Racial Inequity in Special Education By Daniel J. Losen © Independent Education Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Disproportionality in Special Education
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN. Who Are Identified As Exceptional? 6.5 million children in the U.S. Categories include:   Learning disabled   Communication.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Least Restrictive Environment Identification of High Percentage.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Adapted Physical Education Position Paper Revised Dec 2011.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Dr. Robert J. Graham Fordham University
Produced by NICHCY, 2007 Least Restrictive Environme nt D ecision M aking L R E.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Racial Disproportionality in Special Education By Daniel J. Losen ©
Responses and Remedies to Disproportionality in Special Education: Beyond Compliance By Daniel J. Losen © 1.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do YOU Need to Know?
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Racial Inequity in Special Education By Daniel J. Losen ©
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Addressing Disproportionality in Special Education— A Wisconsin Perspective.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
1 ADDRESSING THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF STUDENTS OF COLOR AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION DPI Summer Institute on Disproportionality.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Student Support Services Overview. The mission of the South Burlington School District, a community committed to excellence in education, is to ensure.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
State Advisory Panel & Interagency Coordinating Council Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)Significant Disproportionality & Overview of SAP/ICC Website.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
CHAPTER 6: WORKING WITH FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILIES
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Working with Families of Children with Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Leadership Academy Special Education.
Current Practices for Meeting the Needs of Exceptional Learners
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Racial Inequity in Special Education By Daniel J. Losen © Independent Education Consultant

Addressing Racial Disproportionality The New Priority Area for OSEP Monitoring and Enforcement

Compliance versus Problem Solving The Data Demonstrate Real Problems and Raise Concerns About Harm to Children That “Minimum Compliance” Approach Will Only Perpetuate Most Educators Believe Schools Can Make a Difference If Both Regular and Special Educators Collaborate to Address the Challenges, Real Remedies are Possible and Children Will Be Better Off

Prevention of Inappropriate Disproportionality Prevention is embodied in the spirit and letter of the law. “Prevention” must include both regular education, and special education. This concept is not limited to over-identification, or just the areas within a district that the state has determined to meet the criteria for “significant disproportionality.”

Diagnostic Tool The Checklist: Serves as an entry point to analyzing the contributing factors in your district; and Helps with thinking about interventions (use of 15% for EIS). Three Parts: –District and school resources –Policy, Practice or Procedures – Considering Environmental and Other External Factors

Three Stages Develop Hypothesis Design Intervention Plan Evaluate Efforts and Outcomes Review List –Reconsider Hypothesis and Implementation –Discuss Additional Factors –Adjust Interventions

Consider regular education and the classroom instruction… Experienced with diverse learners? Adequately trained to teach reading and math? Otherwise highly qualified? Having classroom management problems? Is there a language or cultural issue confounding the understanding of child’s behavior or performance? Understanding the source of problematic behavior may prevent identification later? What is the quality of pre-referral actions, early intervening services or response to intervention (RTI) and are students of color, in particular, benefiting?

Resources Distribution: Teacher Training: Administrator Training: Time: Data:

Are there systemic resource issues that contribute to inappropriate identification? Do minority children have equitable access to the highly qualified teachers and resources? Does the system adequately address the needs of culturally diverse learners and their parents? Does the administration demonstrate the capacity to address issues of race and culture, or avoid discussions of racial and ethnic disparities?

List 1: Resources Distribution –Access to Highly Qualified Teachers (#A1) –Efficacy of ELL Program (#A3) –Distribution of Resources Inside the District (#A4)

List 1: Resources Data Collection Capacity, Review, Analysis –Race data used and discussed regularly by general and special educators? –Collection and analysis of restrictiveness and discipline data? –All relevant staff have facility and understanding of data? –Are data used in evaluation of interventions?

Q: Why is it important to analyze risk as well as risk ratio? A: Risk ratios alone leave out important information.

List 1: Resources Teacher Training –Supports for Inexperienced or Struggling Teachers? –RTI –ELL –Trauma –PBS

The Legal Source Exposure to Poor Instruction or LEP Sec 614(b)(5) Rule out, as the determinant factor: The need for services that arise from insufficient instruction in: –Reading –or Math –or because of LEP status. Was in 1997 Act, but can expect renewed attention to this provision.

Evaluation of Referring Classroom Adequacy of Instruction (Reading and Math) Classroom Management Appropriate Support for Teacher Capacity to Teach Diverse Learners (Cultural Responsive Instruction)

List 2: Policies, Practices, and Procedures In depth INTERNAL discussion and review, not primarily based on paper. Policy: (both written and unwritten ways of implementing IDEA that are driven by the central office). Practice: The actual decisions that are made about teachers, students, resources…. Procedures: The established and detailed steps with regard to support, intervention, identification, placement and discipline.

What the Research And Law Says Evaluation: Beyond Biased Tests The tools themselves may appear race-neutral yet have a discriminatory impact. Look at what measures are used, and not used, and the weight attributed to scores, classroom observations, and perspective of the parents. Non-compliance or inappropriate practice can result if the administration or evaluation procedure has an unintended discriminatory impact. What knowledge and training do district evaluators have regarding alternative and culturally responsive forms of assessment? The data often suggests this is one area to review carefully. Do district level staff regularly review the data on referrals and outcomes disaggregated by race?

Policy/Practice Considerations General Education Special Ed Centralization Policy Reflects a Culture of Separation or Collaboration? Tension Between Administrative Costs and Individualized Plans and Placements

Policy Incentives for Identification, Restrictive Placement, Discipline Disability Category Drives Placement and Plan Removal for Classroom Management Test Accountability Response to Grade Retention

LRE and Minority Exclusion Right to special education and related services in the least restrictive environment to the maximum extent appropriate. Calls for an individualized determination – the category of disability should not drive the placement. Increased risk for being labeled CD or EBD should not mean greater exclusion from the regular education setting.

Procedural Issues Manifestation Determination Hearings Adequacy of Parental Involvement Pre-referral Interventions, Including RTI Re-evaluations Where Misidentification is Suspected

Practice (may differ by school, administrator, teacher). Parental Outreach Unconscious Racial Bias Trends in Grouping and Sorting of Children History of Complaints Emphasis on Poverty to the Exclusion of Race Support for Teachers How IEP Meetings are Conducted Connection with General Education (or lack of)

The Civil Rights Project and The National Research Council Say… School policies and decisions are contributing factors. Inadequate teacher training and support for classroom and behavior management likely contributes to the problem of racial disproportionality.

Review and Discussion of List 2 Select Items of Interest for Discussion Select Items Needing Clarification Discuss Contents of List 2 at Table for 15 Minutes or More

(Time Permitting) List 3: Environmental and External Factors Problems with Common Explanations Ruling Out Some Factors Modifying Analysis for Identified Causes Role of Schools: may contribute to environmental factors and/or provide remedies –(lead screening, safety education, health data analysis)

Common Misconceptions Not race, it’s poverty Not us, other districts No non-compliance, we don’t need to change

Other Schools and Districts What is annual net gain or loss of identified students? Are there labeling and sorting disparities within the district in other areas? Are incoming students re-evaluated the year they enter?

Are Significant Racial Disparities Explained Away by Poverty? Regression analysis says no. Blacks and Latinos have divergent patterns for CD, ED and SLD identification, yet similar poverty and reading achievement profiles. Gender differences for risk for CD among Blacks are far greater than among Whites. Wisconsin’s state averages in some cases are among the highest in the nation.

Black Males In the most profound example, contrary to expectations, as factors associated with wealth and better schooling increase, Black males are at greater risk of being disproportionately labeled “mentally retarded.” (See Oswald, Coutinho and Best, “Community and School Predictors of Over Representation of Minority Children in Special Education” in Racial Inequity in Special Education)

Wisconsin Risk for Disability Category by Racial/Ethnic Groups

Minimal Racial Disproportionality in Medically Diagnosed “Hard” Categories

It’s All Poverty: Not Race Poverty cannot explain the different identification rates between Blacks and Latinos. Poverty cannot explain why Blacks and Latinos are more likely to be removed from the mainstream.

Restriction Risk by Disability Category percent of students with CD, and over 70 percent with ED are educated in resource rooms or substantially separate settings. Approximately 56 percent of students with specific learning disabilities are in full inclusion placements (pulled out less than 21 percent of the school day). Overrepresentation for ED and CD significantly increases the risk for blacks of being educated in a substantially separate program.

What Should the Remedy Look Like? Change the numbers: Reduce the differential? The risk? The risk ratio? When are racial goals permissible? Desirable? Should the goals be driven by the context? Early Intervening Services? Improve the quality of regular education? Assuming institutional racism contributes – how can you change that?

Problem Solving and the 15% A finding of significant triggers the reservation of funds. The funds should be spent to help solve the problem that triggered their reservation, but are not restricted to that specific issue.

Contact Information Daniel J. Losen Independent Consultant Home Office: