Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
GIS and Transportation Planning
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to MTF Data Committee presented by Capton Siluvairajan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Date: 10/17/2008.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
The Argos Freight Modeling Project Presentation to SCAG Modeling Task Force 9/22/04 Genevieve Giuliano Peter Gordon School of Policy, Planning and Development.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Copyright  2003 Global Insight, Inc. and Reebie Associates T RANSEARCH I NSIGHT Integrated Freight Data & Forecasting System Produced by Reebie Associates.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Freight Demand Modeling: Tools for Public-Sector Decision Making First National Conference September 25-27, 2006 Washington D.C. Sponsored by TRB FHWA.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
Using the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model for the Oregon Freight Plan Analysis Prepared for the TRB SHRP2 Symposium: Innovation in Freight Demand Modeling.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Bus Trip Tables May 9, 2013 Don Vary, CDM Smith Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
The Freight Model Improvement Program T. Randall (Randy) Curlee, Ph.D. National Transportation Research Center Talking Freight Seminar November.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
2007 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) John Fowler Chief, Commodity Flow Branch Service Sector Statistics Division (SSSD) Talking Freight Webinar December 10,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Auto, Air, and Rail Tables March 18, 2013 Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith Colin Smith, RSG Bhargava Sana, RSG.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
Innovations in Freight Demand Modeling and Data A Transportation Research Board SHRP 2 Symposium A hybrid microsimulation model of urban freight travel.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Transportation and the State of Alabama. Source: Freight Analysis Framework, FHWA Total Freight Transportation in Alabama ,512 Current Millions$
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February 20,2008 Quick Response Freight Manual II

1 Overview 1996 QRFM 1996 Purpose Contents Usage 2007 QRFM II Purpose Contents Lessons Learned

2 Quick Response Freight Manual (1996) Purpose Contents Major usage

3 Quick Response Freight Manual (1996) Purpose To provide background information to new freight planners To help planners locate freight-related data To provide simple techniques and transferable parameters for the conventional four-step planning process To provide techniques and transferable parameters for site planning

4 Quick Response Freight Manual (1996) Contents Factors affecting freight demand Simple growth factor methods Incorporating commercial vehicles into urban models Site analysis Data collection Principles of application Statewide freight forecasting Urban case studies

5 Quick Response Freight Manual (1996) Usage

6 Quick Response Freight Manual Update (2007) Purpose To update the 1996 manual To provide freight methods appropriate for different geographic and temporal scales To provide alternative analysis methods, data sources, and data collection methods to improve the accuracy of freight forecasts

7 Quick Response Freight Manual Update (2007) Contents Part A – Introduction Part B – Methods Part C – Data Sources Part D – Practical Applications

8 Part A – Introduction Freight and Commercial Vehicles Demand – Controlling Factors Why freight moves – economic/industrial factors Who moves freight – shipper, receiver, and carrier factors What moves freight – truck, rail, water, and air Where freight moves – vehicles on the modal networks How freight moves – public policy rules and regulations

9 Part B – Methods Simple growth factor methods Incorporating Freight into “Four-Step” Travel Forecasting Urban State and multistate corridors Commodity modeling Hybrid approaches Economic models Model validation

10 “Four-Step” Models “Four-Step” Process of Freight Forecasting Total TonsTons by O-DO-D Tons by Mode O-D Tons by Mode and Route Generation Distribution Mode Split Network Assignment

11 “Four-Step” Models Trip Distribution – Puget Sound Example Medium truck impedance function Exp (4.75 – 0.05 * medium truck time skim) for less than 27 miles Exp (4.2 – * medium truck time skim) for greater than or equal to 27 miles Heavy truck impedance function 1.0 for less than 7.5 miles Exp (5.0 – * heavy truck time skim) for greater than or equal to 7.5 miles Average Truck Trip LengthsMedium TruckHeavy Truck Observed (Miles) Modeled (Miles)

12 “Four-Step” Models Trip Assignment Preload assignment When trucks don’t change routes in response to congestion Multiclass or simultaneous assignment Passenger Car Equivalents (PCE) Stochastic assignment User-equilibrium assignment

13 Commodity Models Trip generation and trip distribution replaced by commodity flow database Processed into trip table Does not include all trucks Remaining steps as in “four-step” model Mode choice Modal assignment Virginia Freight Model Commodity Flow Forecast Methodology Woods & Poole Employment Projections by Industry, by County Output Levels by Industry, by County Total Consumption by Industry, by County IO Table Matrix Final Demand Matrix Calculate Forecast Growth Rates by Commodity, by Region Map Industries to STCC Codes Apply to TRANSEARCH Database NationalProductivityCoefficients

14 Hybrid Models Commercial truck model for internal-internal truck trips Commodity model for external truck trips (E-E; E-I; I-E) Three-step freight truck models Four-step commodity flow models Case studies Issues with hybrid approaches

15 Economic Models Modeling framework Data requirements Oregon Statewide Passenger and Freight Forecasting Model Cross-Cascades Model Land Use Land Use (Activities) Prices Land/Floor Space Demand Transport Travel/Freight Time/Cost Transport Systems Demand Demand for Transport Accessibilities

16 Validation Trip generation validation Trip distribution validation Mode split validation Assignment validation Model parameters Maximum Desirable Deviation in Total Screenline Volumes Total Screenline Traffic (in Thousands) Percent Deviation

17 Part C Data Sources Existing data Data collection

18 Existing Data Commodity O ‑ D tables Mode-specific freight data Employment/industry data Performance data

19 Truck Specific Data VTRIS Vehicle Travel Information System (VTRIS) can provide WIM data WIM data is total weight of truck and load Need estimate of empty truck weight to estimate payload Does not give nature of load (percent loaded, commodity/contents) GA Interstate Stations Class 6 – Three Axle, SU Trucks GA Interstate Stations Class 9 – Five Axle, Trailer Trucks

20 Commodity O-D Data Freight Analysis Framework Does not include all trucks FAF2 includes international origins and destinations Use SCTG2 commodity classifications FAF2 CONUS Regions New York State Modal Flows By Weight (Millions of Tons)

21 Employment Data County Business Patterns Maintained by U.S. Census Annual economic data by industry (NAICS) Geography United States States Counties Metropolitan areas Zip code Los Angeles County, California 2005 Employment by Industry Number of Employees Agriculture, etc. Mining Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade Retail trade Other

22 Marine Freight Data USACE Waterborne Commerce Published annually by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contains cargo summaries Value and weight information Type of service on U.S. waters Imports and exports Stamford Harbor, CT Freight Traffic 2005 (Thousand Short Tons)

23 Data Collection Vehicle classification counts Roadside intercept surveys Establishment surveys Travel diary surveys

24 Part D Practical Applications Application issues Case studies Intermodal considerations, including drayage

25 Application Issues Growth factoring Four-step modeling Integration with passenger forecasts

26 Case Studies Los Angeles Freight Forecasting Model Portland Metro Truck Model Florida State Freight Model Texas Statewide Analysis Model (SAM)

27 Intermodal Considerations, Including Drayage Types of intermodal freight transportation Characteristics of intermodal freight transportation Intermodal freight data sources

28 Lessons Learned Freight > trucks Trucks > freight Freight trips  passenger trips Many sources of freight data Many approaches to modeling freight