Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Types & Sources Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
SFMTA / SJSU Copartnership Kickoff 10 | 15 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Historic Car number 1 and 162.
National Transit Database Annual Reporting. New Reporting System ( “NTD 2.0 ” ) Monthly ridership was first operational module – Reporting started October.
PASSENGER O-D TRIP TABLE FROM FAREBOX RECEIPTS Kelly Chan 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, October 16, 2013.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Effective Utilization of Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS) Technology 19th Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and Training.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Capacity Unit 3: Measuring & Maximizing Capacity.
Multiple-operator Transit Traveler Information New York State Department of Transportation From TRIPS123 to 511 NY.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Agenda Define Efficiency. Where do we start? –Expenditures –Revenue Establish Performance Indicators. Cost savings measures. Things to think about. Bottom.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
APTS – Fourth Day Miscellaneous Topics. Fleet Management Fixed Route versus Paratransit Operations versus Maintenance.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Presented on January 20, ◦ Services 2 3 fixed routes, 1 bus 23 vans, 19 daily vehicle runs.
ShopKeeper was designed from the ground up to manage your entire fleet maintenance operations … from 1 user to 100, including full security features that.
The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.
“IF YOU CAN MANAGE IT, YOU CAN MEASURE IT” Robert Hudson, Performance Analyst Dept. Planning/Office of Research & Analysis.
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
Multi-Operator Transit Information for Operations and Planning Transit Service Information Portal (TSIP)
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
WYDOT Transit Program Reporting 101 June 16, 2011 Taylor J. Rossetti Joni Kithas Harlan.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 19:Cost Models for Public Transportation.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 23: Transit System Performance Evaluation.
Using APC Data for NTD Reporting APC University, Houston, Texas 16 October, 2014 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning Federal Transit Administration.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
TRANSMILENIO ENRIQUE LILLO EMME/2 UGM May Bogotá n 7 million people n Mean annual population growth of 4,5 % over the last 10 years n 25 % of Colombian.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Course Overview Unit 1: Introduction.
Model Validation of Transit Ridership at the Corridor and Transit Route Level by Mark Charnews October 19, 2006.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
S.A.T.U.R.N. Simulation and Analysis Tools for Urban Automated Rapid Transit Networks.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
BIC 2013 National Conference Presented By: Tim Quinn, Executive Vice President Date: 27 October, 2013 Time: 15:00 to 16:00 Social Media, Accelerating IT.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
PPTA - April 2016 A CT 44 D ATA R EPORTING QC P LAN E LEMENTS, T HEMES AND O PPORTUNITIES.
CUTA FACT BOOK WORKSHOP
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM W1
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Office of Research and Analysis
School of Civil Engineering
National Transit Database Reporting Requirements
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Types & Sources Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Outline Types of transit data Manual data collection Automated data collection

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TYPES OF TRANSIT DATA We need to quantify and characterize our systems with different

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Is Only As Good As Your Data We need accurate data to make appropriate decisions for transit service. What if we were considering adding a new line to a transit system? – What information would we need to know to make appropriate design decisions?

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood What Data is Needed to Maintain Good Service? 7 Demands of Useful Service How Transit Services Them It takes me where I want to go. It takes me when I want to go. It is a good use of my time. It is a good use of my money. It respects me. I can trust it. It gives me freedom (to change my plans). Stops/ Stations Connectivity FrequencySpan Speed or Delay Fares CivilityReliability Simplicity /Presentation

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Three Main Types of Data System Level Data – Entire operational overview – Useful for long-range planning, comparing service to similar regions Route Level Data – Characteristics of specific routes – Useful for long-range planning, service planning, route optimization Trip Level Data – Specific details of trips made on transit system – Useful for service planning, route optimization

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Quality Improvement Cycles Archive Data Analyze Performance and Demand Service Plan Transit Operation Automated Data Gathering Operational Control & Passenger Info Real- time loop Off-line loop

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood System Level: National Transit Database (NTD) Established by Congress (Title 49 USC 5335a) Primary source for statistics on transit in US FTA grantees required to submit data >660 providers currently report to NTD Data used to apportion > $5 billion FTA funds Freely and publically available

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood 2011 National Transit Profile Does this look familiar?

