How to do Primary Angioplasty - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Advanced Cardiovascular Intervention 2011 Dan Blackman Leeds General Infirmary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B alloon-pump assisted C oronary I ntervention S tudy BCIS-1 Simon Redwood Kings College London/ St Thomas Hospital Steering Committee: Divaka Perera,
Advertisements

Assisted Circulation MEDICAL MEDICAL  Drugs  EECP MECHANICAL  IABP ( Introaortic balloon pump)  VAD (Ventricular assist device)
A few basics of cardiac surgery…. Brett Sheridan, MD Assistant Professor Department of Surgery.
Multivessel coronary disease diagnosed at the time of primary PCI for STEMI: complete revascularization versus conservative strategy. PRAGUE 13 trial O.
Cardiogenic Shock and Hemodynamics. Outline Overview of shock – Hemodynamic Parameters – PA catheter, complications – Differentiating Types of Shock Cardiogenic.
on behalf of the TOTAL Investigators
Management of Acute Shock and Right Ventricular Failure Nader Moazami, MD Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Biomedical Engineering,
Clinical Trial Results. org Pexelizumab for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
University Medical Center Groningen Thrombus aspiration during primary PCI FZ Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute.
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction & Cardiogenic Shock - What Should We Do? Advanced Angioplasty 2008 Dan Blackman Leeds General Infirmary.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Impella Technology Elective Support Clinical Evidence and Investigations.
Around-the-Clock Primary Angioplasty: A Process of Care Analysis Comparing Off-Hours and Normal Hours Treatment of Acute STEMI R Leung, D Lundberg, D Galbraith,
Dr. Adel El Banna M.D Consultant of Cardiac Surgery Head of Cardiac Surgery Department National Heart Institute.
Cardiogenic Shock Diagnosis, Treatment and Guidelines Mladen I. Vidovich, MD April 5, 2007.
Cardiogenic shock Kasia Hryniewicz, M.D. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN Greater Twin Cities Area Chapter of.
刘学波 葛均波 复旦大学附属中山医院心内科 上海市心血管病研究所 New Progress of mechanical support in AMI patients with cardiogenic shock AMI 合并心源性休克心肺支持技术进展.
B alloon-pump assisted C oronary I ntervention S tudy BCIS-1 Simon Redwood St Thomas’ Hospital / King’s College London On behalf of the BCIS-1 Investigators.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Ten-Year Follow-up Survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS-II): a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Therapeutic Strategies.
Clinical Conference 10/23/ y.o. with h/o HTN, presented to Palos ER with SSCP SH: remote tob FH: no early CAD All: NKDA Meds: lisinopril 5mg.
Primary Angioplasty and Hemodynamic Support in Cardiogenic Shock Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University Hyuck Moon Kwon,
Inferior/Right Ventricular Infarction CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND TREATMENT Lady Minto Hospital Emergency Rounds February 2015 Prepared by Shane Barclay.
Revascularizaton of Ischemic DCM Percutaneous Revascularization and Hemodynamic Support Matthew R. Wolff, M.D. University of Wisconsin Disclosures: Cordis.
Definition and Classification of Shock
Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Session 2006 Presented by Dr. Judith S. Hochman OAT Trial.
Mechanical Circulatory Support Cardiogenic Shock Post AMI
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
PCI v CABG Dr Rod Stables The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool UK.
Treatment strategies for “stable” CAD patients: COURAGE, OAT, SWISSI II, VIAMI in perspective Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute.
AB 1/03 Non-Coronary Intervention Circulatory Support Advanced Angioplasty 2003 Andreas Baumbach Bristol Royal Infirmary.
Bangalore S, et al. β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2012;308(13): ?
ADMIRALADMIRAL Abciximab before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long term follow-up ADMIRAL Study ADMIRAL.
Late Open Artery Hypothesis Jason S. Finkelstein, M.D. Tulane University Medical Center 2/24/03.
Perindopril Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction PREAMIPREAMI Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Hot Line Session, September.
Ihab Alomari, MD, FACC Assistant professor – Interventional Cardiology University of California, Irvine Division of Cardiology Cath Lab Essentials : LV.
Balloon-pump assisted Coronary Intervention Study BCIS-1 Simon Redwood Divaka Perera, Rod Stables, Martyn Thomas.
IABP用于高危PCI有价值吗? Is IABP Valuable for High-Risk PCI?
Types of Hemodynamic Support in the Cath Lab.
Samuel Thomas Rayburn, III MD Cardiovascular Surgeon Jack Stephens Heart Institute April 25, 2015.
Randomized Early versus Late AbciXimab in Acute Myocardial Infarction treated with primary coronary intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial) Mauro Maioli M.D., Francesco.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Conflict of Interest Baxter Research Grant Medtronic Research Grant
Is the Debate Over? Routine Thrombus Aspiration in STEMI (From TAPAS to INFUSE-AMI to TASTE to TOTAL) Stefan James Professor of Cardiology Uppsala Clinical.
Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA-2) Trial
Advanced Circulatory Support Trials
DIRECTOR, CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
Contemporary Approaches to Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support
Debate: Prophylactic Support Increases Risk With Little Benefit
Management of Cardiogenic Shock in AMI
MCV Campus Ginger Edwards.
Improving Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
University of Chicago Medicine
Role of ECMO in Acute Cardiogenic Shock
circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
Mechanical circulatory support
Impella 2.5® Device Is Associated with Improved Survival in AMICS
Balloon-pump assisted Coronary Intervention Study (BCIS-1):
Andrew McNeice1,2, Imad J. Nadra1,2, Simon D
The Use of Impella for CGS Patients Does It Save Lives?
European Heart Association Journal 2007 April
European Society of Cardiology 2003
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices HOSEIN PASANDI.
Figure 1 PCI strategies in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease
Preventive Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial
Figure 4 Observational studies on multiple treatment strategies
Inferior/Right Ventricular Infarction
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Epidemiological Modelling
Presentation transcript:

