Educator Effectiveness System Changes Overview Using Data to Drive Effective Teaching Elizabeth Ayotte – EES Support, BKM Complex Daniel Espaniola – EO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual Professional Development Plan Santa Rosa District Schools School Year.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Agenda 9/17/14 Intro to AcademiesTraci Intro to Academies SLOs: Learning GoalCIA Work/BreakYou SLOs: Assessment PlanCIA 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview Training
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
1 Educator Performance and Support System (EPSS) Information Session April 4 th, 2012.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Recognize how SLOs align the teacher and principal evaluation Develop a shared understanding of the purpose for using SLOs Become familiar with the SLO.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation System
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Non-Classroom Teacher (NCT) Student Learning Objectives
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness System Changes Overview Using Data to Drive Effective Teaching Elizabeth Ayotte – EES Support, BKM Complex Daniel Espaniola – EO EES, HLLM Complex

Objectives for Today Become familiar with what the differentiated cycles are for SY Learn about timelines related to EES components Understand the PDPDP and PDP and its purpose Review mandatory trainings for teachers for SY Clarification on any of the changes to EES The new look of PDE3

Evaluation Cycle Implementation Timeline (For Teachers Rated Effective or Better) Group AStreamlinedStandardStreamlined Group BStreamlined Standard Non Tenured teachers and tenured teachers rated less than effective will be on an ANNUAL ENHANCED Comprehensive evaluation. Tenured teachers rated as effective or better will participate in an alternating schedule of Standard Comprehensive and Streamlined Comprehensive evaluation. **OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES will publish a schedule related to group A and B participants in Spring of 2016.

A tenured teacher with no EES Rating from SY will be on a STANDARD evaluation track Reasons a tenured teacher would not have an EES rating may include: - On extended leave - Completed probation on PEP-T - Returning from TA VP position

Expectations for ENHANCED Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observations2 observation cycles or more per year, 1x in Fall and 1x in Spring semester. Core Professionalism (and Tripod)All classroom teachers will document and submit evidence within Domain 4 in PDE3 and reflect on student surveys (Gr. 3-12). Hawaii Growth ModelClassroom teachers who teach ELA and Math in grades 4- 8 will roster verify in the Spring and receive growth data for their students. Beginning teachers will not receive SGP data due to the one year lag. Student Learning ObjectiveTeachers will complete 1 SLO using the template and record sheet. PDPDP or PDPUsing data from areas within EES, target areas of growth or improvement within Teacher Practice and Student Growth and develop goals. *The PDPDP should be designed and approved within the first 30 days from the first day of instruction.

Expectations for SY for STANDARD Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observation (s) 1 observation or more a year Core Professionalism (and Tripod)All classroom teachers will document and submit evidence within Domain 4 in PDE3 and reflect on the student survey (Gr. 3-12). Hawaii Growth ModelClassroom teachers who teach ELA and Math in grades 4-8 will roster verify in the Spring and receive growth data for their students. Student Learning ObjectiveTeachers will complete 1 SLO. PDPUsing data from areas within EES, or school or complex needs, target area of growth or improvement. This will be shared at the beginning of year conference with administrator for approval.

Expectations for for STREAMLINED Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observation(s)No classroom observation(s) required. Core Professionalism (and Tripod)Reflection on student survey results embedded with the PDP if applicable. Hawaii Growth ModelReflection on Student Growth results embedded within the PDP if applicable. Student Learning ObjectiveCompletion of template not required. *Expectation to participate in data teams and monitor student results as a normal part of teaching. PDPUsing data from areas within EES, or school or complex needs, target area of growth or improvement. This will be shared at the beginning of year conference with administrator for approval. *If a teacher demonstrates a documented performance deficiency, their Administrator can place them on a STANDARD evaluation immediately.

Professional Development Plan (PDP) Teachers rated Effective or better Teachers submits evidence for completion before Ending Conference Progress check suggested by the first week in Jan Completion of the plan is a matter of professional responsibility but progress on Plan can be used as evidence in Core Professionalism Identify areas of growth and develop goals Share the Plan with administrator before the end of 1 st quarter

Principal Directed Professional Development Plan Teachers rated Less than Effective Use previous EES data to identify areas of targeted growth and learning as directed or in collaboration with administrator Plan must be approved by Principal 30 days from the first day of instruction Progress is monitored by the teachers and Administrator. It can be used as evidence for the EES rating. Failure to make progress on a PDPDP may results in an Unsatisfactory Core Professionalism rating.

Overview Training for Teachers NEW to the EES Teacher PracticeStudent Growth and Learning -Intro to the Framework for Teaching -Working Portfolio -Core Professionalism *Complete by AUGUST 31 st -SLO / SSIO -Hawaii Growth Model *Complete by AUGUST 31 st *Late hires must complete the overview training and view the EES Orientation video, prior to being evaluated. Online modules will be provided through a course in PDE3. EES ORIENTATION *All teachers during an Administrative Day*

DeadlineComponent Prior to first day of instructionEES OrientationAll teachers participate 8/31EES OverviewAny teachers NEW to EES (e.g. do not have a prior EES rating) 9/4SLO/SSIOEvaluator approves 1 st semester SLO/SSIO for implementation 9/10PDPDPAny teacher rated less than effective will complete at the direction of his/her evaluator, *within the first 30 days of instruction. 10/2PDPEvaluator review PDP goals 10/2SLO/SSIOEvaluator approves Yearlong SLO/SSIO for implementation 10/31Working PortfolioEvaluator and NCT agree to and approve Working Portfolio components 2/19SLO/SSIOEvaluator approves 2 nd semester SLO/SSIO for implementation 5/20Final EES RatingEvaluator finalizes and locks components and provides overall EES rating

Questions?