Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process MPO 101 Michigan Transportation Planning Association 35 th Annual Conference July 14,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
Advertisements

Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): MPO Basics 26 JANUARY 2015 CAPE COD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Judy Lorenzo Manager, Transportation Planning Office Fundamentals of Metropolitan and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations in Washington State.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
SAFETEA-LU Reauthorization Process and USDOT’s Reform Proposal November 2008 Todd Kohr Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy U.S.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
Freight Project Financing Challenges, Questions and Options presented by Michael P. Huerta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 30, 2001.
Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Public Lands begin at Claridge Nursery (Green Dots) 1 st Wayne County Courthouse.
U.S. DOT Funding Opportunities for Idle-Reduction Projects Mike Savonis U.S. DOT-FHWA Talking Freight Seminar July 21, 2004 U.S. Department of Transportation.
Public Engagement for Sustainable Transportation Planning: A Brand New Paradigm or the Same Tried and True Approaches Federal Perspectives on Engagement:
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Program Development Session F-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Mobile Metropolitan Planning Organization Federal Certification Process “Public Involvement Component” April 13, 2011 Federal Highway Administration Federal.
Federal-Aid Funding County Highway Accountants Conference May 10, 2007 zpowerpoint/ProjManagersCriticalIssuesBOB Feb07.ppt.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Prioritizing Transportation Projects National League of Cities July 14, 2011 Alan Clark Director of Transportation Planning.
Federal Transportation Improvement Programs Financial Planning and Financial Constraint 2017 FSTIP Workshop Wade Hobbs, FHWA CADO February 9-10, 2016.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Presented by Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning and Capital Programming Funding Prioritization Process Chapter 725 January 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
Farmington Metropolitan Planning Organization
Effectiveness of Funding Mechanisms and
What is a Planning Organization?
NC RPO Meeting July 25, 2018.
About the Transportation planning board
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process MPO 101 Michigan Transportation Planning Association 35 th Annual Conference July 14, 2011 Flint, MI

Objectives of this Workshop List and describe the functions of the MPO/TMA List and describe the functions of the MPO/TMA Learn about the major planning decisions/products of the MPO/TMA Learn about the major planning decisions/products of the MPO/TMA Discuss major policy and planning issues these bodies may face. Discuss major policy and planning issues these bodies may face.

MPO Basics

What do MPOs Do? Metropolitan transportation planning process in cooperation with the State DOT and transit operators Metropolitan transportation planning process in cooperation with the State DOT and transit operators Determine responsibilities in concert with the State DOT(s) and transit operators Determine responsibilities in concert with the State DOT(s) and transit operators Cooperatively develop, update, and approve: Cooperatively develop, update, and approve: Unified Planning Work Program Unified Planning Work Program Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Improvement Program Have a proactive Public Involvement Process Have a proactive Public Involvement Process

MPO Composition Policy Board Policy Board Local Elected and Appointed Officials Local Elected and Appointed Officials Major Modes of Transportation Major Modes of Transportation State Officials State Officials Citizens Citizens MPO Staff MPO Staff Technical Committees Technical Committees Other Committees Other Committees Membership is inclusive

Role of the Board Develop a regional vision Develop a regional vision Establish regional policy Establish regional policy Adopt UWP, Transportation Plan, and TIP Adopt UWP, Transportation Plan, and TIP Ensure that the decisions reflect the concerns of residents of the region Ensure that the decisions reflect the concerns of residents of the region

Voting Structure of the Board All Board members with voting privileges can vote All Board members with voting privileges can vote Board can contain “ex-officio” members that participate but don’t vote Board can contain “ex-officio” members that participate but don’t vote

What Do Board Members Need from Staff ? Reliable and timely information in an understandable format Reliable and timely information in an understandable format Information includes options and analysis of their consequences Information includes options and analysis of their consequences Costs Costs Policy Policy Benefits Benefits Environmental consequences Environmental consequences

Role of the Staff Provide information & technical support to Board Members Provide information & technical support to Board Members Prepare documents Prepare documents Foster interagency coordination Foster interagency coordination Facilitate input and feedback from the public Facilitate input and feedback from the public Manage the planning process Manage the planning process

The MPO as the Forum

Working Beyond Jurisdictions MPO is the forum for discussion MPO is the forum for discussion Place to air issues Place to air issues Find solutions that benefit all jurisdictions/regions Find solutions that benefit all jurisdictions/regions MPOs work with adjoining regions MPOs work with adjoining regions Consistency of projects Consistency of projects Multi-regional projects Multi-regional projects

