Newton-Conover City School Title I – Title II Stakeholders Meeting Tammy Brown – Title I Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged Sylvia White – Title II Improving Teacher Quality

Enrollment StudentsTeach/Students NCHS DHS NCMS Shuford South Newton Thornton Conover / ACT

Teacher Turnover / HQT School Totals TTHQT NCHS16%895.47% DHS22%2100% NCMS11%499.62% Shuford14%4100% S. Newton 13% 3100% Thornton 0% 0100%

Teacher Turnover System Totals by Year NCCSState % % % % % Five year Avg teachers 19 left / 15 tenured

School Staff Data NBCTAd. Deg. NCHS15%22% DHS10%40% NCMS 7%31% Shuford25%45% S. Newton20%36% Thornton14%32% Conover 5%42% ACT83%100% All school have 100% HQ

School Staff Data Years Exp NCHS 4%27% 49% DHS 27% 46% 27% NCMS 17% 40% 43% Shuford 20% 47% 33% S. Newton 12% 36% 52% Thornton 23% 43% 34% Conover 30% 35% 35% ACT00 100%

Equity Report School Enrollment October 2012 # Teachers Student/ Teacher Fully license Advanced degreeBTsNBCT0-3 years 4-10 years 10+ yearsTitle I Free Reduced ACT % 0500 Conover School %2130%35% 64.30% Discovery High School %40%1127%46%27%45.30% Newton-Conover High %22%8824%27%49%53.40% Newton-Conover Middle %31%2317%40%43%66.10% Shuford %45%7720%47%33%yes56.40% South Newton %36%2412%36%52%yes74.50% Thornton %32%6423%43%34%yes81.30%

Equity Report PL all students are taught to the same extent by experienced and highly qualified teachers.. LEA MUST: assure principals in all Title I schools send required notification to parents Ensure parents of student in Title I district are notified they may request professional qualifications of their children’s teachers Ensure poor of minority children are not taught by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of –field teacher at higher rates Identify any inequities in assignment of unqualified and/or inexperienced teachers to minority, learning disabled, low- wealth, or English language learner Describe specific strategies to address the inequities on the equity plan, including a timeline Each LEA evaluates its Equity Plan and makes adjustments based on the impact of the evaluation

Comparability Report Names of Schools Grade Span Total Number of Pupils Enrolled as of 2nd Month SY Number of Instructional Staff (FTE) SY DIVIDE Col. C by D (Student/Instructio nal Staff Ratio)Comparable? (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) Shuford ElementaryPK Yes South Newton ElementaryPK Yes Thornton ElementaryPK Yes Total % of Student/Instructional Staff Ratio % of Student/Instructional Staff Ratio20.9

System Achievements % ProficientGrowth NCHS44.1 Met DHS62.1Met NCMS41.3 Did not meet N. Newton35.8 Did not meet Shuford52.0 Did not meet S. Newton 35.1Met North Carolina44.7

Program Plans & Budget CCIP Link Information for 2014 planning CCIP Link CCIP Link

?