Comparing Two Advection Solvers in MAQSIP Shiang-Yuh Wu, Prasad Pai, Betty K. Pun AER San Ramon, CA 17 March 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.
Advertisements

MODELING CHEMICALLY REACTIVE AIR TOXICS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA USING CAMx Chris Emery, Greg Yarwood and Ed Tai ENVIRON International Corporation.
GEOS-Chem Simulations for CMAQ Initial and Boundary Conditions 1 Yun-Fat Lam, 1 Joshua S. Fu, 2 Daniel J. Jacob, 3 Carey Jang and 3 Pat Dolwick.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Spatial Reduction Algorithm for Numerical Modeling of Atmospheric Pollutant Transport Yevgenii Rastigejev, Philippe LeSager Harvard University Michael.
Simulations of ozone over Israel, West Bank, and Jordan E. Weinroth, M. Luria, A. Ben-Nun, C. Emery, J. Kaplan, M. Peleg and Y. Mahrer Seagram Center for.
Evaluation of Two Numerical Algorithms in Simulating Particle Condensational Growth and Gas/Particle Mass Transfer Yang Zhang and Christian Seigneur Atmospheric.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
1 Lecture 11: Unsteady Conduction Error Analysis.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
A Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model Peter C Chu and Chenwu Fan Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California, USA.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Nth-order Activity of Continuous Systems a,b,c Rodrigo Castro and c Ernesto Kofman a ETH Zürich, Switzerland b University of Buenos Aires & c CIFASIS-CONICET,
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
BRAVO Results of CMAQ-MADRID Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto 10 October 2002.
Ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.
Development and Application of a State-of-the-Science Plume-in-Grid Model CMAQ-APT Prakash Karamchandani, Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan and.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Model Performance Evaluation Database and Software Betty K. Pun, Kristen Lohman, Shu-Yun Chen, and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Presentation at.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
Regional Modeling of The Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Benzene and Diesel Particles with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun Kristen Lohman, and Shiang-Yuh.
Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
A New Version of CMAQ-MADRID and Comparison with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun, Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, and Shu-Yun Chen AER.
CCOS TC Kickoff Meeting Cluster Analysis for CCOS Domain Ahmet Palazoglu (P.I.) Scott Beaver Swathi Pakalapati University of California, Davis Department.
BRAVO Results of REMSAD Shiang-Yuh Wu, Betty Pun & Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon 10 October 2002.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Albert Oliver, Raúl Arasa, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, Mª Ángeles González HARMO17 Budapest May 2016 Simulating large emitters using CMAQ and a local scale finite.
CMAQ Programs and Options
Application Of KF-Convection Scheme In 3-D Chemical Transport Model
CRC NARSTO-Northeast Modeling Study
WindNinja Model Domain/Objective
21th Lecture - Advection - Diffusion
Advection – Diffusion Equation
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
Models of atmospheric chemistry
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
COSMO-GM Rome, WG-2 Meeting, Sept. 5, 2011
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
7th Annual CMAS Conference
Effects of Sub-Grid Scale Terrain upon CAMx Air Quality Simulation Carlie J. Coats, Jr., M. Talat Odman, and Saswati Datta Problem Statement Model.
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

Comparing Two Advection Solvers in MAQSIP Shiang-Yuh Wu, Prasad Pai, Betty K. Pun AER San Ramon, CA 17 March 2000

Introduction Accurate numerical treatment of advection is important because errors can propagate in other processes (e.g., chemistry, deposition) Desired Properties –Mass conservation –Small numerical diffusion –Small phase errors –Positive definite –Monotonic

Bott Scheme and QSTSE Bott Concentrations represented by a 4th order polynomial within each cell Temporal integration by flux form discretization QSTSE Concentrations represented by quintic spline interpolators Temporal integration by Taylor series expansion (2 or 4 terms)

2-D Rotating Cone Test From Nguyen and Dabdub (2000): BottQSTSE (1) Peak (100)77101 Mass Conservation Mass Distribution Relative Time (1) 4th Order Taylor Expansion

MAQSIP Framework Model Builder Configuration File Chemical Mechanism Horizontal Advection Chemical Solver Bott Smol CB4 MQSSA other processes Compilation statements Link statements Libraries Include statements // driver module driver // generalized coordinates module sigma // chemistry module radm2 //advection module bot // diffusion modulediff //getstep modulegetstep // process analysis module pa-radm2...

Base Case Model Simulation SCAQS August 1987 Domain: 63 x 28 grid cells, consistent with previous modeling exercises Grid Resolution: 5 km MM5 used to generate input meteorology Emissions originated from UAM simulation

Upwind Simulation Results

Upwind Numerical Diffusion (Nashville Example)

Nashville Plume-in-Grid Simulation

Simulation Results at Other Sites

Effects of Courant Number Decreasing CN from 0.7 to 0.5 Increases computational time by 30% Results in a maximum difference of 25 ppb after 120 hours

Conclusions It is quite straightforward to incorporate a new advection solver into MAQSIP QSTSE shows improved performance compared to Bott solver –Reduced numerical diffusion at upwind locations –Higher concentrations at downtown and downwind locations A Courant number of 0.5 or less is recommended

Acknowledgements This work was funded by EPRI (WO ) QSTSE was obtained from Prof. Donald Dabdub of University of California, Irvine