Getting Published ?! (*#~) Vasan S. Ramachandran, MD BUSM / Framingham Heart Study Source screen shot: Lawrence P. Nature 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So you want to get published? Kristen L. Mauk PhD, DNP, RN, CRRN, GCNS-BC, GNP-BC, FAAN President Senior Care Central.
Advertisements

Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
AUTHORSHIP SKILLS: QUESTIONS SCIENTISTS FREQUENTLY ASK ABOUT THE WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF JOURNAL ARTICLES.
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
How to write my paper and have it published in a computational biology journal? Phil Bourne University of California San Diego
Writing a Good Paper Philip Bourne & Steven Brenner ISMB 2010.
Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
Getting Published ?! (*#~) Vasan S. Ramachandran, MD BUSM / Framingham Heart Study Source screen shot: Lawrence P. Nature 2003.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
HOW TO WRITE RESEARCH PAPERS FOR ACADEMIC JOURNALS
Scholarly and Professional Communication: Other Topics for the Advanced Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
ASV Education and Career Development Workshop Put down the pipette and pick up the pen: Getting your work published The third part of the story... The.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
Getting Your Article Published: The Mysteries of Peer-Review and the Decisions of Journals Howard Bauchner, MD, FAAP, FRCPCH Editor-in-Chief, ADC Professor.
Publishing in Medical Journals Richard Saitz MD, MPH Section of General Internal Medicine, BMC Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology, BUSM and BUSPH Associate.
Scientific Publishing Joanne Thomson Imperial College London 4 th February 2010.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Reasons of rejection Paolo Russo Università di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Fisica Napoli, Italy 8th ECMP, Athens, Sep. 13th,
Guidelines to Publishing in IO Journals: A US perspective Lois Tetrick, Editor Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
II THE PUBLICATION PROCESS. Conduct literature review Start the paper Conduct study/analyze data Organize/summarize results succinctly Get early, frequent.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
How to write a paper and get it published in a top journal….. and make sure it is cited…..
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Different Types of Scientific Writing. Overview Different types of papers Types of reviews Organization of papers What to leave in; what to leave out.
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
How to write an article Dr. Zahra Abdulqader Amin
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Publishing Your Work Not a Question, But rather an Execution Who? Why? When? Where? How? รัตติกร ยิ้มนิรัญ สาขาวิชาฟิสิกส์ สำนักวิชา วิทยาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีสุรนารี
Preparing papers for International Journals Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh 20 April 2005.
Submitting Manuscripts to Journals: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.
Writing and publishing a research article Thomas H. Adair, Ph.D. Professor of Physiology & BIophysics Center of Excellence in Cardiovascular-Renal Research,
Ginny Smith Managing Editor: Planning and Urban Studies Taylor & Francis Ltd.
How to Write Defne Apul and Jill Shalabi. Papers Summarized Johnson, T.M Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:6, Lee,
Successful publishing managing the review process Professor Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, PhD 2004 Services Doctoral Consortium Miami, Florida 28 October.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
Appendix A: Reporting Research Results  How do scientists share their research findings with others?  Through what stages does a research report go as.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
PUBLISHING THE RESEARCH RESULTS: Researcher Motivation is an Important Step Dr.rer.nat. Heru Susanto Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 4/15/11 Experiences from writing and editing for Monthly Weather Review: One Person’s View Josh Hacker, Naval Postgraduate.
FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
Which Journal to Publish in and How Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Professor, Texas A&M University Knowledge Community Editor, AuthorAID.
IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Matthew R. Cooperberg, MD, MPH UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Getting Published an editor’s tricks Getting Published a reviewer’s.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Medical Writing How to get funded and published November 2003.
The Editor’s Perspective on Reviewing and Selecting Manuscripts for Publication Samuel F. Posner, PhD Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease Deputy.
Jim Neaton PubH 8403 Presentation. Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors; a Book.
Dealing with Reviews. Rejection hurts, but is it fatal?
Editorial decision making and common reasons for rejection Shirin Heidari.
How to Develop a Manuscript: More Aspects Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Professor, Texas A&M University Knowledge Community Editor, AuthorAID.
Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
How to Get Your Research Published? Source screen shot: Lawrence P. Nature 2003.
What’s Included in a Review Irving H. Zucker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center A Primer for Potential Reviewers Experimental Biology 2014 San.
Jim Neaton PubH 8400 December 12, Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors;
CPD 3 - Advanced Publishing Skills 1 - How to Get Published and to Continue to Get Published in Leading Academic Journals Professor Tarani Chandola with.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
International Journal Publication: the Editorial Perspective
Publishing a paper.
The peer review process
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
Strategi Memperbaiki dan Menyiapkan Naskah (Manuscript) Hasil Review
Presentation transcript:

Getting Published ?! (*#~) Vasan S. Ramachandran, MD BUSM / Framingham Heart Study Source screen shot: Lawrence P. Nature 2003

