No Child Left Behind Sub-grant Application Project Planning & Evaluation John Cradler Ruthmary Cradler Educational Support Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
What is a School Psychologist? ©2008, National Association of School Psychologists A Guide for Teachers-in-Training.
Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
Copyright © 2010 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
Copyright © 2011 Verizon Foundation. All Rights Reserved. This document may be reproduced and distributed solely for uses that are both (a) educational.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
1 Promoting Positive Behavior in Learners Through the Modification of Instructional Antecedents John J. Wheeler, Ph.D. Richard S. Bumbalough Tennessee.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Instructional Decision Making
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting San Diego Unified School District Attachment 4.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Examining Student Work. Ensuring Teacher Quality Leader's Resource Guide: Examining Student Work 2 Examining Student Work Explore looking at student work.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
Evidence, Ethics, and the Law Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Campus Improvement Plans
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Systematic planning as an approach to technology implementation: provides a rationale for the technology and related resources.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Purdue University Preparing for Implementation of Revised ASHA Standards Phase I: Curriculum Review Phase II: Revision of Procedures Phase III: Development.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
STaR Chart Data Analysis Progreso East Elementary
Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Schoolwide Programs.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Harmony School of Excellence-El Paso Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind Sub-grant Application Project Planning & Evaluation John Cradler Ruthmary Cradler Educational Support Systems

Evaluation and NCLB Grants Central to the design of the project Document project implementation Document student outcomes Document change in teaching Inform future project improvements Increase future funding possibilities 3

Lack of evidence about outcomes and impact of projects Lack of evidence relating project outcomes to project activities Over emphasis on subjective and anecdotal results Typical evaluation issues 4

Project Evaluation Process Activities JASONDJFMAMJ JASONDJFMAMJ Formative Evaluation Analysis Project Activities JASONDJFMAMJ Project Implementation Summative Evaluation Recommended Project Change 5

Project Planning and Evaluation I. System Conditions III. Instructional Consequences II. Instructional Interventions IV. Learning Outcomes Instructional Change Technology Integration School Conditions District Conditions NCLB Intervention Develop Implement Evaluate Student Change Academic Behavioral Tech-use

I. Evaluation Readiness A. Evaluation Pre-planning 1. Project faculty & administrators understand the necessity to evaluate 2. Sufficient resources have been made available for evaluation 3. Evaluation planning is part of project planning 4. NCLB Evaluation Guidelines inform the development of the evaluation plan 6

I. Evaluation Readiness B. Project Readiness 1. Context for the project is described 2. Teacher technology standards are considered 3. Faculty needs & resources are identified 4. Population(s) served are defined 5. Objectives are clear & related to needs 7

I. Evaluation Readiness B. Project Readiness (cont.) 6. Activities are linked to objectives 7. Activities are scheduled 8. Project products, services, etc. are defined 9. Project personnel are identified 10.Training & resources are described 8

I. Evaluation Readiness C. Develop Evaluation Questions 1. Questions address each project objective 2.Questions can be answered by the evaluation strategies and assessments 3.Questions address extent of project implementation (inputs) 4. Questions address outcomes (outputs) resulting from project interventions (inputs 9

II. Input Evaluation Questions A. Implementation Conditions 1. Faculty & stakeholders support project 2. Project is coordinated with existing programs 3. Resources to implement are available 4. Adequate time for project activities is provided 5. Partner support & resources are evidenced The extent to which... 11

II. Input Evaluation Questions B. Implementation Progress 1.Activities were implemented as planned 2.Professional development was implemented as planned 3. State curriculum standards were applied 4.Faculty implemented project specific activities The extent to which... 12

II. Input Evaluation Questions B. Implementation Progress (cont.) 5.Mid-course adjustments were made as needed 6.Faculty observed engaging in project activities 7.Resources & practices with greatest influence were identified 8.Activities unanticipated or unique to particular projects were implemented The extent to which... 13

III. Output Evaluation Questions A. Instructional Change 1.Faculty integrate technology into curriculum 2.Technology resources changed instruction 3. Technology resources supported the use of state curriculum standards 3. Unanticipated faculty changes occurred The extent to which... 14

III. Output Evaluation Questions B. Student Change 1. Increases in student performance were documented 2.Student use of technology increased learning opportunities 3. Student motivation was increased as a result of the project 4. Unanticipated student change was observed The extent to which... 15

IV. Evaluation & Analysis Strategies B. Data Analysis & Reporting 1.Implementation conditions are related to level of implementation 2.Interventions are related to outcomes 3.Barriers and facilitating factors are discussed 4.Ongoing & end-project recommendations are made 5.Reports are prepared for stakeholders 6.Analysis determines promising practices for future implementation 18

Causal Map for Overall Project Evaluation GEPRA Indicators Technology Standards (four pillars/ISTE) Federal Evaluation Guidelines Goals & Objectives Report Findings to USDOE & Congress Analysis of overall impact Recommend Project Revisions Overall Progress Assessment Faculty Development Project Development & Implementation Student Change Instructional Change Outcome Evaluation Individual Project Evaluations Individual Project Evaluations Individual Project Evaluations Individual Project Plans & Causal Maps Individual Project Plans & Causal Maps Individual Project Evaluations Individual Project Plans & Causal Maps Aggregated Project Evaluation Individual Project Plans & Causal Maps 21

Advanced technology delivering traditional instruction Computer assisted instruction supplementing traditional instruction Technology as a supplement to systemic education reform initiatives Passive learningEngaged learning Low technology High technology Advanced technology integral to systemic education reform initiatives Authentic Performance & project-based research & evaluation Of highly infused technology Weak & Limited research With low technology & skill-based learning Educational Support Systems, 1998 Technology Integration Analysis Technology Driven & Low Education Integration Research Authentic Performance & project-based research & evaluation with very limited technology infusion Analysis of technology in teaching and learning in relation to instructional approach 22