10.05.2011. Objectives Pick one final design (Only discussions crucial to design choice will be allowed to occur) Note that many exact locations for many.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Airplanes Fly Forces
Advertisements

Lecture 10: Configurations Jason Mickey For AE 440 A/C Lecture September 2009.
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
The Fuselage and Empennage
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
ET-493 Senior Design By: Brian Toomer Advisor: Mr. Rode’
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
DR2 Presented by: Mark Blanton Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian September 26, 2000 Chris Curtis.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) What part of the aircraft is located on the outer portion of the trailing edge.
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
Balsa Glider Construction
Balsa Glider Construction
TO SERVE WITH PRIDE AND DEDICATION PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT.
1 ME 442 Senior Project Week 8 Dr. Joseph Vignola Pangborn G43, Phone , Tuesdays & Thursdays, 9:40-12:20 AM,
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01 F.1.1 Rashid STARLight STARLight Mechanical Tahir Rashid STARLight Mechanical Engineer (734)
1 ME 442 Senior Project Week 4 Dr. Joseph Vignola Pangborn G43, Phone , Tuesdays & Thursdays, 9:35-12:25 AM,
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Preliminary Sizing PDR 26 September, 2000.
Fall Final Presentation November 30, 2004 MAVerick Solutions Todd Adkins Leroy Cohen Jr. Adam Hollrith Brian Moore.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
AP-1 5. Project Management. AP-2 Software Failure Software fails at a significant rate What is failure? Not delivering it on time is an estimation failure.
Airplanes By : Hebron Yam,Justin Minucci. How do airplane work? Problem???
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Aircraft Familiarization
1 ME 442 Senior Project Week 3 Dr. Joseph Vignola Pangborn G43, Phone , Tuesdays & Thursdays, 9:35-12:25 AM,
1 ME 442 Senior Project Week 6 Dr. Joseph Vignola Pangborn G43, Phone , Tuesdays & Thursdays, 9:35-12:25 AM,
NOON UNO HIGH-MOBILITY MARS EXPLORATION SYSTEM DANIEL MCCAFFERY JEFF ROBINSON KYLE SMITH JASON TANG BRAD THOMPSON.
M icro A ir V ehicle Wing Deployment System April 7, 2005 MAV erick S olutions Todd Adkins Leroy Cohen Jr. Adam Hollrith Brian Moore Sponsored by: Eglin.
Introduction to IWA. The IWA is based on a patented, next generation design called the Internal Wing Aircraft. The concept brings three separate wings.
PARTS OF AN AIRPLANE General Aviation planes vary in size and shape but the basic parts remain the same. Cirrus SR20 Piper Seneca Eclipse 500 Aviat Pitts.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
Modern Design Concept Chapter 10. Aerodynamic Research Contributions Propulsion Structural Design Monocoque structure Optimum location for the engine.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
Senior Design SR22 Canard September 28, Meeting Objectives 1.Decide on deliverables for PDR (20min) 1.Establish a presentation for Tuesdays Trip.
1 Weekly Summary Solar Sail Spring Semester March 19 th, 2007 Mike Hiti.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 4: Slide 1 Chapter 4 Forces and Moments.
SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
Kwanjung Yee Pusan National University Aircraft Conceptual Design Copyright © 2009 by Kwanjung Yee.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
Science of Flight January 26, 2017 Timothy Boyd Juan Lopez
Four Forces of Flight Lift Weight Thrust Drag
Design Refining a design.
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Preliminary Wing Sizing
Tail Stability Known: Aircraft are inherently unstable
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
c/Maj Christopher Greves
Balsa Glider Construction
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis
Presented by Melissa Doan and Jason Hargraves
stages control devices thrust arrangement
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Boom Supersonic 11/11/17 Agenda
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan QDR
Balsa Glider Construction
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
Balsa Glider Construction
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 6, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Objectives Pick one final design (Only discussions crucial to design choice will be allowed to occur) Note that many exact locations for many internal things will be decided with moment equations at a later time

Agenda Review from Cirrus Trip Ideas and Information for Design Update on Pull vs. Push Establish Design Choice Engine Location Tail Design Wing Design

Meeting Outcomes Design Scope Develop Minimal Top Design In-depth Analysis on Specific Aspects Pick Design to Proceed With Areas of Analysis for Aircraft Schedule for Proceeding

Design Scope Meeting With Cirrus Desire for stronger Trade Studies on Specific aspects of the aircraft Need for an overall design that still meets requirements Talk with Garrard about new direction of Project Decided on final concept design similar to the Velocity XL and the Cozy Mark IV with a two lifting surface configuration and a rear mounted engine

Areas of Interest for Analysis Landing Gear Design: Chris Erickson and Nathan Love Control Surface Analysis: Patrick Mischke Canard Configuration Analysis: Traci Moe Wing Design: Vince Zander General Body Analysis: Brian Douglas Lifting Surface Styles: Brad Lester Moment Analysis: Chris Schumacher

Schedule Analysis (Things done by date listed) Oct 10: PDR with Garrard 4:00 – 4:30 Oct 14: Initial Aircraft Design (Group Development) Oct 28: In Class PDR 3:35 – 4:05 Oct 31: Preliminary Individual Work Nov 21: Individual Analysis Completed Nov 28: Redesign of Preliminary Aircraft Dec 2: CDR Presentation Completed TBD: Final CDR

Assignments for Nate: Landing Gear estimates in weights and sizes Erickson: Landing Gear estimates in weights and sizes Traci: Canard Size and Weight, Fuselage Development Vince: Wing and Fuel Dimensions and Weights, Fuselage Development Brad: Equation Development for Requirements Brian: Equation Development for Requirements Schumacher: New Gantt Chart, New Schedule Development, s about Changes, Consolidation of current information