LCC -Proposal for Next Steps August 28, 2012. Discussion Points Recap of Whitepaper Recommendations Critical milestones and activities driving LCC activities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) Standards for Transitions of Care (ToC) and Care Plans in MU2 & MU3 Presented by: Evelyn Gallego-Haag.
Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday, April 29, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) Review of HITPC MU Stage 3 Request For Comments (RFC) January 09,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday July 25, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, August 8, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting May 7,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting February 7,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Template IMPACT 8/19/2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 19, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Template Insert the Name of Your Pilot / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care All Hands SWG Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
Functional Requirements and Health IT Standards Considerations for STAGE 3 Meaningful Use for Long-Term and Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Update to the HITPC.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG LCC All Hands Meeting
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
S&I Framework Update HIT Standards Committee July 16, 2014 Steve Posnack Office Standards & Technology Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.
Harmonization Opportunities Russell Leftwich. Past Harmonization Efforts Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) – IHE, Health Story, HITSP 32, HL7 – 3,000 ballot comments.
S&I Framework Operating Metrics Timing Outputs Participation & Process Framework Launch DateJan 7, 2011 First Initiative Launch DateJan 31, 2011 Elapsed.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Pilots WG Monday, March 10, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting June 25, 2014.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG Roadmap Discussion 1.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 15, 2011.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday July 18, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Pilots WG Monday, January 6, 2014.
10/27/111 Longitudinal Care Work Group (LCWG) Proposal to Re-Scope and Re-Name the LTPAC WG.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting June 18, 2014.
Data Access Framework (DAF) IHE/S&I Framework Joint Work Group kickoff Meeting November 25 th, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG LCC All Hands Meeting
Longitudinal Coordination of Care. Agenda Confirm Community Work Streams Use Case and Policy Whitepaper Approach Recommendation for Use Case scoping.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) HL7 Tiger Team Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Care Coordination Services (CCS) May 1, 2013.
Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 1, 2011.
LCP SWG Meeting February 28, Proposed Agenda 2 Review Use Case/ Scenario/ User Story Structure LCC Roles and the LCP role in Use Case Development.
HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, Chair David Lansky, Pacific Business Group on.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting October 11, 2011.
Standards and Interoperability Framework Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting May 9, 2011.
Lab Reporting Interface – Implementation Guide Analysis- Kick-off Bob Yencha, Erik Pupo April 6,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting April 4,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Use Case Scoping Discussion 3/22/2011.
Health eDecisions (HeD) All Hands Meeting August 8th, 2013.
Data ccess Framework All Hands Community Meeting May 21, 2014.
Public Health Reporting Initiative June 27, 2012.
Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Structured Data Capture (SDC) FHIR Profile IG SWG.
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
ONC LTPAC Roundtable Recommendations 0 TopicStage 3 MU RecommendationsCurrent Activities Transitions of Care: Patient-centered view of care Frame HIT needs.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 29, 2011.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LTPAC SWG Meeting March 11,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, May 23, 2013.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting January 4, 2012.
Health eDecisions (HeD) All Hands Meeting February 21st, 2013.
Public Health Reporting Initiative July 25, 2012.
S&I Framework Longitudinal Coordination of Care Workgroup All Hands Meeting March 1, 2012.
Data ccess Framework All Hands Community Meeting June 11, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Use Case Scoping Discussion 3/19/2011.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, July 11, 2013.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting September 12, 2011.
Standards and Interoperability Framework esMD Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions S&I F2F Thursday, April 12 th, :00 AM.
Labs Early Adoption Program Template Insert the Name of Your Implementation / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Structured Data Capture (SDC) All Hands Meeting May 26, 2016.
West Essex Business Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

LCC -Proposal for Next Steps August 28, 2012

Discussion Points Recap of Whitepaper Recommendations Critical milestones and activities driving LCC activities IMPACT Project deadlines and their impact on LCC activities Scope for Potential LCC Use Case 2.0 Scope for developing Stage 3 MU Comments Proposed key activities and timelines for LTPAC and LCP SWGs

Recap: Whitepaper Recommendations RecommendationResponsible TeamProposed Timeline 1.Harmonize S&I LCC WG Use Case 1.0 (conduct standards analysis and standards development) S&I Harmonization Team SEPT-OCT Develop Implementation Guide (IG) for LCC Use Case 1.0 S&I Harmonization Team DEC Leverage IG for Stage 3 MU Comment PeriodLCC WGDEC Ballot IG through HL7 for LCC Use Case 1.0S&I HL7 Balloting TeamJAN Extend LCC IG to develop new use case (Use Case 2.0) for exchange of Collaborative Care Plans. Use case will describe 2-3 scenarios. LCP SWGJAN Harmonize S&I LCC WG Use Case 2.0 (conduct standards analysis and standards development) S&I Harmonization Team FEB Develop and ballot through HL7 IG for LCC Use Case 2.0 S&I Harmonization Team/ HL7 Balloting Team MAY Provide S&I Framework resources for WG SupportONC/OSI LeadershipSEPT 2012

External Drivers Sept ‘12Oct ‘12Nov’12Dec ’12Jan’13Feb ’13Mar ’13Apr ’13May’13 HITPC Stage 3 MU HL7 Ballots IMPACT HITPC Pre-RFC Meeting Standards Analysis & Recommendation (1-2months) HL7 Fall Ballot Closes IMPACT Go-Live Implementation Guidance Development (1- 2 months) Stage 3 RFC Distributed RFC Deadline (Dec 21) ONC Synthesis of RFC Comments (1- 2 months) WGs reconcile RFC comments (1 month) Draft stage 3 Recs due Final stage 3 Recs due to HHS HL7 Spring Ballot Open HL7 January Ballot Open

IMPACT Project Deliverables For Consideration DeliverableDescriptionDue DateAlignment with WP Recommendation Standards Analysis & Recommendation Map ~450 Data Elements to Consolidated CDA. Vendor will conduct gap analysis as preliminary step to develop IG. OCT 2012Aligns with #1 and #5— standards analysis for Use Case 1.0 and 2.0 Implementation Guide Development Develop CDA templates and sample files incorporating the ~450 data elements. IG will not be developed with level of detail required for HL7 balloting. Missing elements will be identified as Free Text. NOV 2012Partial alignment with #2—IG development for Use Case 1.0. Additional harmonization work required from S&I Framework. IMPACT Project Go- Live Pilot CDA Transfer of Care document based on CCD templates from IG DEC 2012Outcomes of pilot can inform IG for Use Case 2.0 and Stage 3 MU recommendations

Key Questions for LCC WGs Is there value in developing the IG for LCC Use Case 1.0 given the IMPACT Project Scope of Work? If yes, how do we reconcile use case 1.0 with the IMPACT project data sets? If no, let’s consider…

…How to leverage IMPACT work for LCC WG activities Build from IMPACT standards analysis work and IG to create LCC Use Case 2.0 (contains all ~450 data elements) – LCC Use Case 1.0 may no longer be relevant for S&I harmonization given additional data elements identified since LCC Use Case 1.0 consensus (June 2012) LCC Use Case 2.0 will be handed off to S&I Harmonization Team (Deloitte). Deloitte team will then create ‘Care Plan IG’ which will be submitted for HL7 balloting Monitor and review IMPACT contract work (standards analysis) as part of weekly LTPAC SWG call

Scope for LCC Use Case 2.0 LCC Use Case 2.0 and IG may not contain all data elements for the exchange of Collaborative Care Plans LCC WG should revisit ‘baseline transaction and build’ presented during June LTPAC Collaborative Summit – Versions 2.0 to Version X.0 of LCC Use Case are built incrementally to add requirements of other trading partners (i.e. IRF, Behavioral Health, CBO) Care Plan is built out from most simple to most complex (i.e. treatment plan, care plan…to collaborative care plan)

