Land Cover and Biometry Measurements GLOBE expedition 2015 Meelis Välba, Alex Zernov, Jako Aimsalu, Helen Uibu, Vadim Mihhailov, Marie Johanna Univer,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nonparametric and Probabilistic Classification of Agricultural Crops Using Multitemporal Images Smögen Workshop, August 2006 Jun Yu & Bo Ranneby.
Advertisements

GLOBE Land Cover Measurements Manual Mapping Land Cover Sample Sites Accuracy Assessment MultiSpec Computer assisted land cover mapping Accuracy Assessment.
Phenology: Green-Up Protocol GLOBE Green-Up Protocol Elena Bautista Sparrow International Arctic Research Center and School of Natural Resources and Agricultural.
1) Tree Canopy Cover Percentage 2) Shrub Cover Percentage 3) Identification of Dominant and Co-Dominant Species 4) Tree Heights of Dominant Species and.
The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
PRESENTATION ON “ Processing Of Satellite Image Using Dip ” by B a n d a s r e e n i v a s Assistant Professor Department of Electronics & Communication.
AA_Vis_1. Students examine both the “true color” And “false-color Infrared” images provided by GLOBE AA_Vis_2.
Chapter 2 Topographic Maps….
AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.
Milan Janák Field Mapping Training Workshop, 13 – 17 June, 2011 Instructions for field inventory of species in Montenegro listed under Habitats Directive.
Distinguishing vegetation communities. Understand the difference between land cover, vegetation, ecosystems, and habitat Understand the general procedure.
Aerial photography and satellite imagery as data input GEOG 4103, Feb 20th Adina Racoviteanu.
LeeAnna Young, Leanne Penry, Liz Montgomery, Johnathan Sutton, John Atkinson.
Embracing Tree Health Monitoring. TREE HEALTH MONITORING PROJECT PARTNERS.
The Geographer’s Tools
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Using Remote Sensing Imagery By: J.Verplanke,
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Effects of changes in grassland management on plant diversity. Åsmund Asdal, Norwegian Crop Research Institute, Norwegian program for PGRFA PGR diversity.
SUCCESSION Communities change through long periods of time.
Aerial Photographs and Remote Sensing Aerial Photographs For years geographers have used aerial photographs to study the Earth’s surface. In many ways.
Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of Northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement-classification method and spectral mixture analysis J.Théau, D.R.
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research Preserving Switzerland's natural heritage Achilleas Psomas January 23rd,2006 University.
BELLRINGER VOCABULARY: Geography- Landforms- Environment- Global Positioning System (GPS)- Geographic information systems (GIS)- Artifacts-
Subcontinental oak forest types in Slovakia Jan Roleček, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
GIS and GPS Applications in Support of Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program Implementation in Middle Tennessee David.
Hungarian oak forests from the Central European perspective Jan Roleček, Vegetation Science Group, Institute of Botany and Zoology Masaryk University,
Land Cover Tour Team Turtles and Veljo Kimmel Introduction  The 1st question for determining land cover type is – is it developed or natural site? In.
Maps There are many different types of Maps. What are Maps 1. Maps are drawing of part of the earth as seen from above. 2. Maps are tools that people.
Leaf Area Index for Fire Chronosequences in Siberian Boreal Forest PI: Don Deering, NASA GSFC CO-I: Slava Kharuk, Sukachev Institute of Forest Research.
Ecological Site Descriptions and State-and-Transition models of the Caldenal.
Module 14: Exotic Species Introduction Cameron, Barney, Puja, Nate, Crystal, Rachael Atlantic Forest, Brazil SEE-U 2000.
Field Measurements: Trees (complete). Circumference DBHBiomass Carbon Storage (per tree) C = D*3.14 Allometric Equations Carbon = Biomass*45% Carbon Storage.
Globes- 3-D representation of the earth Pros: Accurate shape, landmasses correct size and shape Cons: Inconvienent, only able to see one side at a time.
Chapter 1 : Looking at the Earth Section 1: Thinking Like A Geographer.
Regional Scale Forest Mapping with Medium Resolution Satellite Data Dmitry E. Aksenov Elena S. Esipova Natalia V. Kuksina Mikhail L. Karpachevsky.
Heathland field trip Mapping for Climate Change © Amy Rogers © Carl Corbidge.
Phenology: Green-Up Protocol Green-Up Protocol. Phenology: Green-Up Protocol Inquiry Context How long does green-up take for a given species? How does.
GIS for Environmental Modeling GIS and GIS Models.
How much carbon is being stored in the forest ecosystem near my school?
Mapping Technology and Topographic Maps Chapter 1, Lesson 3 and 4.
Somerford Mead: drivers of species’ change: management, climate or chance? Dr. Alison W. McDonald The Department of Plant Sciences The University of Oxford.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Cropland mapping in South America
Effects of liming on the ground vegetation of a Corsican pine stand in Flanders, Belgium Arne Verstraeten Meeting of the ICP Forests Expert Panel on Biodiversity.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Figure 7.1. Map of the land cover of the Iztaccíhuatl and Popocatépetl vocanoes area.
Kirill Langer Vegetation Ecology Summer Semester July 2013 University of Colorado Mountain Research Station Plant Species Diversity in the Subalpine Elk.
Why Study Land Cover?. Our GPS readings are accurate to about ± 16 meters. Satellite ground tracks do not exactly cover any one 30 m x 30 m site If.
Driving Question “How can we, as third grade students at Oceanlake Elementary School, improve the stand of trees on our school property to become a healthy.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research “Using the historical range of variability of landscape elements to identify and monitor.
HardHarderVery HardSuper HardImpossible
The Geographer’s Tools Chapter 1 Section 2 Maps and Globes Two or Three Dimensions –Maps purpose is show locations on the earth and where they are in.
White Mesa Cultural and Conservation Area
What is Geography?.
Grazing preferences of goats in diverse rangeland
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Colour air photo: 15th / University Way
Tools of the trade Global Studies.
Space data for forest monitoring in Taiwan
Other Surface Water and Remote Sensing
Disturbed and Harvested Site Species
Review of Satellite Imagery
Maps: The Geographer’s Basic Tools
Geography & Technology Global Positioning System “GPS”
Land Cover Investigation
Review of Satellite Imagery
Review of Satellite Imagery
Making Land cover map of the Mekong Delta
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Presentation transcript:

Land Cover and Biometry Measurements GLOBE expedition 2015 Meelis Välba, Alex Zernov, Jako Aimsalu, Helen Uibu, Vadim Mihhailov, Marie Johanna Univer, Henri Hirv, Heli Salundi, Svetlana Gostiseva, Rasytė Gaidienė, Elijas Palionis, Alina Mokliak, Kateryna Cheban, Yelyzaveta Borodynia, Piia Liisa Künnapas, Lii Sepp, Ülle Reier, Imbi Henno

Main purposes  To determine the major land cover type at a Land Cover Sample Site.  To measure and classify the plants at a Land Cover Sample Site to help determine the MUC classification.  To compare the satellite picture (one pixle at a time) with real nature

Research questions  Compare the different Land Cover Sample Sites  What are the dominant and co-dominant species?  Are the dominant and co-dominant species common in this area?  Can the same types of land cover have different size and amount of trees, shrubs or grasses?  If you compared a Landsat image from ten years ago to one from today how do you think they would differ?

Methodology  Select the 30 m x 30 m area  Record data(latitude, longitude, elevation)  Identify plants or land cover  Take some photos  Biometry measurements(canopy and ground cover)

Tools and materials  GPS receiver  Camera  Pencil or pen and Data Sheet  Landsat TM images of your GLOBE Study Site  Local and topographic maps (if available)  Aerial photos (if available)  MUC Field Guide  Biometry Protocol materials as needed  50 m tape measure  Calculator (optional)  Tubular densiometer  Rope  Markers for sites  Clipboard

Densiometer

Measured area by Google earth Landsat-8 July 21, 2015 natural colours image

Measured area by Landsat-8 July 21, 2015 false colour composite Sentinel-1 radar image on July 31, 2015

Site 1 forest  Lat. 59 ⁰ 15’59,66’’ N  Long. 25 ⁰ 38’40,7’’ E  Elevation 109m  Tree canopy cover 64%  MUC code 0231

Dominant species  Dryopteris filix-mas - Maarja sõnajalg  Rubus saxatilis - lillakas  Pteridium aquilinum - kilpjalg  Hepatica - sinilill  Melampyrum - mets-härghein  Pleurozium schreberi - harilik palusammal  Carex pallescens - kahkjas tarn  Viola riviniana - võsakannike  Deschampsia flexuosa - võnk-kastevars  Geranium sylvaticum - mets-kurereha  Corylus avellana - harilik sarapuu  Acer platanoides - harilik vaher Germanium sylvaticum

 Salix caprea - raagremmelgas  Lonicera - kuslapuu  Ribes alpinum - mage sõstar  Calamagrostis arundinacea – metskastik  Poa nemoralis – salunurmikas Lonicera

Site 2 the old field (meadow)  Lat. 59 ⁰ 15’56,82’’ N  Long. 25 ⁰ 38’07,91’’ E  Elevation 91m  MUC code 442 Cirsium arvense

Dominant species F for common field species and M for common meadow species  Cirsium arvense – põldohakas F  Silene latifolia - valge pusurohi  Convolvulus arvensis - kassitapp  Galium album - valge madar  Rumex thyrsiflorus - aasoblikas  Achillea millefolium - harilik raudrohi  Linaria - käokannus  Phleum pratense – põldtimut M  Festuca rubra - punane aruhein  Leucanthemum vulgare - harilik härjasilm  Campanula patula - harilik kellukas M  Pilosella officinarum - harilik karutubakas Leucanthemum vulgare

 Centaurea scabiosa – põldjumikas M  Rumex crispus - kärnoblikas  Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus – niidukäharik M  Potentilla argentea - hõbemaran Linaria Convolvulus arvensis

Site 3 near Purgatsi lake  Lat. 59 ⁰ 15’54,08’’ N  Long. 25 ⁰ 39’07,49’’ E  Elevation 113 m  Tree canopy cover 62%  MUC code 821 (parks and sporting areas)

Dominant species  Quercus robur - tamm  Picea abies - kuusk  Sorbus - pihlakas  Melampyrum nemorosum - härghein  Calamagrostis - kastik  Fragaria vesca - metsmaasikas  Oxalis acetosella - harilik jänesekapsas  Veronica chamaedrys - külmamailane  Vicia sepium - aed-hiirehernes  Lathyrus vernus - kevadine seahernes Melampyrum nemorosum

Conclusions  The three measured sites were the same as the satellite pictures  Dominant species can be the same if the sites are similar (site 1 and 3)  The dominant species are usually common in this area  The same type of land cover can have different amount and size of land cover (for example if there is a human impact)  The meadow in site 3 was a field 10 years ago

Extras 1 On the meadowIn the forest

Extras 2 MushroomsOur supervisor

Thank you for your attention