The Public The Public States Local Government Local Government User/ Special Interest Groups User/ Special Interest Groups Regional Agencies Regional Agencies Tribal Governments Tribal Governments Federal Government Federal Government Private Sector Private Sector Legal System Legal System The People in the Process

Key Decisions and Products Unified Work Program (UWP) Unified Work Program (UWP) Long Range Transportation Plan (The Plan) Long Range Transportation Plan (The Plan) Transportation Improvement Program/Plan (TIP) Transportation Improvement Program/Plan (TIP) Public Participation Plan Public Participation Plan

Unified Work Program (UWP) Lists the metropolitan area’s program of planning studies Identifies sources of funding, schedules and responsible agencies Coordinates the planning by all regional participants Describes all Federally-funded studies Lays out MPOs Strategic Plan

Sources of Federal Funding for UWP Development PL and STP funds administered by FHWA PL and STP funds administered by FHWA Section 5303 funds administered by FTA Section 5303 funds administered by FTA FHWA and FTA capital funds may also be used for planning (STP and Section 5307) FHWA and FTA capital funds may also be used for planning (STP and Section 5307) Statewide Planning and Research (SPR) Statewide Planning and Research (SPR) State and Local Funds State and Local Funds

The Transportation Plan To be eligible for Federal funds: To be eligible for Federal funds: a project must be consistent with the approved transportation plan a project must be consistent with the approved transportation plan

The Transportation Plan… Documents conclusions and decisions Documents conclusions and decisions Includes long term and short term policies, strategies, and actions Includes long term and short term policies, strategies, and actions Covers capital improvements and operations Covers capital improvements and operations Addresses federal requirements including: Addresses federal requirements including: movement of people and goods movement of people and goods Environmental Mitigation Environmental Mitigation Environmental Justice Environmental Justice Is financially constrained by reasonably available resources Is financially constrained by reasonably available resources

Requirements for the Transportation Plan… 20+ horizon at time of adoption 20+ horizon at time of adoption An update every 4 or 5 years depending on air quality status An update every 4 or 5 years depending on air quality status Multi-modal coverage Multi-modal coverage Fiscal constraint Fiscal constraint Early and continuous public involvement including consultation Early and continuous public involvement including consultation Consideration of the 8 Planning Factors Consideration of the 8 Planning Factors

Transportation Plan Fiscal Constraint Demonstrate consistency with available and projected revenues Demonstrate consistency with available and projected revenues Identify proposed new revenue sources and strategies to ensure their availability Identify proposed new revenue sources and strategies to ensure their availability Balance Revenues and expenditures Balance Revenues and expenditures Unfunded projects are not officially part of the Plan Unfunded projects are not officially part of the Plan

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Allocates limited transportation funds to projects and programs Allocates limited transportation funds to projects and programs List of transportation projects to be implemented in the short-term (no less than 4 years) List of transportation projects to be implemented in the short-term (no less than 4 years) Includes nearly all federally funded surface transportation projects Includes nearly all federally funded surface transportation projects Includes all regionally significant projects – regardless of funding source in air quality non-attainment and maintenance areas Includes all regionally significant projects – regardless of funding source in air quality non-attainment and maintenance areas Identifies funding source for each project Identifies funding source for each project

Programming Transportation Improvements TIP adoption requires identifying top priority projects for funding TIP adoption requires identifying top priority projects for funding The total cost of worthy projects always exceeds available funding – must set priorities The total cost of worthy projects always exceeds available funding – must set priorities The TIP and STIP are products of the programming process The TIP and STIP are products of the programming process

TIP Fiscal Constraint Financially constrained by year Financially constrained by year Demonstrate which projects can be implemented with current revenue sources Demonstrate which projects can be implemented with current revenue sources Identify strategies for ensuring the availability of new funding sources Identify strategies for ensuring the availability of new funding sources In non-attainment/maintenance areas, projects with available or committed funding can appear in first 2 years of TIP In non-attainment/maintenance areas, projects with available or committed funding can appear in first 2 years of TIP

Requirements for the TIP… Covers at least 4 years Covers at least 4 years Updated at least every 2 years. Updated at least every 2 years. Consistent with approved Transportation Plan Consistent with approved Transportation Plan Conforms to air quality requirements Conforms to air quality requirements Financially constrained by year Financially constrained by year Approved by MPO and Governor Approved by MPO and Governor Included in State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Included in State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Can be amended during its life span (subject to approval by Governor and inclusion in STIP ) Can be amended during its life span (subject to approval by Governor and inclusion in STIP )

