Principle of Care and Giving to Help People in Need René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm Economics/Lilly Family.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Altruism v. Self-interest. Thomas Hobbes: “Because I was in paine to consider the miserable condition of the old man; and now my almes, giving him some.
Advertisements

Parents and Families. Judith Weatherly (20th century), U.S. editor and writer. “Meeting Parental Needs, A Never-ending Dilemma,” The Exceptional Parent.
Homo empathicus: Dissecting the ‘warm glow’ of prosocial behavior 2014 Van der Gaag Symposium 24 June 2014 Introduction1.
Trends in Women’s Philanthropy Dr. Debra Mesch Director, Women’s Philanthropy Institute Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University Procura 15 th Anniversary.
Inter-generational Transfer of Parenting Styles Amanda J. Wood & Meagan M. Krause Advised by: Dr. Susan Wolfgram, University of Wisconsin-Stout There are.
Contrast two theories explaining altruism in humans.
Emotion and Relationship Effects on Gender Differences in Empathy Method Participants were 60 women and 24 men. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis,
Empathy Davis (1994) multidimensional approach: Perspective taking (PT): adopt the viewpoint of others (“I sometimes attempt to understand my friends by.
School-wide Bullying Prevention A Guidance Services Presentation.
Depression, Partnership Quality and Partnership Breakdown An analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study Anna Garriga Kathleen Kiernan University of York.
Prelude to the Research Validity Lecture A RH: is a guess about the relationships between behaviors In order to test our RH: we have to decide on a research.
1 Reducing Stigma toward the Mentally Ill: The Impact of Exposure versus Information Stephanie Turner Hanover College.
René Bekkers Arjen de Wit Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam 11 th ISTR Conference Münster, Germany July 22, 2014 Look who's crowding-out!
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Scientific Understanding of.
RESEARCH METHODS IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Integrating Representative Sample and High Net Worth Survey Data on Giving René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
Surveying Volunteering: Giving in the Netherlands René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
Introduction to Theory & Research Design
1 Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
Amber S. Emanuel 1, James A. Shepperd 2, Virginia J. Dodd 1 & Henrietta Logan 1 1 Department of Behavioral Sciences & Community Dentistry, University of.
Divorce and a Child’s education Leticia Garcia Northern New Mexico College Department of Integrated Humanities and Social Sciences Psychology Concentration.
René Bekkers Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Philanthropy and Economic Performance 10 July ISTR Conference, Siena.
Chapter 13: Moral Understanding and Behavior Module 13.1 Self-Control Module 13.2 Reasoning About Moral Issues Module 13.3 Helping Others Module 13.4 Aggression.
Public and Private Families Chapter 1. Increasing ambivalence Women in workforce vs. children in day care Divorce vs. unhappy marriage.
Social Psychology. Experimental reports detail the results of experimental research projects. Experimental reports are write-ups of your results after.
PEONIES: Making self determination and self direction the root of quality Sara Karon, Ph.D. Director, the PEONIES Project Center for Health Systems Research.
Social Capital and Blood Donation in the Netherlands René Bekkers VU University Amsterdam November 17, th Arnova Conference, Toronto Ingrid Veldhuizen.
THE SOCIAL SIDE OF GIVING TO CHARITIES: THE EFFECT OF ALTRUISTIC AND EGOISTIC MOTIVATIONS ON ANONYMOUS GIVING (WORKING PAPER) Ömer TORLAK & Muhammet Ali.
Chapter 4 – Research Methods in Clinical Psych Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
THE ONE; THE MANY… Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships Triandis, et. Al Leah Brown, Elizabeth.
 Inconsistent support › Expected mood enhancement did not decrease helping for individuals in a high-empathy situation (Batson et al., 1989) › Empathy.