How to do Primary Angioplasty - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Advanced Cardiovascular Intervention 2011 Dan Blackman Leeds General Infirmary

MY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE: Research Grants Medicines Company Advisory Board Medicines Company Lilly

Causes of Cardiogenic Shock Predominant LV Failure 74.5% Acute Severe MR 8.3% VSD 4.6% Isolated RV Shock 3.4% Tamponade/rupture 1.7% Other 7.5% Shock Registry JACC :1063

Survival from mechanical causes Shock Registry JACC 2000;36:1104 & 36: 1110 GUSTO 1 Circulation 2000;101:27 Holzer R CCI 2004;61:196

Emergency revascularisation - SHOCK Trial 85% of survivors NYHA Class I/II at 12 months Hochman JAMA 2000;285:190 p=0.11 p=0.03 p=0.02

Single or Multi-vessel PCI? 81% of PCI patients multi-vessel disease 85% PCI IRA only; 23% complete revascularisation MV PCISV PCICompletePartial p=NS p<0.01 MV PCISV PCI Shock Trial Shock Registry p=NS

Role of CABG p=NS SHOCK Trial CABG vs PCI baseline characteristics –LMS Disease 41% vs 13% p=0.051 –3VD 80% vs 60% p=0.18 –Diabetes 49% vs 27% p=0.11 n=47n=81n=276n=109

AHA/ACC Guidelines for Revascularisation

PCI Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Stabilise the patient first, open the vessel second Up-front IABP Central venous access Inotropic/Pressor support as required Anaesthetic support in the cath lab

De Backer, NEJM, 2010;362: patient RCT in shock 280 patients cardiogenic Increased arrythmia with dopamine (AF/VT/VF) Significantly lower mortality with norepinephrine in CS Vasoconstriction (by SVR) is often absent* Patients with vasoconstriction have better outcome* SOAP II – Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in Shock

Antmen, JACC, 2004;44:671 Cardiogenic Shock Systolic BP >100mmHg Nitroglycerin mcg/min Systolic BP mmHg NO Shock Dobutamine 2-20mcg/kg/min Systolic BP mmHg With Shock Dopamine 5- 15mcg/kg/min Systolic BP <70mmHg With Shock Norepinephrine 1- 30mcg/kg/min

Abciximab in Cardiogenic Shock n=77 n=41n=55 n=113 n=25

PRAGUE-7 study 80 patient RCT Up-front (n=40) vs provisional (n=40) abciximab in PPCI for cardiogenic shock P=NS for all

Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation

IABP in Cardiogenic Shock Primary PCI Retrospective analysis of 23,180 patients from NRMI database 7268 treated by IABP

Timing of IABP in Cardiogenic Shock Primary PCI Single centre registry Primary PCI for shock Brodie AJC 1999;84:18

Tandem Heart pLVAD Left atrial-to-femoral arterial LVAD Low speed centrifugal continuous flow pump 21F venous transeptal cannula 17F arterial cannula Maximum flow 4L/minute Expensive +++

