FEBRUARY 24, 2014 University Building and Grounds Committee Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Process
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
CLA RTP amendments 1. Align with December 10 vote to allow up to 2 members of same academic area to serve at different ranks 2. Specify that two members.
Academic Senate 101 You Make It Happen! Catherine Cox President Mission College Academic Senate August, 2007 Adapted from ASCCC 101, presented at the ASCCC.
Administrative Procedures for Allegations of Research Misconduct Executive Summary (see WSU Policy 2101 for Details)
Capital Financial Plan and Physical Design Framework DRAFT Committee on Grounds and Buildings May 2010.
Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.
1 UAS Campus Masterplan December 2012 Draft. 2 PRIOR WORK - INPUTS –UAS Masterplan 2009 – Accreditation Review 2010 – UAS Strategic & Assessment.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.
Town Hall Meeting Development of Next Two-Year Budget FY2010 and FY2011 December 4, 2008 Presented by: Scott Bass, Provost and Don Myers, Vice President.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library (for new.
Capital Budgeting.
Welcome Elizabeth Schanbacher Assistant Superintendent of Educational Technology.
FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Faculty Budget Committee Report College of Charleston Faculty Senate Meeting April 7, 2015 Committee Members: Thomas Carroll (Exercise Science), Julia.
2 From the BOV Bylaws Faculty Representatives The Faculty shall elect a non-voting representative to the following committees of the Board: Academic.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
ASA Board Membership Board Members: (vote) Four Paraguayan Citizens Four U.S. Citizens One Third-country National Ex-Officio Members: (voice but no vote)
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Institution program proposal is developed using campus processes (Review by department/division, university curriculum committee, faculty senate, dean,
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
University Senate October 7, University Senate October 7, 2015 Summary Presidential Briefing President Loh provided a briefing on two suggested.
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Blugold Commitment Differential Tuition Proposal Workshop September 19, 2012 Stephanie Jamelske Jeremy Miner Mike Wick Stephanie Jamelske Jeremy.
September 9,  Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) approached WSU about possible placement of salt storage facility on campus  Beavercreek.
Faculty Meeting Review Group Alvan Bregman (convener), Lisa Hinchliffe, Joanne Kaczmarek.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
University Senate February 11, University Senate February 11, 2016 Summary Senate Chair’s Report The Senate leadership has been meeting with senator.
College-wide Meeting November 19, 2014 – 12:45PM Gateway A Photo Courtesy of James Hassett.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Presentation to the Finance and Administration Advisory Group ▸Implementing a New Space Request Process ▸Process for requesting additional space.
Institutional Planning and Effectiveness Integrated system of review that helps drive the overall mission of the College!!! Office of Institutional Research.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
College Wide Governance Meeting
Academic Program Review
University Strategic Plan
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Best Practices Managing Agendas and the Electronic Curriculum System
Facilities Report to the Buffalo State College Senate May 6, 2016
Project Goals Leverage one of our unique CSU Dominguez Hills assets—our underutilized land—to advance the university mission and increase student success.
Construction Management & Inspection
Tenure Policies Q & A Session
Westfield State University
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
New Certificate Program
Terminate an Academic Unit
Roles and Responsibilities
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
Roles and Responsibilities
Best Practices Managing Agendas and the Electronic Curriculum System
Presentation transcript:

FEBRUARY 24, 2014 University Building and Grounds Committee Report

Update on Capital Plan CategoryProject DescriptionProject Cost Maintenance and Repair Creative Arts Center$3,650,000 Shared Service – Salt Storage$1,000,000 Modernizing Classrooms Classroom Modernization & Maintenance $5,000,000 Modernization of Library (LAKE)$960,000 Data Analytics & Visualization Environment $600,000 CompletionVeteran & Workforce Gateway$3,500,000 Total$14,710,000

Salt Barn Site Layout

Structures on Site Paved access roads to approximately 2.1 acre, fenced yard StructureOwnersh ip Salt storage structure (80’x60’, 3000 ton capacity) ODOT Truck storage (90’x50’)ODOT Morton barn (90’x50’)WSU Partially enclosed building (135’x25’)WSU Storage Building (20’x20’)WSU Open storage areaWSU

Draft Wright Way Policy (5410): Capital Project Policy Process: For all projects greater than $500,000 or any project that directly impacts natural areas, a copy of the Project Initiation Form will be presented to the Faculty President’s office upon execution to ensure that faculty are engaged early and proactively in capital projects.

Draft Wright Way Policy (5410): Capital Project Policy Natural Areas Wright Way Policy 5410 for Capital Projects applies in its entirety to any construction or renovation on natural areas (excludes landscaped areas) of the University property. Natural areas are defined as wooded, undeveloped areas. Maintenance of the existing trail system is anticipated and is not subject to this policy. In addition, an environmental impact assessment must be conducted for all projects that occur within or impact any campus natural area. This assessment will result in an Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by Facilities Planning and Development (FPD), detailing changes in the native ecosystem and impacts on other users of the natural area to be affected. Public notification of the Environmental Impact Statement will be made at least 90 days prior to commitment of construction, and communicated directly to the University Faculty Senate and Student Government. At a minimum, two public information sessions will be held during the academic year where the project and impact assessment will be presented by the Project Liaison (PL), at which public comment and input will be solicited.

Ad Hoc Woods Conservancy Committee The Senate will continue the Woods Conservancy Committee as an ad hoc committee that reports to the Senate Executive Committee. The voting membership of the committee will consist of representatives from each college. The non-voting membership will include a representative from FPD, Construction and Physical Plant.

Commitment to the Woods The University will provide support for one Graduate Research Assistant (tuition waiver + stipend) and $25K in funding for woods conservancy projects annually for three years. Unused funds can be carried over for use in future years. After the initial three year period, the funding will be renewable annually with the Provost's approval.

Woods Projects All funded conservancy projects must align with the goals of the University Mission Statement and preserve or enhance the value of the Wright State Woods. The committee will provide a description of proposed project to the Provost for approval prior to the tenth week of each spring semester. At the end of each academic year, the committee will provide a written report to the Senate and the Provost detailing the activities of the committee including a description of the outcomes of approved Woods conservancy projects.

Initial Tasks of the Committee Develop a procedure for identifying appropriate Woods projects and recommending funding these project to the Provost Develop a proposal for an easement to protect the Woods (WSU, ODNR, ODOT).

Naming rights to the pedestrian bridge