ENG. R. GAKUBIA CEO -WASREB ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 9 TH -12 TH MAY 2012 THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR EFFICIENT, AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE WATER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
______________________
Advertisements

GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development BY : EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 5 TH JUNE 2013.
BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF BUSINESS MEMBERSHIP ORGANISATIONS Andrei Mikhnev World Bank Group.
Regulatory Environment and Small-hydro Development Professor Priyantha D C Wijayatunga Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka and University of Moratuwa.
0 0 Water Sector and Regulation in ALBANIA WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY Avni DERVISHI Chairman of Albanian WRA November 25,2013, Florence.
PPP’s IN NIGERIA: Prospects in the Water Sector
Part 2: Key Challenges and Potential Policy Framework leading to clearer, more diverse, more effective public and private roles – Introducing the discussion.
John J Downes International Travel and Tourism Law Consultant
International Seminar on ICT Policy Reform and Rural Communication Infrastructure Keio University, Shonan Fujisawa, Japan, 24th August Paul Moffatt.
ADB Support of Public Procurement Reform Presented By: Amr J. Qari, Procurement Specialist Seventh Regional Public Procurement Forum, May , 2011.
Overview Summary from Africa and ASEAN assistance Dr. Peter Pembleton, UNIDO.
+ PROJECT BACKGROUND: KENYA THE NEED FOR CONSUMER PARTICIPATION IN THE REFORMS PROCESS OF THE ELECTRICTY SUB-SECTOR Susanne Rabisch, CUTS Nairobi.
High-Level Meeting of Regional Energy Regulatory Associations of Emerging Markets Sergey Novikov Head of the Federal Tariff Service (FTS of Russia) April.
PRESENTER: Dr. Ishmael Yamson DATE: September 23, 2010.
Regulatory Administrative Institutions MPA 517 Lecture-8 1.
BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY: PARTNERSHIPS AND FINANCE by S. Adrian Ross Senior Programme Officer PEMSEA.
Why are economic and financial instruments needed? A presentation made by Noma Neseni, IWSD.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
1 Introduction to the Kenyan Water and Sanitation Sector By: P. Matseshe, HSC., Quality Assurance Manager (WSTF) 9/9/2015 Phanuel Matseshe, HSC (Quality.
Supporting Tourism Investment in the Pacific Islands: IFC’s Sector-based Approach to Overcoming Investment Climate Barriers Trinnex Meeting 30 August 2010.
Dr Odysseas Michaelides Auditor General of the Republic June 2014 The role of the SAIs in times of economic crisis Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus.
East Asia and the Pacific Region
Student ID:MA3N0202 Name: Li-Wen Chang(Jenny) 1.  What’s the “Financial supervision mechanism”  The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC)  Case ─
How Can the Institutional Setup Improve Transparency and Governance of Enforcement Donald Macrae, WBG Consultant Inspection Reform Conference, Amman, 3.
1 Introduction to the Kenyan Water Sector and Sanitation Sub-Sector Prepared by Patrick Onyango 9/21/2015 Phanuel Matseshe, HSC (Quality Assurance Manager)
NASBA Role of State Regulators in Global Standards Setting Bob Bunting, Deputy President October 29, 2008.
Page 1 Regulation: Catalyst for better governance and enhanced integrity in water utilities? Experiences from GIZ Water Programmes Regulation: Catalyst.
Privatization, Regulation, and Competition REFORMING INFRASTRUCTURE.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 5 Energy Regulation Module 5: STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND ROLE OF AN ENERGY REGULATOR.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
1 AN OVERVIEW OF POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK GOVERNING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT By Zitto Z. Kabwe, MP Chairperson, PAC - TANZANIA SADCOPAC/EAAPAC TRAINING.
International Legal Regulation of the Securities Market Regulation of the securities market is an ordering activity of all its participants and transactions.
WATER TARIFFS: Balancing social and economic objective. Eng. PETER NJAGGAH WASREB, Kenya Waspa Annual Conference 8-9 th September 2011.
Regulatory Institutions in Turkey. Regulatory Institutions Central Bank of Turkey Banking Supervision and Regulatory Institutions Capital Markets Board.
© 2005 by Center for Energy Economics, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin. All rights reserved. 1 Efficacy of Energy Regulators.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
1 WSTF Field Monitors Training Workshop Introduction to the Kenyan Water and Sanitation Sector By: P. Matseshe, HSC., Quality Assurance Manager 11/9/2015.
Role of Stakeholders in promoting competition reforms How competition reforms benefit our daily lives ? OFC - PIDS - CUTS Competition Advocacy Seminar.
TOWARDS BETTER REGULATION: THE ROLE OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT COLIN KIRKPATRICK IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESEARCH CENTRE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER, UK UNECE Symposium.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshops 1 Session 2: Legal & Institutional Background for Management of Small-Town Water Systems.
 Era of Economic Liberalisation – post 1991  Role of the State redefined  New Economic Policy – Open – Competitive – Growth Model  Over load of regulation,
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT: MAKING THE LINK Dr. Rasheed Draman.
Independence and powers of regulators: legal and institutional requirements Heinz Hilbrecht, Director, European Commission World Forum on Energy Regulation.
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF WATER SERVICES PROVISION Portfolio Committee on Water Affairs and Forestry 22 June 2005 V.227.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF WSPs: Overcoming the Barriers Eng. PETER NJAGGAH WASREB, Kenya Innovative Water Sector financing.7 th – 12 th November 2011,
C e r t i f i c a t i o n f o r j u s t i c e a n d s u s t a i n a b i l i t y Developing Timber Legality Verification in Indonesia Taufiq Alimi.
Course 3.6 Regulatory Commissions: Management & Staff Functions, Bangladesh, Mar 31- Apr 4, 2002 SOUTH ASIA REGIONAL INITIATIVE/ENERGY Regulatory Commission.
Overview of Past and Present Public Governance Frameworks KENYA.
Energy Regulatory Authority (ERA) of Mongolia Mr.Tumentsogt Tsevegmid, MSc, MPA Regulator, Energy Regulatory Authority University Street 2A, Ulaanbaatar.
Ministry of Water and Irrigation State Department for Water Services
Corporate Governance In Tanzania 2009
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF WATER SERVICES PROVISION
BREEDE-GOURITZ ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN & STRATEGIC PLAN
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
International Federation of Accountants
2nd Global Procurement Conference | 4-5 July 2017
Danube Water Conference, Vienna, May 2017
Public Private Partnerships (PPP)
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY 2 NOVEMBER 2012 IPAP 2012/10.
ERERA AND ECOWAS ELECTRICITY MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Introduction to the Kenyan Water Sector and Sanitation Sub-Sector
WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
Afrodita Popa Adriana Pienaru
Outline What is governance and what does it comprise?
WATER UTILITY REFORM PLAN
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
OUTLINE Legislative context, NERSA vision and NERSA mission
Presentation transcript:

ENG. R. GAKUBIA CEO -WASREB ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 9 TH -12 TH MAY 2012 THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR EFFICIENT, AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR THE COUNTIES

CONTENTS 1.What is Regulation? 2. Regulatory Models. 3.Key functions of Regulations 4.Benefits of Regulation 5.Regulatory Framework for the Counties. 6.Guiding principles of Regulation. 7.Lessons learnt 8.Wayforward. 9.Conclusion

What is Regulation?  Process by which oversight and rules are set for public or private companies in an industry.  The oversight and rules often have to do with:  economic factors (tariffs or pricing)  service level factors (water quality, pressure, access to services, etc.).  Regulation places constraints on behavior, through incentives and sanctions.

Clientilist model of water provision Source: Vivien Forster, ‘Ten years of Water Service Reform in Latin America: Towards an Anglo-French Model’ [2005]

Reformed model of water provision

But: Some Missing Features ??? Water Service Board/Water Service Provider Regulatory Agency Policy - Makers Politicians Employees Contractors Connected population Unconnected population Lay-offs Undue influence Price rise = ??

WATER ACT 2002: INSTITUTIONAL SETUP *Details in new institutions flyerSource:WSRS*Details in new institutions flyerSource:WSRS MW&I Policy Formulation Regulation Services Provision National level Regional level Local level Consump- tion, Use Water and Sewerage ServiceWater Resources Management Water Appeal Board WAB Water Services Regulatory Board WASREB Water Resources Management Authority WRMA Water Services Boards WSBs Catchment Areas Advisory Committees CAACs Water Services Providers WSPs Consumers, Users Water Resources User Associations WRUAs Water Services Trust Fund WSTF

October 10, 2015Water Services Regulatory Board8 WATER ACT 2002: REGULATION OF WATER SERVICES Water Services Regulatory Board Water Services Boards Licence Water Service Providers Service Provision Agreement Customers Service Provision Rules Institutional Framework - Separated Policy, Regulatory and Service Provision Functions

REGULATORY MODELS(1)  Regulatory systems can take different forms according to the existing legal traditions and system in the country. The most common regulatory models are:  Regulation by independent body.  Regulation by contract: Generally used within the context of public-private partnership.

