How many different units of length can you think of?

Units of length? Light year, parsec, AU, mile, furlong, fathom, yard, feet, inches, Angstroms, nautical miles, cubits, cm, mm, km, μm, nm

The SI system of units There are seven fundamental base units which are clearly defined and on which all other derived units are based: You need to know these, but not their definitions.

The metre This is the unit of distance. It is the distance traveled by light in a vacuum in a time of 1/ seconds.

The second This is the unit of time. A second is the duration of full oscillations of the electromagnetic radiation emitted in a transition between two hyperfine energy levels in the ground state of a caesium-133 atom.

The ampere This is the unit of electrical current. It is defined as that current which, when flowing in two parallel conductors 1 m apart, produces a force of 2 x N on a length of 1 m of the conductors. Note that the Coulomb is NOT a base unit.

The kelvin This is the unit of temperature. It is 1/ of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water.

The mole One mole of a substance contains as many molecules as there are atoms in 12 g of carbon-12. This special number of molecules is called Avogadro’s number and equals 6.02 x

The candela (not used in IB) This is the unit of luminous intensity. It is the intensity of a source of frequency 5.40 x Hz emitting 1/683 W per steradian.

The kilogram This is the unit of mass. It is the mass of a certain quantity of a platinum-iridium alloy kept at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures in France. THE kilogram!

SI Base Units QuantityUnit distancemetre timesecond currentampere temperaturekelvin quantity of substancemole luminous intensitycandela masskilogram Can you copy this please? Note: No Newton or Coulomb

Derived units Other physical quantities have units that are combinations of the fundamental units. Speed = distance/time = m.s -1 Acceleration = m.s -2 Force = mass x acceleration = kg.m.s -2 (called a Newton) (note in IB we write m.s -1 rather than m/s)

Some important derived units (learn these!) 1 N = kg.m.s -2 (F = ma) 1 J = kg.m 2.s -2 (W = Force x distance) 1 W = kg.m 2.s -3 (Power = energy/time) Guess what

Prefixes It is sometimes useful to express units that are related to the basic ones by powers of ten

Prefixes PowerPrefixSymbolPowerPrefixSymbol attoa10 1 dekada femtof10 2 hectoh picop10 3 kilok nanon10 6 megaM microμ10 9 gigaG millim10 12 teraT centic10 15 petaP decid10 18 exaE

Prefixes PowerPrefixSymbolPowerPrefixSymbol attoa10 1 dekada femtof10 2 hectoh picop10 3 kilok nanon10 6 megaM microμ10 9 gigaG millim10 12 teraT centic10 15 petaP decid10 18 exaE Don’t worry! These will all be in the formula book you have for the exam.

Examples 3.3 mA = 3.3 x A 545 nm = 545 x m = 5.45 x m 2.34 MW = 2.34 x 10 6 W

Checking equations If an equation is correct, the units on one side should equal the units on another. We can use base units to help us check.

Checking equations For example, the period of a pendulum is given by T = 2π l where l is the length in metres g and g is the acceleration due to gravity. In units m= s 2 = s m.s -2

Let’s try some questions for a change Tsokos Page 6 Questions 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 26, 29. Can you finish these for Monday 11/9/12 please?

Let’s do some measuring! Do the measurements yourselves, but leave space in your table of results to record the measurements of 4 other people from the group

Errors/Uncertainties

In EVERY measurement (as opposed to simply counting) there is an uncertainty in the measurement. This is sometimes determined by the apparatus you're using, sometimes by the nature of the measurement itself.

Estimating uncertainty As Physicists we need to have an idea of the size of the uncertainty in each measurement The intelligent ones are always the cutest.

Individual measurements When using an analogue scale, the uncertainty is plus or minus half the smallest scale division. (in a best case scenario!) 4.20 ± 0.05 cm

Individual measurements When using an analogue scale, the uncertainty is plus or minus half the smallest scale division. (in a best case scenario!) 22.0 ± 0.5 V

Individual measurements When using a digital scale, the uncertainty is plus or minus the smallest unit shown ± 0.01 V

Repeated measurements When we take repeated measurements and find an average, we can find the uncertainty by finding the difference between the highest and lowest measurement and divide by two.

Repeated measurements - Example Pascal measured the length of 5 supposedly identical tables. He got the following results; 1560 mm, 1565 mm, 1558 mm, 1567 mm, 1558 mm Average value = 1563 mm Uncertainty = (1567 – 1558)/2 = 4.5 mm Length of table = 1563 ± 5 mm This means the actual length is anywhere between 1558 and 1568 mm

Average of the differences Imagine you got the following results for resistance (in Ohms) 13.2, 14.2, 12.3, 15.2, 13.1, 12.2.

Precision and Accuracy The same thing?