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood What is in the NTD? Modules include: – Safety and Security – Financials Capital funds, operating expenses, operator wages – Assets Stations and maintenance facilities, transit way mileage, revenue vehicles – Resources Number of employees, energy consumption – Transit Service (Supplied and Consumed) Vehicle revenue miles, Vehicle revenue hours, unlinked passenger trips, passenger miles traveled

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood NTD Glossary (Expenses) Capital Expenses = purchase of equipment – Useful life > one year and Greater than $5,000 – Includes Facilities (Guideway, Passenger Stations, Administration Buildings, Maintenance), Rolling Stock (vehicles), Other Equipment Operating Expenses = operation of the agency – Function (Vehicle Operations, Vehicle Maintenance, Non- Vehicle Maintenance, General Administration) – Object Class (Salary&Wages+Fringe= Compensation, Services, Materials and Supplies, Utilities, Casualty and Liability, Purchased Transportation, Other)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood NTD Glossary (Service Consumed) Unlinked Passenger Trips = boardings Passenger Miles = cumulative sum of the distances ridden by each passenger Average Trip Length = avg distance ridden for = passenger miles / unlinked passenger trips Average Passenger Load = avg # pass aboard a vehicle at any one time

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood NTD Glossary (Service Supplied) Average Speed = miles / hours in revenue service Revenue Service = operation when passengers can board and ride on the vehicle Vehicle Total Miles = all miles from pull out to pull in, including "deadhead" Vehicle Revenue Miles = miles in revenue service Vehicle Total Hours = hours from pull out to pull in, including "deadhead" Vehicle Revenue Hours = hours in revenue service

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood NTD Glossary (Service Supplied) Revenue Vehicle = vehicle in fleet available to operate in revenue service including spares and out for maintenance Vehicles Available for Maximum Service = vehicles agency has available to operate revenue Vehicles Operated Maximum Service = largest # vehicles operated at any one time Base Period Requirement = vehicles needed to serve the base (all- day) transit service Peak-to-Base Ratio = Max Service / Base Period Percent Spares = (Veh Available – Veh Operated) / Veh Operated

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood NTD Performance Measures Service Efficiency – Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile – Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Hour Service Effectiveness – Operating Expense per Passenger Mile – Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip Service Effectiveness – Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile – Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Hour

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood IN-CLASS EXERCISE Head to to complete the

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route and Trip Levels Are Similar We describe unlinked passenger trips with – Route Stop Locations – Route Scheduling & Efficiency – Volumes of Passengers – Access/ Egress Locations – Travel and Boarding Times – Trip Purposes Two ways to collect this detailed data – Manually – Automatically Exact Characteristics Depend on Application

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood MANUAL DATA COLLECTION Engineers can tailor route and trip analyses through

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Manual Procedure Considerations Instruments: – Pencil/paper – Hand-held units Route Selection: – 100 percent – Sample Type of “Checks”: – Ride check: on-board the vehicle – Point checks: at a specific location Surveys also used (at trip-level)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Ride Checks Captures an entire route in detail Data collection is done on-board Checkers counts the number of boardings, alightings, & thru-passengers at each stop Distance between each stop may also be recorded Output: Route-level & Stop-level ridership data

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Ride Check Data Sheet - Example

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Ride Check - Basic Calculations 1.Total Unlinked Passenger Trips on the Route = Sum of all Boardings 2.Load Profile for the Route = Cumulative Stop – Cumulative Stop  Peak (maximum) load along the route  Average load along the route 3.Passenger Miles Traveled on the Route = Sum of Stop-Level Load * Distance between Stops

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Example Load Profile Peak Load Point: 47 Pax Average Load: 24 Pax

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Point Checks Data collection is done at one (or more) stops along a route Number of passengers on the vehicle is recorded Often conducted at high (peak) load points along a route

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Surveys Travel surveys are used to estimate complete origin-destination patterns Questions include boarding location, alighting location, transfer location More next lecture