2 Sources erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.pptx DOI: /science.caredit.a Google images. Cartoonstock.com

3 NATURE|VOL 422 |20 MARCH 2003 |

4 Issues Discussed Author responsibilities: an overview Choosing a journal Unmasking editorial processes: inside the board room Processing editorial decisions & revising MS

5 Some Key Tips Read many papers, and learn from good ones & bad ones Write frequently: quality is everything Review frequently Learn to be objective about your work Believe that editors/reviewers are likely trying to be objective about your work Learn to expect and accept rejection Modified from Bourne PE. Plos Comput Biol 2005

6 Some Key Tips Ingredients of good science Novelty of idea (timing) Comprehensive review of literature Strong data; strong analysis/stats input Thought provoking discussion recognizing limitations of one’s work Ingredients of good writing Good organization Appropriate use of tables & figures Right length Right audience Modified from Bourne PE. Plos Comput Biol 2005

Why write and publish research papers? Ideally – to share research findings and discoveries with the hope of improving healthcare. Practically – to get funding to get promoted to get a job to keep your job! Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

“Scientists are rated by what they finish, not by what they attempt” Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

9 Publishing begins with choosing a Good Research Question !!

10 MS Structure Source:

11 First Impressions

12 Writing Simply “Those who have the most to say usually say it with the fewest words” Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

13 Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

14 Writing simply & clearly Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

15 Avoid obtuse/obstruse language Appears in Brumback RA. J Child Neurol 2009;24:

16 MS Preparation Source:

Process of Publication Submission of manuscript Assignment and review Decision Revision Resubmission Re-review Acceptance Publication Rejection Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

18 Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

19 Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

20 Beware of autoplagiarism Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

21 Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

22 Authorship principles Fairness (ICJME 3 criteria) ‘Openness’/transparency Communication Team perspective: Sensitivity towards varying views on contributorship Enjoying the process ‘Feeling good’ about process “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." (Winston Churchill, from a House of Commons speech on Nov. 11, 1947)

23 Appears in Brumback RA. J Child Neurol 2009;24:

What constitutes redundant publication? Data in conference abstract? Same data, different journal? Data on website? Data included in review article? Expansion of published data set? No Yes Maybe OK if later Yes Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

25 Choosing the Right Journal

What constitutes a good journal? Impact factor – average number of times published papers are cited up to two years after publication. Immediacy Index – average number of times published papers are cited during year of publication. Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

27 Impact factors

28 Choosing the right journal Woolley K L, Barron J P Chest 2009;135:

29 The Cover Letter Suggested reviewers and excluded reviewers Kelner K. Science. DOI: /science.caredit.a DeBehnke DJ. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 844–850

30

31 The Editorial Process Source:

What constitutes good science? Novel – new and not resembling something formerly known or used (can be novel but not important) Mechanistic – testing a hypothesis - determining the fundamental processes involved in or responsible for an action, reaction, or other natural phenomenon Descriptive – describes how are things are but does not test how things work – hypotheses are not tested. Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

33 Novelty is most critical !

34 Erratic Editors

35 The Editor may be on your side ! Editors work hard & tend to be pro-authors Editors respect the peer review system Editors struggle with difficult decisions & are also ‘pained’ by decisions (as authors) Editors have broader perspective Editors don’t like involvement in authorship disputes Editors don’t mind rebuttals

36 Quotes from Editors

37

38 A request for revision ?! Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

39 A request for revision ?! Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

40 Be responsive to reviewers Make it easy for them to re-review the MS

41 Source: erm.wustl.edu/Dodson_ERM_ pdf

42 Miscellaneous Reasons for Rejection Glick M. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138;

43 Interpreting Wording of Rejection Rejection with referral to another journal in family

Flow diagram illustrating the choices authors can make after receiving a manuscript rejection letter from the editor of their first-choice journal. Woolley K L, Barron J P Chest 2009;135: ©2009 by American College of Chest Physicians

45 Dealing with Rejection Kelner K. Science. DOI: /science.caredit.a

46 Rejection Fraction !

47 Some new challenges Open Access journals Social media & Open peer review “joint’ online authorship

48 Some Key Tips Read many papers, and learn from good ones & bad ones Write frequently: quality is everything Review frequently Learn to be objective about your work Believe that editors/reviewers are likely trying to be objective about your work Learn to expect and accept rejection Modified from Bourne PE. Plos Comput Biol 2005

49 Some Key Tips Ingredients of good science Novelty of idea (timing) Comprehensive review of literature Strong data; strong analysis/stats input Thought provoking discussion recognizing limitations of one’s work Ingredients of good writing Good organization Appropriate use of tables & figures Right length Right audience Modified from Bourne PE. Plos Comput Biol 2005

“There is no way to get experience except through experience.” Source: dor.umc.edu/.../WritingandpublishingaresearcharticleAdair.ppt

51 Getting published! Thank you!