Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 Tracker performance Vacuum/helium/air.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC

Advertisements

1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.

ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.

Tracker Reconstruction Stuff Timothy Carlisle Oxford.

1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.

SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.

1 Downstream PID update Rikard Sandström PID phone conference

KEK Analysis Report Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2006/06/10 MICE CM15.

Analysis Meeting – – Slide 1 Beam momentum measurement using TOFs: progress report Analysis Meeting, February 2008 Mark Rayner.

Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.

1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.

1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.

Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.

Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 Quality Assurance; status 18/05/06.

1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.

1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.

Tracker Misalignment Study David Forrest CM23 HIT, Harbin January 14 th.

1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.

1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.

Cosmic Ray Analysis 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Not enough time to go into detail, so just a quick summary of the status since CM22:

Time stamping for Emulsion Tracks with Gyaku Data Base method Y.Nonoyama.

Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 Full tracker station assembly/QA, schedule.

Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.

MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.

18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.

1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.

Stats update Was asked to provide comparison between toy mc and g4mice at two points along z (middle of first and third absorbers) 10,000 events, step.

Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.

Critical Issues for MICE Chris Rogers MICE CM 15.

Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.

Tracker Software Update Adam Dobbs, MICE CM37 7 th Nov 2013.

PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.

Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.

PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.

G. Barber Sci-Fi Tracker Progress Ral 28 Oct Progress On The Design Of The Full Tracker Contents:- Recap of New Station Layout Version 2.5 Version.

August 26, 2003P. Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting1 Paul Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting, August 26, 2003 Test Beam 2002 Analysis Techniques for Estimating Intrinsic.

Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.

Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.

Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.

1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow May 5 th 2009.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

T. Matsushita 1 Waveguide length with 3D model Internal waveguides The shortest = 1.5 m The longest = 2.6 m Others depending on the spacing Front face.

PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.

MCS: Multiple Coulomb Scattering Sophie Middleton.

Tracking Background GRETINA Software Working Group Meeting September 21-22, 2012, NSCL MSU I-Yang Lee Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.

26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.

RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.

If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.

T585 analysis status /2/2 HIDEYUKI SAKAMOTO Contents On small light yield problem checked by Aron’s information Tracking status Transverse and Longitudinal.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.

Analysis meeting: Beam momentum measurements using TOFs Tuesday, 22 January 2008 Slide 1 of 10 Beam momentum measurement using.

18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,

Measuring Multiple Scattering in Step IV Timothy Carlisle Oxford See MICE Note 374 for updated results.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.

Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')

MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration Fermilab Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration.

CHEP ’06 GEANT4E 1 GEANT4E: Error propagation for track reconstruction inside the GEANT4 framework Pedro Arce (CIEMAT) CHEP 2006, Mumbai, 13-17th February.

MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.

Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.

C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Beam Energy-Loss measurement

MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations

C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University

Presentation transcript:

Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 Tracker performance Vacuum/helium/air

T. Matsushita 2 Purpose Requested to check the tracker performance with tracker volume filled by air at the tracker review meeting on 21 Apr 2006 This study is to answer the request

T. Matsushita 3 Material Three different materials compared; Vacuum/Helium/Air Density Vacuum: 1.e-25 g/cm^3; defined as universe_mean_density in CLHEP/Units/PhysicalConstants.h ref; 5e-11 Torr => 8e-17 g/cm^3 He: K, 1 atm; Air: K, 1 atm; N:0.7, O:0.3 Radiation K, 1 atm.x/X0 (x=1m) Helium gas; 5671m1.76e-4 Air; 304m3.29e-3 ref;

T. Matsushita 4 Multiple Coulomb scattering  0 =13.6MeV/  cp z(x/X 0 ) 1/2 [ log(x/ X 0 )] accurate to 11% or better for < x/ X 0 < 100;PDG y plane (rms) = 1/sqrt(3) x  0  plane (rms) =  0 For 200MeV/c muon  plane (rms)y plane (rms)x/ X 0 He gas;4.7e-41.3e-40.88e-4 (x=0.5m) Air;2.4e-36.8e-41.65e-3 (x=0.5m) A station;4.1e-34.5e-64.5e-3 (x=1.9mm)

T. Matsushita 5 Setup Simulation setup Input beam; matched 2.5 pi mm rad. data 10k events G4MICE; Malcolm-demo-T Performance checked with upstream tracker Baseline spacing; cm for stations 12, 23, 34, 45

T. Matsushita 6 Event selection Select number of points used for track fit = 5 Reject if reconstructed value(s) <= Selection efficiency is about 90%

T. Matsushita 7 Residual - Pt RMS of residual distributions All range vac: 5.6 hel: 8.5 air: 5.9 |Pt|<200 vac: 1.9 hel: 1.9 air: 1.8 Not much difference vacuum helium air

T. Matsushita 8 Residual - Pz RMS of residual distributions All range vac: 9.5 hel: 8.0 air: 9.1 |Pz|<100 vac: 7.2 hel: 6.7 air: 7.9 Not much difference vacuum helium air

T. Matsushita 9 RMS parameterisation From error propagation formulae, parameterise RMS of residual in terms of Pt and Pz  (Pz) =  / Pt(true)  (Pz) =  * Pz(true)^2  (Pt) = 

T. Matsushita 10 RMS(Pt) vs Pt(true), Pz(true) RMS(Pt) in terms of Pt/Pz is parameterised by  (constant) RMS(Pt) =  (Pt) RMS(pt) =  (Pz)  (Pt) vac: 1.8 hel: 1.8 air: 1.8  (Pz) vac: 1.8 hel: 1.8 air: 1.8 Not much difference, although parameterisation is not perfect vacuum helium air

T. Matsushita 11 RMS(Pz) vs Pt(true), Pz(true) RMS(Pz) in terms of Pt/Pz is parametrised by  RMS(Pz) =  /Pt(true) RMS(pz) =  *Pz(true)^2  vac: hel: 99.1 air:  vac: 0.18E-3 hel: 0.16E-3 air: 0.19E-3 Not much difference, although parametrisation is not perfect vacuum helium air

T. Matsushita 12 Summary Analysis with G4MICE show little difference on tracker performance with tracker volume filled by vacuum/helium/air for the default spacing; cm Probably we need to redo the analysis after fixing the spacing. With the current spacing, 4 mrad deflection caused by a station has 2.25mm lateral displacement between station 1 and 2! (for 200MeV/c muon) Question still remains; do we want to use air instead of helium? By the way, I would like to try the G4MICE version used for MICE-NOTE90 analysis, which is known to be newer than the one I am currently using