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood AUTOMATED DATA COLLECTION Transit operators are increasingly relying on new technologies…

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Automated Data Sources 1.Automated Fare Collection (AFC) 2.Automated Passenger Counters (APC) 3.Automated Vehicle Location (AVL) Archived data from AFC and AVL systems is an important byproduct of installing these systems.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Automated Fare Collection (AFC) Magnetic stripe & smart cards Smart card systems have unique ID that provides entry (exit) information at the individual level – Data not available in real-time (coming soon!) Magnetic stripe and smart cards together can produce station/stop level data – Rail gateline counts – Bus fare boxes (operator often punches a key indicating other fare types, such as free passes)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Smart Card Example: OD Estimation AM Inbound trip: tap-in at “origin” PM Outbound trip: tap-in at “destination” Infer that passenger is traveling from Brookhaven to Midtown and back AM Tap at Brookhaven PM Tap at Midtown

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Automated Passenger Counters (APC) Sensors near vehicle doors count passenger on and offs, usually using infrared beams Some vehicles also determine weight/steps on-board vehicle Typically data not available in real-time Usually only on a sample (%) of bus fleet; redistribute buses to determine counts

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Automated Vehicle Location (AVL) Originally, Signpost-beacon-based used to track the location of buses Post-2000, GPS-based technology Provided in real-time Usually matched with schedule through Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems Also combined with other data sources (AFC & APC) to capture detailed ridership Valuable for service planning (i.e. determining running times, schedule adherence)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Signpost-based AVL

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood GPS-based AVL

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Combining AVL & APC Detailed Route Level Analysis

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood DATA COLLECTION COMPARISON

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Manual vs. Automated Data Manual Data Low capital costs High marginal (labor) costs Small sample sizes – Limited spatial and temporal variation Often unreliable (errors by checkers) Longer data collection/processing times Automated Data High capital costs Low marginal (labor) costs Large sample sizes – Detailed temporal and spatial data Biases can (usually) be corrected Available in (quasi) real-time

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Passenger Counting Technologies (2008) Technology / Procedure# SystemsPercentage Combination of manual and automatic4451.2% Manual (paper and pencil) only1820.9% APCs only1214.0% Other automated methods (farebox, hand-held units) % Total systems %

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Future Trends Increasing use of automated data collection systems – Including mixed modes (manual & automated) More disaggregate data used for planning and decision-making (refined units of analysis)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood DATA STANDARDS

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Transit Data Consumption The changing landscape Schedule Paper Schedules 10 9:36 Digitization Interactivity

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood GTFS General Transit Feed Specification routes.txt stops.txt trips.txt stop_times.txt calendar.txt agency.txt shapes.txt

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood How Does Open Data Help? Data access models Agency responds to special requests by developers Small subset of riders find this specific tool useful. Transit Agency App Developers Riders DATA Anyone can access data Many riders access a diverse market of tools powered by GTFS. Agency produces data and opens it once.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Transit Open Data Timeline Source: Rojas, Francisca (2012) Transit Transparency: Effective Disclosure through Open Data

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Open Schedule Data (GTFS) Adoption 44 Source: Wong, James. (2013). Leveraging the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) for Efficient Transit Analysis. Proceedings of the 2013 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Conclusions We need accurate data to make appropriate decisions for transit service. The National Transit Database (NTD) is the largest source of transit data in the US. Manual data collection consists in recording transit information in person. Automatic data collection uses captors in buses to record vehicle location, vehicle loads, etc. Future trend of opening up data based on standardized formats.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Reference Materials in this lecture were taken from: Walker, J. (2011). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Island Press. Furth, Hemily, Muller, Strathman (2006). “Using Archived AVL-APC Data to Improve Transit Performance and Management. TCRP Report 113." Transportation Research Board. National Transit Database Sampling Manual (2009) "Sampling Tests Automatic Passenger Counters." The Inside Lane. 26 Sept Boyle, D (2008). "TCRP Synthesis 77: Passenger Counting Systems.” TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C.