Investment in Gas Infrastructure A regulator´s view Nina GRALL Seminar on Gas Industry Restructuring in SEE 4/5th October 2005, Belgrade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Asia Gas Buyers’ Summit Mumbai, 2-3 February 2004
Advertisements

Guidelines for New Gas Infrastructure Investment Regulation in the Energy Community (GGIIR) Basic Criteria Joint working group meeting , Belgrade.
Workshop on “Requirements of financial institutions on the financing of gas infrastructure projects, Brussels, Regulatory requirements for new.
Guidelines for Good Third Party Access Practice For LNG System Operators (GGPLNG) Rocío Prieto ERGEG’s Gas Focus Group (GFG) XIV Madrid Forum, May.
The big picture in the EU Managing conflicting objectives in tariff design Tom Maes, Vice-Chair CEER Gas Working Group Understanding the impact of regulatory.
Number of players The number of players at wholesale level is very limited (more then 97% of sources /production + import/ in one /incumbent/ hand) New.
Towards Regional Independent Operators – a main driver for successful market integration.
Update on GSE Activities Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht GSE President GIE General Assembly Madrid 21 November 2007.
The Role of regulators in Energy security Sergey G.Novikov Head of Federal Tariff Service of Russian Federation Istanbul
Markus Krug, Co-Chair CEER Workstream 20 th Madrid Forum 26 September 2011 Harmonised transmission tariff structures Framework Guideline.
E.ON on the Romanian Energy Market ZF Power Summit Bucharest, February 27, 2013 Frank Hajdinjak CEO E.ON România.
1 The Regulatory Approach to Fostering Investment David Halldearn Ofgem 28 September 2006.
XV Madrid Forum, 6 and 7 November 2008 Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management Rules for Storage Mr. Walter Boltz ERGEG’s Gas Focus Group (GFG)
|Date faculty of law groningen centre of energy law 1 Security of Supply – EU Perspective and Legal Framework First EU-Russia Energy Law Conference,30.
2nd GTE Conference Copenhagen, September 2004 Author:Milan Sedlacek SPP (Slovak Gas Industry) Slovak Republic GAS TRANSIT THROUGH A NEW EU MEMBER STATE.
EG pfa-sb Athen_November2005.ppt GIE Annual Conference The View of the Users of Gas Infrastructures Presented by Dieter Pfaff E.ON Ruhrgas AG Chairman.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Johannes ENZMANN European Commission DG Energy and Transport Unit Electricity and Gas GIE Annual Conference.
Legal and Regulatory framework Regional Power Exchange Issues Apr 4, 2006 Kjell A Barmsnes
E P D K 1 Turkish Electricity Market and Recent Developments Cemal Çelik Energy Expert EMRA-TURKEY March ANTALYA.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Transparency – Proposal to amend chapter 3 of the Annex of Regulation 1775/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION H. Hick, DG TREN C 2 NW GRI 5th.
ANRE ROMANIAN ENERGY REGULATORY AUTHORITY - ANRE Challenges in transitioning to a liberalised, competitive market – Romanian experience.
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Transmission System Operators Page 1 Investment work stream GRI North-West Operators‘ Group Investment Work Stream SG.
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Framework Guideline (Pilot) Dr. Stefanie Neveling, ACER Workstream Co-Chair Walter Boltz, ACER.
The 3rd package for the internal energy market Key proposals EUROPEAN COMMISSION Heinz Hilbrecht Directorate C - Security of supply and energy markets.
Walter Boltz, Chairman ERGEG Gas Working Group 19th Madrid Forum 21 March 2011 Monitoring Report Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management.
Ainārs Meņģelsons Public Utilities Commission Latvia 11th Baltic Energy Regional Initiative October 1, 2010 Jūrmala, Latvia ELECTRICITY REGIONAL INITIATIVE.
Benoît Esnault Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) - ERGEG 19th Madrid Forum, March 2011 Energy Infrastructure Package ERGEG preliminary.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport1 Ana Arana Antelo Head of Unit Electricty & Gas – European Commission/DG TREN GIE Annual Conference, ,
Directorate General for Energy and Transport European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport Regulation of electricity markets in the.
Legal developments in the Polish Power Sector Arkadiusz Krasnodębski.
XVI th Madrid Forum Madrid, 28 May 2009 Walter Boltz (Gas Working Group Chair) Transparency guidelines and GRI transparency work.
UPDATES ON THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN LITHUANIA Aistija Zubaviciute National Control Commission for Prices and Energy 3 April 2007, Riga.
© ONTRAS Development and innovative strategies for transmission system operators Ralph Bahke Managing Director, ONTRAS.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Johannes ENZMANN Administrator DG Energy and Transport European Commission GTE 2nd Annual Conference 23 September.
Benoît Esnault Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) - ERGEG 19th Madrid Forum, March 2011 Preparatory work for Framework Guideline Tariffs.
Walter Boltz & Asta Sihvonen-Punkka, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package Brussels, 11 th December 2008 Implementing the 3 rd Package Framework.
The industrial consumer’s view IFIEC EUROPE 1 GTE 2 nd Annual Conference September 2004 Copenhagen Barriers to competition in the view of a consumer.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) 17 th Madrid Forum 14 January 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
1 Vienna Economic Forum –VEF- ERE AND THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRIVATISATION OF DSO Bujar Nepravishta Chairman of ERE Tirana-8 th and 9 th June.
Vienna, 24 november GRI SSE: work done so far 1. Assessment summary on selected transportation routes ongoing 2. Preliminary paper on hubs as regional.
1 The Spanish Gas Industry and the 3 rd Package Antoni Peris Mingot – Sedigas President GIE Annual Conference – Madrid.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Unbundling DG TREN C-2 European Commission DG Energy and Transport Belgrade, Seminar on Gas Industry Restructuring.
CESEC Energy Community Project Monitoring
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
Independence and powers of regulators: legal and institutional requirements Heinz Hilbrecht, Director, European Commission World Forum on Energy Regulation.
Gas Regional Initiative W orkstream regulatory co-ordination, subfocus investment Workshops Bonn, 8 February 2007 Draft 2.
Gas storage: GB experience and future trends Sonia Brown Director, European Strategy and Environment GSE Conference - May 2007.
State Regulation in the Natural Monopoly Sphere Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation of Natural Monopolies ALMATY – 2006.
Gas Transit Workshop Brussels, 24th January 2007 Milan Sedlacek, SPP - preprava, Slovak Republic Gas transit regulation ( Slovakia as a country with standard.
7th Stakeholder Group meeting The Hague – 07 May 2010 Gas Regional Initiative Region North-West Secondary Markets Betsy Annen, CRE Bernhard Schaefer, E.ON.
Doug Wood GTE-CEER transit workshop Brussels, 24 January 2007 Doug Wood GTE-CEER transit workshop, 24 Jan 2007 European Federation of.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Mark van Stiphout – C2 Electricity and Gas GSE Workshop on storage investment 24 May 2007 Policy framework.
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
1 Capacity and Congestion Management Duties of TSOs - Availability of infrastructure and capacities for shippers to fulfil their supply obligations - Guarantee.
Gas Transmission Charging Review: Final Capacity Charging Proposal Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
GRI SSE Work Plan Project proposal of HEA
Congestion Management
The 3rd package for the internal energy market
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Pilot framework guideline - Public consultation results and new content of guidelines - Dr.
Gas Transmission Europe
Background and Process
GRI SSE Work Plan Project proposal of HEA
CESEC Energy Community Project Monitoring
GIE Annual Conference Bratislava, September 2006
Capacity Allocation Mechanisms
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
Meinhard Janssen GIE Board Member
ERGEG comment to KEMA study on Art. 3 and 7
EUROGAS LNG TASK FORCE Bilbao, 13 March 2009 Presentation by
Presentation transcript:

Investment in Gas Infrastructure A regulator´s view Nina GRALL Seminar on Gas Industry Restructuring in SEE 4/5th October 2005, Belgrade

Agenda  Infrastructure – Impact on Market Development  Investment Requirements  Market/Regulatory Requirements

Agenda  Infrastructure – Impact on Market Development  Investment Requirements  Market/Regulatory Requirements

Infrastructure – Impact on market development  Strategic scope of SEE gas market Supporting diversification of EU gas supply  competition Meeting SEE´s increasing demand  Availability of grid capacities key requirement for development of national and regional gas market(s) gas-to-gas competition  Barriers for well functioning market exist where no (physical or contractual congestion) or too little (need capacity expansion) capacity is available to allow (new) suppliers to meet customers demand  Requirements Availability of domestic capacities  national SoS, increase of competition Availability of transit capacities  regional SoS, increase of competition, diversification of EU supply

Agenda  Infrastructure – Impact on Market Development  Investment Requirements  Market/Regulatory Requirements

What do investors need?  Certainty Legal binding market rules (law, regulator) Clear roles and responsibililties  Stability Stable legal framework Stable regulatory rules  Predictability Meeting the long term nature of infrastructure investment Maximum utilisation of capacity  market rules, capacity allocation  Standardised rules for the regional market  ECSEE, market rules

Agenda  Infrastructure – Impact on Market Development  Investment Requirements  Market/Regulatory Requirements Capacity Allocation Requirements Transparency on Available Capacities Efficient Use of Existing Capacities Meeting the Future Capacity Demand Unbundling Requirements Tariff Derivation

