Australia’s policy and regulatory framework for gene technology QMAC 2003 (Dr) Sue D Meek Gene Technology Regulator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Governments role in the regulation of offshore exploration activities Commonwealth waters Environmental Sustainability Unit – August 2010.
Advertisements

Division: EIDD WTO TBT Workshop on Good Regulatory Practice March 2008 Focus on Transparency and Consultation.
Chapter 20 REGULATIONS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. Regulations Are intended to allow us to safely use the benefits of biotech. Help in developing and using biotech.
Stakeholder Involvement Program to Establish New and Better Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities in WA 3c web: telephone: (08)
Regulators’ Code July Regulators’ Code A statutory Code Came into effect in April 2014, replacing the Regulators’ Compliance Code All local authorities.
Domestic Import Regulations for GMOs and their Compatibility with WTO Rules: Some Key Issues Heike Baumüller ICTSD Trade and Development Symposium
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Mastering Supply Chain Integrity in the Australian Food Industry – FSANZ’s Contribution Janine Lewis Food Standards Australia New Zealand DEEDI sponsored.
Reform of Agvet Chemical Regulations. Reform History Chemicals and Plastics Action Agenda established Reducing the Regulatory Burden on.
© FSANZ Misleading Food Labels Melanie Fisher General Manager Food Standards Australia New Zealand October 2005.
1 David Loschke18 March 2005 New Zealand Timber Preservation Council Annual Conference 2005 The Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority.
SOURCE: “Co-existence project kicked-off”, European Biotechnology News, Vol. 4, 2005 European Commission project aimed at co- existence of GE and non-GE.
Name of presenter Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Planning Council name Date.
Who’s Minding the Store Downunder: The regulator protecting public health and safety. Deon Mahoney Food Standards Australia New Zealand Seattle University.
Working with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s)
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Improving the efficiency of the regulatory process Rob Mason Head of Regulatory Policy Chemicals.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
In search of a consistent Risk Assessment Framework for organisms Society for Risk Analysis ANZ conference 2013 Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.
1st FAO GLOBAL MULTI-STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON ANIMAL WELFARE Session 1 - Sharing Successful Practices And Experiences: The Voice of The Government Institutions.
Current Status of Food Traceability in European Union Willy De Greef IBRS.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM PRESENTATION 13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry.
Biosecurity Laws and Regulations in Turkey Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Avni Öktem Nanobiotechnology R&D Group, Department of Biological Sciences Middle East Technical.
Regulatory Procedure for the Assessment of GM Foods.
London, England 7-8 July 2011 International Congress on Professional and Occupational Regulation The Regulatory Continuum and the Role of the Regulator.
1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.
Department of Science and Technology: Role in the administration, utilization and management of GM food Ben Durham Chief Director Biotechnology and Health.
Auditing regulatory frameworks for economic assets post-privatisation Bob Holbert, Director Performance Audit Services Group.
Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.
WP4 - Analysis of legislation, ethical issues, regulations and intellectual property ResistVir Meeting 6 th July 2006, Helsinki, Finland Dr Mike Adcock.
SAHPRA proposals Nov 2009 A GLIMPSE OF WHAT SAHPRA IS INTENDED TO BECOME KEY PROPOSALS FOR SAHPRA NOVEMBER 2009 DR NICHOLAS CRISP.
Introduction to GMOs: Myths and realities Masami Takeuchi, Ph.D. Food Safety Officer.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
GMO AMENDMENT BILL PRESENTERS  Julian JafthaDoA  Ben DurhamDST  Leseho SelloDEAT  Modiegi SelematselaDoH  Ndivhou RabuliDoA  Mbudzeni SibaraAdvisory.
Research Ethics & Compliance Dr Simon Barrett Manager, Research Ethics & Compliance Monash Research Office.
Research Ethics & Compliance Dr Simon Barrett Manager, Research Ethics & Compliance Monash Research Office.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
Regulatory Transparency and Efficiency in the Communications Industry in Australia Jennifer Bryant Office of Regulation Review Australia.
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003.
IPASA presentation to Portfolio Committee on Health 31 October 2014 Abeda Williams.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015: Presentation to members of the media Sherry Perreault Head of Lobbying Regulation Standards in Public Office Commission.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
WELS Scheme Independent Review. Background WELS scheme commenced in 2005 s76 of WELS Act 2005 requires an independent review after 5 years Dr Chris Guest.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
PASC 38 Services Standardization Workshop Dr Bronwyn Evans Chief Executive Officer Standards Australia SERVICES STANDARDISATION IN ACTION An Australian.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
EU Plant Health Regime - Role of research -Evaluation of EU PLH Regime Guillermo H. Cardon European Commission, DG SANCO Plant health / Harmful organisms.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Conformity Assessment Best Practices and Advancing GRP in EAC: The Value of Public-Private Partnerships EAC Workshop.
Biotech Regulations Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office June, 2002.
ANRE The Regulator’s role with Small and Large Consumers - Romania Lusine Caracasian Head of Public Relations&Cooperation Office
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry
Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Stewardship Revision Quiz
Office of Legal Affairs
Regulatory Transparency and Efficiency in the Communications Industry in Australia Jennifer Bryant Office of Regulation Review Australia.
Setting Actuarial Standards
AGRICULTURAL & VETERINARY CHEMICALS REGULATION IN AUSTRALIA
AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE
Stewardship in biotechnology
Presentation transcript:

