IETF54 Charter Issues Dealt with since IETF53 PANA WG Meeting Basavaraj Patil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONET Problem Scope and Requirements draft-kniveton-monet-requirements-00 T.J. Kniveton Alper Yegin IETF March 2002.
Advertisements

Mobile IP How Mobile IP Works? Agenda What problems does Mobile IP solve? Mobile IP: protocol overview Scope Requirements Design goals.
Protocol carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Subir Das/Basavaraj Patil Telcordia Technologies Inc./Nokia 12/14/2001.
1 PANA-IETF70 PANA WG Work Items March 12-13, 2008 IETF 71.
EAP Channel Bindings Charles Clancy Katrin Hoeper IETF 76 Hiroshima, Japan November 08-13, 2009.
PANA Requirements and Terminology - IETF54 -. PANA WG, IETF 54, Requirements and Terminology draft-ietf-pana-requirements-02.txt Changes Comments/questions.
Performance Evaluation of Open Virtual Routers M.Siraj Rathore
1 Improved DNS Server Selection for Multi-Homed Nodes draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection-04 Teemu Savolainen (Nokia) Jun-ya Kato (NTT) MIF WG meeting.
IETF 58 PANA WG PANA Update and Open Issues (draft-ietf-pana-pana-02.txt) Dan Forsberg, Yoshihiro Ohba, Basavaraj Patil, Hannes Tschofenig, Alper Yegin.
July 15, 2002IETF54 PANA WG1 PANA Usage Scenarios Updates (draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-02.txt) Yoshihiro Ohba Subir Das
Network Mobility Yanos Saravanos Avanthi Koneru. Agenda Introduction Problem Definition Benchmarks and Metrics Components of a mobile architecture Summary.
– Chapter 5 – Secure LAN Switching
1 IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3. Covers the principles of end-to-end datagram delivery in IP networks.
Issues to Consider w.r.t Protocol Solution - IETF54 -
7/14/2003IETF57 PANA enabling IPsec based Access control draft-mohanp-pana-ipsec-00.txt Mohan Parthasarathy Tahoe Networks - Presented by Hannes Tschofenig.
1 AutoconfBOF2.PPT / Aug / Singh,Perkins,Clausen IETF Not Confidential Ad hoc network autoconfiguration: definition and problem statement (draft-singh-autoconf-adp-00.txt)
August 1, 2005IETF63 PANA WG Pre-authentication Support for PANA (draft-ohba-pana-preauth-00.txt) Yoshihiro Ohba
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Linksec_Presentation Submission May David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff LinkSec Handoff Issues? David Johnston
KAIS T Security architecture in a multi-hop mesh network Conference in France, Presented by JooBeom Yun.
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
Prefix Delegation Protocol Selection T.J. Kniveton MEXT Working Group IETF 70 - December ’07 - Vancouver.
49th IETF - San Diego - 1 Mobile Networks Support in IPv6 - Draft Update draft-ernst-mobileip-v6-01.txt - Thierry Ernst - MOTOROLA Labs Ludovic Bellier.
1 © NOKIA Nokia_TIA-835D_MIPv6_authentication / 18AUG03 / ETacsik MIPv6 authentication MIPv6 authentication – AAAv6 MIPv6 authentication – PANA MIPv6 authentication.
IETF-71, Philadelphia PANA in DSL networks draft-morand-pana-panaoverdsl-01.txt Lionel Morand France Telecom Alper Yegin Samsung Yoshihiro Ohba Toshiba.
SNMP for the PAA-EP protocol PANA wg - IETF 60 San Diego -> Yacine El Mghazli (Alcatel)
AAA and Mobile IPv6 Franck Le AAA WG - IETF55. Why Diameter support for Mobile IPv6? Mobile IPv6 is a routing protocol and does not deal with issues related.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG IETF 79, Beijing, China Margaret Wasserman Hui Deng
Client/Server Model: A Business View The different Client/server implementations differ according to: 1.Where the processing for the presentation of information.
1 Background and Introduction. 2 Outline History Scope Administrative.
6lowpan ND Optimization draft Update Samita Chakrabarti Erik Nordmark IETF 69, 2007 draft-chakrabarti-6lowpan-ipv6-nd-03.txt.
PANA Framework Prakash Jayaraman, Rafa Marin Lopez, Yoshihiro Ohba, Mohan Parthasarathy, Alper Yegin IETF 59.
SNMP for the PAA-2-EP protocol PANA wg - IETF 59 Seoul -> Yacine El Mghazli (Alcatel)
Multi-hop PANA IETF Currently: –“For simplicity, it is assumed that the PAA is attached to the same link as the device (i.e., no intermediary IP.
Mar 20, 2005IETF65 PANA WG Requirements for PANA support of location based services draft-anjum-pana-location-requirements-00.txt F. Anjum D. Famolari.
PPP Configuration.
Implications of Trust Relationships for NSIS Signaling (draft-tschofenig-nsis-casp-midcom.txt) Authors: Hannes Tschofenig Henning Schulzrinne.
RTP Splicing Status Update draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-for-rtp-11 Jinwei Xia.
IETF 57 PANA WG PANA Discussion and Open Issues (draft-ietf-pana-pana-01.txt) Dan Forsberg, Yoshihiro Ohba, Basavaraj Patil, Hannes Tschofenig, Alper Yegin.
Basic User Registration Protocol BoF Basavaraj Patil/Nokia Subir Das/Telcordia Technologies IETF-50 March 20, 2001.
DSLF Subscriber Auth Requirements and IETF PANA Protocol PANA WG Chairs IETF 70 Dec 7, 2007 – Vancouver, Canada.
Washinton D.C., November 2004 IETF 61 st – mip6 WG MIPv6 authorization and configuration based on EAP (draft-giaretta-mip6-authorization-eap-02) Gerardo.
Nov. 9, 2004IETF61 PANA WG PANA Specification Last Call Issues Yoshihiro Ohba, Alper Yegin, Basavaraj Patil, D. Forsberg, Hannes Tschofenig.
Presentation at ISMS WG Meeting1 ISMS – March 2005 IETF David T. Perkins.
Copyright 2009 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. Addressing in Networks Last Update
August 2, 2005 IETF 63 – Paris, France Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability Ajay Rajkumar Chair, IEEE WG.
Slide 1 RFID Network Infrastructure Overview P. Krishna Reva Systems.
IETF-53-IPv6 WG- Cellular host draft 1 Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host Jari Arkko Peter Hedman Gerben Kuijpers Hesham Soliman John Loughney.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
MODERN BoF Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, and Registering telephone Numbers IETF 92.
IETF66 PANA WG Problem Statement for a time-basis accounting in an "always-on“ Broadband scenario R. Maglione - Telecom Italia
Paris, August 2005 IETF 63 rd – mip6 WG Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping in split scenario (draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split-00) mip6-boot-sol DT Gerardo Giaretta,
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: EAP Pre-authentication Problem Statement in IETF HOKEY WG Date Submitted: September,
PANA in DSL networks draft-morand-pana-panaoverdsl-00.txt Lionel Morand Roberta Maglione John Kaippallimalil Alper Yegin IETF-67, San Diego.
August 4, 2004EAP WG, IETF 601 Authenticated service identities for EAP (draft-arkko-eap-service-identity-auth-00) Jari Arkko Pasi Eronen.
<draft-ohba-pana-framework-00.txt>
Open issues with PANA Protocol
PANA in DSL networks draft-morand-pana-panaoverdsl-01.txt
PANA Discussion and Open Issues (draft-ietf-pana-pana-01.txt)
PANA Issues and Resolutions
Implementing Network Access Protection
P2P Streaming for Mobile Nodes: Scenarios and Related Issues
SNMP usage for PAA-EP PANA wg - IETF 63 Paris
IETF67 B. Patil, Gopal D., S. Gundavelli, K. Chowdhury
Pat R. Calhoun Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access - PANA -
draft-ipdvb-sec-01.txt ULE Security Requirements
AP Functional Needs of CAPWAP
PMIP6 extensions for inter-access handovers and flow mobility
802.11i Bootstrapping Using PANA
PAA-2-EP protocol PANA wg - IETF 58 Minneapolis
Presentation transcript:

IETF54 Charter Issues Dealt with since IETF53 PANA WG Meeting Basavaraj Patil

IETF54 Issues Discussed and Closed 1. Separation or colocation of PAA and EP Separation of the PAA and EP would require that there be yet another protocol between the PAA and EP Discussion in the WG and the need for simplicity has concluded that the PAA and EP should be colocated 2. Location of PAA Can the PAA be located beyond the first hop router or point of network attachment Conclusion of discussion is that the PAA is located on the same IP subnet/link as the PaC (i.e generally the first hop router or even at the AP if the AP is IP enabled) “For simplicity, it is assumed that the PAA is attached to the same link as the device (i.e., no intermediary IP routers). “

IETF54 3. The PAA is not the enforcement entity for access control The PAA is only an interface to the backend AAA infrastructure for authenticating a host PAA can communicate with the EP which may be the access router or node (AP) to provide ACLs, Policies or filters The actual mechanism for delivering these rules to the EP is outside the scope of this WG 4. IP Address assignment Does a host require that it have an IP address before PANA messaging occurs? Conclusion: The node MUST have an IP address before PANA messaging can be initiated

IETF54 5. Is PANA required when 802.1x or PPP are available.1x is applicable to 802 networks PPP is suboptimal in L2s that resort to the use of PPP for simply authentication reasons Conclusion: PANA does not compete or aim to replace 802.1x or PPP (dependent on scenarios). It simply provides another (Non L2 specific) way of accomplishing access authentication

IETF54 Open Issues 1. Security implications of doing access authentication above L2 To be discussed as part of the problems to be addressed in the solution discussion

IETF54 Charter Outcome of discussion: A revised charter which has a much more narrow focus and clear goal of what is to be defined in this WG Charter posted to ML and available at URL ADs have reviewed the charter. Awaiting IESG approval

IETF54 Questions???