What does the market need? Regulatory Requirements – 1  Stable framework Legal binding market rules (law, regulator) Clear roles and responsibililties  Easy access to the system and non-discrimination Simple TPA modell (national and cross border)  one stop shop on TSO and regulatory level, inter-TSO cooperation Standardised TPA rules  Standard Transportation Contract Standardised allocation mechanisms and congestion management Standardised nomination procedures Non-discriminatory tariff setting Non-discriminatory treatment  Unbundling !  Transparency and information Services offered Rules applied  congestion, allocation, nomination, balancing, standard documents Tariffs and tariff derivation, tariff calculator Available capacities  forecast and historical data, calculation methodology Grid data  entry/exit points Disruption management and maintenance Mindest Standards Requirements GGP2/Gas Regulation

What does the market need? Regulatory Requirements – 2  Capacities Sufficient availability of capacities Efficient use of existing capacities  UIOLI, 2ndary market Meeting future capacity demand  long term planning, system expansion Fair and non – discriminatory capacity allocation Firm and interruptible capacities Short- and long-term capacities  Range of services offered Bundled and unbundled services Critieria1: Market demand? Which services does the market really need? Criteria2: Maximum flexibility for system users  Flexibility Bundled and unbundled services  storage, balancing energy Market based system  balancing energy Mindest Standards Requirements GGP2/Gas Regulation

 Capacity Allocation Requirements  For each round offering available capacities Open season for evaluation of market demand identifying market demand for -intake and offtake points capacity should be allocated -relative amount of capacity requested at each point; -minimum lot size to be offered -products to be offered: long term/short term down to a minimum period of […], firm/interruptible Open season shall already indicate -Allocation procedure to be applied -Indicative tariff  Following the open season results (declared demand) Percentage to be offered on a short term basis -Short term capacities not booked to be re-offered on a long term basis Percentage to be offered on a long term basis Preferred to new market entrants

 Transparency on Capacity Availability

 Efficient Use of Existing Capacities  Principle Unused capacity has to be made available to the market  Instruments 1.Users shall trade their unused capacity rights on the 2ndary market -No restriction by TSO -Not limited to approval by TSO as long as payment obligation remains with the original holder of the relevant capacities -Obligatory trading via a bulletin board of TSO  transparency! 2.UIOLI in case user does not sell unused capacities on the 2ndary market  Double sided responsibility TSO obliged to support 2ndary trade and UIOLI application User obliged to free up unused capacity Roles and responsibilities to be included in Standard Transportation Contract

 Meeting the Future Capacity Demand  Role of TSO „develop the transmission system in such way to meet both the required capacity and reasonable demands to ensure the long-term availability of the system“ (Art 2 Directive 2003/55/EC)  Long term planning to evaluate the future capacity demand National and on cross border basis  Open season to evaluate specific capacity demand Entry/exit points Amount of capacity  Investors´/TSOs´ role to meet the demand by capacity expansion? Tender process Open for interested investors?

 Unbundling Requirements  TSO as a subsidiary of parent companies has to carry out unbundled transmission functions  TSO shall have enough human and physical resources at its disposal to carry out its work independently from other parts of the integrated companies including especially personnel unbundling of staff employed from national affiliates and related companies from supply activities including sufficient financial means available to fulfil its tasks to maintain and develop the network  TSO shall have effective decision-making rights independent from the parent companies with respect to assets necessary to operate maintain or develop the network parent company not permitted to give instructions regarding day-to-day operations (individual decisions concerning construction or upgrading of the network) but economic and management supervision rights of parent company in respect of return on assets (approval of annual financial plan)  TSO shall publish a compliance programme to ensure that the unbundling provisions are met by all legal, operational and personell means compliance programme shall contain rules of conduct, which have to be respected by staff in order to exclude discrimination

 Tariff Derivation – 1  Treatment of new infrastructure Subject to criteria art 22 Directive 2003/55/EC Special focus on risk assessment and impact on competition  Risk assessment shall demonstrate individual risks associated with the project  political, regulatory, volume, business explanation why an special treatment would not be detrimental to competition in the relevant markets concerned sensitivity to the extent and duration of special treatment -reference to break even/pay back period? financial-business model assessing the influence of different elements and duration of special treatment on the business- positions of the project subject to variable elements -expected total entry flow, expected exit flows on national markets, expected utilisation factors

 Tariff Derivation – 2  Tariffs shall be derivated according to the following principles tariffs shall reflect efficiently incurred costs, including appropriate return on investment; due regard may be taken to international benchmarking of tariffs; tariffs shall avoid cross-subsidies between network users; tariffs shall promote efficient use of the network and provide for appropriate incentives on new investments; tariffs shall take into account: the duration, the load factor, the distance of transportation, the capital investment per capacity unit and volumes etc;  In case the owner of the pipeline sells his pipeline system to another company the transaction price shall have no impact on the value of the asset base taken into account for the tariff setting  Backhaul flows in case of congestion appropriate discounts shall be applied in the case of backhauls backhauls shall be defined by reference to the direction of the predominant physical flows in a network

Further Information Mrs Nina GRALL phone: dd 806 fax: dd 900 Regulator: Gas:  Natural Gas  Contact  Web Tarif Calculator:  Tarif Calculator

Thank you for your attention !