1 Monitoring & Evaluation Plan Bea iSTEP 2009. 2 Monitoring – Why? Are we on the right track? Do we need corrective action? What are the problems? Are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

VIRTUAL ORIENTATION FOR INCOMING EXCHANGE STUDENTS Raisa Saviaho at University of Warsaw Oct 12th, 2007.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Advanced Database Projects In Access © Hodder Education 2008 Access Projects – Problem Specification.
User Involvement Statistics Iceland’s Experience Nordic Statistical Conference August 2010 Heiðrún Sigurðardóttir Þorbjörg Magnúsdóttir.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
A plain English Description of the components of evaluation Craig Love, Ph.D. Westat.
See How Faculty/Staff Rate the AUP Submission Follow-up Annual Update Online Submission Process Survey Results
Rare’s CampaignTracker A brief overview of its design and function and what we have learned so far.
Software Project Transition Planning
Formative and Summative Evaluations
IT Learning Programme The Evaluations Tool Pilot Project 19 th July 2010.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
1 Service Learning Group D Mentors  Dr. M. N. Kaumal  Dr. H. R. Perera Cooperate Partner.
Parent Tutoring (PT) An Individualized Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Reading Problems Study 1 Duvall, Delquadri, Elliott & Hall (1992) Study 2.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
What is agricultural extension? The link between research in agricultural practices and technologies and farmers. Goal: Help farmers improve their practice.
Assessing Financial Education: A Practitioner’s Guide December 2010.
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
S/W Project Management
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Mentoring for Excluded Groups and Networks (MEGAN) Peer Review Report Dr. Ioan Durnescu Brussels
Social Media How Can This New Technology Possibly Help My Congregation?
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
Visibility and promotion of your team inside Company How to sell results of your team?
THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.
Supporting voluntary and community action supporting voluntary and community action Measuring Outcomes How do we understand the changes we are making …
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
Continuing to Discover! Leeds Beckett University Library’s usage of feedback and statistical data to develop EBSCO Discovery Service Libraries and Learning.
S T A T I S T I K A U S T R I A We provide i n f o r m a t i o n
“Films & Blogs: An authentic approach to improve the writing skill - An intercultural project-based framework in the Senior High State School” Kosmas Vlachos.
ENC1930-U3M Professor: Nicholas Anderson Room: GC283B TR 9:30-10:45.
Social Evaluation of MobileMAN Current work: - Website and use of WIKIMobileMAN - Social Aspects of First Testing MobileMAN Internal Meeting Helsinki,
TRACKING AND REPORTING PROGRESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AmeriCorps Program Directors’ Kickoff: 2015 –
Kick Off Meeting June WP6: Overview WP Leader: Province of Asti (in close collaboration with iMpronta) Importance of monitoring and evaluation:
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 6 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 6- Diaries.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
This chapter is extracted from Sommerville’s slides. Text book chapter
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.
RBM and Asset Strategy.
10 April May 2008 Measuring what’s important Monitoring Outcomes Doug Gosling.
Informed decisions for Selection Support in Libraries 20th Pan-helenic Conference of Academic Libraries Thessaloniki, 14/11/2011 Núria Sauri Electronic.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Incorporating Feedback Lesson 5 0. Check-in: paper prototype By now, your paper prototype should be complete, so that you can begin creating your app.
GENEVA EVALUATION NETWORK WORKSHOP CONFERENCE EVALUATION Organized by Laetitia Lienart & Glenn O’Neil Geneva, 16 March 2011.
Responsibilities and tasks EcoR Partener P6 - EcoR Partener CRPMPEC Canakkale, Turkiye 15th, 2011,September 16’th - IMPLEMENTATION OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
By: Matt Sreca  Teachers can give students rubrics of what is expected in the blog that they will post. This helps the student understand what is needed.
ERASMUS+ EMREX – Field trial on the impact of enabling easy mobility on recognition of external studies Title and date.
CACHE Level 2 Child Care and Education © Hodder Education 2008 Reflective practice Reviewing your experiences and using feedback to improve your practice.
RDA-WDS Publishing Data IG Data Bibliometrics Working Group.
STAT MINI- PROJECT NKU Executive Doctoral Co-hort August, 2012 Dot Perkins.
National Network of Libraries of Medicine Outreach Evaluation Resource Center Planning Outcomes-Based Outreach Programs.
 Community Health Status Assessment MAPP Phase 3 California Gaining Ground Coalition Small County Learning Community August 13, 2015 Tamara Maciel Bannan,
Applied Methodologies in PHI Session 5: Evaluation Kath Roberts (NOO/EMPHO)
Floury Food Safety Training From Virtual To Reality For Youth/FFS
Measuring Impact Guide
Good practices abroad / Cyprus case The OiRA implementation
PMU E-Alumnus Project Final Presentation
(Asst. Prof. Dr. Gültekin Boran)
Implementation, Monitoring, and NM DASH
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Presentation transcript:

1 Monitoring & Evaluation Plan Bea iSTEP 2009

2 Monitoring – Why? Are we on the right track? Do we need corrective action? What are the problems? Are we wasting resources/time on something? What are we missing?

3 Monitoring – What? Activity/ProjectWhat to monitor Needs AssessmentEnd user reactions / feedback Cell Phone Project Technology progress & compatibility with needs Literacy Project Technology progress & compatibility with needs Braille Tutor Project Technology progress & compatibility with needs Documentation / Dissemination Updates to blogs, journals and other media iSTEP Student Learning Lessons learned so far – introspection & group discussion

4 Monitoring – How? Weekly group “huddles” Plan vs. Actual comparison Feedback from partner (Eric Beda) – possibly weekly End user interactions – as many as possible Reality checks

5 Evaluation – Why? My thesis depends on it Understand whether we are making an impact Measure significance of impact Identify areas for improvement Produce transparent results to stakeholders Make necessary adjustments

6 Evaluation – When? Phase 1: Pre-Intervention Measurements – What is the current status? Phase 2: Intermediate Assessment – Are we making progress toward our goals? Phase 3: Final Evaluation – Were we successful? Final Phase: iSTEP Overall Assessment – Did iSTEP students gain from the experience?

7 Evaluation – What? Activity/ProjectMetric(s) Cell Phone Project Number of new entries into database, before, during and after intervention Literacy Project Student test scores before, during and after intervention: tests may include spelling, reading and writing Braille Tutor Project Student test scores before, during and after intervention: tests may include writing and reading in Braille language Campaign Number of comments on FB page, Hits on website, Amount of blog readership, Twitter activity, etc.

8 Evaluation – How? Collect data! Questionnaires/Surveys to end users Field testing of technology Continuous interviews/conversations with partners and end users Determine, discover, and redefine metrics as necessary

9 Potential Difficulties Data may be scarce and difficult to obtain Evaluation settings will not be ideal – Lots of confounding factors! – Statistical testing might be difficult Participation in surveys and questionnaires might be low Language and/or cultural barriers Time management will be tough – setting things up will be time-consuming May not obtain accurate responses from end-users Traveling to and from project locations could be costly – Might limit interactions with end-users Unexpected delays and issues may throw off evaluation

10 Questions? Comments? Thank you for listening Suggestions Welcome and Appreciated!