Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Federal Highway Administration programs build partnerships with Pedestrians and Bicyclists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Transportation Conference August 29-30, 2006, NCTC Rob Draper, Federal Highway Administration Pat Fisher, Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Recreational Trails Program Terry Maxwell Maryland Scenic Byways / Recreational Trails Program Manager Office of Environmental Design State Highway Administration.
Field Engineers Learning & Development Seminar Dallas, TX — April 19-23, 2010 Designing for Nonmotorists Policy, Planning, Programs, and Provisions for.
Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation 2045 Morse Road Columbus Ohio
Transportation Enhancement Activities Expanding transportation choices, increasing recreation opportunity and access, revitalizing economies.
Nicholas Finch Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Preview of Federal-aid 101 Authorization Overview: Where we are! Where are we headed?
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
EEM Established in 1989 Section of the Streets and Highways Code provides the Legislature with the authority to allocate $10 million annually. Fiscal.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Overview NYS Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council August 2, 2010 Albany, New York.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
Transportation Enhancements: California’s Past, Present, & Future Stephanie M. Stoermer FHWA California Division.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
THE PRESIDENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET REQUEST Federal Transit Administration.
Eligible Uses of Transportation Planning Funds SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
Federal MAP-21 Programs 1 Module 7 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) National Historic Trails Workshop, October
Webinar: August 28, Transportation Alternatives Program Webinar: August 28, 2013 Introduction: Shari Schaftlein, Director, FHWA Office of Human.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) International Snowmobile Congress — June
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Federal Transportation Funds for Snowmobile Trails Christopher Douwes Trails and Enhancements Program Manager.
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM MAUREEN NEIGHBORS, COMMUNITY SERVICES UNIT CHIEF CRYSTAL DAVIS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS MANAGER.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Christopher Douwes, Federal Highway Administration.
2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
SUCCESS OF INDIANA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS Indiana TE Committee Gerald Nieman, INDOT, TE Program Manager Tom Beck, INDOT/Railroad Glenda Seal, INDOT/Seymour.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS. OVERVIEW  The CRTPA coordinates the annual submission of priority project lists (PPLs) to the FDOT for annual funding consideration.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
Transportation Enhancement Funds Workshop April 19, 2004 MAG Saguaro Room.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Transportation Enhancements Application Workshop Welcome!! October 3 & 4, 2012.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) PROGRAM. Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program What is the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program? What is the Transportation.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
The Community Preservation Act Hadley – April 14, 2004 The Community Preservation Coalition What is the CPA and how does it work? What does the CPA mean.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
Innovative Approaches to Wildlife/Highway Interactions Funding Opportunities.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
May 5, 2007 AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Requirements for Pedestrian Improvements on Road Projects in the Board’s Six Year Priority Plan.
SAFETEA-LU Reauthorization Process and USDOT’s Reform Proposal November 2008 Todd Kohr Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy U.S.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Transportation Enhancement Program MDNR Natural Resources Trust Fund Workshop SEMCOG University October 15, 2009 Vince Ranger TE Grant Coordinator MDOT.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
Department of Transportation and the Corporation for National and Community Service: Engaging Corps.
TITLE PAGE: Project Title
Office of Greenways & Trails
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation
Montana Trails Coalition
Grant Funding for Outdoor Recreation through DCR
Federal-aid Highway Program
MAP-21: Current Federal Transportation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Federal Transportation Funds Benefit Recreation Federal Highway Administration programs build partnerships with Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Who is FHWA? The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), part of the US Department of Transportation, provides expertise, resources, and information to improve the nation's highway system and its intermodal connections. The Federal-Aid Highway Program provides financial assistance to the States to construct and improve the National Highway System, other roads, bridges, and trails. The Federal Lands Highway Program provides access to and within national forests and parks, Indian reservations, and other public lands by preparing plans, letting contracts, supervising construction, and inspecting bridges. FHWA conducts and manages a comprehensive research, development, and technology program.

FHWA Partnerships Historical Partnerships State DOTs; Federal land management agencies; Federal Transit Administration; Metropolitan Planning Organizations. New or Expanded Partnerships since 1991 Nongovernmental organizations; State resource agencies; recreational interests; the general public.

FHWA Funds for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Projects Pedestrian and bicycle projects are eligible for every major Federal-aid funding category. The Federal Surface Transportation Program is the largest single funding source for shared use paths, trails, and related projects in the United States: –Now more than $400 million/year for pedestrian and bicycle related facilities. –About $50 million/year for recreational trails. Pedestrian Safety is one of FHWA’s “Vital Few” priority areas.

Key Programs for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Projects Federal Lands Highways Program Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancement Activities Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality National Scenic Byways Program Recreational Trails Program

Federal Lands Highways Program Provides access to and within Federal lands. Project decisions made by the Federal land management agencies in coordination with local governments. Trails are eligible for funding, but Federal agencies have been placing higher priority on highway access and safety projects. Increasing emphasis on pedestrian safety.

Surface Transportation Program; and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Very broad range of eligible activities. Pedestrian and bicycle projects are eligible for all STP funds; including Hazard Elimination (proposed new Highway Safety Improvement Program). Pedestrian and bicycle projects using STP funds may be located anywhere. CMAQ projects must have an air quality benefit. In States with no nonattainment areas, CMAQ funds may be used as STP funds.

