1.8 mm Cataract Surgery: Clinical Results 6 Months after Coaxial and Biaxial MICS and Implantation of a New Micro- incision IOL Rosa Braga-Mele, M. Ed,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A prospective, randomized clinical trial
Advertisements

TESTUPLOAD. TORSIONAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION In January 2006 Alcon Surgical incorporated Ozil torsional into the Infiniti Vision System. Unlike the conventional.
Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
OHM Comparative quantification of ingress of trypan blue into anterior chamber following microcoaxial phacoemulsification with torsional or longitudinal.
Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification trough 3.2, 2.2 and 1.8 clear corneal incision. Luis Izquierdo Jr MD. PhD. Maria.
Dominic McHugh MD FRCS London, UK
The new Akreos MI 60 lens Joel Pynson, MD - Director Design Engineering Bausch & Lomb, Toulouse - France London, September 9th 2006.
Surgical technique Incision opened up to 3.8mm, Using Monarch injector, Acrysof IOL MA 30 in first 11 cases subsequently single piece inserted first. The.
NEW TRULIGN™ TORIC IOL Surgeon Training
Astigmatism Following 2 IOL Injection Techniques: Wound Assisted Versus Wound Directed Jay J. Meyer, MD Hart B. Moss, MD Kenneth L. Cohen, MD University.
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG DR ARUP BHAUMIK DISHA EYE HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH CENTRE BARRACKPORE, WEST BEGAL, INDIA
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
Intraocular lenses for small incision surgery
DEPARTMENT OF COUNSELLING
Phaco-drainage Phacosection Amporn technique
Refractive Lens Exchange. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly.
Intraocular lens dislocation secondary to haptic torsion Lawrence E. Lohman, MD FACS Matthew C. Willett, MD.
Microcoaxial phaco using 1
Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm Microincision Surgery Jay McDonald II, MD Adjunct Clinical Professor University of Arkansas School of.
Title slide Surgical Peculiarities in Cases of Irido- fundal Coloboma Having Cataract Extraction Prof Sudarshan K. Khokhar, MD Dr Sanjay K. Mishra, MS.
Step by step: Learning Phacoemulsification and MICS for Tremor Surgeons Gede Pardianto Sumatera Eye Hospital Medan - Indonesia.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Occlusion Controlled Phaco and Shallow Anterior Chamber Dr. Bekir Sıtkı Aslan TOBB ETU Hospital Ankara Turkey Financial Interest-Alcon Speakers Bureau.
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
New Phaco Technology Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Sciences University Drs. Fine, Hoffman & Packer,
Outcomes after WIOL – CF accommodative intraocular lens implantation Institute of Vision and Optics University of Crete School of Medicine Heraklion, Crete.
Spending 40 cc in an entire Cataract Surgery. Comparative study. Arturo Pèrez-Arteaga M.D. Medical Director & Founder Centro Oftalmològico Tlalnepantla,
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
Cataract Surgery. What is a Cataract? A cataract is a clouding of the lens in the eye that affects vision. Most cataracts are related to aging. Cataracts.
EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER SULCUS SUPPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS BY PROF. HAMED NASER EL- DIN TAHA HAED OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPT. SAUDI GERMAN HOSPITAL JEDDAH.
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
Jorge L. Alio MD PhD Ma. Cecilia C. Agdeppa MD VISSUM-Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante ASCRS Convention 2010 Boston Efficiency of MicroIncision Cataract.
Kaori Morii, M.D. Shinji Miura, M.D, Ph.D. Dept. of Ophthalmology, Asagiri Hospital, Hyogo, JPN We have no financial interest. This retrospective study.
Assessment of Incisional Wounds Before and After Intraocular Lens Insertion In Microincision Cataract Surgery Akimi Kizawa1), Shuichiro Hayashi2), Daijiro.
Healon5 Visco-sandwich Technique for Phacoemulsification in Morgagnian Cataract Surgery Masaki Sato, MD Tetsuro Oshika, MD Department of Ophthalmology.
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Modern Cataract Surgery Professor Ejaz Ansari, FRCOphth MD.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.
THE OUTCOMES OF MICS WITH CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEM VS MICS WITH WHITESTAR ICE AND CASE SETTINGS IN HARD CATARACTS HELVACIOGLU Firat, MD, SENCAN Sadik, MD,
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.
Pearls for Success with the Synchrony Dual-Optic Accommodating IOL Preloaded Injector Víctor M. Bohórquez, MD Ricardo Alarcón, MD ServiOftalmos Bogotá,
Torsional Phaco with a straight needle and “Spade” tip A bench test and clinical examination comparing it with the standard bent “Kelman” needle… Nigel.
Comparison of two differents ultrasound mode in BMICS technique : Pulse and Continuous US Danielle DEIDIER M.D. Clinique Saint Vincent Toulon - France.
1 Bimanual Microincision Cataract Surgery with Stellaris Advanced Flow Module Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Science.
Studený P., Dědková B., Farkaš A., Vokrojová M., Siveková D., Břešťák M. Oční klinika FNKV a 3 LF UK Praha Oční oddělení, Karlovarská krajská nemocnice.
J. E. “Jay” McDonald, II M.D. McDonald Eye Associates Fayetteville, Arkansas Financial disclosure: Bausch and Lomb – Consultant; Addition.
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PRELOADED IOL CT LUCIA 601P(Y)
Evaluation of the efficacy and of the safety of the new
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes of Torsional versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Systems on Dense Cataracts Bonnie An Henderson MD, Kelly J Grimes.
MI60 INTRAOCULAR LENSES – OUR EXPERIENCE
Capsular Tension Rings with Premium Lenses
The authors have no financial interest
Barry A Schechter, MD Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Microincision Cataract Surgery with a Scleral Approach
Özcan R. Kayıkçıoğlu, Sinan Emre
B.MALYUGIN MD,PhD A.GOLOVIN MD
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
Authors have no financial interests
Five-Year Experience With Routine Use of Healon5 in Cataract Surgery
Young Jeung Park, M.D. Ph.D. Won Suk Choi, M.D.
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG
Presentation transcript:

1.8 mm Cataract Surgery: Clinical Results 6 Months after Coaxial and Biaxial MICS and Implantation of a New Micro- incision IOL Rosa Braga-Mele, M. Ed, M.D., FRCS(S) Associate Professor, University of Toronto, Canada Director of Cataract Unit and Surgical Teaching, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto Consultant for B&L, AMO and Alcon

Methods A Pilot Study was conducted to evaluate the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System and a new microincisional IOL when used to perform phaco in a clinical setting by 1 surgeon At our center, we performed surgery with: –Biaxial MICS ( mm incision) and MicroFlow needle –Coaxial MICS (1.8 mm incision) with MICS 1.8 mm needle All patients –+2 to +4 nuclear sclerotic cataracts –Insertion of the MI60 intraocular lens ( a microincisional IOL delivered through a mm incision) Both B-MICS and C-MICS surgeries –Stellaris Advanced Flow Module in flow mode was used Intraoperative, Day 1 and 6 month data were analyzed

Phaco Platform Used Choice of Pump Systems; Fluidic Options (Vacuum or Flow-based) 6 Crystal Ultrasound hand piece Custom Power Modulation MICS Platform Ready Bimanual and Micro- coaxial techniques –1.4mm MICS –1.8 and 2.2mm Coaxial MICS Wireless Dual Liner Foot Control Stellaris Vision Enhancement System

Fluidic control & Power modulations EQ Fluidics –Minimizes surge Highly accurate vacuum measurements –Transducer sensitive to extremely small changes in vacuum –Non-contact –Housed in low compliance material Rapid response software controls pump –Avoid rapid influx of fluid from anterior chamber Ultrasound Control –Advanced Custom Control Software –Extended hyper- pulse and micro- burst modes –Pulse shaping increases followability

Microincision IOL (Akreos MI60) Material is flexible, deformable, resists tearing Suitable for injection through sub-2 mm incision Minimize PCO with 4 angulated haptics (10°) and a continuous 360° barrier Stable in the bag through suitable haptic design

Settings Used on Stellaris AFM Sculpting Segment Removal 60 mmHg Vac 475 mmHg Vac 30 cc/min flow cc/min Dual Linear Flow 30% power continuous 20% power 6 ms on/ 12ms off 75 cm BH 120 cm BH For B-MICS BH raised by 10 cm over above settings

BMICS MicroFlow Needle (N= 20) Needle for 1.8 CMICS (N=20) Needle for 1.8 CMICS (N=20) Average phaco power 14%18.5% Absolute phaco time 32.6 sec 17.7 sec Effective phaco time 4.5 sec 3.3 sec Intraoperative Parameters Advanced Flow Module – Flow Mode Used (N=40)

Intraoperative At end of phaco wound size was re-measured –BMICS 1.5 mm (enlarged to 1.8 for IOL) –CMICS 1.8 mm MI60 IOL was inserted through 1.8 mm incision with minimal or no difficulty –Gentle insertion, no tissue damage –Easily unfolds into capsular bag –Centres immediately –End of insertion: wound re-measured: 1.9mm in all cases

1.8 mm C-MICs with MI60 IOL insertion PLEASE CLICK ON VIDEO FILE IF NOT PLAYING HERE. THANK YOU.

Day 1 Postoperatively Biaxial MICS ( mm incision) N=20 Coaxial MICS (1.8 mm Incision) N=20 Corneal Clarity ClearClear BCVA All eyes 20/25 All eyes 20/20 IOL well-centered IOL well-centered Subjectively, patients happy with no complaints Subjectively, patients happy with no complaints

Month 6 Postoperatively Biaxial MICS ( mm incision) N=20 Coaxial MICS (1.8 mm Incision) N=20 Corneal Clarity ClearClear BCVA All eyes 20/20 No induced astigmatism No induced astigmatism Good contrast sensitivity Good contrast sensitivity IOL well-centered IOL well-centered Subjectively, patients happy with no complaints (no edge glare, halos) Subjectively, patients happy with no complaints (no edge glare, halos)

Summary AFM Flow module –Enhances nuclear removal while minimizing required phaco energy and good chamber stability Similar phaco time and power utilization for both BMICS AND CMICS Slightly better fluidic control and chamber stability using the 1.8 mm CMICS setup over BMICS Learning curve short –Specifically for CMICS procedure Good postoperative outcomes with minimal or no induced astigmatism and good IOL centration with good visual outcomes for patients (using MI60 IOL and 6 mos f/u)