Characteristics of a Successful Programming Process Early consensus on planning goals Early consensus on planning goals Effective communication among technical and policy leaders Effective communication among technical and policy leaders Continuous public involvement Continuous public involvement Qualitative as well as quantitative criteria Qualitative as well as quantitative criteria

Federal Requirements for Public Involvement MPOs must prepare a public involvement plan MPOs must prepare a public involvement plan Plan must be proactive and provide for: Plan must be proactive and provide for:  Complete information and timely public notice  Early and continuing involvement  Full public access to key decisions  Explicit consideration and response to input

Objectives of Public Involvement Provide timely information about transportation issues and processes Provide timely information about transportation issues and processes Seek public review and comment Seek public review and comment Respond to public comments Respond to public comments Provide access to key decisions Provide access to key decisions Continuing involvement of the public in developing plans and TIPs Continuing involvement of the public in developing plans and TIPs

Congestion Management Process Required for TMA/MPOs over 200,000 population Required for TMA/MPOs over 200,000 population Approach to identifying, analyzing, & evaluating system-wide congestion Approach to identifying, analyzing, & evaluating system-wide congestion Serves as input into planning & programming processes Serves as input into planning & programming processes

Major Policy and Planning Issues

Federal Aid Fundamentals

Federal Transportation Funding Federal Aid is provided to the state in several ways and categories: Federal Aid is provided to the state in several ways and categories: Core Programs Core Programs Other allocated funding, i.e. LTAP, SPR Other allocated funding, i.e. LTAP, SPR “Earmarked funding” such as High Priority Projects “Earmarked funding” such as High Priority Projects Emergency Relief Emergency Relief

Amount of funding is based on formulas Each state is different (75/25 split in Michigan Public Act 51 of 1951) Each state is different (75/25 split in Michigan Public Act 51 of 1951) Final dollar amounts are subject to Congressional obligation limitation Final dollar amounts are subject to Congressional obligation limitation Equity Bonus Equity Bonus

Future Funding is subject to change SAFETEA-LU expired in 9/2009 SAFETEA-LU expired in 9/2009 Administration & Congressional priorities may change Administration & Congressional priorities may change Future motor fuel revenues may vary Future motor fuel revenues may vary The Highway Trust Fund has been saved from insolvency by Congress. The Highway Trust Fund has been saved from insolvency by Congress.

Other Federal-aid Fund Facts The Federal-aid Highway Program is a reimbursable program The Federal-aid Highway Program is a reimbursable program With few exceptions, Federal funds must be matched with funds from other sources (i.e. state or local) With few exceptions, Federal funds must be matched with funds from other sources (i.e. state or local) Must be coordinated with the MPO and the State DOT Must be coordinated with the MPO and the State DOT

Traditional State and Local Funding Sources User fees (dedicated and non-dedicated) User fees (dedicated and non-dedicated) Bonds (revenue and general obligation) Bonds (revenue and general obligation) General revenues General revenues

Innovative Financing Public/private partnerships Public/private partnerships Tolls – Congestion pricing Tolls – Congestion pricing Advance construction Advance construction GARVEE bonds and TIFIA loans GARVEE bonds and TIFIA loans State Infrastructure Bank State Infrastructure Bank

What is Operations? Strategies and approaches to improve system performance Strategies and approaches to improve system performance Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Traffic Signal Operations Traffic Signal Operations Reversible lanes Reversible lanes Incident Management Incident Management Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

Freight Movement Good freight movement is vital to a region’s economy Good freight movement is vital to a region’s economy MPO should examine how freight moves in and out of its region MPO should examine how freight moves in and out of its region Engage the freight community to find “win-win” solutions to problems Engage the freight community to find “win-win” solutions to problems

Safety 2010 saw a reduction in fatality levels not seen since the 1950s saw a reduction in fatality levels not seen since the 1950s. MPO can examine system for trends and allocate resources to address safety related issues. MPO can examine system for trends and allocate resources to address safety related issues. MPOs can serve as a forum for safety related discussion with applicable agencies. MPOs can serve as a forum for safety related discussion with applicable agencies.

What is Air Quality Conformity? Link between air quality planning and transportation planning Analytical process to ensure that transportation plans, programs, and projects meet the SIP’s emissions budgets for mobile sources Pass/fail test on meeting the SIP’s emissions budgets

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, or national origin Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, or national origin Proactive Public Involvement key to compliance Proactive Public Involvement key to compliance

Questions?

Thank You Chris Dingman FHWA-Michigan Division 315 W. Allegan, Room 201 Lansing, MI Spencer Stevens FHWA-Office of Planning Oversight and Stewardship 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC or