Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation David Neuffer Fermilab.
Advertisements

Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
RF Bucket Area Introduction Intense muon beams have many potential applications, including neutrino factories and muon colliders. However, muons are produced.
Μ-Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab.
Simulation Study Results Study: Replace LiH-based cooler with gas-filled transport and rf cavities Results: Beam Cooling is significantly improved. Final.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Physics of Particle Accelerators Kalanand Mishra Department of Physics University of Cincinnati.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Ajit Kurup, C. Bontoiu, M. Aslaninejad, J. Pozimski, Imperial College London. A.Bogacz, V. S. Morozov, Y.R. Roblin Jefferson Laboratory K. B. Beard, Muons,
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation for a Neutrino Factory David Neuffer Fermilab.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation and FFAG -Factory Injection David Neuffer Fermilab.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation for a Neutrino Factory David Neuffer, Andreas Van Ginneken, Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
1 International Design Study Front End & Variations David Neuffer January 2009.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
 Stephen Brooks / RAL / April 2004 Muon Front Ends Providing High-Intensity, Low-Emittance Muon Beams for the Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider.
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
ISS Muon Bunch Structure Convenors: S Berg, BNL, and G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
1 Muon Capture for a Muon Collider David Neuffer July 2009.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation - Ring Coolers? - FFAGs? David Neuffer Fermilab.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Presentation transcript:

Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr

Why? A Neutrino Factory yields the highest flux neutrino beams achievable, and the beam parameters are well controlled and understood A Neutrino Factory is the only way to produce equal ratios of electron and muon type neutrinos Thus, the Neutrino Factory and its remote detector will enable precision measurements of all the unknown parameters.

Proton Driver Hydrogen Gas Plasma Solenoids

H-ion beam

Proton Driver Hydrogen Gas PlasmaSolenoids R adio F requency Q uadrupole Chopper

Proton Driver Hydrogen Gas PlasmaSolenoids R adio F requency Q uadrupole ChopperThin foil Acceleration

Proton Acceleration  Linac  Super Conducting Linac  Synchrotron  Super Conducting Synchroton  Proton FFAG

Proton Driver Hydrogen Gas PlasmaSolenoids R adio F requency Q uadrupole ChopperThin foil Acceleration Target 10 GeV Protons Bunch length ~ 1 ns

Target, Capture & Decay Target material – Liquid-Hg. Why?  High atomic number, Z = 80. Target limitations:  Bunch length ~ 1 ns  Bunch Intensity ~ to be determined  Pulse Duration ~ < 40 μs  Repetition Rate ~ 50 Hz

Target, Capture & Decay Why not solid materials like Au (Gold), Tantalum or Thallium?  Radiation Damage  Thermal shock  Cooling problem  Eddy current effects

Target, Capture & Decay Figure 1: Left: Liquid Mercury target Right: Solid Carbon target

Target, Capture & Decay The Hg-jet target inside a 20-T solenoid magnet to capture the decayed pions and muons. The pion-muon production in the target followed by a transport channel of a magnetic solenoid.

Drift Section Allows pions to decay to muons. Decay length L 0 needed, relativity a factor. L 0 = βc x γτ where γ = E/m Probability of decay given by, P = 1 – exp(-L D / L 0 ) Pions with E = 5GeV, ~84% decay in a tunnel of length 500m.

Phase Rotation Needed to match initial muon “longitudinal phase space” into RF buckets for further cooling/acceleration. To determine how well matched the phase space of a particle an acceptance is defined. Each section of the accelerator complex will have a different acceptance measured in πm-rad. 1-D longitudinal acceptance is given by, A || = βγ(ΔE/E)cΔt where ΔE/E is the energy spread of the beam and Δt is the time spread between individual particles arriving. Matching is achieved by decelerating particles that arrive with high energy and accelerating those with low energy. This bunches the particles together.

Ionization cooling Reduces transverse emittance and match transverse acceptance in later accelerators. Uses liquid hydrogen absorbers to reduce the energy of the particles in 3-dimensions and then re-accelerates them in a linear path along the required axis. Reduces energy spread (emittance). Reduces time spread. Ensures healthy flux. Matches RF frequencies for later acceleration. Improves performance by a factor of 10 and cost by 20%. Many ways to accomplish this. Decisions based on effectiveness, cost and necessity.

The ‘Neuffer’ System Many different methods but ‘Neuffer’ uses existing technology – more cost effective. Allow particles to drift – means there is then a correlation between position and momentum. Bunch the beam using RF cavities – which use a standing wave whose frequency is set such that it gives particles an accelerating push as they pass through. Phase Rotate to align the energies. Inject into a cooler system – probably use a wedge absorber. This focuses the beam (reduces its emittance) so that it is accepted into the accelerator system. Accepts both positive and negative muons – will need a sign divider to filter out the sign that is not wanted for a particular experiment.

FFAG’s for Muon Acceleration Fixed Field Alternating Gradient accelerators: Muon decays occur too quickly for cycling magnets. Require less RF then Linacs and RLA. FFAG lattice can accept beam over large energy range (5-20 GeV). And a large momentum acceptance. High repetition rate. Small magnet apertures. Field increases with particle energy but through path variation not time variation. Orbit changes with energy, RF changes slightly. Injection low energy Extraction high energy

Scaling or Non-Scaling Scaling FFAG’s have a constant orbit shape, Which gives constant betaron tune. If Non-Scaling then can lose control of tune so get resonance. However with rapid acceleration betaron doesn’t have time to build up resonances that destroy the beam. Advantages to Non-Scaling FFAG’s: Smaller orbit excursion thus small/cheaper magnets. Higher RF system can be used ~200MHz Linear variation of magnetic field with radius which leads to a large dynamic aperture and transverse acceptance.

The acceleration in FFAG’s occur in RF cavities between the bending magnets. RF Cavities The accelerating field varies sinusoidally with time. For a particle to be accelerated, they must arrive at the cavity at the right time. RF Voltage Time Example: For a muon (negative charge) to be accelerated it should arrive in the RF cavity at positive and exit at negative voltage.

Typical Values Depending on the desired energy one or two FFAG’s can be used. The values for the two ring case are shown below: Low Energy RingHigh Energy Ring Energy range (GeV)5 to 1010 to 20 Ring Radius (m)6480 RF Characteristics10 MV/m, 201MHz Total RF Volatge480 MV578 MV Orbits to E max Acceleration Time (μs) 1328 Particle Decay Loss9%10%

Muon Storage Rings Where the muons decay to neutrinos. Accelerated to relativistic speedsIncreases muon lifetime

Muon Storage Rings Geometries Two main types: 1.) Triangle 2.) Racetrack

Muon Storage Rings Triangular - Can produceandsimultaneously along axis of the decay straights (to two different detector sites) - More efficient than racetrack configuration

Muon Storage Rings Racetrack - Produces highly collimated neutrino beams - More flexible geometry due to flexibility in number of allowed muon bunches.

Muon Storage Rings Triangle Racetrack Efficiencies

Summary

Thank you

Slow Chopper Beam DumpBeam Fast Chopper