Other Chi-Square Tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chi-Square and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Advertisements

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 12 Chi-Square.
Chapter 11 Other Chi-Squared Tests
Chi square.  Non-parametric test that’s useful when your sample violates the assumptions about normality required by other tests ◦ All other tests we’ve.
1 Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Analysis of Categorical Data Goodness-of-Fit Tests.
Inference about the Difference Between the
Chapter 10 Chi-Square Tests and the F- Distribution 1 Larson/Farber 4th ed.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Econ-2030-Applied Statistics-Dr. Tadesse. Chapter 11: Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence n Inferences About.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.1 Chi-Square Goodness of Fit.
Ch 15 - Chi-square Nonparametric Methods: Chi-Square Applications
11-2 Goodness-of-Fit In this section, we consider sample data consisting of observed frequency counts arranged in a single row or column (called a one-way.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 20 – April 3, 2008.
Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution
Goodness of Fit Test for Proportions of Multinomial Population Chi-square distribution Hypotheses test/Goodness of fit test.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
Chi-Square and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Chapter 13 Chi-Square Tests. The chi-square test for Goodness of Fit allows us to determine whether a specified population distribution seems valid. The.
GOODNESS OF FIT TEST & CONTINGENCY TABLE
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Inference for Counts:
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Distribution. Review So far, we have used several probability distributions for hypothesis testing and confidence intervals with.
Section 10.1 Goodness of Fit. Section 10.1 Objectives Use the chi-square distribution to test whether a frequency distribution fits a claimed distribution.
Chapter 9 Section 2 Testing the Difference Between Two Means: t Test 1.
Chi-square Test of Independence Steps in Testing Chi-square Test of Independence Hypotheses.
10.1: Multinomial Experiments Multinomial experiment A probability experiment consisting of a fixed number of trials in which there are more than two possible.
Chi-square test. Data Statistics Continuous measurement: Interval Mean Categorical measurement: NominalFrequency, count, proportion One-way chi-square.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide Chapter 11 Comparisons Involving Proportions n Inference about the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations Proportions of Two Populations.
Chi-Square Procedures Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit, Independence of Variables, and Homogeneity of Proportions.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Advanced Math Topics 12.3 Goodness of Fit. The chi-square statistic is used to determine if two or more sample percentages are significantly different.
Non-Parametric Statistics Part I: Chi-Square .
Chapter 10 Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 17 l Chi-Squared Analysis: Testing for Patterns in Qualitative Data.
GOODNESS OF FIT Larson/Farber 4th ed 1 Section 10.1.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Chi-Square Test James A. Pershing, Ph.D. Indiana University.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
Section 10.2 Independence. Section 10.2 Objectives Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent Use a contingency table.
Comparing Counts.  A test of whether the distribution of counts in one categorical variable matches the distribution predicted by a model is called a.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill CHAPTER 11 Other Chi-Square Tests.
9.2 Testing the Difference Between Two Means: Using the t Test
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
The table shows a random sample of 100 hikers and the area of hiking preferred. Are hiking area preference and gender independent? Hiking Preference Area.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chi-Square and F Distributions 10.
11.2 Tests Using Contingency Tables When data can be tabulated in table form in terms of frequencies, several types of hypotheses can be tested by using.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 10 Testing the Difference between Means, Variances, and Proportions.
Sec 8.5 Test for a Variance or a Standard Deviation Bluman, Chapter 81.
DICE!  You are going to make your own and then we are going to test them (later) to see if they are fair!
381 Goodness of Fit Tests QSCI 381 – Lecture 40 (Larson and Farber, Sect 10.1)
Chapter Fifteen Chi-Square and Other Nonparametric Procedures.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 9 Testing the Difference between Two Means.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test. In general, the chi-square test statistic is of the form If the computed test statistic is large, then the observed and.
Calculator steps: The calculator steps for this section can be found on YouTube or by clicking: HereHere Bluman, Chapter 111.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 12 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Chapter 10 Section 5 Chi-squared Test for a Variance or Standard Deviation.
Inference for Tables Chi-Square Tests Chi-Square Test Basics Formula for test statistic: Conditions: Data is from a random sample/event. All individual.
Section 10.2 Objectives Use a contingency table to find expected frequencies Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent.
Section 10.1 Goodness of Fit © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 of 91.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Testing the Difference between Means, Variances, and Proportions
Unit 8 Section 7.5.
Testing the Difference Between Two Means
Testing the Difference between Means and Variances
Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Between Two Means, Two Proportions, and Two Variances.
Sun. Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat.
Chapter 10 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
Presentation transcript:

Other Chi-Square Tests Chapter 12 Other Chi-Square Tests

Chapter 12 Objectives Test a distribution for goodness of fit, using chi-square. Test two variables for independence, using chi-square. Test proportions for homogeneity, using chi-square.

