1 The Impact of Computer Use on Reading Achievement of 15-year-olds Patrick Bussière and Tomasz Gluszynski Child, Youth and Social Development Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School/Centre: Reflecting on the effectiveness of Self-Evaluation Resource The levels on the board are as in How Good Is Our school? Above the board, type.
Advertisements

Parkland School Division
Family and Community Support Why Has Mathematics Instruction Changed? Myths and Facts.
Key Messages Learners need to know  What skills are available  When to use them  Why they are appropriate for the task  How to apply them to achieve.
Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
State Testing PARCC, LEAP, iLEAP. What State Assessments will your children take this year? When will they take them ? All students grades 3-8 will take.
Assessing Student Learning: Using the standards, progression points and assessment maps Workshop 1: An overview FS1 Student Learning.
THE EARLY FRENCH IMMERSION PROGRAM Halifax Regional School Board INFORMATION SESSION 2015.
Fit to Learn Using the Employability Skills Framework to improve your performance at College The Employability Skills Framework has been developed by business.
Deborah Cobb-Clark (U Melbourne) Mathias Sinning (ANU) Steven Stillman (U Otago)
What is PIAAC?. About PIAAC PIAAC is an international large-scale assessment administered in in 23 countries It assessed 16 - to 65-year-olds,
5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
An approach to teaching it. Jacqueline is purchasing her first car and feels torn as she balances conflicting desires and messages. She yearns to be seated.
Hacettepe University Usluel, Y. K., Kelecioğlu, H. & Mazman, S.G. COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER AND INTERNET USAGE OF PISA BALKAN COUNTRIES 2010.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Corporate slide master With guidelines for corporate presentations An introduction to thinking skills Module 3 1.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010.
International Survey of Adult Skills (ISAS) Policy Results 14th October 2013.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Introduction to Primary Science APP. What do the AFs look like? AF1 – Thinking Scientifically AF2- Understanding the applications & implications of science.
Key Stage 2 SATs Achievement Nationally,most children are expected to achieve Level 4. Some children may achieve Level 3. This does not mean they.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
1 1 EQAO Reporting of 21 st Century Skills Spring Conference 2013 Richard Jones & Carol Ricker-Wilson Presentation to AERO.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Literacy is...  the quality or state of being literate, esp. the ability to read and write  An individual’s ability to construct, create, and communicate.
PIAAC: SOME THINGS IT TELLS US ABOUT HIGHER EDUCATION New England Association of Colleges Conference 2014 William Thorn Senior Analyst, OECD.
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
NEW ASSESSMENT. NEW RESULTS SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT What do families need to know? (Insert School Name) (Insert Date) INSERT LOGO.
PISA International Conference. Reading Performance of Hong Kong’s 15-Year-Old Students in PISA.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
TRIAL MakingConnections Science and literacy.
“EQAO has an accountability mandate to provide data that inform classroom teaching practices and contributes to improved student achievement in Ontario’s.
FCD CWI 1 The Foundation for Child Development Index of Child Well- Being (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005 A Social Indicators Project Supported.
Statistical Literacy: Statistics Canada Initiatives DLI National Workshop May 14, 2007 Montreal.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Andreas Schleicher, OECD Directorate for Education, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow.
Assessment Without Levels December National Curriculum Levels From 1988 until July 2015, National Curriculum Levels were used from Y1 and through.
Andreas Schleicher, Quality of Education – Teachers’ Professional Training and Development, Athens, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
CTA Spirals Progressions for English Language Arts and Literacy
Assessment meeting for parents of children in Y1 to Y6 Wednesday 9 th December 6pm & Thursday 10th December 9:15am.
What do families need to know? (Plainfield Central Middle School) ( )
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
I NTERNATIONAL B ENCHMARKING S TUDY — C ONTENT A LIGNMENT Mary J. Pitoniak, Nancy Glazer, Luis Saldivia Educational Testing Service June 22, 2015 National.
 managing self managing self  relating to others relating to others  participating and contributing participating and contributing  thinking thinking.
Second Language Acquisition Important points to remember.
Technology and Literacy 2 April Learning Intentions To be able to explain the literacy profile of NZ students To identify the subject specific demands.
LEAP TH GRADE. DATES: APRIL 25-29, 2016 Test Administration Schedule:  Day 1 April 25- ELA Session 1: Research Simulation Task (90mins) Mathematics.
Bart D. Christie, Principal Carla Rivas, Assistant Principal Fifth Grade Teachers Sera Azcuy Lloyd Cohen Betty Cosculluela Jennie Flores Kristina Saliers.
Action Research GGGE6383 Materials for Teaching & Learning Name: Izyani Binti Mistar Matric No: P73940 Title: The Use of WhatsApp in Language Learning.
NUMERACY NATIONAL LITERACY and NUMERACY FRAMEWORK INFORMATION FOR PARENTS GD LITERACY.
KS2 SATs Presentation to parents 20 th April 2016.
Key Stage 1 SATs Marlborough Primary School Monday 25 th April 2016.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
Reading literacy. Definition of reading literacy: “Reading literacy is understanding, using and reflecting on written texts, in order to achieve one’s.
CPUT Libraries Information literacy in the new curriculum M.Moll.
PISA 2015 Excellence and Equity in Education Peter Adams
Rita Hvistendahl og Astrid Roe
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 英語閱讀與會考命題趨勢 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 PISA 與英語閱讀素養 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
PCAP for Grade 8 Canadians
Assessing Writing Module 5 Activity 2.
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Indicators on the Quality of Educational Performance Quality of Education Teachers’ Professional.
Skills frameworks New Approaches to Statistical Capacity Development
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Presentation transcript:

1 The Impact of Computer Use on Reading Achievement of 15-year-olds Patrick Bussière and Tomasz Gluszynski Child, Youth and Social Development Studies Applied Research Branch, HRDC The 2002 PCERA Symposium Montréal, April 30 - May 2, 2002

2 To analyse, compare, contrast, and evaluate To think imaginatively To apply knowledge in real-life situations To communicate thoughts and ideas effectively PISA Reading Achievement About the capacity of young adults to use written information effectively

3 Reading, Mathematics, and Science 32 countries provinces Youth aged 15 Over 250,000 students ,000 students from more than 1,000 schools 17 languages English and French 2-hour direct skills assessment 20-minute contextual questionnaire to youth School questionnaire 3-minute IT questionnaire 30-minute YITS questionnaire to youth 30-minute interview with parents Items added to school questionnaire

4 Reading Literacy Using, interpreting and reflecting on written material Scientific Literacy Using scientific knowledge, identifying scientific questions, and drawing evidence-based conclusions to understand and make decisions about the natural world

5 Three dimensions of Reading Literacy Retrieving information Ability to locate information in a text Interpreting information Ability to construct meaning and drawn inferences from written information Reflecting and evaluation Ability to relate text to their other knowledge,ideas and experiences

6 Below Level 1 These students may be able to read, but have not acquired the skills to use reading for learning Reading Literacy Level 1 Recognise main theme on a familiar topic, make simple connections Above to to 407 Les s tha n to to 552 The 5 proficiency levels are separated by 72 points. Reading Literacy Level 5 Evaluating information and building hypotheses, drawing on specialised knowledge, accommodating concepts contrary to expectations 16.8/ / / / / / 6

7 Further work is based on the first results of PISA in Canada reported in the pan-Canadian report. For the purpose of this study, the data on Information and Communication Technology in PISA is analyzed.

8 Percentage of students reporting having a computer at home and percentage reporting having a link to the internet at home. Percentage A vast majority of 15-year-old Canadian students have a computer at home and a link to the internet.

9 More than half of the Canadian students aged 15 used a computer daily at home, but computers at school are used less often. Percentage of Canadian youth aged 15 reporting daily or non-use of a computer at home and at school.

10 There is a positive relationship between the PISA reading scores and having a computer or a link to the internet at home. Roughly half a reading proficiency level separated those with and without internet at home. PISA Reading Scores Relationship between PISA reading scores and having a link to the internet at home Consistently, similar patterns were found for each of the three dimensions of reading. Therefore, results of analysis of the overall reading score are presented.

11 Relationship between PISA reading scores and number of computers at home PISA Reading Scores There is a positive association with reading scores and home computer access, and it increases with the number of computers present.

12 Higher reading scores are associated with: frequent use of computers at home and Internet, as well as infrequent use of computers at school and computer games. PISA Reading Scores Relationship between PISA reading scores and frequency of usage of: computer at home, internet, computer at school and computer games.

13 Three Indices of computer familiarity. Index of computer usage (COMUSE) : derived from responses to questions related to the frequency with which they used computer for learning purposes. Index of comfort with and perceived ability to use computer (COMAB): derived from responses to questions related to comfort when using computers for various tasks and perceived ability with computers compared to other youth. Index of interest in computers (COMATT): derived from responses to various statements on how they felt about computers.

14 Multivariate Analysis Up to now, absolute effect (I.e. variable’s effect in the absence of other variables) of ICT variables on student achievement were presented. Next 3 tables show the relative effect (I.e. variable’s effect in the presence of other variables) of ICT variables Thresholds to judge the magnitude of the effect: –Trivial:Less than |0.10| –Small:Between |0.10| and |0.30| –Moderate:Between |0.30| and |0.50| –Large:Greater than |0.50| An effect size less than |0.10| indicates that less than 1% of the variance in achievement scores is explained by the variable and, as such, reflects a trivial impact.

15 Relative effect of individual and ICT factors on reading achievement scores. Note: R² = without ICT variables and R² = 0,280 with ICT variables (for Canada)

16 Relative effect of family and ICT factors on reading achievement scores. Note: R² = without ICT variables and R² = 0,237 with ICT variables (for Canada)

17 Relative effect of individual, family and ICT factors on reading achievement scores. Note: R² = 0,3318 (for Canada)

18 Key findings Most 15-year-old Canadians have a computer and internet access at home, and they use them often. Having a computer at home is important, but using it is the key. Over and above individual and family factors, multivariate analyses show: –positive effect on reading achievement scores for: frequent use of a computer at home comfort & perceived ability of computer use –negative effect on reading achievement scores for : computer use for learning purposes. However, enjoyment of reading has the greatest effect on reading achievement scores.

19 Policy Implications The new economy relies on knowledge workers with both good reading and computer skills. Chances of improving reading scores through the provision of computers alone are not high. Since computers are widely available to students, policy should be directed to encouraging their use.