The effects of selective harvesting on upland oak/hickory forests David Dyson and Jessi Ouzts Independent Study Project, Advent 2005 Introduction Coarse.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CENTRAL CASCADES ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP An intersection of state and federal organizations, sharing and focusing science and management resources.
Advertisements

Case Study 2 Neighborhood Models of the Allelopathic Effects of an Invasive Tree Species Gómez-Aparicio, L. and C. D. Canham Neighborhood analyses.
1.Area regulation 2.Volume regulation 3.Structural regulation Approaches to regulation in the selection method and maintaining a balanced stand with sustainable.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS of the FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR Southern Variant (FVS-Sn) Nathan D. Herring Dr. Philip J. Radtke Virginia Tech Department of Forestry.
Cruising Approaches  Area Based Methods  Tree Based Methods.
Comparison of structural attributes between old-growth and adjacent managed forests in Bosnia and Herzegovina Srdjan Keren Renzo Motta Dusan Rozenbergar.
Estimating Tree Failure Risk Along Connecticut Utility Right-of-Ways Helen Poulos Wesleyan University Ann Camp Yale School of Forestry and Environmental.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
Deliverable 2.3 CVS will construct refined guidelines for using plot data and taxon distribution data to develop restoration targets for specific sites.
Description & Analysis of community composition. The individualistic hypothesis Henry Gleason.
Forestry Measurements
Development of a landscape-scale model for restoration planning following SPB induced tree mortality John Waldron 1, David Cairns 2, Robert Coulson 3,
Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm.
Forestry Measurements Ms. Dombroski September 2005.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Cruise Design Measurement Computations. Determined by 1.Value of product(s) 2.Variability within the stand 3.Budget limitations Sampling Intensity.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
 Used by NRCS foresters  Simple and Quick way to determine  Average tree diameter  Range of tree diameters  Trees per acre  Stand composition 
Secondary forest succession quantification using LIDAR analysis in the southern Appalachians Tucker J. Souther 1, Robbie G. Kreza 1, Marcus C. Mentzer.
Effects of Silvicultural Practices on Woody Vegetation John Kabrick, Steve Shifley, and Dan Dey – USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Randy Jensen,
Restoration of Compartment 46 to promote oak-hickory regeneration, shortleaf pine and native grasses in Sewanee, TN Johnson Jeffers and colleagues in FORS.
Powered By Powered by: Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis.
Tree Data National Manual Version 1.61 Section 5.0.
FLORA AND VEGETATION OF THE KOKIWANEE NATURE PRESERVE David J. Hicks and Teresa M. Michaelis Biology Department, Manchester College North Manchester, IN.
Community dynamics in old growth and second growth hemlock forests.
Domain Inventory Project 23 March Domain Compartments.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We would like to thank John Brooks, Dr. Ken Martis, Mr.Brownie Stewart, Dr. Nancy Hoalst Pullen, Dr. Jay Gatrell, and all the students.
Forest Survey Can you identify this tree?. Red Maple.
Relationships Between Landscape Structure & Southern Pine Beetle Outbreaks in the Southern Appalachians John Waldron, David Cairns, Charles Lafon, Maria.
Risk Mapping for Forest Pests Kurt W. Gottschalk and Andrew M. Liebhold USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Morgantown, WV USA.
Patterns of CO 2 Efflux from Woody Stems in a Red Oak (Quercus rubra) Chronosequence Will Bowman 1 Rob Carson 1, Bill Schuster 2, and Kevin Griffin 1 1.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Identification of Forest Trees Gymnosperms Cupressaceae (Cypress/Cedar Family) Pinaceae (Pine Family)
Integrating field data and remote sensing to study secondary forests in Amazonian rural settlements Mateus Batistella Embrapa Satellite.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Fire Regimes in Yellow Pine Stands, Craig Creek Valley, Virginia, USA Georgina DeWeese Wight 1, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer 1, Charles.
The 1950s: A Decade of Intensive Forest Management on the Domain Department of Forestry & Geology, Sewanee: The University of the South Jase Brooks and.
Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Granite Creek area Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Harvest up to 95% of dead/dying trees
Analysis of secondary forest succession using LIDAR analysis in the southern Appalachians Brian D. Kloeppel 1, Robbie G. Kreza 1, Marcus C. Mentzer 1,
How did you estimate the number of daisies? Did you try to count them all? Or did you use another method? See if this will help…
Powered By Powered by: Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis.
Forest floor invasion results, 2002 Questions we asked: 1. Last year we found woody stem density was 65% lower in Vinca areas than on the natural forest.
Overstory Vegetation Overstory Vegetation 2008 MOFEP PI Meeting John Kabrick and Randy Jensen.
3. Results – cont. 3. Results 1. Introduction and objectives Pre-harvest Tree and Vine Biomass in a Forest in NW Mato Grosso, Brazil Ted R. Feldpausch.
