0 Versioning Panel John Turner Campbell Pryde Maciej Piechocki …. And YOU!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selecting a Methodology for BPR
Advertisements

Benchmarks and work plans
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Presentation Title | Date | Page 1 Extracting Value from SOA.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Joe Auriemma Siemens Medical Solutions, Health Services Senior Director, Integration Engineering Siemens Medical Solutions.
1 of 20 Evaluating an Information Project From Questions to Results © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Evaluating an Information.
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
For APNOMS Managing Pervasive Computing and Ubiquitous Communications Challenges Ahead Graham Chen.
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Business Process Improvement in the Economic Programs Directorate at the U.S. Census Bureau Deborah M. Stempowski Shirin A. Ahmed U.S. Census Bureau ICES.
Copyright CompSci Resources LLC Web-Based XBRL Products from CompSci Resources LLC Virginia, USA. Presentation by: Colm Ó hÁonghusa.
International Financial Reporting Standards The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASC Foundation.
XBRL COFINREP Implementation VII COFINREP Workshop Bartosz Ochocki
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES BANK OF SPAINS XBRL FORMULAE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AND CONCLUSIONS Víctor Morilla IT Project Manager of Bank of Spain.
Data Architecture at CIA Dave Roberts Chief Technical Officer Application Services, CIO CIA
1 Future strategy for e-submission as seen by industry Dr Michael Colmorgen, IFAH-Europe 2nd Veterinary Workshop on E-submission 4 Dec 2009, EMEA, London.
1 The role of macro- regional strategies after 2013 The Commissions view (or rather the view of one official) David Sweet, DG Regional Policy, European.
Italian Good Practice Projects Michela Arnaboldi and Giovanni Azzone
1 Performance Indicators: Selection, Application, and Reporting Presented by John M Rodgers Federal Aviation Administration.
1 Economic and Management Performance General Framework Presented by Keld Ludvigsen Director of Finance CAA Denmark and Chairman of ANSEP.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Rob Briner Organizational Psychology Birkbeck
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
QA & QI And Accreditation.  A continuous process to review, critique, and implement measurable positive change in public health policies, programs or.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (2005) The Application of Electronic Forms in the Financial Work Flow.
Agenda for Discussion Agenda for Discussion Risk Management Stakeholder Analysis project solutions for your world Gina Davidovic, PMP
Software Engineering - Specifications 1 Specifications Specification document must be clear, complete and correct.
Test Taking Strategies for Aviation Meteorology (AMT 220)
Activity 1………………Saving vs. Investing Activity 2……….….Saving for a Rainy Day Activity 3…………………… = Saving Activity 4…..Investing for the Long Term.
/1 Transparency Challenge Panel March / Welcome & Introductions Suzanne Wise Strategy Consultation Overview of responses and next steps.
TQA CONCEPTS & CORE VALUES
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.
Take from Ten First Subtraction Strategy -9 Click on a number below to go directly to that type of subtraction problems
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Limits (Algebraic) Calculus Fall, What can we do with limits?
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
PEREQUAL PLATFORM Marco Mantoan – E-lastic Project responsible for ANFIA Service 1st MEETING PARTENARIAT - “E-lastic” Project Leonardo da Vinci Programme.
Internet Redesign Project Texas Workforce Commission
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Monitoring and Controlling the Project
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
10-1 © Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 10: Selecting the Best Alternative Design Strategy Plus Project Management Concepts.
Eaton Business System Overview
Missouri Enterprise Helping Missouri Manufacturers Make More, Sell More, Earn More Missouri Manufacturer Survey: The Top Ten Things You Told Us.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
1 Private Company Financial Reporting Brief History of Efforts in U.S.
 Acceptance testing is a user-run test that demonstrates the application’s ability to meet the original business objectives and system requirements and.
Creative Commons Sustainable IT Architecture year plan 1 / 18 Sustainable IT Architecture Sustainable IT Architecture.
Getting a XBRL Project Up and Running. Mr John Morgan UBmatrix Australia th XBRL International Conference “Getting.
Taxonomy Testing Techniques Which Yield High-Quality Taxonomies Charles Hoffman, CPA – UBmatrix.
1 Japan FSA's XBRL Project - Launch of New Public Disclosure System with Mandatory XBRL - May 2008 Toshinori Kobayashi Financial Services Agency, The Japanese.
Track 2: Reducing the Reporting Burden in the Regulatory Environment, Simultaneous mandatory adoption of IFRS and XBRL - Chile, Ana Cristina Sepúlveda.
UPDATE. TODAY OUR STAKEHOLDERS WHY XBRL TODAY? MAKING OUR MISSION EXPLICIT THREE GOALS FOR 2014.
. Financial Information supply chain Columbia Business School’s Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis  “An Evaluation of the.
Presentation transcript:

0 Versioning Panel John Turner Campbell Pryde Maciej Piechocki …. And YOU!

Know our scope! Versioning in an XBRL sense is all about taxonomies. Instance documents? Meh. Too easy. You are on your own. 1

Change comes to us all What does versioning mean if you are: –A Corporate Filer? –A Regulator? –An Analyst? –A Taxonomist? –An XBRL vendor? –A reporting vendor? –A data vendor? 2

Corporate Filer What changed in the accounting literature that I need to take account of in preparing my document? What changed in the taxonomy and how does it impact me? How do I communicate changes in my extension taxonomy, without impacting comparability? How quickly can it be done? 3

Regulator Have filers updated their disclosures? How have filers altered their disclosures, given the changes that have happened? Are filers complying with current disclosure law? What changes do I need to make to my internal reporting framework so that I dont lose the time series? 4

Analyst Whats broken? Which companies have become more comparable? Which ones are now less comparable? Which changes impact my analytics? Which changes impact my analytics in a material fashion? 5

A Taxonomist What do I need to change? Why? How do I best achieve that, with minimal breakage? What do I need to communicate to my community of interest? 6

An XBRL Vendor How do I use versioning metadata? How do I present it to my users? How much can I automate without having to ask my users? How much do I have to spend to support the versioning strategies employed by taxonomists that use my tools? 7

A reporting vendor? Can I use this metadata in my own systems? They have NOTHING to do with XBRL whatsoever! 8

A Data Vendor? DONT CHANGE ANYTHING!!! 9

A Data Vendor? What has changed in the rules? How have they been implemented? What concepts have changed for individual companies? How do I best protect my investment in my time series? 10

Three Things What is the same? (Namespaces) What has changed? How and Why? 11

What do we have? 12 ? ? ?

What do we have? 13

What do we have? 14

We could go on! Versioning is a bit of a conundrum – everyone wants something, but we have very limited input into the process. XML is no help. There *are* ways around most aspects of Versioning via techniques like slipstreaming. However, it is very clear that we need a consistent spec, and interoperable tools. 15

Since We have alternative approaches: –FDIC –APRA –And every other project And even an alternative Specification from SBR All of which is probably an indication that weve not cracked this yet! 16

What are the next steps? We need your input and your focus on this issue. We probably need to re-examine the XII Versioning effort pretty substantially This is not *that* hard, but it does take lots of effort, and volunteers are a tough master. 17