Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COACHES MEETING Boston College Compliance Office February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Division II Recruiting
Welcome to the World of Compliance
Division II Federal Graduation Rates and Academic Success Rates Reporting.
Use Mobile Guidebook to Evaluate this Session NCAA Division I Academic Standards and Legislative Update SACRAO Transfer Conference February 18, 2014.
NCAA Initial-Eligibility Rules & Updates Western Association for College Admission Counseling June 10, 2014 San Jose, CA Paul Rorvig, Associate Director.
Your Path to the Student-Athlete Experience NCAA Eligibility Center Expires September 1, 2014.
ROADMAP TO INITIAL ELIGIBILITY NCAA Eligibility Center Expires September 1, 2009.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
MISSION STATEMENT Serve as a model program both academically and competitively for NCAA Division I Develop a national reputation of excellence and the.
NCAA Initial-Eligibility and the Recruiting Process
Limited Resource Institutions APP and Academic Certification Best Practices NCAA Regional Rules Seminar 2014 Eric Brey Quintin Wright Katy Yurk.
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
Overview of Actions Taken by the NCAA Division I Board of Directors – October 2011 Adopted increased initial-eligibility standards. Adopted increased two-year.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
Origins, Development, and Current Structure. Origins President Swain’s weekly faculty meetings l Student absences and misbehavior discussed l Trial of.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
Fundamental Introduction NCAA Division III Bylaw 14
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
APR Improvement Plans April 2014 Lindsey McDonnell Director of Certification Curriculum National Association for Athletics Compliance.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Auburn University Athletics Compliance Program Susan Bazemore Krissy Ellis Bernard Hill Jamie Funk Diana Martin Rich McGlynn David Mines.
At Western Michigan University.  Legislators refer to NCAA division status when referring to the size and prestige of universities, as do students.
UNIVERSITY SENATE REPORT Athletic Affairs Committee Report April 25, 2011.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
Educational Session: NCAA Division I Hot Topics Thursday, January 16, :30 to 11:00 A.M.
Stephen LaPorta- Director of Compliance- Education James Madison University Athletics Compliance.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
COACHES MEETING Boston College Compliance Office October 21, 2008.
Creating a Pathway to the NCAA Division I or Division II Student-Athlete Experience JCCA Summer Conference, Louisville, KY Thursday, August 1, 2013 NCAA.
“HOW TO” FOR THE COLLEGE BOUND STUDENT-ATHLETE NCAA SEMINAR Susquehanna Township High School October 29, 2014 Andrae Martin, Assistant High School Principal/Athletic.
Admissions/Registrars & Athletics: How To Make It Work! Anthony Gallina, Coordinator, Undergraduate Admissions – Oakland University Christopher Goeth,
NCAA Eligibility Basics
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
NCAA RULES EDUCATION IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND STAFF SESSION MARCH 9, 2012.
Helping the Student-Athlete NCAA Clearinghouse & Considering the Next Step.
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Beginning of the Year Coaches Meeting August, 28, 2007.
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
Principle 9 Academic Success. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the academic success of its student-athletes,
Navigating NCAA Division II Regulations in Financial Aid Mollie Bohrer, NCAA Financial Aid Counselor California Baptist University 2012 CASFAA Annual Conference.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
April 2011 NCAA Division I Board of Directors charge: o New program should focus on the student-athlete experience and be simplified, streamlined and.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
03/21/ MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the OSU Department of Athletics is to educate, provide opportunity to young people and develop.
Student-Athlete Advising Round Table – Fall 2010.
Guide for College Bound Student Athletes George Mason High School Boys Soccer Program.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
CSUSM Softball Digs Community Service. Topics Goal 1  Graduating Our Student- Athletes NCAA Eligibility Requirements NCAA Progress toward Degree Academic.
Lynn Holzman Director of Academic and Membership Affairs, NCAA.
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! September 2010.
Academic Performance Program Michigan State University February 2005 Department of Intercollegiate Athletics & Office of the Faculty Athletics Representative.
NCAA Faculty Athletics Representative Report Presented by: Kimberly A. Dunn, Ph.D. NCAA Faculty Athletics Representative Associate Professor, School of.
Correlating Engagement and Student Success (Online version) Student Success Specialist Western Oregon University Jesse Poole.
DIVISION II ACADEMIC REPORTING Maria DeJulio Gregg Summers.
NCAA Infractions Process Ted Leland, Director of Athletics April 2016.
SIUE Staff Senate Summer 2015 Training. Plan of Attack  Getting to Know You  Overview of SIUE Organizational Structure  What is the Staff Senate? 
NCAA Academic Performance Program Overview
NEW NCAA Division I Initial-Eligibility Academic Requirements
Federal Graduation Rates and Academic Success Rates Reporting
Institutional Committee Recommendations
Committee of Intercollegiate Athletics
NCAA Eligibility Center Workshop Stanislaus State Nov
Division I Committee on Academic Performance Waivers and Hearings
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
What Presidents Need to Know About Intercollegiate Athletics
Presentation transcript:

Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007

2 Charge of the Committee: 1) recommends operating policies for the intercollegiate athletics program 2) monitors the program for compliance with University policies and with NCAA and SEC legislation, and 3) assists the President and the Director of Athletics as needed