12.1 Test for Goodness of Fit The chi-square statistic can be used to see whether a frequency distribution fits a specific pattern. This is referred to as the chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

Test for Goodness of Fit Formula for the test for goodness of fit: where d.f. = number of categories minus 1 O = observed frequency E = expected frequency

Assumptions for Goodness of Fit The data are obtained from a random sample. The expected frequency for each category must be 5 or more.

Fruit Soda Flavors A market analyst wished to see whether consumers have any preference among five flavors of a new fruit soda. A sample of 100 people provided the following data. Is there enough evidence to reject the claim that there is no preference in the selection of fruit soda flavors, using the data shown previously? Let α = 0.05. Cherry Strawberry Orange Lime Grape Observed 32 28 16 14 10 Expected 20 Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim. H0: Consumers show no preference (claim). H1: Consumers show a preference.

Fruit Soda Flavors Step 2: Find the critical value. Cherry Strawberry Orange Lime Grape Observed 32 28 16 14 10 Expected 20 Step 2: Find the critical value. D.f. = 5 – 1 = 4, and α = 0.05. CV = 9.488. Step 3: Compute the test value.

Fruit Soda Flavors Step 4: Make the decision. The decision is to reject the null hypothesis, since 18.0 > 9.488. Step 5: Summarize the results. There is enough evidence to reject the claim that consumers show no preference for the flavors.

Retirees The Russel Reynold Association surveyed retired senior executives who had returned to work. They found that after returning to work, 38% were employed by another organization, 32% were self-employed, 23% were either freelancing or consulting, and 7% had formed their own companies. To see if these percentages are consistent with those of Allegheny County residents, a local researcher surveyed 300 retired executives who had returned to work and found that 122 were working for another company, 85 were self-employed, 76 were either freelancing or consulting, and 17 had formed their own companies. At α = 0.10, test the claim that the percentages are the same for those people in Allegheny County.

Retirees Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim. New Company Self-Employed Free-lancing Owns Company Observed 122 85 76 17 Expected .38(300)= 114 .32(300)= 96 .23(300)= 69 .07(300)= 21 Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim. H0: The retired executives who returned to work are distributed as follows: 38% are employed by another organization, 32% are self-employed, 23% are either freelancing or consulting, and 7% have formed their own companies (claim). H1: The distribution is not the same as stated in the null hypothesis.

Retirees Step 2: Find the critical value. New Company Self-Employed Free-lancing Owns Company Observed 122 85 76 17 Expected .38(300)= 114 .32(300)= 96 .23(300)= 69 .07(300)= 21 Step 2: Find the critical value. D.f. = 4 – 1 = 3, and α = 0.10. CV = 6.251. Step 3: Compute the test value.

Retirees Step 4: Make the decision. Since 3.2939 < 6.251, the decision is not to reject the null hypothesis. Step 5: Summarize the results. There is not enough evidence to reject the claim. It can be concluded that the percentages are not significantly different from those given in the null hypothesis.

Firearm Deaths A researcher read that firearm-related deaths for people aged 1 to 18 were distributed as follows: 74% were accidental, 16% were homicides, and 10% were suicides. In her district, there were 68 accidental deaths, 27 homicides, and 5 suicides during the past year. At α = 0.10, test the claim that the percentages are equal. Accidental Homicides Suicides Observed 68 27 5 Expected 74 16 10

Firearm Deaths Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim. Accidental Homicides Suicides Observed 68 27 5 Expected 74 16 10 Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim. H0: Deaths due to firearms for people aged 1 through 18 are distributed as follows: 74% accidental, 16% homicides, and 10% suicides (claim). H1: The distribution is not the same as stated in the null hypothesis.

Firearm Deaths Step 2: Find the critical value. Accidental Homicides Suicides Observed 68 27 5 Expected 74 16 10 Step 2: Find the critical value. D.f. = 3 – 1 = 2, and α = 0.10. CV = 4.605. Step 3: Compute the test value.

Firearm Deaths Step 4: Make the decision. Reject the null hypothesis, since 10.549 > 4.605. Step 5: Summarize the results. There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the distribution is 74% accidental, 16% homicides, and 10% suicides.