 Daniel Batson  Robert Cialdini  Altruism: motivational state in which the ultimate goal is increasing a victims’ welfare  Egoism: motivational state.
Nursing research Is a systematic inquiry into a subject that uses various approach quantitative and qualitative methods) to answer questions and solve.
Women and Philanthropy: An Untapped Resource Big Brothers Big Sisters Mid-Large Agency Alliance CEO Networking & Learning Meeting Revving up your fundraising.
Do donors raise their donations when they are aware of decreasing government subsidies? A survey experiment Arjen de Wit & René Bekkers 7 th ERNOP Conference.
Warm up Which approach comes to mind for each of the following… 1. Unconscious mind, primitive urges vs. morality 2. Self-actualization 3. Brain, nervous.
Virtue and lifeworlds Aristotle’s warrior prince –courage, generosity, magnificence, high mindedness, gentleness, friendliness, truthfulness, wittiness,
Research for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation Chapter 1 What is research? What is nursing research? What are the goals of Nursing research?
CORRELATIONS: PART II. Overview  Interpreting Correlations: p-values  Challenges in Observational Research  Correlations reduced by poor psychometrics.
Altruism, Warm Glow and Charitable Giving 3 rd SPI Conference, September 12, 2015 René Bekkers, Dave Verkaik Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
Physical Science and You Chapter One: Studying Physics and Chemistry Chapter Two: Experiments and Variables Chapter Three: Key Concepts in Physical Science.
Gender Differences in Giving in the Netherlands René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam November 8, 20111Workshop in Multidisciplinary.
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development is based on studies he conducted using both cross- sectional and longitudinal research methods. Cross-sectional.
The Analysis of Regional Differences in Philanthropy Evidence from the European Social Survey, the Eurobarometer and the Giving in the Netherlands Panel.
Do donors raise their donations when they are aware of decreasing government subsidies? A survey experiment Arjen de Wit & René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies,
Charitable Giving to Fight Cardiovascular Diseases: Is It Any Different During A Recession? Rene Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
What is Philanthropy Good For? René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies Seminar July 13, 2010.
Testing Mechanisms in Charitable giving René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam 3-4 November 2014Behavioral Economics and.
Altruism, Warm Glow and Generosity: A National Experiment René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm Economics/Lilly.
Selfishness and Self-Mattering: Do I Fit In? Leah Burke Advisors: Ellen Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. The University of New Hampshire INTRODUCTION.
Empathy and Perspective Taking and the Radicalism of Social Attitudes Aleksandra Jerzmanowska Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities.
Chapter 1 The Science of Biology. Goals of Science to provide natural explanations for events in the natural world. to use those explanations to understand.
Philanthropy in the Low Countries: Opportunities for Universities? René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam CASE LOWLANDS.
Altruism, Warm Glow and Charitable Giving: Four Experiments TIBER Conference, August 27, 2015 René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
The Science of Psychology
SPI Conference 2017, September 7, 2017
What are the benefits of volunteering for volunteers?
PGPE Conference, Warsaw 9 October 2014 René Bekkers
Twenty Years of Generosity in the Netherlands
Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study
Look who's crowding-out!
Giving in Europe How much, by whom, and for which causes?
René Bekkers, VU Amsterdam Sigrid Hemels, Erasmus University Rotterdam
René Bekkers – Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Values of Philanthropy
Culture change takes time
Chapter 12: Prosocial Behavior: Helping Others
René Bekkers, VU Amsterdam Sigrid Hemels, Erasmus University Rotterdam
René Bekkers – Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
HOVRS Training.
Presentation transcript:

