Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei-Chi Lu van den Boom, G., Pass, F., van Merrienbore, J.J.G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Daniel C. Moos, PhD Amanda Miller (Elementary Teacher)

Advertisements

Applying Psychology to Teaching

Body dissatisfaction as a risk factor of eating disturbances Abstract: Body dissatisfaction is important risk factor of eating disturbances (Cash T., 2004).

Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.

Neag School of Education Using Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Online Courses Anthony R. Artino,

The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Quantitative Research

Using of various monitoring forms to improve the learning motivation amid students of the medical university State Funded Educational Institution for Higher.

Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.

Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies

@ 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Chapter 11 The Ecology of the Experiment: The Scientist and Research Participant in Relation to Their

1 Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course Catherine, S. C. (2002). Self- regulated learning.

Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?

1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.

Daniel C. Moos, PhD Caitlin Bonde (‘14). Overview Introduction Introduction to flipped classrooms Theoretical framework to examine learning Prior empirical.

Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 06/15/2009

Seeking and providing assistance while learning to use information systems Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: Sep. 16, 2009 Babin, L.M.,

Developing Teaching Assistant Self-Efficacy through a Pre-Semester Teaching Assistant Orientation K. Andrew R. Richards & Chantal Levesque-Bristol Purdue.

Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: the interplay of technology and pedagogical practices Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor: Min-Puu.

Empowering volunteers to perform smoking- cessation service with a workshop training program using participatory action research Presenter: I-chuan Li.

Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction-An Investigation of Motivation Perception 指導教授： Chen, Ming-puu 報告者： Chen, Wan-Yi.

Evaluating a Research Report

1 Politeness Effect: Pedagogical Agents and Learning Gains 報告人：張純瑋 Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., and Collins, H. (2005).

Monica L. Heller & Jerrell C. Cassady Ball State University, Muncie, IN.

Gaming the System in the CALL Classroom Peter Gobel Kyoto Sangyo University

School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Medical Education Unit Leeds Institute of Medical Education will skill Workshop: Pause2Learn: developing the will.

Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels Presenter: Zong-Lin Tsai Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: January 19,

Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Nurturing Self-Regulated Learners through Authentic Assessments Seah-Tay Hui Yong.

Winters, F., Greene, J., & Costich, C. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational.

The Effect of Student Teaching on Pre-service PE Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs Zan Gao, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Zan Gao, University of Utah,

The API (Agent Persona Instrument) for assessing pedagogical agent persona Presenter: Wan-Ning Chen Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: May 18, 2009 Baylor,

Improving University teachers’ skills and psychological health through ACT Francisco Montesinos, Spain.

Supporting learners with math anxiety: The impact of pedagogical agent emotional and motivational support 報告人：張純瑋 Baylor, A. L., Shen, E., & Warren,

1 Self-Regulation and Ability Predictors of Academic Success during College Anastasia Kitsantas, Faye Huie, and Adam Winsler George Mason University.

1/27 CRESST/UCLA DIAGNOSTIC/PRESCRIPTIVE USES OF COMPUTER- BASED ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM SOLVING San-hui Sabrina Chuang CRESST Conference 2007 UCLA Graduate.

Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: March 15,

1 Study strategies in a computer assisted study environment 指導教授： Chen Ming-Puu 報告者： Chen Hsiu-Ju 報告日期： Beishuizen, J. J., & Stoutjesdijk,

Discussion and Implications Results Acknowledgements: UWEC Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for funding aspects of this research. Introduction.

The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college Advisor: Min-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei- Chi Lu Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of feedback.

The Role of Inservice Teachers’ Motivation, Learning Strategy and Social Ability Profiles in a CSCL Environment Advisor ： Min-Puu Chen Presenter ： Kuei-Hui.

Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 02, 2009 Papastergiou, M.(2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science.

Research Design ED 592A Fall Research Concepts 1. Quantitative vs. Qualitative & Mixed Methods 2. Sampling 3. Instrumentation 4. Validity and Reliability.

E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.

Investigate the present status of Self-regulated Learning skills of University students studying in the Open & Distance Learning Environment. Vajira De.

The Impact of Student Self-e ﬃ cacy on Scientiﬁc Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation in River City, a Multi-user Virtual Environment Presenter:

A Pilot Study of a Multimedia Instructional Program for Teaching of ESL Grammar with Embedded Tracking.

An Online Support System to Scaffold Real-World Problem Solving Presenter: Chih-Ming Chen Advisor: Min-Puu Chen Date: 11/10/2008 Ge, X., & Er, N. (2005).

The role of feedback and self-efﬁcacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: Jun.

Engaging junior college students in computer-mediated lessons using scaffolding strategies 指導教授： Chen, Ming-Puu 報告者： Juan, Hui-Lan 報告時間： Lim,

Exploring the Effects of Motivated Learning Support in a Problem-based Learning Environment Ming-Puu Chen National Taiwan Normal University Taipei, Taiwan.

1 Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds Instructor: Chen, Ming-Puu Presenter:

AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’

Using Psychometric Analysis to Drive Mathematics Standardized Assessment Decision Making Mike Mazzarella George Mason University.

Developing Engineering Students’ Self-Regulation through a Discipline Specific Student Success Course Rachel McCord Lecturer The University of Tennessee.

