T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Study of the G4 stepping cut value Toby Burnett and Anthony Nardozza (senior physics student) Are the results at all sensitive.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Secondary beam analysis – PS and SPS Started May 22, 2012.

Advertisements

Behaviour of MicroMega chambers in magnetic field: analysis of H2 June data Outline: (0) Introduction (1) Data set used and noise filtering (2)Cluster.

13/02/20071 Event selection methods & First look at new PCB test Manqi Ruan Support & Discussing: Roman Advisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua))

20/Feb/2004K.Ozone1 TERAS analysis update 1.Compton Spectrum estimation 2.Energy resolution 3.Summary.

7 June 06 1 UW Point Source Detection and Localization: Compare with DC2 truth Toby Burnett University of Washington.

Science Tools 27 Sep 06 1 Generating post-DC2 IRFs: a proposal Toby Burnett.

1 Downstream PID update Rikard Sandström PID phone conference

Analysis Meeting 26 Sept 05T. Burnett1 UW classification: background rejection (A summary – details at a future meeting)

S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-061 DC2 IRF Status Meeting agenda, references at:

1 Muon Yield Comparisons for Different ICOOL Versions and Lattices X. Ding Front End, Nov. 23, 2010.

C&A 1 May 06 1 Point Source Detection and Localization Update Using the UW HealPixel database on DC2_2 data Toby Burnett University of Washington.

C&A 8 May 06 1 Point Source Localization: Optimizing the CTBCORE cut Toby Burnett University of Washington.

C&A 10April06 1 Point Source Detection and Localization Using the UW HealPixel database Toby Burnett University of Washington.

Analysis Meeting 17 Oct 05T. Burnett1 UW classification: background rejection Update with new all gamma and background samples.

The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.

1 Using Insightful Miner Trees for Glast Analysis Toby Burnett Analysis Meeting 2 June 2003.

A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.

T. Burnett: IRF status 5-feb-061 DC2 IRF Status Meeting agenda, references at:

C&A 21 Aug 06 1 A Monte Carlo Puzzle, for the SCG Toby Burnett University of Washington.

C&A 17April06 1 Point Source Detection and Localization using DC2 pulsars Toby Burnett University of Washington.

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Study of the G4 stepping cut value Toby Burnett and Anthony Nardozza (senior physics student) Are the results at all sensitive.

Science Requirements Verification GLAST LAT Project September 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review Presentation 2 of 12 GLAST Large Area Telescope Gamma-ray Large.

Analysis Meeting 14Nov 05T. Burnett1 Classification, etc. status at UW New application to apply trees to existing tuple Background rejection for the v7r2.

9 GeV Au+Au Collisions Run on March 11 th, 2008 Out of ~200k Events –11000 had Vertices –6700 had Vertices within 2 cm of the beamline –4150 appeared to.

T. BurnettC&A group 15 Aug 051 Thoughts on PSF determination Quick review of the PSF function How we use it in Seattle More results from the All-gamma.

Classification and Regression Trees for Glast Analysis: to IM or not to IM? Toby Burnett Data Challenge Meeting 15 June 2003.

Analysis Meeting 8 Aug 05T. Burnett1 Status of UW classification and PSF fits Data selection Classification PSF.

T. Burnett: PSF status 3Feb061 DC2 PSF Status The function: 8 bins in energy (2/decade), 6 in cos(  ) (0.1) Two classes A: GoodEvent3; C: GoodEvent1 &&

CalRecon Moments Analysis Studies I Tracy Usher1/17 A Brief History of Glast Release GR (Friday, July 15) –Effectively, the first DC-2 2M all-gamma.

20 October, 2004GlueX Detector Review 1 The GlueX Detector Curtis A. Meyer This talk Next talk.

Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.

1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.

I.V. Bazarov, Multivariate Optimization of High Brightness DC Gun Photoinjector, UCLA Workshop, 8-10 November CHESS / LEPP ERL DC Gun Injector.

DC2 at GSFC - 28 Jun 05 - T. Burnett 1 DC2 C++ decision trees Toby Burnett Frank Golf Quick review of classification (or decision) trees Training and testing.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.

Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -

Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????

Fixed Target Program in STAR Fixed-target running allows much higher rates without e-cooling at lower energies Top of  B range now ~ 400 MeV; extends.

Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.

CTB04: electron Data vs MC Stathes Paganis University of Sheffield LAr CTB04 WG 25-Aug-05.

Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.

Material and thickness for pi0 Y.Sudo Univ. of Tsukuba 2008/07/18.

Optimization of Analysis Cuts for Oscillation Parameters Andrew Culling, Cambridge University HEP Group.

GLAST/LAT analysis group 31Jan05 - T. Burnett 1 Creating Decision Trees for GLAST analysis: A new C++-based procedure Toby Burnett Frank Golf.

ST Occupancies (revisited) M. Needham EPFL. Introduction Occupancies matter Date rates/sizes In particular was data size on links from Tell1 to farm estimated.

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.

T. Burnett: Anagroup 5/24/04 1 Latest PSF and Point-source sensitivity prediction status Anagroup meeting Toby Burnett 24 May 04.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

Electrons in CTB: status of data/MC comparisons LAr & Inner Detector H8 CTB groups Physics Week, CERN, 30-May-2006.

親愛的吉姆舅舅：今天吃完晚餐後，奶奶說，在家裡情況變好以前，您要我搬到城裡跟您住。奶奶有沒有跟您說，爸爸已經好久沒有工作，也好久沒有人請媽媽做衣服了？我們聽完都哭了，連爸爸也哭了，但是媽媽說了一個故事讓我們又笑了。她說：您們小的時候，她曾經被您追得爬到樹上去，真的嗎？雖然我個子小，但是我很強壯，

Plans of developments and validation for th Geant4 Workshop September 2011 SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA.

The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.

Harmonic Generation in a Self-Seeded Soft X-Ray LCLS-II J. Wu Feb. 24, 2010.

Heating and radiological

Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam

تحليل الحساسية Sensitive Analysis.

UW “Source Detection” Status

“Push” Monthly Statements

CEPC Injector positron source

LAT performance for DC2 and the “4-panel plot”

Sections, Assemblies & Exploded

مديريت موثر جلسات Running a Meeting that Works

LCLS Commissioning Parameters

Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009

Energy Calibration with Compton Data

Background sources update

CEPC Injector positron source

Data Challenge 1 Closeout Lessons Learned Already

For More Details:

Presentation transcript:

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Study of the G4 stepping cut value Toby Burnett and Anthony Nardozza (senior physics student) Are the results at all sensitive to the value(s)? Can we optimize to save CPU time? There has only been one study, by Richard, a long time ago – I have no idea where to find it 

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Reference It is described in the Physics Reference Manual, ceManual/print/PhysicsReferenceManual71.pdf ceManual/print/PhysicsReferenceManual71.pdf Default is 1 mm

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Details All-gamma (18MeV- 180 GeV) source GlastRelease v9r7 UW physics Condor farm 200 runs of 5000 incident (1M) for each setting

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 CPU, accepted difference nominal

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Cut=0.01 mm Cut=1.4 mm Representative PSF fits Selection: DC2 classA front Cut=0.1, 0.7 mm PS: I have 16 M v9r9, with new CTB values: same cuts give worse PSF

T. Burnett C&A 31 July 06 Summary CPU time: no gain to be achieved by relaxing cut Small (1%) effect on accepted rate needs to be understood, compared with beam test perhaps. No apparent effect on PSF Need to study effective area