Precision A man’s height was measured several times using a laser device. All the measurements were very similar and the height was found to be ± 0.01 cm This is a precise result (high number of significant figures, small range of measurements)

Accuracy Height of man = ± 0.01cm This is a precise result, but not accurate (near the “real value”) because the man still had his shoes on.

Accuracy The man then took his shoes off and his height was measured using a ruler to the nearest centimetre. Height = 182 ± 1 cm This is accurate (near the real value) but not precise (only 3 significant figures)

Precise and accurate The man’s height was then measured without his socks on using the laser device. Height = ± 0.01 cm This is precise (high number of significant figures) AND accurate (near the real value)

Precision and Accuracy Precise – High number of significent figures. Repeated measurements are similar Accurate – Near to the “real” value

Random errors/uncertainties Some measurements do vary randomly. Some are bigger than the actual/real value, some are smaller. This is called a random uncertainty. Finding an average can produce a more reliable result in this case.

Systematic/zero errors Sometimes all measurements are bigger or smaller than they should be by the same amount. This is called a systematic error/uncertainty. (An error which is identical for each reading )

Systematic/zero errors This is normally caused by not measuring from zero. For example when you all measured Mr Porter’s height without taking his shoes off! For this reason they are also known as zero errors/uncertainties. Finding an average doesn’t help.

Systematic/zero errors Systematic errors are sometimes hard to identify and eradicate.

Uncertainties In the example with the table, we found the length of the table to be 1563 ± 5 mm We say the absolute uncertainty is 5 mm The fractional uncertainty is 5/1563 = The percentage uncertainty is 5/1563 x 100 = 0.3%

Uncertainties If the average height of students at BSW is 1.23 ± 0.01 m We say the absolute uncertainty is 0.01 m The fractional uncertainty is 0.01/1.23 = The percentage uncertainty is 0.01/1.23 x 100 = 0.8%

Let’s try some questions.

Let’s read! Pages 7 to 10 of Hamper/Ord ‘SL Physics’

Combining uncertainties When we find the volume of a block, we have to multiply the length by the width by the height. Because each measurement has an uncertainty, the uncertainty increases when we multiply the measurements together.

Combining uncertainties When multiplying (or dividing) quantities, to find the resultant uncertainty we have to add the percentage (or fractibnal) uncertainties of the quantities we are multiplying.

Combining uncertainties Example: A block has a length of 10.0 ± 0.1 cm, width 5.0 ± 0.1 cm and height 6.0 ± 0.1 cm. Volume = 10.0 x 5.0 x 6.0 = 300 cm 3 % uncertainty in length = 0.1/10 x 100 = 1% % uncertainty in width = 0.1/5 x 100 = 2 % % uncertainty in height = 0.1/6 x 100 = 1.7 % Uncertainty in volume = 1% + 2% + 1.7% = 4.7% (4.7% of 300 = 14) Volume = 300 ± 14 cm 3 This means the actual volume could be anywhere between 286 and 314 cm 3

Combining uncertainties When adding (or subtracting) quantities, to find the resultant uncertainty we have to add the absolute uncertainties of the quantities we are multiplying.

Combining uncertainties One basketball player has a height of 196 ± 1 cm and the other has a height of 152 ± 1 cm. What is the difference in their heights? Difference = 44 ± 2 cm

Who’s going to win? New York Times Latest opinion poll Bush 48% Gore 52% Gore will win! Uncertainty = ± 5%

Who’s going to win? New York Times Latest opinion poll Bush 48% Gore 52% Gore will win! Uncertainty = ± 5%

Who’s going to win? New York Times Latest opinion poll Bush 48% Gore 52% Gore will win! Uncertainty = ± 5%

Who’s going to win Bush = 48 ± 5 % = between 43 and 53 % Gore = 52 ± 5 % = between 47 and 57 % We can’t say! (If the uncertainty is greater than the difference)

Let’s try some more questions!

Error bars X = 0.6 ± 0.1 Y = 0.5 ± 0.1

Gradients

Minimum gradient

Maximum gradient

y = mx + c

Hooke’s law F = kx

Hooke’s law F = kx F (N) x (m)

Kinetic energy E k = ½mv 2

y = mx + c E k = ½mv 2 E k (J) V 2 (m 2.s -2 )

Period of a pendulum T = 2π l g

Period of a pendulum T = 2π l g T (s) l ½ (m ½ )

Period of a pendulum T = 2π l g T 2 (s) l (m)

Let’s try an investigation Can you read the sheets that Mr Porter is giving you?

Data collection and processing Heading, Units, Uncertainties Decimal places consistent between data and also with uncertainties Repeated measurements Averages (with uncertainties) Graph(s) with units and labels Lines of best fit – maximum and minimum gradients if possible/required

Homework Complete „Oscillating Mass” investigation. Due Monday 26th September