1 Charm Results from FOCUS Kihyeon Cho Kyungpook National University Daegu, Korea (On behalf of FOCUS Collaborations) Flavor Physics CP Violation 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Excited Charm and K0sK0s Resonance Production at ZEUS V. Aushev For the ZEUS Collaboration XXXIX International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics ''Gold.

Advertisements

The FOCUS Collaboration Univ. of California-Davis, CBPF-Rio de Janeiro, CINVESTAV-Mexico City, Univ. Colorado-Boulder, FERMILAB, Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign,

1 Semiexclusive semileptonic B->charmdecays C. Gatto - INFN Napoli A. Mazzacane - Universita’ di Napoli April 10, 2003.

Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.

S-Waves & the extraction of  s Sheldon Stone FPCP 2010, Torino, Italy, May 2010.

EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -

Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.

Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.

1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.

Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-

1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.

Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.

Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.

XLIId RENCONTRES DE MORIOND ELECTROWEAK INTERACTIONS AND UNIFIED THEORIES CLEO-c Results Basit Athar March , 2007 University of Florida CLEO Collaboration.

1 Charm Decays at Threshold Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.

Hot Topics from BaBar Fabrizio Bianchi INFN, Torino (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration) Direct CP Violation in (hep-ex/ ) Observation of and search.

Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,

Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,

B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.

Bo XinD  K/π e + and Vcs and Vcd at CLEO-c 12/20/2008 Study of and measurement of V cs and V cd at CLEO-c Study of D  K/πe + and measurement of V cs.

Semileptonic Charm Decays Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS Collaboration) Vanderbilt University, BEACH 2004, July 1.

B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.

1 BEACH 2006 July 5, 2006 Content I: Why We Study Charm Semileptonic Decays. II: Recent Analyses on Semileptonic BF, from BES and CLEO-c. III: Form Factors.

1 Doris Y. Kim, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Content Part I: Theories of Charm Semileptonic decays Part II: q 2 dependence in Pseudo- scalar.

Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.

Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.

Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.

Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.

EPS 2003 AachenDaniele Pedrini - Focus results1 FOCUS mixing and CPV results Recent results on charm from E831-FOCUS Daniele Pedrini (INFN-Milano) on behalf.

 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.

Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.

Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.

Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.

4/17/2005FOCUS / Doris Kim1 Doris Y. Kim University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Content ( hep-ex/ , PLB 607 (2005) 233 ) Part I: Theories of charm.

1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.

Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.

WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->

The Collaboration Univ. of California-Davis, CBPF-Rio de Janeiro, CINVESTAV-Mexico City, Univ. Colorado-Boulder, FERMILAB, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati,

1 Charm Semileptonic Decay The importance of charm SL decay Pseudoscalar l decay Vector l decay –Analysis of D  K*  –The V/PS enigma :  (D+  K*  /

Outline Detectors and Methods –Spectrometer layout –Segmented target, OOT cut effectiveness –CITADL Kaonicity pion ID effect on K-pi reflection –Target.

Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.

D 0 - D 0 Mixing at B A B AR Amir Rahimi The Ohio State University For B A B AR Collaboration.

Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.

Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,

Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing

Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.

B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.

1 Semileptonic physics in FOCUS D  K  0 l form factor measurement –Motivation –Method and Signals D   l form factor measurement –Motivation –Signals.

Sandra Malvezzi - Charm Meson Results in Focus 1 Sandra Malvezzi I.N.F.N. Milano Meson Lifetimes, Decays, Mixing and CPV in FOCUS.

Extract the partial rates We can make fits to the partial decay rates to extract (1) normalization f + (0)|V cx | (2) Form factor shape parameters r 1.

A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.

B.E.A.CH., Vancouver, june 24-28, 2002 B.E.A.CH., Vancouver, june 24-28, 2002 SERGIO P. RATTI INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica – PAVIA.

1 Charm Review Update on charm mixing Charm semileptonic decay –Analysis of D  K*  –Analysis of D s  Charm 3 body hadronic decay –Isobar model versus.

Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.

1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.

Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.

Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)

QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.

ChPT tests at NA62 Mauro Raggi, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf of the NA62 collaboration X Th quark confinement and hadron spectrum Tum campus,

CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)

Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.

D leptonic decay and semileptonic decays from BESIII Yangheng Zheng University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (on behalf of BESIII collaboration) July.