Assessing Student Engagement at the Course Level Rick D. Axelson, PhD, Univ. of Iowa, Off. Consult & Research in Medical Educ. Arend Flick, PhD, Norco.

Assessing Student Engagement in the Classroom Rick D. Axelson, PhD Assistant Professor, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine Arend Flick, PhD.

Classification of the Language Learning Strategies Language Learning Strategies have been classified by many scholars (Wenden and Rubin 1987; O'Malley.

Thinking aloud about NEW AND OLD BALLS and ramps Bemilies, et al. University of Kentucky--Lexington, KY ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION  Scientists use many methods.

Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning Presenter: Hou, Ming-Hsien Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: August 19, 2008 Manlove, S.,

Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,

How does classroom discussion and questioning affect students’ learning?

Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments Narciss, S., Proske, A. & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in.

Logan L. Watts, Ph.D. Baruch College, CUNY

The science subject knowledge

Toward a Reliable Evaluation of Mixed-Initiative Systems

Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?

An Empirical Study of Learning Strategy Use by Differently Proficient Students in a Web-based Environment Wang Zhiru.

Assessment and Authentic Learning

Presentation transcript:

Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei-Chi Lu van den Boom, G., Pass, F., van Merrienbore, J.J.G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551–567.

 This study investigated the effects of reflection prompts and tutor feedback on the development of students’ self-regulated learning competence (i.e. SRLC).  Self-regulated learning competence We define competence as the mix of complex cognitive skills, interpersonal skills and attitudes based on how someone can function effectively in a particular domain or profession.

 Reflection and feedback  Chi (1996) implemented a five-step tutoring frame, in which external feedback provided by a tutor plays an important role (Graesser, Person, & Magliano, 1995).  Chi (1996) differentiates between three kinds of tutor feedback: corrective feedback, didactic explanations, and suggestive feedback.

 Students working with the study task variant with embedded reflection prompts focusing on the aspects of self-regulated learning would gain more development on SRLC aspects than students studying the task without these prompts.  The effect of the reflection prompts to vary as a function of tutor feedback in such a way that the impact of the reflection prompts increases if in addition tutor feedback is provided on the resulting reflection expressions.

 Participants: 42 first and second-year students from a Teacher Training College, the Netherlands. There were 32 women and 10 men (mean age=20.1 years.) They were familiar with the domain of psychology, but they had not been taught anything on health psychology.  Students received a study task within the domain of Health Psychology. The study task was delivered in the electronic learning environment on the Open University’s Study Net.

 Reflection Prompt (SRP vs. PRP)  SRP: ‘forethought’ (SRP1), ’intermediate thought’ (SRP2), and ’afterthought’ (SRP3).  PRP: placebo prompts (PRP1, PRP2 and PRP3).  Tutor Feedback (with vs. without)  The experimental design was a 2(Reflection Prompt: SRP vs. PRP) ×2 (Tutor Feedback: with vs. without) factorial pretest–posttest design.  Participants were assigned to one of the four experimental conditions in such a way that each condition contained 10 or 11 participants.

 ILS: a self-report questionnaire, and is comparable to the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ; Pintrich, Smith, Garcia, & McKeachie, 1993).  The three subscales of metacognitive regulation strategies are: Self-Regulation (regulate one’s own learning processes; 10 items), External Regulation (letting an external source regulate one’s learning; 10 items) and Lack of Regulation (noticing one’s difficulties with regulation of learning processes; five items). All items had to be scored on a five-point Likert scale.

 learning performance: a paper and pencil posttest with three open-ended questions (total 7 points) and seven multiple-choice questions (total 7 points) were used.  The open-ended questions were scored (score range 0–7 points) by the psychologist who developed the content of the study task.  Performance scores of the students were converted to a score between 0 and 10.  The student opinions were collected by means of an Evaluation questionnaire. Each item was accompanied with a five-point Likert scale.

 All data were analyzed with 2 (Reflection Prompt: SRP vs. PRP) ×2 (Tutor Feedback: with vs. without) multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs).

 No significant main effects were found for the reflection prompt condition on any of the subscales: self-regulation, external regulation, and lack of regulation.  No significant Reflection Prompt Tutor Feedback interaction was found for any of the metacognitive regulation strategies subscales.  Learning performance: a paired-samples t-test yielded a meaningful increase in performance from pretest to posttest (M=4.39, S.D.=1.71; t (38)=14.359, P<0.001). However, a MANCOVA revealed neither main effects nor an interaction.  The opinions of the participants : The MANCOVAs revealed a main effect of tutor feedback on the opinion about the tutor, F (1, 38)=7.875, MSE=0.946, P<0.01.

 The combination of a PRP and tutor feedback was evaluated as the most disturbing condition (M=3.80, S.D.=1.14), a PRP without feedback from a tutor as the least disturbing (M=2.30, S.D.=0.95). Fig. 4. Reflection Prompt×Tutor Feedback interaction for the Evaluation of reflection prompts as disturbing.

 This research offers indications that reflection prompts, especially if combined with tutor feedback, have positive effects on the development of students’ self-regulated learning competence.  The MSLQ (Pintrich et al., 1993) can be considered as an alternative for the ILS, and “think aloud measures” or direct observations of performance on regulation tasks and in- depth interviews (Winne & Perry, 2000) represents promising measures to realize this triangulation.  It might be expected that in longer lasting settings in which prompts and feedback are embedded in broader courses.