Transportation Enhancements 10% of STP (including Minimum Guarantee attributed to STP): more than $600 million/year 12 eligible categories for projects that relate to surface transportation, including: –Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Safety Programs –Scenic/Historic Site Acquisition or Highway Programs –Landscaping and scenic beautification –Historic Preservation; Historic Transportation Facilities –Rail-trails –Archaeological Planning and Research –Mitigate highway water pollution and wildlife mortality –Transportation Museums

Transportation Enhancements Administered by State DOTs. Each State has its own project selection process. States requirements may be stricter than the Federal requirements. Contact your State TE Manager. See and Future: expected to continue with few if any changes.

Some TE Concerns By law, TE projects must relate to surface transportation. TE is attacked for diverting the Highway Trust Fund for nonhighway purposes, and nonmotorized users don’t pay into it. A House of Representatives proposal in Summer 2003 to eliminate TE funds failed: But attacks still continue. Nothing in Federal law or regulation requires trails to be paved, although TE-funded trail projects must have a firm and stable surface to meet accessibility requirements. Project sponsors must include various interest groups in the project development process, such as equestrians and other trail users, historic preservation advocates, etc.

National Scenic Byways Program America’s Byways TM Designates All American Roads and National Scenic Byways. Provides funds for Federally designated and State designated scenic byways. Discretionary program: States must apply. Over $25 million/year, but earmark concerns. See for program. See for travel information.

Eligible Scenic Byways Projects Plan, design, develop State byway program. Corridor management plans. Safety improvements to byways. Enhance recreation access. Protect scenic, historic, recreation, cultural, natural, archaeological resources adjacent to a scenic byway. Develop and provide tourist information. Develop and implement a marketing program.

Recreational Trails Program Funds to develop and maintain recreational trails for all trail uses. –Only FHWA program to support routine maintenance $50 million/year distributed by formula to States: see Represents a portion of the Federal motor fuel excise tax paid by OHV users. States solicit and select projects for funding. See

RTP Partnerships Each State has a State Trail Committee to assist with the program. Committees represent both nonmotorized and motorized recreational trail users. The committees help trail groups cooperate and communicate with each other. New partnerships lead to better projects, and better maintained trails.

RTP Partnerships Through the RTP, FHWA has worked with: National Trails Day – first Saturday of June: see National Trails Training Partnership to develop trail training: Federal Interagency Council on Trails. US Forest Service Technology and Development Centers to provide trail publications to the public: Bureau of Land Management trail training course.

RTP Partnerships National conferences for trail organizations. US Access Board, US Forest Service, and other agencies and organizations to develop accessibility guidelines for trails: see board.gov/outdoor/outdoor-rec-rpt.htm and board.gov/outdoor/outdoor-rec-rpt.htm OHV, Mountain Bike, and Equestrian groups to develop trail design and management manuals. Snowmobile and OHV safety information. Coalition for Recreational Trails for the RTP Database:

Byways, RTP, and TE Benefits Increased recognition of economic benefit: –Tourism –Quality of life –Real estate agents list “near trail” as a benefit. People often post “For Sale” signs along the trail rather than the street. Health benefits: both for physical activity and mental relaxation.

Who can sponsor a project? Federal agencies (restrictions in California) Tribal government agencies State agencies Local agencies: county, city, town, township, borough, school, water/sewer district, etc. Nonprofit organizations (many States) For profit organizations (just a few States) Project sponsors are encouraged to use qualified youth conservation or service corps.

How does project funding work? Project sizes vary in each State: some have minimum and/or maximum amounts. Reimbursable cost share program (not up front except for case-by-case working capital basis). In general: 80% Federal share: –Federal project sponsors may provide an additional Federal share; –Funds from Federal programs can match; –States may allow a programmatic match.

How do I get funds for my project? Contact your State RTP or TE Administrator: see or Develop a workable, realistic project. Get public support. Develop funding sources and donations. Consider youth corps involvement. Develop a good design: consider the trail setting, community benefits, user needs, accessibility.

How do I get funds for my project? Consider potential problems: –Environmental impacts: wetlands, endangered species, archaeological impacts, etc. –Permits –Public opposition: liability, property rights, safety, environmental impact. Complete the project application completely. If approved, get to work! Submit an invoice if you want to get paid!

Federal Highway Program Future The Federal Surface Transportation Program depends on multiyear authorization acts. USDOT proposed in SAFETEA with few changes: TE: No direct changes; stable funding. Byways: Funding to $31.5 million; minor changes to strengthen byways marketing. RTP: Funding to $60 million; strengthen role of the State RTP committee; clarify eligibility; simplify Federal share; allow preapproval planning and environmental costs; exempt from some highway program requirements.

Reauthorization Currently under temporary extension (thru FY 2004). Administration’s proposal, SAFETEA, is at Senate passed its $318 billion proposal in February. The House passed its $275 billion proposal in March. They need to come to agreement: possible veto threat. Advocacy organizations lobby for their key issues. All proposals continue TE with only minor changes. All proposals anticipate the RTP, Scenic Byways, and Federal Lands Highway Program to have relatively minor changes, and more funds.

For more information: State RTP Administrator contacts: State TE Manager contacts: National RTP and TE oversight: Christopher Douwes Trails and Enhancements Program Manager ; fax