health Care Reform Office of Consumer Affairs, Division of Health Care Reform Consumer-driven evaluation survey process Consumer-driven evaluation survey process Primary consumer team members Primary consumer team members Paid employees of SCDMH Paid employees of SCDMH Participates in instrument development Participates in instrument development Conducts interviews, compiles data, and produces reports Conducts interviews, compiles data, and produces reports

History of Consumer Involvement in Evaluation For several years in the late 1990s, the Team conducted open-ended surveys with over 900 clients, striving to evaluate individual CMHC programs. For several years in the late 1990s, the Team conducted open-ended surveys with over 900 clients, striving to evaluate individual CMHC programs. Starting in 2002, a fast evolution began as the emphasis shifted from program evaluation to system evaluation. Survey questions became closed ended. Starting in 2002, a fast evolution began as the emphasis shifted from program evaluation to system evaluation. Survey questions became closed ended.

History of Recovery Measurement in South Carolina March 2002: Formal planning process for recovery system evaluation begins. Expert researchers partner with the CCET. March 2002: Formal planning process for recovery system evaluation begins. Expert researchers partner with the CCET. June 2002: Consumer focus groups, staff surveys June 2002: Consumer focus groups, staff surveys August–October 2002: Surveying to test for validity and reliability August–October 2002: Surveying to test for validity and reliability

Instruments MHSIP MHSIP Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Scale (CCET) Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Scale (CCET) Recovery Questionnaire Recovery Questionnaire

South Carolina Consumers Define Recovery Focus Groups What does it mean to be in recovery or recovered from mental illness? What does it mean to be in recovery or recovered from mental illness? What helps a person recover from mental illness? What helps a person recover from mental illness? What prevents a person from recovering from mental illness? What prevents a person from recovering from mental illness?

Recovery Questionnaire Domains (10) from the Focus Groups Hope - Self-esteem - Housing Hope - Self-esteem - Housing Employment - Stigma - Self-management Skills Employment - Stigma - Self-management Skills Empowerment/Independence/Self Empowerment/Independence/SelfResponsibility/Control Relationships - Social Relationships - Social Relationships - Family Relationships - Family Spirituality/Higher Power/Religion Spirituality/Higher Power/Religion

Sample Size Plan A: Sample consisted of 50 adult clients with open cases in all 17 community mental health centers. Plan A: Sample consisted of 50 adult clients with open cases in all 17 community mental health centers. Expectation: 25 (425) would complete the initial survey and half of that number would agree to be resurveyed 2 to 4 weeks later. Plan A Results: <10% available to participate. Plan B: Asked for available adult clients with open cases to volunteer. Plan B: Asked for available adult clients with open cases to volunteer.

Method Informed consent attained. Informed consent attained. Initial face-to-face interviews conducted by CCET team members. Initial face-to-face interviews conducted by CCET team members. Follow-up surveys were conducted either face-to- face or by phone. The process was the choice of the client. Follow-up surveys were conducted either face-to- face or by phone. The process was the choice of the client.

Incentives for Client Participation Each client received a button, a $5 McDonalds gift certificate, and a certificate of appreciation signed by the SC State Mental Health Director, George P. Gintoli, for the initial interview. Each client received a button, a $5 McDonalds gift certificate, and a certificate of appreciation signed by the SC State Mental Health Director, George P. Gintoli, for the initial interview. On the second interview, clients received 2 more buttons and an additional gift certificate. On the second interview, clients received 2 more buttons and an additional gift certificate.

Process 400+ clients were surveyed/resurveyed from mid-August through mid-October clients were surveyed/resurveyed from mid-August through mid-October Scannable forms were reviewed and prepared for data entry. Scannable forms were reviewed and prepared for data entry. All analysis was conducted in a de-identified manner. All analysis was conducted in a de-identified manner.

Analysis The psychometric properties of the MHSIP, the Recovery Questionnaire, and the Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Scale included: Item-to-Scale Correlations Item-to-Scale Correlations Test-Retest Reliability Test-Retest Reliability

Results Based on the research, changes were made to the Based on the research, changes were made to the Recovery Questionnaire and to the Consumer-to- Consumer Evaluation Scale. The Recovery Questionnaire is presently being used by The Recovery Questionnaire is presently being used by SC Share in South Carolina to evaluate their Recovery for Life program. Plans are underway by South Carolinas Columbia Area Plans are underway by South Carolinas Columbia Area MH Center, the largest community mental health center, to utilize the Recovery Questionnaire in June 2003.

Lessons Learned Challenging to go to a full-system survey approach in a limited time period – 2 times in 8 weeks - from individual program site assignments. Challenging to go to a full-system survey approach in a limited time period – 2 times in 8 weeks - from individual program site assignments. Dramatic increase in consumer hours, conflicted with consumers Medicaid benefits, stressed Team Members. Dramatic increase in consumer hours, conflicted with consumers Medicaid benefits, stressed Team Members. But still … state car break-downs, a crash, But still … state car break-downs, a crash, getting lost, getting sick, losing surveyors … It was a terrific learning experience with … It was a terrific learning experience with positive outcomes. We survived it all.

Consumer Involvement in Evaluating a Recovery-based Systems Change Initiative Vicki Cousins, Director Office of Consumer Affairs South Carolina Department of Mental Health Katherine M. Roberts, MPH Coordinator, Consumer-to-Consumer Evaluation Team South Carolina Department of Mental Health