Icfi.com | Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Regional Planning Meeting September 28, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Guide to Strengthen the Capacity of Promotoras
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Reviewing 10-Year Plans to End Homelessness Asheville, NC.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Retooling Transitional Housing
Pursuing Effective Governance in Canada’s National Sport Community June 2011.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Leading by Convening: The Power of Authentic Engagement
BETTER TOGETHER Region 6 DOL Gathering. 2 Organize Community Resources SIX GUIDING PRINCIPLES Deepen, Sustain Employer Partnerships Make Easier to Acquire.
Using medicaid with HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
Campus Improvement Plans
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
ZERO: 2016 Ending Chronic and Veteran Homelessness by 2016 Fort Worth/Arlington/Tarrant County CoC.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
“Ensuring Employment Sector Service Excellence Across Communities” Carol Stewart Employment Sector Council London-Middlesex (ESCLM)
Coordinated Assessment in Rural Communities Presented by HUD September 12, 2012.
Ending Veteran Homelessness in the Commonwealth of Virginia by the end of 2015.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
1 Massachusetts Interagency Council on Housing and Homelessness Overview of Strategies to Prevent and End Homelessness Liz Curtis Rogers March 31, 2011.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Aligning Efforts— Statewide Commission Pat Simmons, MS, RD, LD Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
DOC REENTRY SERVICES TEAM Reentry Services Director Gary Johnson Reentry Program Manager Tim Lanz Community Reentry Coordinator Farris Bell Facilities.
BUILDING A YOUTH DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM IN YOUR COMMUNITY John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development Rutgers, the State University of NewJersey National.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2013 NOFA Preparation Meeting May 2, 2013.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
THE FUTURE OF THE ARVADA CENTER FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES.
MDHI Community Meeting on HMIS Priority Communities Initiative May 13 th and 14 th, 2015.
All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Fiscal Fitness: Understanding and utilizing fiscal mechanisms.
Bill Hogan, Commissioner Alaska Department of Health and Social Services.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
March 12,  May 2010 Governor Bob McDonnell signed Executive Order 10 calling for a Housing Policy Framework  The Homeless Outcomes Policy Report.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
 Outlines the key business results for the agency/unit.  Offers the direct report and the leader opportunity to write two to four goals aligned with.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
SSVF Best Practice Standards. Background 2 Released April Developed by SSVF TA team and VA SSVF Program Office, in consultation with SSVF grantees,
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Important Changes to Youth Services in WIOA. Youth Services in WIOA Some of the most significant changes from WIA to WIOA are related to youth services.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
VIRGINIA’S RESPONSE TO HOMELESSNESS. Virginia’s Efforts to Reduce Homelessness  Executive Order 10 in May 2010 Established a housing policy framework.
Virginia Department of Veterans Services Ending Veteran Homelessness in Virginia.
ARLINGTON COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE (C0C) 10 YEAR PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS THE ROAD TO FUNCTIONAL ZERO Total Veterans housed since January 2015: 25 Median.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
ACT Comprehensive Assessment
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Beaver County Behavioral Health
TSMO Program Plan Development
Continuum of care for the homeless
Working Together: Domestic Violence and Homelessness Services Coordination: Connecticut’s Approach July 25, 2018.
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Presentation transcript:

icfi.com | Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Regional Planning Meeting September 28, 2012

icfi.com | 2 MDHI’s Mission To coordinate and support the Denver Metro Continuum of Care (CoC) to ensure the most efficient and effective services to reduce homelessness in the seven-county region

icfi.com | 3 MDHI CoC 2011 HUD Award $15,140,015

icfi.com | 4 Communication Coordination Collaboration System-Wide Collaboration

icfi.com | 5 Defining Levels of Agency Contact  Communication. Agencies are at the level of communication if they have accurate knowledge of each other’s existence, service offerings, and eligible clientele. They will also know how to access each other’s services, and may refer clients to each other. They may have shared involvements through cross- training, meetings, committees and task forces, but they do not have mechanisms in place to support each other’s work. Communication may occur between direct services workers, middle management, or agency leadership.  Coordination. Agencies are at the level of coordination if, in addition to communicating, they support each other’s efforts to obtain resources for clients. However, they do not deliberately work to develop shared goals and structure their operations to meet these goals. Agencies at this level do not make any significant changes in the services they offer or how they do business. Coordination may occur between direct services workers, middle management, or agency leadership.