Principle of Care and Giving to Help People in Need René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm Economics/Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI

2 Moral Development A universal moral principle that one should help those in need is the highest stage in theories of moral development. It builds on empathic concern – responsiveness to others’ emotions. Empathy works best with friends/family. The principle of care proscribes helping regardless of one’s social relationship with those in need. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

This evokes empathy October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University 3

This evokes the principle October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University 4

5 The Measure – Sample Items 1. People should be willing to help others who are less fortunate. 2. Everybody in this world has a responsibility to help others when they need assistance. 3 (*). These days people need to look after themselves and not overly worry about others. 4. When people are less fortunate, it is important to help them even if they are very different from us. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

6 Two hypotheses 1. The Principle of Care – Giving Hypothesis Stronger endorsement of the principle of care increases giving to help people in need. 2. The Empathic Concern – Mediation Hypothesis The principle of care is why empathic concern is related to help people in need. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

7 Previous findings The principle of care predicts a wide variety of helping behaviors in a national sample of US citizens (GSS ). 75% to 100% of the relationship between empathic concern and helping behaviors is mediated by the principle of care. These findings are strongest for helping people in need known in the abstract. Source: Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. & Bekkers, R. (2010). Helping Behavior, Dispositional Empathic Concern, and the Principle of Care. Social Psychology Quarterly. 73(1): October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

8 Our Questions Does the principle of care also relate to giving in other countries? Does the principle of care also relate to amounts donated? Does the relationship persist over time? Even in experiments, in which giving is observed rather than self-reported? October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

9 Innovations Data from large, representative sample surveys from the US and the Netherlands. More items = more reliable measure. Longitudinal data spanning two years. Observational evidence from experiments. Focus on giving to help people in need. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Full principle of care scale a.People should be willing to help others who are less fortunate. b.Everybody in this world has a responsibility to help others when they need assistance. c.These days people need to look after themselves and not overly worry about others. d.When people are less fortunate, it is important to help them even if they are very different from us. e.It is important to help one another so that the community in general is a better place. f.Personally assisting people in trouble is very important to me. g.When thinking about helping people in trouble, it is important to consider whether the people are like us or not. h.We should not care too much about the needs of people in other parts of the world. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University 10

IRI subscale sample items Empathic concern: “I often have tender, concerned feelings for people less fortunate than me” Perspective taking: “I sometimes try to understand my friends better by imagining how things look from their perspective” Personal distress: “Being in a tense emotional situation scares me” October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University 11

Study 1: Self-reported giving to basic needs, combined funds, and international aid (ANES) 12 $ per year N=2,264 Base: $ 401 October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Study 2: Self-reported giving to national and international aid organizations (FSDP) 13 % giving N=2,605 Base: 54% October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Study 3: Self-reported giving to national and international aid organizations (GINPS10) 14 € per year N=1,765 Base: € 37 October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Study 3: Self-reported giving to national and international aid organizations (GINPS08) 15 € per year N=1,280 Base: € 37 October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

16 Study 4: Altruism Experiment 85 undergrads received $5 show up fee and made anonymous decisions on $40 Donations go to Red Cross to buy books for children whose family home had been destroyed by a fire. How do people respond to experimenters increasing their donations? Scales are completed after 6 decisions were made. Source: Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., Vesterlund, L. and Xie, H. (2014). “Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism." NBER Working Paper October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Study 4: Observed giving to the Red Cross in experiment (VOX) 17 $ N=85 Base: $ 21 October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

Study 5: Observed giving of reward to (inter) national health charities in experiment (GINPS) 18 € N=1,280 Base: €0.64 October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

19 Strong support for hypotheses 1. The Principle of Care – Giving Hypothesis Stronger endorsement of the principle of care increases giving to help people in need. 2. The Empathic Concern – Mediation Hypothesis The principle of care is why empathic concern is related to help people in need. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

20 Conclusions The scale is valid, reliable, and stable. The Principle of Care is an important motive for giving to help people in need. Not merely for concurrent measures, but also for giving measured in the future. Not just for self-reported, but also for observed measures of generosity. October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

What’s next? Observe giving in an experiment. First measure empathic concern and the principle of care. Then: induce empathy by instructions to imagine what victims feel like. Or: induction of the principle of care by instructions to state the morally right decision. 21October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University

22 Authors René Bekkers, Center for Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, Center on Philanthropy, IUPUI, October 10, 2014PGPE Conference, Warsaw University