Present status of Charm Measurements

On Behalf of the BaBar Collaboration

Spectroscopy with Hyperon Beams

University of South Alabama

A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV

Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR

Presentation transcript:

1 Charm Results from FOCUS Kihyeon Cho Kyungpook National University Daegu, Korea (On behalf of FOCUS Collaborations) Flavor Physics CP Violation 2004 October 4 -9, 2004

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 2 Contents Why Charm Physics? FOCUS Experiment Recent Charm Results from FOCUS 1.Pseudoscalar semileptonic decays 2.Vector semileptonic decays 3.Charm hadronic mixing 4.Search for new particles – pentaquarks, double charm baryons Conclusions

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 3 Why charm physics? Window to new physics  Standard model rates for rare decays, CP violation and mixing are very low.  With current experiments, observation of CP violation, rare decays or mixing  new physics Provides information about QCD  Measurements of production characteristics, lifetimes, branching ratios and subresonant analyses provide insight into QCD. Needed for b physics  Many b particles decay to charm so branching ratios and lifetimes are needed for accurate b results.  Experimental techniques are developed in charm physics. (lifetime measurement, Dalitz plot analyses...)  Heavy quark effective theory often needs charm to bootstrap to b physics.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 4 Pho toproduction of C harm with an U pgraded S pectrometer ~100 Physicists, 18 institutes from 5 countries Univ. of California-Davis, CBPF-Rio de Janeiro, CINVESTAV-Mexico City, Univ. Colorado-Boulder, FERMILAB, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Indiana Univ.-Bloomington, Korea Univ.-Seoul, Kyungpook National Univ.-Daegu, INFN and Univ.-Milano, Univ. of North Carolina-Asheville, INFN and Univ.-Pavia, Univ. of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez, Univ. of South Carolina-Columbia, Univ. of Tennessee-Knoxville, Vanderbilt Univ.-Nashville, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison FOCUS Experiment

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 5 Vertexing is the Key Golden Modes: D +  K -     D 0  K -   D 0  K -       BeO tarsil | primary vtx | secondary vtx Decays / 200  m BackgroundSubtracted Golden Mode Charm

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 6 1.Pseudoscalar semileptonic decay Using D 0      D 0       (D 0      (  D 0       Pole masses  f - (0)/f + (0)  f +  (0)/f + K (0)  Non-parametric q 2 dependent

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 7 Why Pseudoscalar semileptonic decay? The differential decay rate is Measuring the q 2 dependence and form factors in heavy quark transition is critical to our understanding of QCD. Hadronic current contains information about strong contributions.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 8 What do we measure in D 0  Pl   (D 0      (  D 0      Pole masses f - (0)/f + (0) f +  (0)/f + K (0)  provides the test of SU(3) symmetry breaking Non-parametric q 2 dependent  A model independent measurement would allow to discriminate between different models. f + (q 2 ) parameter Pole form Modified pole from

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 9 Fitting Technique on D 0         Fitting Technique on D 0         Fit D*-D 0 mass difference plot to find the amount of combinatoric background. Apply the mass difference cut (< GeV/c 2 ) to suppress combinatoric and peaking background

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 10 Results on D 0         Results on D 0         Fit to cos  l and q 2 to measure branching ratio, pole masses and the ratio f - (0)/f + (0). 288   92 Preliminary (GeV/c 2 ),

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 11 Extracting f +  (0)/f + K (0) Compute a numerical integration on Dalitz Get efficiency as a function of q 2 Get yield from the fit Using PDG |V cd /V cs | 2 =0.051  Consistent with the predictions from SU(3) symmetry breaking and lattice QCD Preliminary

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 12 Non-parametric q 2 dependent  e Ke form factor f + (q²) single-pole model Based on 820 events q² / GeV² Kl  l q² / GeV² Using ~13,000 K  events D 0  l  / Kl 3 brand new results from CLEO, Belle and FOCUS on form factor f + (q²) in D 0  l  / Kl f + (q²) Excellent agreement with LQCD! Preliminary

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 13 Summary for pseudoscalar semileptonic decay The  and  branching ratio is consistent with recent results from CLEO. The pole masses are lower than the predicted value at the D* or D s * masses. We presented a non-parametric analysis of the q 2 dependence for D 0  K  which shows excellent agreement with the results obtained with the parametric analysis and lattice QCD. Preliminary,(GeV/c 2 )

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS Vector Semileptonic decay D +  K *0    form factor Branching ratio D 0  K *-    form factor Branching ratio

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS  (D +  K *0    /  D +  K 0   ) Use upstream K s (~10%) so that both the signal (K  ) and normalization (K s  ) leave 3 tracks in FOCUS microstrip Theory S-wave corrected Old quark model PLB 598 (2004) 33

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 16 Form Factors of D 0  K *-  + Form Factors of D 0  K *-  + K* -  Ks  - After background subtraction, we fit D*-D 0 mass difference and cos  l X cos  v X q 2 distribution at the same time. Results  R V =    R 2 =    World’s first measurement Preliminary

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 17 Summary of vector semilepotonic decay Form Factor FOCUS D 0  K *-  + FOCUS D +  K *0   RvRv     R2R     ReferencePreliminary PLB 544 (2002) 89 PLB 598 (2004) 33 Preliminary

