The roles visually impaired users in the development of assistive technologies Tersia //Gowases. Roman Bednarik. Markku Tukiainen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tool-Support for Interdisciplinary and Collaborative User Interface Specification IADIS 2008 Amsterdam – Workgroup HCI University of Konstanz – Thomas.
Advertisements

T. Bothos / D. Apostolou Prediction Market prototype V1 Information Management Unit (IMU) Institute of Communication and.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Introducing Evaluation Chapter 12.
The Association for Driver Rehabilitation Specialists Annual Conference Buffalo, New York Presented by: Tommy Crumpton, LOT, MOT, CDI, CDRS August 3,
References Prof. Saul Greenberg, University of Calgary, notes and articles INUSE 6.2 and RESPECT 5.3 Handbook Prof. , University of , Notes and articles.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design LECTURE 3: REQUIREMENTS DISCIPLINE.
Agile Usability Testing Methods
Designing Ubiquitous Computing Systems for Sports Equipment Matthias Kranz, Wolfgang Spiessl, Albrecht Schmidt University of Munich The Fifth Annual IEEE.
School of Marketing Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science Sales management issues relating to cross-functional selling teams John Wilkinson.
WHAT IS INTERACTION DESIGN?
1 of 622 April 2006Melissa Dawe, CHI 2006 Workshop Designing a Remote Communication System with and for Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities and their.
Semester in review. The Final May 7, 6:30pm – 9:45 pm Closed book, ONE PAGE OF NOTES Cumulative Similar format to midterm (probably about 25% longer)
Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection & Design Lucy A. Suchman & Randall H. Trigg.
Senior Project Database: Design and Usability Evaluation Stephanie Cheng Rachelle Hom Ronald Mg Hoang Bao CSC 484 – Winter 2005.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 24 Usability 2.
1 User Centered Design and Evaluation. 2 Overview My evaluation experience Why involve users at all? What is a user-centered approach? Evaluation strategies.
Older Adults and Visual Impairment What Do Exposure Times and Accuracy Tell Us About Performance Gains Associated with Multimodal Feedback? by Julie A.
INTRODUCTION. Concepts HCI, CHI Usability User-centered Design (UCD) An approach to design (software, Web, other) that involves the user Interaction Design.
Prototyping and Designing New Assistive Technologies for People with Disabilities Shaun Kane Human-Centered UMBC
Tersia //Gowases: Can low vision users benefit from eye tracking? Computer interactions of low vision users.
How the visually impaired use computers. Contents Visual impairment (cliff notes) How VI users interaction with computers –Current problems & solutions.
REFRESHER COURSES FOR OLDER DRIVERS – A LITERATURE STUDY Björn Peters, PhD, VTI, Sweden.
User Centered Design April 1-3, 2009 Joshua Ganderson Laura Baalman Jay Trimble.
Sofia Carlander Kinoshita Laboratory 2004/2005
Human Interface Engineering1 Main Title, 60 pt., U/L case LS=.8 lines Introduction to Human Interface Engineering NTU Seminar Amy Ma HIE Global Director.
On Education Gerrit C. van der Veer most work done by Anne Bowser Elizabeth Churchill Jennifer Preece.
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
Human Computer Interaction Semester 1, 2013/2013.
The Dashboard Examined.  What is the information that needs to be presented to the driver.  What format should it be presented in?  Can a quality design.
ASPIRE ASPIRE Active Student Participation Inspires Real Engagement Administrator Meeting (School Name) (Date) Presented by: (Presenter’s name here)
Evaluation of Adaptive Web Sites 3954 Doctoral Seminar 1 Evaluation of Adaptive Web Sites Elizabeth LaRue by.
Releasing the potential of housing modification design through Building Information Modelling Rachel Russell MSc Occupational Therapist and PhD Candidate.
S556 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN Week 11. Creating a Vision (Solution) SLIS S556 2  Visioning:  Encourages you to think more systemically about your redesign.
2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process The Requirements Discipline in More Detail  Focus shifts from defining to realizing objectives.
Presenter : Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for E-learning Application: From Functional Usability to.
Usability testing. Goals & questions focus on how well users perform tasks with the product. – typical users – doing typical tasks. Comparison of products.
Design Step 2: Research the Problem. Knowledge Base Does a similar product already exist? Are there regulatory and standards issues? –intellectual property.
The Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies is sponsored by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Methodology and Explanation XX50125 Lecture 3: Usability testing Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Usability Testing Chapter 6. Reliability Can you repeat the test?
AVI/Psych 358/IE 340: Human Factors Data Analysis October 22-24, 2008.
CS2003 Usability Engineering Human-Centred Design Dr Steve Love.
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 40 Observing.
Classroom Research Workshop at Darunsikkhalai, 2 November 2012 Richard Watson Todd King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
Interaction Design Dr. Jim Rowan Foley Introduction What’s in the Book that we’ll cover.
Aeronautics / EDS / SDS Volvo Technology Fall IFAB 2013 WP5: Work package presentation University of Skövde 20 Nov 2013.
Developing personal and team effectiveness using IT
Paper Evaluation Summary. Aims of the paper Determine whether personal support played a role in the uptake of the internet. Determine if this uptake can.
interactive logbook Paul Kiddie, Mike Sharples et al. The Development of an Application to Enhance.
1 Human-Computer Interaction Usability Evaluation: 2 Expert and Empirical Methods.
Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 10 ILS Z556 1.
Introducing Evaluation Chapter 12. What is Evaluation?  Assessing and judging  Reflecting on what it is to be achieved  Assessing the success  Identifying.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
Development of the Construct & Questionnaire Randy Garrison & Zehra Akyol April
Distributed Co-Design Greg Walsh Human-Computer Interaction Lab University of Maryland Presented to CHI2011 Doctoral Consortium, May 26, 2011.
User-Centered Design Services for MSU Web Teams Sarah J. Swierenga, Director Usability & Accessibility Center MSU Webmasters 402 Computer Center February.
Testing Multimedia Products
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
Design.
Web Development A Visual-Spatial Approach
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Title: Validating a theoretical framework for describing computer programming processes 29 November 2017.
Future Directions Conference September 3rd, 2010
WHAT IS INTERACTION DESIGN?
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Lab: Formative Evaluation
uPortal 3 User Experience
Introducing Evaluation
Six activity types Acquisition Discussion Practice Production
1. INTRODUCTION.
Presentation transcript:

The roles visually impaired users in the development of assistive technologies Tersia //Gowases. Roman Bednarik. Markku Tukiainen

Visual impairement refers to a range of visual abilities and limitations Blind Sighted Field of view Acuity Contrast Color … …

ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems VI publications (0.35% CHI articles) 6% VI worldwide (WHO, 2010) Total publications ( ) Full text search

A A B Single study paperMulti study paper We identified 46 study cases from the 33 papers that reported involving VI participants

Construct conceptual framework Design & develop system architecture Build system (prototype) Observe & evaluate system System development research process Nunamaker et al (1990) State meaningful research questions Review literature for new ideas and approaches Define system functionalities and constraints Design unique architecture Define measureable requirements Produce high or low fidelity system prototype Demonstrate the feasibility of the design & theory Evaluate the usability and performance

The roles of research participants Allison Druin (2002)

Participant roles System development research processesUserTesterInformantCo-designer TOTAL Construct conceptual framework Design & develop system architecture Build system (prototype) Observe & evaluate system TOTAL (Percentage) 5 (12.8%) 21 (45.7%) 18 (39.1%) 2 (4.3%) 46 (100%) Role of VI participants at the different phases of system development

System development research processesUser Construct conceptual framework3 Design and develop system architecture0 Build system (prototype)2 Observe & evaluate system0 TOTAL (Percentage) 5 (12.8%) Role: User VI users contribute to the development of process by using the technology User feedback is collected indirectly (observations, videotape, think aloud) as they interact with the technology Laboratory observations

System development research processesTester Construct conceptual framework0 Design and develop system architecture0 Build system (prototype)2 Observe & evaluate system19 TOTAL (Percentage) 21 (45.7%) Role: Tester VI VI participants test the developed system. Measureable data (usability, performance measures) is collected as participant interacts with the system Participant feedback is indirect (observation or data logs). Findings can be used to validate or adapt system Laboratory studies, field studies, remote studies

System development research processes Informant Construct conceptual framework7 Design and develop system architecture0 Build system (prototype)2 Observe & evaluate system9 TOTAL (Percentage) 18 (39.1%) Role: Informant Informants are similar to testers, however they provide information on their subjective opinions and experiences, in addition to measurable data. Informants are used in different phases of the development “based on when researchers believe [they] can inform the design process” [Druin, 2002] Surveys (interviews and questionnaires).

System development research processesCo-designer Construct conceptual framework0 Design and develop system architecture2 Build system (prototype)0 Observe & evaluate system0 TOTAL (Percentage) 2 (4.3%) Role: Co-designer VI As co-designers visually impaired participants actively take part in the iterative design of the system. Continuous feedback as VI are members of small design teams which also included sighted users Example [O17]: 1 blind audio designer, 1 blind haptic designer and 1 sighted audio designer during the design of their assistive haptic feedback application.

National Federation for the Blind Jernigan Institute Research and training center developed and directed by the blind themselves 2004 Challenge: “In collaboration with the NFB--to build interface technologies that will empower blind people to drive a car independently. ”

Virgina Tech solution to blind driver challenge

Google’s self driving car

Implications of sightless driving Estimated $2 Trillion Industry – Drunk drivers – Car pools – Working in transit Texting and being on the phone while driving – Fewer accidents (I hope) … Self driving cars are now legal in Nevada and California (2012)

Participant roles System development research processesUserTesterInformantCo-designer Construct conceptual framework Design & develop system architecture Build system (prototype) Observe & evaluate system Involve participants at all phases of development process

References Druin, A. The role of children in the design of new technology Behaviour & Information Technology (2002), 21, Nunamaker, J. F.; Chen, M. & Purdin, T. D. M. Systems development in information systems research Journal of Management Information Systems. M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1990, 7, Google self driving car. Airpix car for blind driver _blind_drivers.html _blind_drivers.html Blind driver challenge driver-challenge driver-challenge