Your university’s logo here Fair Housing and Accessibility: A New Governance Approach R-9 Craig Ravesloot, Lillie Greiman, Bob Liston, Mary Olson & Tom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

High Level Conference European Parliament MHADIE-Policy Recommendations for Education Judith Hollenweger Work package Leader Education Zurich University.
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
HNC/D Business Review Overview, Objectives and Key Tasks David Marshall.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
UNESCO Centre Marina Monteith and Dr Una O’Connor Bones.
Angus College Angus Council. OVERVIEW Making a difference School/College activities School/College partnership agreement Vocational Learning Centres.
ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE Developing the Maine Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan
5 Years To Draft ~ 5 Fatal Flaws: The Los Angeles Community Care Facilities Ordinance.
NICE and NICE’s equality programme in 2012 Nick Doyle Clinical and public health analyst.
Evaluation.
Clinical Psychology Leaflet Task By the end of the session you will have had the opportunity to reflect on how well you achieved the learning outcomes.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Proposals A Template. In Organizations & Workplaces: proposals… 1.Clarify work agreements within and outside the organization 2.Set forth your productivity.
Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Overview and Status Executive Order “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”
SAS No. 70 BADM 559 Jong Choi. Overview of SAS 70 Definition ▫SAS 70 helps service auditors to assess operational and technical controls of a service.
R-11: Building Capacity for Full Community Participation Glen W. White, PhD Jerry Schultz, PhD Jean Ann Summers, PhD Dot Nary, PhD Christina Holt, MA Momina.
Phnom Penh 5/7 February 2008 VIETNAM PRESENTATION Vu Dinh Trung Vietnam Competition Administration Department International Cooperation Division.
C O A L I T I O N Corner Fair Housing Update for Relocation Professionals © 2005, Employee Relocation Council/Worldwide ERC ® Coalition Coalition Corner:
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Web Analytics and Social Media Monitoring CAM Diploma in Digital Marketing (Metrics and Analytics) Assignment Briefing December 2013 & March 2014 Papers.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
Growing Smart:Chapter 40R A New Tool for Communities Presented by Sarah B. Young Deputy Director for Policy January 7, 2005 Jane Wallis Gumble, Director.
Supervising and Regulating the Use of Credit Repository Data Raphael W. Bostic Federal Reserve Board June 18, 2001.
Regional Transportation and Complete Mobility Okotoks Presentation June 23, 2014.
Appendix E – Checklist for Review of Performance Audits Presented by: Ashton Coleman Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General August 16, 2012.
Community mobilization to compliance with the Tobacco laws in rural areas of Khon Kaen province, Thailand Writers in the 2009 Writing Workshop ( Health.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Group PresentaTion Template
DISABILITY- STATISTICS BOTSWANA Diemo Motlapele Senior Statistician/Health Information Manager - Statistics.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
for quality and accountability
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
R-7 Health Navigator Initiative Megan O’Brien, PhD, MPH Dot Nary, PhD Sasha Li.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Duty and responsibility -- Make EVERY DAY a TRAINING DAY….so that… EVERYONE GOES HOME! Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives.
Your university’s logo here Craig Ravesloot & Lillie Greiman Question:  How many people with mobility impairments have poor access to their homes and.
Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation.
Validity Validity is an overall evaluation that supports the intended interpretations, use, in consequences of the obtained scores. (McMillan 17)
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Understanding Policy Contexts CEP:ELM, 2011 Mombasa.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
2013 Fall Forum Improving Health Outcomes : Finding Options for Better Access to Care Health Policy Advocacy & Action Plan Development.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Unit R005: Creating an interactive product using multimedia components Learning Outcome 03 : Be able to carry out usability testing Cambridge Nationals.
Research And Evaluation Differences Between Research and Evaluation  Research and evaluation are closely related but differ in four ways: –The purpose.
GCM Community Involvement Tool Kit Glenburn Lodge, Muldersdrift, South Africa November 27-28, 2007.
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
The Home Usability Network
Social Media – Addressing Risk with Technology
The RORG Network, 20th January 2011
Home Alone or Out and About: Enhancing
City Travel Project Brochure examples
National CRPD Monitoring Mechanism Monitoring CRPD
Melissa Gholson, Ed.D. June 28, 2017
UFAS, Why applicable? Simply Put, “It’s the Law”
Craig Ravesloot & Andrew Myers
Validation Team Exit Report
ORLA – Ireland’s Online Library for Learning Analytics
Company Name Date By Whomever
Student Data & Privacy.
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY Step X Step Detail of Procedures The Who…..
Marketing Name _____________________ 5.2 Questions
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
THE ENVIRONMENT THAT INFLUENCES NURSING CARE
Company Name Date By Whomever
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Validation Team Exit Report
Presentation transcript:

Your university’s logo here Fair Housing and Accessibility: A New Governance Approach R-9 Craig Ravesloot, Lillie Greiman, Bob Liston, Mary Olson & Tom Seekins

Your university’s logo here Purpose To examine compliance of existing housing with federal housing laws To describe housing accessibility, usability and suitability To examine the relative effectiveness of standard complaint-based advocacy to a New Governance approach to improving housing accessibility and usability

Your university’s logo here New Governance New Governance (NG) enhances the litigation- centric approach to civil rights protection It uses education and collaboration to enhance compliance with civil rights laws It engages stakeholders in the process of enhancing compliance It may be useful for going beyond accessibility to addressing usability

Your university’s logo here Measures Rapid Housing Usability and Accessibility Assessment Spaces in and around the home Accessible: must be in accordance with the letter of the law, particularly the 7 design and construction requirements of the Fair Housing Act Usable: can be used by the individual Suitable: best fit for the individual

Your university’s logo here Procedures 1.Collect Usability/Suitability Data from 200 people with mobility impairments living in multifamily (4+) housing built since 1991 (Fair Housing Act Amended) 2.Identify individuals with usability and accessibility problems (in-home assessments) 3.Randomly assign individuals to treatment and evaluate for effects on usability and accessibility

Your university’s logo here Project work to date: Background research – Fair housing: policy and practice – New Governance – Accessibility and usability measures – Geography of home and disability Consumer involvement framework Usability survey development

Your university’s logo here Questions for the Audience 1.Do the intervention and outcome measures have face validity from your perspective? 2.Suggestions for improving the study design or intervention? 3.How do you see the results of the study being potentially useful/valuable?