Determining the Feasibility of the Recovery of Woody Biomass Bob Rummer, US Forest Service Mark Engle, Four Corners Consulting.
Transitions from Oak to Maple Dominated Forests in the eastern U.S Abstract Fire suppression, deer browsing, and clearcutting restrict oak (Quercus spp.)
Measuring Timber Stands
Crown-Condition Classification Tutorial (Revised January 2008)
MOFEP HARD MAST 2004 Project Update Team members: Randy Jensen, Mark Johanson, Gary Sullivan, Larry Vangilder, Mike Hubbard.
Vegetation Census Lab. Field Trip to Sessions Woods.
Economics of Biomass Harvest Dean Current and Dalia Abbas Woody Biomass Harvesting Workshop and Equipment Demonstration Grand Marais, MN – August 7, 2006.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Intermediate Stand Management – The Crop Tree Approach.
CFI NPT Forestry & Fire Management Division.
Brian Izbicki, Dr. Heather D. Alexander and Dr. Brent R. Frey
Cruise Summaries.
Establishing Plots.
Other Cruise Methods.
Approaches to regulation in the selection method and maintaining a balanced stand with sustainable yield Area regulation Volume regulation Structural regulation.
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Individual Snag Detection
Additional Data Collection in 2017
Jing Hu University of Queensland
Sampling Strategies and Quadrats
Liz LaPoint RMT December 2013
Assessing woody carbon stocks in Miombo woodlands of Mozambique (see map for location). We used multiscale sampling of vegetation cover (leaf area index)
50 Essential Forestry Terms Afforestation All-aged (uneven-aged) Artificial Regeneration Basal Area Biomass Broadleaf Clear-cut Harvest Climax Forest.
WNPS Native Plant Stewardship Program
Kirk Hanson (360)
By: Philip W. Williams Bachelor of Science in Forestry Student
Sampling Strategies and Quadrats
Presentation transcript:

The effects of selective harvesting on upland oak/hickory forests David Dyson and Jessi Ouzts Independent Study Project, Advent 2005 Introduction Coarse woody debrisHickory seedlings Streamside management zoneCompartment 10 – Severe basal damage due to skidding Slash and tulip poplar seedlings Residual trees Sampling Methods Compartment 10 harvest: 50 acres: Logged in March, 2004 Total stumpage value: $15,700 Original BA = 114 Current BA = 80 Compartment 6 harvest: 29 acres Logged February-April, 2005 Total stumpage value: $13,900 Original BA = 109 Current BA = 93 Objectives of this study: To assess and compare residual damage of low-impact harvesting on two recently logged sites on the Domain. To assess forest structure and dynamics after selective harvest. Used a grid overlaid on a topographic map to determine sampling points. In the field, sampled within concentric 1/100 th and 1/1000 th acre plots Determined slope/aspect, elevation, percent cover. In 1/100 th acre recorded dbh and damage level of trees over 2” dbh In 1/1000 th acre recorded all tree species less than 2” dbh Results Figure 3. Post harvest - diameter class distribution of all trees over 2” dbh Key Points Logging at Compartment 6 left a more even diameter class distribution Logging at Compartment 10 left a bell curve distribution, removing more trees in the higher and lower d-classes Commercial species were found on both Compartment 10 and Compartment 6, primarily in the form of oaks. Liriodendron tulipifera and Carya sp. were present in smaller numbers in the overstory. Acer rubrum, Sassafras albidum, and Liriodendron tulipifera dominated the seedling class. Damage percentage was determined by recording visible incidents of major basal and trunk damage (major = cut through bark and deep into heartwood). It was estimated at 22% for Compartment 10 and 17% for Compartment 6. Economically, Compartment 10 (the larger of the two) brought in more board foot volume and more revenue. Figure 4. Compartment 6 with sampling points. Post harvest counts of seedlings per acre by species showed Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Sassafras albidum in the highest numbers, with Quercus alba and Q. prinus found in slightly lower densities. A. rubrum and Quercus alba seedlings were more abundant in Compartment 6. L. tulipifera and Q. prinus were found more in Compartment 10. The post harvest tree stem count by species showed highest frequencies of Acer rubrum, Oxydendrum arboreum and Quercus alba in Compartment 10, while Nyssa sylvatica dominated the understory, predominantly in Compartment 6. Figure 7. Post-harvest diameter distribution of commercial species in Compartment 6. Figure 8. Post-harvest diameter distribution of commercial species in Compartment 10. Figure 6. Compartment 10 with sampling points. Figure 5. Map showing study sites on Sewanee Quad. Figure 10. Harvesting data from Compartments 6 & 10. Figure 9. Comparison of residual damage in Compartments 10 and 6. Figure 2. Comparison of pre- to post-harvest BA and SPA on Compartment 6. Figure 1. Comparison of pre- to post-harvest Basal Area (BA) and Stems per Acre (SPA) on Compartment 10.