Tandem Heart Outcome Data Improved haemodynamic parameters Increase in bleeding, limb ischaemia, and sepsis Thiele EHJ 2005;26:1276. Burkhoff AHJ 2006;152:e1 p=NS

Impella Axial flow pump Much simpler to use Increases cardiac output & unloads LV LP 2.5 –12 F percutaneous approach; Maximum 2.5 L flow LP 5.0 –21 F surgical cutdown; Maximum 5L flow Expensive ++ Pressure Lumen Motor Blood outlet Blood Inlet

Impella outcome data ISAR-SHOCK –26 patient RCT Impella vs IABP –  Cardiac Index,  MAP (by 10mmHg) vs IABP –Complications ≤ IABP –No difference in mortality PROTECT-II –654 patients RCT IABP vs Impella in high-risk PCI –Stopped after n= 305 due to futility –Primary EP composite of 10 MAEs –Incidence 38% Impella vs 43% IABP

How to treat STEMI + Cardiogenic Shock Emergency angiography and revascularisation On-table echo to rule out mechanical defects Stabilise the patient in the lab before revascularisation –IABP –Central venous access –Pressors if required – Norepinephrine (dopamine) –Anaesthetic support Consider calling the surgeon for true surgical disease PCI culprit artery. Consider other vessels if shock persists. Staged PCI or CABG if patient stabilises Consider percutaneous VAD if shock persists with IABP + effective revascularisation

ESC Guidelines for Cardiogenic Shock

Revascularisation: SHOCK trial STEMI complicated by shock due to LV failure n= 302 Hypotension (SBP<90mmHg), End organ hypoperfusion, CI 15mmHg Randomised within 36 hours of index event Medical (150) IABP Revasc at 54 hours Emergency Revascularisation (152) PCI or CABG within 6hr IABP recommended Primary endpoint: 30 day mortality Secondary endpoint: 6 and 12 month mortality PCI = 81 and CABG = 47 Late follow-up

Heart Attack: The Challlenge, Manchester 2010 Shock: Incidence, Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcome NYHA I-II NYHA III-IV Death Sleeper, JACC, 2005; 46:266.

Emergency revascularisation in the Elderly - SHOCK Trial >75 years ERV vs IMS baseline characteristics –LVEF 28% vs 36% p=0.051 –Anterior MI 63% vs 41% p=0.18 –Female 54% vs 31% p=0.11 p=0.01

Elderly - SHOCK & other registry data n=44n=233n=61 n=74

Why worry about Cardiogenic Shock? Cardiogenic shock complicates 6-8% of STEMI * Mortality is 60.1% ** It is the leading cause of death from STEMI * GUSTO, NRMI, GRACE ** Shock registry JACC 2000

ESC Guidelines for Revascularisation Complete revascularisation has been recommended with PCI in all critically stenosed large epicardial coronary arteries

Right Ventricular Infarction (3%) Shock with clear lungs Elevated JVP ECG and echo Maintain preload Reduce RV afterload Maintain AV synchrony

Mortality by PCI outcomes TIMI FLOW SuccUnsucc PCI Webb, JACC 2003;42:1380.

Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices Even with revascularisation and IABP support mortality from cardiogenic shock post STEMI remains ≥50% Recovery of myocardial performance following successful revascularisation may take several days. During this time many patients succumb to low cardiac output Efficacy of IABP is limited by the lack of active cardiac support, requirement for a certain level of LV function, and the need for accurate synchronisation with cardiac cycle Patients with severely impaired LV function and/or persistent tachyarrhythmias derive little benefit from IABP

Management Principles Diagnose & treat causes other than LV failure Support cardiac output and organ perfusion –Inotropes / pressors –Mechanical support Early Revascularisation PCI/CABG

Inotropes and Vasopressors AgentDose μg/min α vasoconstrict β Inotropy/vasodilate Arrhythmia Epinephrine Norepinephrine Dopamine Dobutamine Isoproterenol Vasoconstriction (by SVR) is often absent* Patients with vasoconstriction have better outcome* * SHOCK Data

PCI + staged CABG Chiu et al Single centre retrospective registry study PCI only vs PCI + staged CABG for cardiogenic shock with multivessel disease Propensity matched n=44 in each group 1.3 vessels revascularised by PCI; 2.6 by CABG 30-day mortality 20.5% PCI + CABG vs 40.9% PCI only