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS D 0 -D 0 hadronic mixing and DCS decays D 0 goes to K +  - in two ways (mixing + CF decay and DCS decay)  Interference Assuming CP conservation, D 0  K +  - wrong sign to right sign decay ratio is written by Three terms from DCS decays, interference & mixing Soft pion charge in D* +  D 0  + defines right sign(RS) and wrong sign(WS). Fit for R DCS, x’ 2 and y’ Mixing parameters

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 19 Right Sign vs Wrong Sign

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 20 Summary for Mixing Results All results shown here assume CP conservation. FOCUS results agree better with BaBar in location and shape than CLEO.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS New particle searches S=-1 pentaquark  (1540) + with uudds S=-2 pentaquark  (1860) – – with uddss Charm pentaquark  c (3100) 0 with uuddc Double charm baryons  cc with ccu and ccd

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 22 Evidence for  + (uudds)

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 23 Evidence for  + (cont’d)

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 24  (1540) + p Ks search  (1540) +  p Ks search No evidence for  (1540) +  pKs but reconstructs 8 million K*(892) +  Ks  + and 240,000  (1385) +   0  +

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 25  (1860) – – search  (1860) - -   -  - (S=-2 pentaquark) NA49 shows evidence for  (1860) - - and  (1860) 0 decaying  -  .. No evidence for  (1860) - -   -  - but reconstructs 60,000  (1530) 0   -  +, approximately 1,000 times more than observing experiment.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 26 Charm Pentaquark search No evidence for a charm pentaquark decaying to D* - p or D - p with a factor of 10 more D* + decays than the observing experiment.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 27  CC search No evidence

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 28 Summary for Search Results No evidence for  (1540) +  pKs but reconstructs 8 million K*(892) +  Ks  + and 240,000  (1385) +   0   No evidence for  (1860) - -   -  - but reconstructs 60,000  (1530) 0   -  +, approximately 1,000 times more than observing experiment No evidence for a charm pentaquark decaying to D* - p or D - p with a factor of 10 more D* + decays than the observing experiment. No evidence for double charm baryons with 10 times more  C decays than the observing experiment.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 29 Conclusions Charm mode … Charm physics gives a rich source of new results. FOCUS is playing a major role in understanding the charm decays. The recent charm results from FOCUS include  Charm pseudoscalar semileptonic decays  Charm vector semileptonic decays  Charm hadronic mixing  Search for pentaquarks and double charm. FOCUS is continuing studies of charm physics.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 30 Backups

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 31 FOCUS Spectrometer At Fermilab   BeO charm  Segmented target Silicon vertexing MWPC tracking ~175 GeV Cenenkov ID EM/hadronic Calorimeter Muon detectors

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 32 Kl 1.91  0.04 q 2 dependent (cont’d) Clearly the data does not favor the simple Ds* pole We presented a non-parameteric analysis of the q 2 dependence for D 0  K  which shows excellent agreement with the results obtained with the parameteric analysis and lattice QCD.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 33 D +  K *0    channel Only external diagram involved. Factorization is possible between hadronic and leptonic current.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 34 H 0 (q 2 ), H + (q 2 ), H - (q 2 ) are helicity-basis form factors computable by LQCD right-handed  + left-handed  + Two amplitudes get summed over W polarization using D-matrices Helicity FF are combinations of one vector and two axial form factors. Two observables parameterize the decay  Four body decays requires five variables: 3 angles, M k , q. D +  K *0    decays

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 35 Yield 31,254 Data MC Focus “ K* ” signal matches model -15% F-B asymmetry! Interference in D +  K *0   Interference in D +  K *0    Huge Asymmetry in cos  v below K* pole led to a discovery of s- wave interference.

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 36 K * interference term (Ae i  ) S-wave interference term Signal events weighted by avg(cos  V ): No added term PLB535(2002) 43

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 37 S-Wave effects apparent only with high statistics Lattice Gauge! Experiment Models PLB544(2002) 89 Form Factors D +  K *0 l  Form Factors D +  K *0 l   A=0.330   0.015GeV -1     =0.68  0.07  0.05 rad  R V =    R 2 =   0.064

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 38 D 0  K *-  + channel

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 39 K * interference term (Ae i  ) A term which is non- symmetric vs. cos  v appears due to the S-wave Use a model that includes S- wave   = 0.68 rad fixed from  A=0.347   GeV -1

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 40 Branching Ratio D*-D mass difference plot for normalization mode Accounting for S-wave component in Normalization mode  Excellent agreement with semielectronic decay

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 41 Summary of vector semilepotonic decay FOCUS D 0 FOCUS D + RvRv     R2R     A(GeV -1 )       (rad) 0.68 (fixed) 0.68  0.07  0.05 ReferencePreliminary PLB 544 (2002) 89 PLB 598 (2004) 33 Preliminary

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 42  Fit Shape (Signal)

KIHYEON CHO CENTER FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS 43 Double charm baryon production compared If the  C + K -  + (  C K -  +  + ) signal is real, SELEX produces at least 42 (111) times more  cc baryons relative to  C than FOCUS.