From LTPAC Summit: Baseline Transaction and Build Master Longitudinal Care Use Case Version 1: Baseline Developed HH-POC Creates base Use Case Structure and focuses on HHA/ SNF as the starting point that gives the best overall coverage of data elements. Version 1: Baseline Developed HH-POC Creates base Use Case Structure and focuses on HHA/ SNF as the starting point that gives the best overall coverage of data elements. Version 2: Include ~450 elements identified by the IMPACT Project (potential Use Case 2.) Version 3: (IRF, Behavioral Health, CBO, ???) White Paper Roadmap lays out priority order to incrementally add requirements of other trading partners Version 3: (IRF, Behavioral Health, CBO, ???) White Paper Roadmap lays out priority order to incrementally add requirements of other trading partners Version …: Other trading partners Round out full longitudinal picture Version …: Other trading partners Round out full longitudinal picture Now: Foundation Future: Full LCP Support Building Incrementally 8 June 2012, Baltimore, MD

Building a Common Terminology for the Care Plan The WP acknowledges there are at least 10 recognized nursing care plan models and vocabularies. The concepts, vocabularies and value sets are not standardized. A process which allows for robust, standards based exchange of assessment data and leading to standards based exchange and update of the Care Plan Document Collaborative Care Plan Care Plan created through a process of communication, prioritization and negotiation leading to a consensus list of care plan HC’s, G’s and I’s Interdisciplinary Care Plan Cumulative Care Plans for all involved health professionals or disciplines Multidisciplinary Care Plan A plan of care which contains all required elements in association: Health Concern; Intervention; Desired Outcome or Goal; Milestones or Time Line; Responsible Party Care Plan Cumulative set of plans of care by all involved health professionals or disciplines. Multidisciplinary Plan of Care Cumulative Set of interventions and instructions for all health concerns addressed by a health professional or discipline Plan of Care Interventions and instructions intended to address a health concern by a health professional or discipline Treatment Plan Most resembles HHPoC MOST SIMPLE MOST COMPLEX

Scope for Stage 3 MU comments Map whitepaper recommendations against Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations for ‘Improve Care Coordination’ Leverage gap analysis to develop LCC Use Case 2.0 Out of Scope Mapping WP to Stage 2 MU Final Rule – Part of Deloitte Scope of Work for ‘ToC Companion Guide’ Mapping WP to S&I Framework CEDD – Use Case 2.0 will need to be mapped to ToC CEDD

Summary of Proposed Key Activities for LCC SWGs Finalize and get consensus on ~450 Data Elements List - LTPAC Monitor and review progress of IMPACT Project Standards Analysis and IG Development work - LTPAC Update LCC Use Case to develop LCC Use Case 2.0 based on ~450 Data Elements List - LCP Map Whitepaper recommendations against Stage 3 MU Preliminary recommendations – LCC and LCP Discussion Point: Which activities will be led by LTPAC SWG and which will be led by LCP SWG?

LCC WG Timeline: Sept 2012 – May 2013 Sept‘12Oct ‘12Nov ’12Dec’12Jan’13Feb ’13Mar ’13May ’12 Milestones PAS SWG LTPAC SWG LCP SWG Use Case 2.0 Standards Analysis & Development Ballot Reconciliation Stage 3 MU RFC Deadline IMPACT Contract Awarded HL7 Fall Ballot Closes Finalize: Use Case Data Elements List (07SEP2012) Fall Ballot Prep HL7 January Ballot Opens Implementation Guidance IMPACT Project Go-Live Monitor IMPACT Project Pilot (1-2 months) Development: Use Case 2.0 Implementation Guide S&I Framework Contracts Expire Development: Stage 3 MU Recommendations Monitor: IMPACT Project Standards Analysis & IG Development (3-4 months) Mapping: Whitepaper to Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations Development: Use Case v2.0 (2 to 3 months) HL7 Spring Ballot Opens

Other Discussion Points Timeline for reconciling Use Case 1.0 or developing Use Case 2.0 and submitting to S&I Harmonization team Timeline for S&I Harmonization Team to develop IG and put through HL7 balloting cycle – What version of Use Case will be developed to ensure submission of IG for January cycle? For May cycle? Contract end dates for S&I Framework Support Contracts (end of Feb 2013)