Australia’s policy and regulatory framework for gene technology QMAC 2003 (Dr) Sue D Meek Gene Technology Regulator

Overview Why the regulatory system is as it is What it does/doesn’t encompass How it operates Who looks after the rest?

Feedback from Consultation National Consistency Transparency and accountability Responsive to stakeholder’s views Scientifically based assessment Independent decision-making Avoid duplication/improve coordination

Issues excluded from scope Comparisons with alternative technologies Cost/benefit considerations Marketing and trade impacts

The object of the Gene Technology Act 2000 ‘ To protect the health and safety of people, and to protect the environment, by identifying risks posed by, or as a result of, gene technology and by managing those risks through regulating certain dealings with GMOs’

Australia’s Nationally Consistent System For Regulating Dealings with GMOs Gene Technology Act 2000 Gene Technology Regulations 2001 Inter-Governmental Agreement Gene Technology Ministerial Council Corresponding State/Territory legislation

What is Regulated? Dealings with live and viable GMOs Accreditation of organisations - IBCs Certification of contained facilities Public record of GMOs and GM products Monitoring and compliance

Licenced Dealings involving Intentional Release Dealings involving the Intentional Release of a GMO into the environment (DIR) Range from a small scale field trial, to a full scale general, or commercial, release Require the preparation of a Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan Decision on the licence application to be made within 170 working days

DIR - Risk Assessment Properties of the organism Effect of modification -toxicity/allergenicity -increased competitiveness -potential for gene transfer Proposed extent/scale Provisions for limiting spread/persistence

DIR - Licence Conditions Limited and Controlled Release –Containment conditions growing harvest/transport post-harvest monitoring Commercial Release -General oversight conditions

Interaction between the OGTR and other authorities AQIS - quarantine matters (including GMO import controls) The Gene Technology Act - complements the work of other authorities FSANZ - food safety and product labelling APVMA - safe and effective use of insecticides and herbicides

AQIS/OGTR - Import Controls Quarantine Act 1908 and Gene Technology Act 2000 both apply to GMO imports Quarantine Proclamation June 2003 AQIS refers GMO import permit applications to the OGTR

Australia’s Nationally Consistent System For Regulating Dealings with GMOs GT Technical Advisory Cttee GT Ethics Cttee GT Community Consultative Cttee Gene Technology Regulator Gene Technology Standing Committee Office of the Gene Technology Regulator Gene Technology Ministerial Council ENVIRONMENT MINISTER APVMAFSANZNHMRCNICNASTGA LOCAL COUNCILS AQIS Technical Regulatory Consultation Provide advice at the request of the Ministerial Council or GT Regulator Commonwealth IDC on Gene Technology Inter-Governmental Agreement and Gene Technology Acts State and Territory Technical Regulatory Consultation

Impact of GMOs on Marketability and Agricultural Trade Rationale for exclusion of economic impacts from assessments under the Gene Technology Act: “Compromise the regulatory system’s focus upon scientific evaluation of risk and the protection of human health and the environment”

Marketability and Trade - Role of States & Territories GT Act anticipates State/Territory Gov’ts might act to limit commercial releases State/Territory controls imposed until marketability, agricultural trade and segregation practices better understood July GT MinCo issued Policy Principle to recognise areas designated under State/Territory law to ‘preserve the identity of GM or non-GM crops for marketing purposes’

Marketability and Trade - Role of Industry Establishment of DAFF Biotechnology Project on Supply Chain Management May Primary Industries Ministerial Council (PIMC) endorsed “industry self- regulation with government oversight” PIMC’s Plant Industries Committee produced ‘indicative principles’ for development of industry stewardship programs

Marketability and Trade - Role of Industry (Continued) Decision whether or not to grow a GM crop is one for the industry itself to determine, in accordance with State imposed controls Gene Technology Grains Committee (GTGC) established as an industry initiative GTGC developed: Canola Industry Stewardship Principles for Coexistence of Production Systems and Supply Chains ABARE/BRS/AOF market impact reports

Mailing Address MDP 54, PO Box 100 Woden ACT 2606 Web Site Telephone Hotline Media Queries

Copyright © Office of the Gene Technology Regulator This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to