icfi.com | 6 Defining Levels of Agency Contact (cont.)  Collaboration between Agencies. Agencies are at the level of collaboration if they work with each other to articulate shared goals, analyze their operations to determine how they may achieve those goals, and make the changes dictated by this analysis. Collaboration can occur between two agencies, or among several agencies. Because collaboration requires organizational commitments, agency leadership must be involved in determining, supporting, and enforcing new policies and procedures that may be instituted through this collaboration.

icfi.com | 7 Defining Levels of Agency Contact (cont.)  Community-wide Collaboration. When the level of collaboration extends to include all or most agencies in a community focused on the same population with the same goals, it becomes a strong community-wide level of organization. A community-wide collaboration involves system-wide change and integration of services through a variety of mechanisms. Maintaining this collaboration requires ongoing planning to assess what has been effective, what needs to change, and what needs to be done to reach the community’s goals. This planning might be done through task force, council, or stakeholder meetings or through quarterly retreats. Regardless of the method, it must involve shared decision- making and strategic planning at multiple levels as well as the expectation that each part of the system will modify its own activities to support and complement the work of the other parts.

icfi.com | 8  Homeless Service Providers  Non-profit Housing Developers  Homeless and formerly homeless people and homeless advocates  Local government/ESG Grantees  Housing Authorities  Mental Health Service funders and service providers  Business Community and major employers in region  Domestic Violence providers  VA and Veteran service providers  Substance Abuse Service funders and service providers  Youth/foster care providers  Colleges & Vocational Education Institutions  Workforce Investment Board  Police Officers  School Districts  Philanthropy Stakeholders

icfi.com | 9 Levels of Stakeholder Involvement  Core Stakeholders of a coalition are willing to dedicate a significant amount of time to a coalition and have a high level of interest in and commitment to a coalition’s mission. Their responsibilities may require them to spend a significant number of hours per month on coalition activities. Core stakeholders may take responsibility for developing the structure of the planning process, which includes formulating a vision and guiding principles, defining a clear decision- making procedure, and establishing a timeline and desired outcomes. They keep a coalition moving forward by undertaking action steps that will help a coalition meet its goals and objectives. They also regularly participate in a coalition’s meetings. Depending on the structure of a coalition, these stakeholders oftentimes serve on the board of directors and subcommittees.

icfi.com | 10 Levels of Stakeholder Involvement (cont.)  Secondary stakeholders may be directly affected by the activities of a coalition but may not want to be involved in the day-to-day activities of a coalition. These stakeholders may take on short-term projects that are of particular interest to their organization. Similarly, they may only attend coalition meetings sporadically when the meetings are relevant to their organization’s mission. Essentially, secondary stakeholders do not want to take on ongoing responsibilities for a coalition. Continuum leadership should understand that all stakeholders do not have to be involved from the beginning of a coalition, nor do all stakeholders need to be involved in all aspects of system change. A secondary stakeholder can still collaborate with a continuum to develop shared goals and new policies and procedures to achieve those goals without participating in the daily activities of a coalition.

icfi.com | 11 Levels of Stakeholder Involvement (cont.)  Advisory stakeholders usually have some specialized knowledge or skills, access to resources, or clout in the community that may benefit a coalition. As a courtesy, advisory stakeholders should be regularly kept abreast of a coalition’s activities and accomplishments. However, they should not be expected to participate in coalition activities on a regular basis. Instead, advisory stakeholders should only be called upon for highly specialized assignments that take advantage of their unique skills or access to resources.

icfi.com | 12 Small Group Discussion  Coordinated Assessment  Data Quality/ Using data when planning homeless services and housing needs  Performance and program monitoring  Discharge planning  Mainstream resources and use of other HUD funding  Aligning CoC-Wide Plan with Opening Doors and regional Strategic Plans  How can Community Leaders contribute

icfi.com | 13 How can we provide easily accessible, high quality housing and supportive services for people in our community?

icfi.com | 14 Contact Information Kate Lyons, ICF International Jill Spangler, Abt Associates