Regulation Models(2) Regulation by institutions (Anglo- American tradition) Regulation by contract (French civil law tradition) Regulator Government Utility Customers ServicesTariffs Set Tariffs and Service standards Appoints Government asset holding company Utility Customers Contract ServicesTariffs Contract Monitoring committees Arbitrator Sets Tariffs and Service standards Source: World bank Institute “ Designing and Implementing Successful Utility Reform” 2010

Key functions of Regulation Licensing – Competition Regulation: ( decides which provider is allowed access to the market ). Setting Performance Standards and Performance Monitoring:( Water quality, service levels, financial standards, defination of consumer rights, complaints handling mechanism ). Tariff Regulation: to promote the financial sustainability of the utility through cost recovery tariffs. Enforcement: taking action when a utility does not meet the established standards.

Benefits of Regulation  Protection from political interference :  removal of tariff-setting decisions from the political environment  Enhancing the utilities to make the business and social arguments for tariff or service level increases.  Improved, evidence-based management and monitoring:  Utilities often lack the systems to effectively monitor their financial and operational performance..  Access to private capital:  boosting of Investors and donors confidence when they make investment decisions.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR EFFICIENT AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY FOR THE COUNTIES(1)  Provision of water services will be by licence issued by the Water Services Regulator.(otherwise one shall be guilty of an offence).  Licence requirement are exempted in the provision of water services :— (a)by a person to his employees; (b)on the premises of an institution to the occupants where the source of supply of the water is lawfully under the control of the institution or where the water is supplied to it in bulk by a licensee; (c)in circumstances which are prescribed by rules made by the Regulator to be exempt from the requirement for a license.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR EFFICIENT, AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY FOR THE COUNTIES (2)  Water services shall be provided by water services providers(WSPs) established by county governments.  The WSPs shall comply with standards of commercial viability set by the Water Services Regulator.  The WSP must submit its Memorandum and Articles of Associations that conform to the model developed and approved by the Water Services Regulator.

Guiding principles of Regulations 1.Benefits of Regulation must exceed its Costs 2.Regulation is a Means to an End, not an End in Itself 3.What ultimately matters are outcomes- sustainable water supply and sanitation services - not regulatory rules (“performance not processes”). 4.Quality of service standards must be realistic, affordable, monitorable and enforced 5.Whenever possible, use benchmarks rather than actual costs for prices or subsidies

Lessons learnt 1/3  The monopolistic character of water services provision means that self-regulation is typically inappropriate. Regulation should be separated from provision.  Regulation is one piece of a reform process and must be an integrated part of it  Regulators must operate independently from both short term political pressures and the regulated companies.  Regulation is likely to be most effective if it employs incentives as well as sanctions.

Lessons learned 2/3  Regulation should be transparent, with maximum use of published performance targets and achievements levels.  Good independent information on asset conditions, performance and standards, operating costs and investments efficiency is an essential prerequisite for effective regulation.  Seeking customer input as a routine part of regulation is important

Lessons learned 3/3  Independence is a prerequisite, but also  Coherence-Tariffs and service standards are inter- related: higher service standards, or greater coverage, mean that higher costs will be incurred.  Predictability and Credibility - Depends not only on well-designed regulatory framework, but also on sound policy and governance frameworks for the sector.  Legitimacy and accountability-Regulatory processes need to be understood and generally accepted by consumers, who bear the ultimate impact of tariff and service standards decisions.

WAY FORWARD- COUNTY WATER SERVICES.  Viable water services business will require:  Separation of oversight and operation.  Ring-fencing of revenue accounts to keep track of costs and hold institutions to account. Hence a professional providers(separate legal entity)  good management systems and professional capacity;  tariffs that ensure cost recovery; and,  consumer engagement( happy customers pay their bill! )  Consolidated water services provision to achieves economies of scale and to access professional capacity

CONCLUSION(1)  The principle of regulation under the Water Act 2002 has greatly improved sector performance  There is increased compliance to regulatory requirement.  Trends indicate good performance for WSPs that have: - good governance -right Management quality and skills mix -embraced commercialization.

CONCLUSION(2) Service standards and pricing are dependent on the quality of the water services infrastructure. The IEK( the learned society of the engineering profession ) in persuit of its mission “ providing information and leadership to the engineering profession on issues of concern to public and profession” remains a valued stakeholder in the quality of water services infrastructure. Hence IEK should as right be represented in the board of Water Services Regulator as a body as well as in any other national body set up to develop service infrastructure.

Thank you for your attention!