Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 2.
Advertisements

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Formative Assessment Institute Presented by: Jennifer Nehl From.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
INFORMative Assessment of Student Understanding; Ratio and Rate of Change August, 2012.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Formative Assessment “Stiggins style”
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
HOW ASSESSMENT SUPPORTS RTI 2 AND CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP Clinch-Powell Cooperative Presenters:
Math Leadership Support Network ’09-’10 Mathematics Leadership Support Network Presentation Provided Jointly by the P-12 Math and Science Outreach Division.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
Next Generation Science Cadre Facilitators: Jennifer Spencer Katrina Slone.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 What Assessment for Learning Looks Like in the Classroom.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Course Map/Check for Understanding Refer to Handout #01 – Course Map/Checking for Understanding On the first page, review the learning targets from the.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Chief Instructional Leaders Title I Fall Conference October 5, 2010 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV.
Balanced Assessment in the Classroom. Review the Balanced Assessment Survey Packet page 26.
Differentiation Please sit at a table labeled with your chapter number. Five participants at a table. Each person in the table group will have read the.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Formative Assessments John Vail Kalamazoo RESA. Formative Assessments Please write down the top three questions you have about formative assessments?
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Project & Syllabus.
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Our Leadership Journey
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Our Assessment Future Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Yesterday … Yesterday, Stiggins shared his thoughts on our Assessment Legacy. We also started some thinking about our own assessment system. Take a moment to share with your partner your thoughts on the Assessment Legacy and your own assessment system in your classroom..

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Targets and Success Criteria Learning Target: Differentiate between formative and summative assessment. Explain the Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Success Criteria: Apply understandings of formative and summative assessment to current classroom practice.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Balanced Assessment System In triads, take turns explaining the chart on page 21 in your book, A Balanced Assessment System. Each partner has one section. Partner A: Classroom Assessment Partner B: Interim/Benchmark Assessment Partner C: Annual Testing

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Video Video of Stiggins on Assessment. Two Parts: Part 1: Our Assessment Legacy (30 min) Part 2: Our Assessment Future (20 min) Will watch Our Assessment Future in two parts.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Balanced Assessment System Key IssuesFormative Context (FOR)Summative Context (OF) Key decision(s) Decision Makers Information needed Levels Classroom Assessment Interim/Benchmark Assessment Annual Testing

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Video Pause video. In triads, revisit the chart on page 21 in your book, A Balanced Assessment System and add to chart. Each partner has the same section. Partner A: Classroom Assessment Partner B: Interim/Benchmark Assessment Partner C: Annual Testing

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing your Assessment System Think about a unit of instruction you taught this past semester. In your notebook, list the assessment records you kept for one unit of instruction. Comment next to each record whether the results were used formatively or summatively.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Balanced Assessment System What is the ratio of formative to summative use of assessment results for one instructional unit? What do you think the ideal ratio of formative to summative for one unit of study might be? What, if any, changes to the ratio would you make? What would you do to make the changes?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee OF and FOR Learning Assessment of Learning (Summative): How much have students learned as of a particular point in time? Assessment FOR Learning (Formative): How can we use assessment to help students learn more? (not just checking learning but promoting learning)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Lunch Discussion How balanced is your assessment system? What are some changes you are considering making?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Video In the last part of Our Assessment Future, Stiggins addresses the teacher’s role in assessment FOR learning and seven specific strategies for using formative assessment.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Video In preparation for the video, take out last night’s homework. Review your notes and thinking. Homework: List the “five keys” to Quality Classroom Assessment. Reflect on and explain the following two ideas: One “key” that is a strength in your classroom practice One “key” that you would like to embed into your classroom practice. Start video.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Teacher’s Role in Assessment FOR Learning 1.Identify the standard. 2.Deconstruct it to enabling targets. 3.Transform to student friendly version. 4.Create accurate classroom assessments. 5.Use with students to track growth.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Specific Strategies for Students 1.Student friendly targets from the beginning. 2.Models of strong and weak work. 3.Continuous descriptive feedback. 4.Teach self-assessment and goal setting. 5.Teach one facet at a time. 6.Teach focused revision. 7.Teach self-reflection to track growth.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Specific Strategies of Assessment For Learning 1.Read the strategy that has been assigned to your table group. 2.Discuss the strategy and what it means in Classroom Practice. Draw a picture to stand for your strategy. 3.Prepare a poster that can be used to explain your strategy to class participants. Consider … What is the teacher’s responsibilities for this strategy? What is the students’ role? How will this strategy support learning? What other ideas need to be shared about this strategy?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee In Summation… The 7 strategies are not a recipe to be followed step by step, but instead a compilation of practices that when implemented well will increase students' efficacy and achievement.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Targets and Success Criteria Learning Target: Differentiate between formative and summative assessment. Explain the Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Success Criteria: Apply understandings of formative and summative assessment to current classroom practice.