3 Committee Membership Fourteen voting members: Chair (also the Faculty Athletics Rep) Vice Chair Six faculty members Administrative and Professional Assembly representative Staff Council Chair Student Government Association President Executive Vice President Vice President for Alumni Affairs Vice President for Development

4 Committee Membership Four ex-officio non-voting members: –President or designee –Provost or designee –Athletics Director –Associate Athletics Director for Compliance

5 Subcommittees: –Academic Standards –Awards –Compliance –Drug Education/Testing Advisory Group –Equity, Sportsmanship and Welfare –Priority and Seating –Professional Sports Counseling Panel –Summer Sports Camps/Clinics

6 Service on the Committee Several Faculty Member positions will expire in 2007 Committee meets 6 – 8 times a year Faculty members chair the subcommittees

7 Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics (CIA) and the Student Athletes All CIA subcommittees have student athlete representation Equity, Welfare and Sportsmanship Subcommittee work on exit interviews CIA Chair involvement with the Student Athlete Advisory Committee Faculty Visitation Program — will begin Spring 2007

8 Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics (CIA) and Coaches Faculty Visitation Program — will begin Spring 2007 Chair has much interaction in FAR position Chair attends monthly coaches meetings CIA members and coaches on NCAA certification committees

9 Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics (CIA) and Compliance Compliance Subcommittee reports to full committee Associate ADs Compliance attend all meetings Secondary violations report at each committee meeting CIA chair signs off on all violation reports to the conference and the NCAA CIA receives reports from Athletics Department and other monitoring subcommittees: Sports Camps and Clinics; Drug Education and Testing Panel; Professional Sports Counseling Panel

10 Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics (CIA) and academics Academic Standards Subcommittee Reports from the Senior Associate Athletics Director for Student Services and his staff Reports from Office of Institutional Research and Analysis

11 Changes in NCAA admission and eligibility standards satisfactory progress standards in high school core courses in 2003; 16 in 2008 Academic Progress Rate (APR) in Contemporaneous penalties in ; historical penalties in

12 Academic Progress Rate Measurement tool based on student-athlete eligibility plus student-athlete retention Calculated for all Division I teams Includes all scholarship student- athletes Accounts for student-athletes who transfer into and out of institutions in good academic standing

13 Contemporaneous Penalties Begin Loss of a scholarship for one year for teams that fail to meet APR cut standard of 925 if a student-athlete on scholarship leaves school in poor academic standing

14 Auburn’s APR Scores Teams had perfect scores of Teams scored in the top 10% of teams in each Division I sport Only 1 other school in the SEC had 3 teams in the top 10% - Florida Only 1 other school in the SEC had more than 3 teams – Vanderbilt with 4 Page 1 of 2

15 Auburn’s APR Scores For teams scored below the cut score of 925 For penalties were incurred Page 2 of 2

16 Historical Penalties Begin in Assessed for academic failure over time and include: –public warnings –scholarship reductions –practice restrictions –postseason competition restriction including bowl games and NCAA championships –restricted membership status for the institution in the NCAA

17 Graduation Rates General Information Federal Graduation Rate: data required by U.S. Dept. of Education (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Systems). Provides graduation rate information for all students as well as scholarship student athletes. NCAA Graduation Success Rate: data required by NCAA. Provides graduation rate information for scholarship student athletes only.

18 Federal Rate Compared to GSR Federal rate collection since 1996 GSR: since 2005 Federal rate cohort includes first time freshmen that begin in summer or fall and receive athletic aid their first term. A student athlete included in this cohort remains in the cohort even if he/she quits the team or leaves school. GSR cohort: first time freshmen – summer/fall/or spring starts – receiving athletic aid at any time during their first year. Also includes transfers in. Page 1 of 2

19 Federal Rate Compared to GSR Federal Rate exclusions from cohort include military/mission service or death. GSR exclusions: any athlete that leaves Auburn in good academic standing and has eligibility left. GSR has no “all student body” comparison. This rate is always a four year cohort combined report – never reports on one cohort. Page 2 of 2

20 Rate Comparisons – 4 cohorts Student Athletes ( to ) Federal 56% AU 63% Div 1A NCAA GSR 74% AU 78% Div 1A Data as reported by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

21 Academics and athletics SEC Honor Roll— either a cumulative 3.0 grade point average or a 3.0 GPA for the last academic year— 156 athletes (Summer 2005, Fall 2005, Spring, 2006; did not include equestrian) Top Tigers— either a cumulative 3.0 grade point average or a 3.0 GPA for the last academic year— 185 academic Top Tigers (Spring 2005, Summer 2005, and Fall 2005)

22 Academics and athletics Tutoring services: 60 tutors logged 3100 hours meeting 655 requests from 316 athletes for Fall 2006 Camp War Eagle — student- athletes attend Campus services utilized: STEP program, Writing Center, Counseling/Counseling Psychology services, Office for Students with Disabilities

23 NCAA Certification Self-study Peer-review team visit October 2006 Final review by March 2007

24 Questions or comments? Please contact Marcia Boosinger Chair, Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics or for further information.