November 10, 2010 Administrative Program Review at Boston College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
We ACT Leadership Team Meeting Friday, February 7 th, 2014.
Advertisements

SHELLY POTTS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Mechanisms.
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
Supervisor Orientation
WASC Report Board of Trustees February 2010 Diane Jonte-Pace Vice Provost Chair, Re-accreditation Self Study.
Organizational Performance Self Assessments at DOI An Entry-Level Approach based on the President’s Quality Award Criteria Norma Campbell Alan Turco Office.
System Office Performance Management
1 14. Project closure n An information system project must be administratively closed once its product is successfully delivered to the customer. n A failed.
Financial Model ‘An integrated model for STFC’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.1 Project Manager: Mark Affonso Project Champion: Jane Tirard.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
System Office Performance Management
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
SCC EHR Workshop for Contractors: Implementation Considerations May 25, 2011.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Carrie Lee Herndon Solutions Group WaterSmart Innovations ‘09 August 12, 2010.
NAVIGATING THE WATERS: USING ASSESSMENT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE Amy Harper, Area Coordinator, Fordham University Greer Jason, PhD, Assistant Dean of Students,
Strategic Objectives 2011 January 14, Growth of Aligned Programs ObjectiveAccountabilityProcessOutput/ Outcome Status Report Enhance and expand.
Qatar Planning Council 1 Best Statistical Information to Support Qatar’s Progress Statistical Capacity Building for Information Society in Qatar.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Robert M. Worley II Director, Education Service VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Department of Veterans Affairs 2013 CCME Annual Symposium February 26,
The Power of Community A Roundtable Session facilitated by Christie Huck, City Garden Montessori School, St. Louis, Missouri Better Together: Community.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Do We Dare Slow Down? Taking the Time to Assess Judith Olson-Fallon Lori Young James Eller.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Presenters: Bonnie Ann Dowd, CBO San Diego Community College District Chris Hill, Grossmont College Aimee Myers, Sierra College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida,
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
3 CX Best Practices to Keep Your Customers Coming Back © Primary Intelligence, Inc
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Scott Butson District Technology Manager. Provide professional to all district staff Professional development has been provided on a regular basis to.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Information Call April 29, Today’s Call –BCPSQC –Aim & Objectives –Overview of Quality Academy –Curriculum –Supports and Benefits of Participation.
Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign & Innovation University of Maryland, University College.
Office of Human Resources1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2008 AT HKS.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Council for the Advancement of Standards Student Leadership Programs September 14 th, 2012.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Illuminating Britelite’s Internal Services for Success Strategy for Process Improvement.
Mickey Slimp, Executive Director, Northeast Texas Consortium of Colleges & Universities Rich Gross, Executive Vice President, the Clements Group Ronda.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
Best Practices Performance Measurement for Governing Boards and Commissions Prepared for training presented in April 2008.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.
S AM H OUSTON S TATE U NIVERSITY O FFICE OF I NSTITUTIONAL E FFECTIVENESS A DMINISTRATIVE P ROGRAM R EVIEW.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
This webinar featured David Quigley, Provost, and Michael Lochhead, Executive Vice President. Periodically, the University embarks on a strategic.
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
IT Governance Planning Overview
Sam Houston State University
Institution Name.
Business Services Goals and Objectives for /20/2019.
Sam Houston State University
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

November 10, 2010 Administrative Program Review at Boston College

1.Introduction of the Administrative Program Review (APR) 2.High-level review of the program and its processes 3.Discussion of how Facilities organizations can use APR for assessment and planning activities Today’s Objectives

What is Administrative Program Review? For the University: APR is a developmental process of on-going reviews that involve systematic assessment, planning, and improvement across administrative units at Boston College. For Departments: APR is a set of activities designed to help managers and employees examine their department’s current operations, make adjustments and establish plans for continuous improvements.

Status of APR Activities to Date »Started in 2006: Year 4 of a 7-Year Cycle »21 departments out of 47 departments »6 – 8 reviews /year during steady-state »Functional areas: AthleticsHuman Resources Auxiliary ServicesInformation Technology EVP AreaStudent Affairs Facilities ServicesUniversity Advancement Financial VP Area

APR Activities and Projected Timeline Preparation & Kick-Off Self-Study External Review Implementation & Follow-Up Action Plan April – May June – February February - April April - June

APR Teams and Deliverables External Reviewers Department Team Self-Study Report External Reviewers’ Report Self-Study Team Action Plan

APR Activities and Projected Timeline Preparation & Kick-Off Self-Study External Review Implementation & Follow-Up Action Plan April – May June – February February - April April - June Trades Grounds Mail Services Housekeeping

APR Organizational Structure Executive Sponsorship EVP & VPs Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment APR Director Logistical Support Data Support Departments Under Review Internal Team Members Department Managers Self-Study Team Department Members External Team Members Outside Area Experts

1.Introduction of the Administrative Program Review (APR) 2.High-level review of the program and its processes 3.Discussion of how Facilities organizations can use APR for assessment and planning activities Today’s Objectives

External Reviewer Perspective “Participating as an external reviewer was an excellent educational opportunity. It was like participating in a 3 day case study”

External Reviewer Benefits »Learn a great deal about another Facilities Organization »Learn a great deal from BC review team and the other external reviewers »Excellent networking opportunity »Provides a new perspective for your own organization »The experience is refreshing

Facilities Services Perspective »Top-to-Bottom look at programs and operations »Examining mission, scope and services »Face-time with VP and EVP »Access to peer institutions and experts »Feedback from customers and constituencies »Connections to University mission and plans »Using data to justify plans and changes »Getting staff involved in improving service

Facilities Services Results and Outcomes »Creating a transportation department »Reorganizing staff, schedules & patterns »Installing new software technology »Adjusting space to meet customer needs »Establishing a single point-of-contact »Implementing standardized inspection program »Expanding single-stream recycling »Developing a training program »Redirecting package delivery from ResHalls

Summary of Key Strengths »Executive sponsorship »Developmental approach »Managed by the departments »Mix of internal and external expertise »Alignment with university mission »Pro-active planning and continuous improvement »Mechanism for tracking on-going progress »Management and employee development

Thanks for Attending this Session! Facilities Services Department Office of Administrative Program Review Boston College 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill, MA